Skip to content

Appropriate Timing of Surgery After Neoadjuvant Chemoradiation for Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer

Effect of Timing of Surgery After Neoadjuvant Chemoradiation on Histopathological Results, Complications, Recurrence and Survivals for Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03287843
Enrollment
350
Registered
2017-09-19
Start date
2006-01-01
Completion date
2022-01-01
Last updated
2022-03-31

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Neoplasm, Rectum

Keywords

Locally advanced rectal cancer, Neoadjuvant chemoradiation

Brief summary

This study aimed to compare the outcomes of early versus late surgical resection in patients who underwent curative total mesorectal excision after neoadjuvant chemoradiation. Half of the participants will undergo surgery before 8 weeks, while the other half will undergo surgery after 8 weeks.

Interventions

PROCEDURETotal mesorectal excision before 56 days (4-8 weeks)

Low anterior resection or abdominoperineal resection

PROCEDURETotal mesorectal excision after 56 days (8-12 weeks)

Low anterior resection or abdominoperineal resection

Sponsors

Ege University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 85 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Clinic stage II-III cancer ( T3- T4 tm or/and N(+) disease ) 2. Patients with histologically confirmed adenocarcinoma of the rectum 3. Tumor distal border located within 15 cm. from anal verge (as measured by rigid rectoscopy) 4. Standardized total mesorectal excision surgery 5. Tumor must be clinically resectable with curative intent (R0 resection must be most likely) 6. Elective operation 7. The patient must consent to be in the study and the informed consent must be signed

Exclusion criteria

1. Clinic stage I and IV cancer disease 2. Patients with malignant disease of the rectum other than adenocarcinoma 3. Recurrent rectal cancer 4. Emergency cases (Mechanical bowel obstruction, perforation) 5. Other previous or concurrent malignancies 6. Any contraindication for radiochemotherapy 7. Previous chemotherapy or radiotherapy to the pelvis 8. Tumor has arisen from chronic inflammatory bowel disease or hereditary polyposis disease 9. American Society of Anesthesiologists Score \>3 patients

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Pathological Complete Response Rate2 monthsComplete pathological response, defined as the absence of viable tumor cells, may develop after neoadjuvant treatment for rectal cancer. Prognostic factors affecting pathological complete response will be evaluated.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Tumour Regression Grade30 days after surgeryAll pathological examinations were undertaken by two experienced gastrointestinal pathologists. Pathological treatment response to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy was evaluated by a five-tiered system described by Mandard. Tumor regression grade groups were identified as: Grade 1: the absence of residual cancer Grade 2: the presence of residual cancer cells scattered throughout the fibrosis Grade 3: an increase in the number of residual cancer cells but fibrosis still predominant Grade 4: residual cancer outgrowing fibrosis Grade 5, the absence of regressive changes Grade 1 considered as complete response. Grade 2-4 considered as partial response and Grade 5 considered as no response.
Surgical Complications90 days after surgeryMorbidity will be assessed according to the classification of Clavien-Dindo as follows: Grade 1: Any deviation from the normal postoperative course without the need for pharmacological treatment or surgical, endoscopic, and radiological interventions. Allowed therapeutic regimens are: drugs as antiemetics, antipyretics, analgetics, diuretics, electrolytes, and physiotherapy. This grade also includes wound infections opened at the bedside Grade 2: Requiring pharmacological treatment with drugs other than such allowed for grade I complications. Blood transfusions and total parenteral nutrition are also included. Grade 3: Requiring surgical, endoscopic or radiological intervention (Grade 3a: Intervention not under general anesthesia, Grade 3b: Intervention under general anesthesia) Grade 4: Life-threatening complication requiring Intensive Care Unit management (Grade 4a: Single organ dysfunction (including dialysis), Grade 4b: Multiorgan dysfunction) Grade 5 Death
Completeness of the Mesorectal Dissection30 days after surgeryExamination will be made in a fresh state for completeness of the mesorectal dissection and will be graded according to the criteria of Quirke as follows: Low: (Grade 1) Little bulk of the mesorectum with defects down into the muscularis propria and/or very irregular circumferential resection margin. Moderate: (Grade 2) Moderate bulk of the mesorectum but there is irregularity in the mesorectal surface. Moderate coning of the specimen toward the distal margin. At no site is the muscularis propria visible with exception of the insertion of the levator muscles. Moderate irregularity of the circumferential resection margin. High: (Grade 3) Intact mesorectum with smooth mesorectal surface. No defect deeper than 5 mm. No coning on the specimen. Smooth circumferential resection margins on slicing.
Disease-free Survival5 years after surgeryRecurrence free survival
Overall Survival5 years after surgeryTotal survival with or without disease
Recurrence5 years after surgeryBoth pelvic recurrence and distant metastasis will be assessed.

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Classic Interval Group
İn this arm patients will go under surgery before eight weeks, after neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy. Total mesorectal excision before 56 days (4-8 weeks): Low anterior resection or abdominoperineal resection
160
Long Interval Group
İn this arm patients will go under surgery after eight weeks, after neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy. Total mesorectal excision after 56 days (8-12 weeks): Low anterior resection or abdominoperineal resection
167
Total327

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicClassic Interval GroupLong Interval GroupTotal
Age, Continuous60.4 years61.7 years61.0 years
Sex: Female, Male
Female
65 Participants71 Participants136 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
95 Participants96 Participants191 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
1 / 1604 / 167
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 1600 / 167
serious
Total, serious adverse events
36 / 16033 / 167

Outcome results

Primary

Pathological Complete Response Rate

Complete pathological response, defined as the absence of viable tumor cells, may develop after neoadjuvant treatment for rectal cancer. Prognostic factors affecting pathological complete response will be evaluated.

