Skip to content

Treatment of HFpEF With Nitrate Supplement

Treatment of HFpEF With Nitrate Supplement: A Double-blind, Placebo Controlled Trial Including Patients With Atrial Fibrillation

Status
Completed
Phases
Early Phase 1
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03289481
Enrollment
13
Registered
2017-09-21
Start date
2017-06-29
Completion date
2018-08-22
Last updated
2021-10-06

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Heart Failure With Normal Ejection Fraction

Keywords

Heart failure, HFpEF, Nitrate supplement

Brief summary

The objective of this project is to determine if Neo40, a nitric oxide generating lozenge, when consumed twice daily by subjects with HFpEF, will increase exercise tolerance, decrease symptoms and improve quality of life for patients.

Detailed description

Heart failure (HF) is the most common principal diagnosis for hospital admission in patients over 65 years old. There are two types of HF, those with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) and those with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). Approximately half of patients with the clinical syndrome of HF have preserved systolic function. HEpEF is becoming more prevalent with aging of the population and obesity. There are only two class I recommendations for the treatment of HFpEF, which are controlling blood pressure and the use of diuretics to relieve symptoms. Exercise training is another approach to improving symptoms, however it may be poorly tolerated. Nitrate supplement in the form of concentrated beetroot juice was recently shown to improve exercise tolerance in patients with HFpEF. (1) Beetroot juice contains high concentration of nitrate (NO3). This is metabolized to nitrite (NO2). It enters the blood stream, where it is further reduced to nitric oxide (NO) resulting in intense vasodilation. Patients with diastolic dysfunction are often asymptomatic at rest but complain of dyspnea with exertion. Increase in heart rate with exercise causes reduced diastolic filling time and increases left sided filling pressure. Borloug, et al demonstrated this with right heart catheterization and supine exercise in patients with diastolic dysfunction. Infusion of NO2 resulted in decreased filling pressures and increased cardiac output. (2) Neo40 is a new product made from concentrated beetroot juice in the form of a lozenge designed to dissolve on the tongue. NO3 supplement causes vasodilatation only in the setting of hypoxia and acidosis resulting in targeted vasodilatation.

Interventions

DIETARY_SUPPLEMENTActive lozenge

nitric oxide generating lozenge

DRUGPlacebo

placebo tablet

Sponsors

HumanN
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
MaineHealth
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Masking description

Masking will be done by the pharmacy. Active and placebo lozenges will look identical.

Intervention model description

Double-blind, placebo controlled crossover study

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Diagnosis of HFpEF, defined as: * symptomatic with one of more of the following: orthopnea, paroxysmal nocturnal dyspnea, lower-extremity edema, dyspnea on exertion; AND * ejection fraction \>50% * ratio of early mitral inflow velocity to septal tissue dopler velocity \>8; AND * one or more of the following: left atrium measurement \>34 mL/m2, elevated N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide level within the past 12 months, long term loop diuretic use for control of symptoms or elevated filling pressures on prior cardiac catheterization 2. Stable medical therapy, defined as: no change in cardiac medications within 30 days 3. Willing to comply with the protocol and provide written informed consent

Exclusion criteria

1. Non-cardiac condition causing limitation of exercise tolerance 2. Acute coronary syndrome, myocardial infarction or cardiac revascularization within 60 days 3. Clinically significant valvular disease, defined as moderate-severe or severe stenosis or insufficiency 4. Significant ischemia seen on stress testing within the past 12 months that was not revascularized 5. Subject has taken and investigational medication within the past 30 days 6. History of allergy to beets 7. Systolic blood pressure of \<100 at screening 8. Significant medical condition that would interfere with treatment, safety or compliance with the protocol

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Time on Treadmillafter one week of active lozenges compared to one week of placebo lozengeschange in total time traveled on treadmill
Metabolic Equivalentsafter one week of active lozenges compared to one week of placebo lozengeschange in metabolic equivalents on treadmill
E/E Primeafter one week of active lozenges compared to one week of placebo lozengeschange in E/E prime on exercise echo (E/E prime is a ratio between early mitral inflow velocity and mitral annular early diastolic velocity in order to measure diastolic dysfunction)
Estimated Right Ventricular Systolic Pressureafter one week of active lozenges compared to one week of placebo lozengeschange in estimated right ventricular systolic pressure on echo

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

This study was a cross over case-control study (each subject was a control for themselves).

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Active Lozenge First
Subject will take active lozenge for one week, perform cardiac testing then take placebo lozenge for one week and perform cardiac testing. Active lozenge: nitric oxide generating lozenge
4
Placebo Lozenge First
Subject will take placebo lozenge for one week, perform cardiac testing then take active lozenge for one week and perform cardiac testing. Active lozenge: nitric oxide generating lozenge
5
Total9

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicActive Lozenge FirstPlacebo Lozenge FirstTotal
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
4 Participants3 Participants7 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
0 Participants2 Participants2 Participants
Diagnosis of HFpEF4 Participants5 Participants9 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
4 Participants5 Participants9 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
4 participants5 participants9 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
2 Participants1 Participants3 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
2 Participants4 Participants6 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 90 / 9
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 90 / 9
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 90 / 9

Outcome results

Primary

E/E Prime

change in E/E prime on exercise echo (E/E prime is a ratio between early mitral inflow velocity and mitral annular early diastolic velocity in order to measure diastolic dysfunction)

Time frame: after one week of active lozenges compared to one week of placebo lozenges

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)
Active LozengeE/E Prime1.93 ratio
PlaceboE/E Prime-.05 ratio
Primary

Estimated Right Ventricular Systolic Pressure

change in estimated right ventricular systolic pressure on echo

Time frame: after one week of active lozenges compared to one week of placebo lozenges

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)
Active LozengeEstimated Right Ventricular Systolic Pressure11.79 mmHg
PlaceboEstimated Right Ventricular Systolic Pressure8.6 mmHg
Primary

Metabolic Equivalents

change in metabolic equivalents on treadmill

Time frame: after one week of active lozenges compared to one week of placebo lozenges

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)
Active LozengeMetabolic Equivalents7.99 cal/min
PlaceboMetabolic Equivalents8.46 cal/min
Primary

Time on Treadmill

change in total time traveled on treadmill

Time frame: after one week of active lozenges compared to one week of placebo lozenges

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)
Active LozengeTime on Treadmill402.8 seconds
PlaceboTime on Treadmill181.2 seconds

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026