Time frame: 2 months

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Classic Interval GroupPathological Complete Response Rate16 Participants
Long Interval GroupPathological Complete Response Rate31 Participants
Secondary

Completeness of the Mesorectal Dissection

Examination will be made in a fresh state for completeness of the mesorectal dissection and will be graded according to the criteria of Quirke as follows: Low: (Grade 1) Little bulk of the mesorectum with defects down into the muscularis propria and/or very irregular circumferential resection margin. Moderate: (Grade 2) Moderate bulk of the mesorectum but there is irregularity in the mesorectal surface. Moderate coning of the specimen toward the distal margin. At no site is the muscularis propria visible with exception of the insertion of the levator muscles. Moderate irregularity of the circumferential resection margin. High: (Grade 3) Intact mesorectum with smooth mesorectal surface. No defect deeper than 5 mm. No coning on the specimen. Smooth circumferential resection margins on slicing.

Time frame: 30 days after surgery

ArmMeasureCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Classic Interval GroupCompleteness of the Mesorectal DissectionLow5 Participants
Classic Interval GroupCompleteness of the Mesorectal DissectionModerate11 Participants
Classic Interval GroupCompleteness of the Mesorectal DissectionHigh144 Participants
Long Interval GroupCompleteness of the Mesorectal DissectionLow8 Participants
Long Interval GroupCompleteness of the Mesorectal DissectionHigh149 Participants
Long Interval GroupCompleteness of the Mesorectal DissectionModerate10 Participants
Secondary

Disease-free Survival

Recurrence free survival

Time frame: 5 years after surgery

Secondary

Overall Survival

Total survival with or without disease

Time frame: 5 years after surgery

Secondary

Recurrence

Both pelvic recurrence and distant metastasis will be assessed.

Time frame: 5 years after surgery

Secondary

Surgical Complications

Morbidity will be assessed according to the classification of Clavien-Dindo as follows: Grade 1: Any deviation from the normal postoperative course without the need for pharmacological treatment or surgical, endoscopic, and radiological interventions. Allowed therapeutic regimens are: drugs as antiemetics, antipyretics, analgetics, diuretics, electrolytes, and physiotherapy. This grade also includes wound infections opened at the bedside Grade 2: Requiring pharmacological treatment with drugs other than such allowed for grade I complications. Blood transfusions and total parenteral nutrition are also included. Grade 3: Requiring surgical, endoscopic or radiological intervention (Grade 3a: Intervention not under general anesthesia, Grade 3b: Intervention under general anesthesia) Grade 4: Life-threatening complication requiring Intensive Care Unit management (Grade 4a: Single organ dysfunction (including dialysis), Grade 4b: Multiorgan dysfunction) Grade 5 Death

Time frame: 90 days after surgery

ArmMeasureCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Classic Interval GroupSurgical ComplicationsClavien Dindo 3a4 Participants
Classic Interval GroupSurgical ComplicationsClavien Dindo 215 Participants
Classic Interval GroupSurgical ComplicationsClavien Dindo 4b0 Participants
Classic Interval GroupSurgical ComplicationsClavien Dindo 3b8 Participants
Classic Interval GroupSurgical ComplicationsClavien Dindo 51 Participants
Classic Interval GroupSurgical ComplicationsClavien Dindo 4a4 Participants
Classic Interval GroupSurgical ComplicationsNo complication124 Participants
Classic Interval GroupSurgical ComplicationsClavien Dindo 14 Participants
Long Interval GroupSurgical ComplicationsNo complication134 Participants
Long Interval GroupSurgical ComplicationsClavien Dindo 17 Participants
Long Interval GroupSurgical ComplicationsClavien Dindo 214 Participants
Long Interval GroupSurgical ComplicationsClavien Dindo 3a3 Participants
Long Interval GroupSurgical ComplicationsClavien Dindo 3b2 Participants
Long Interval GroupSurgical ComplicationsClavien Dindo 4a2 Participants
Long Interval GroupSurgical ComplicationsClavien Dindo 4b1 Participants
Long Interval GroupSurgical ComplicationsClavien Dindo 54 Participants
Secondary

Tumour Regression Grade

All pathological examinations were undertaken by two experienced gastrointestinal pathologists. Pathological treatment response to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy was evaluated by a five-tiered system described by Mandard. Tumor regression grade groups were identified as: Grade 1: the absence of residual cancer Grade 2: the presence of residual cancer cells scattered throughout the fibrosis Grade 3: an increase in the number of residual cancer cells but fibrosis still predominant Grade 4: residual cancer outgrowing fibrosis Grade 5, the absence of regressive changes Grade 1 considered as complete response. Grade 2-4 considered as partial response and Grade 5 considered as no response.

Time frame: 30 days after surgery

ArmMeasureCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Classic Interval GroupTumour Regression GradeMandard Grade 53 Participants
Classic Interval GroupTumour Regression GradeMandard Grade 116 Participants
Classic Interval GroupTumour Regression GradeMandard Grade 237 Participants
Classic Interval GroupTumour Regression GradeMandard Grade 373 Participants
Classic Interval GroupTumour Regression GradeMandard Grade 431 Participants
Long Interval GroupTumour Regression GradeMandard Grade 367 Participants
Long Interval GroupTumour Regression GradeMandard Grade 429 Participants
Long Interval GroupTumour Regression GradeMandard Grade 54 Participants
Long Interval GroupTumour Regression GradeMandard Grade 236 Participants
Long Interval GroupTumour Regression GradeMandard Grade 131 Participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 23, 2026