Neoplasm, Rectum
Conditions
Keywords
Locally advanced rectal cancer, Neoadjuvant chemoradiation
Brief summary
This study aimed to compare the outcomes of early versus late surgical resection in patients who underwent curative total mesorectal excision after neoadjuvant chemoradiation. Half of the participants will undergo surgery before 8 weeks, while the other half will undergo surgery after 8 weeks.
Interventions
Low anterior resection or abdominoperineal resection
Low anterior resection or abdominoperineal resection
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
1. Clinic stage II-III cancer ( T3- T4 tm or/and N(+) disease ) 2. Patients with histologically confirmed adenocarcinoma of the rectum 3. Tumor distal border located within 15 cm. from anal verge (as measured by rigid rectoscopy) 4. Standardized total mesorectal excision surgery 5. Tumor must be clinically resectable with curative intent (R0 resection must be most likely) 6. Elective operation 7. The patient must consent to be in the study and the informed consent must be signed
Exclusion criteria
1. Clinic stage I and IV cancer disease 2. Patients with malignant disease of the rectum other than adenocarcinoma 3. Recurrent rectal cancer 4. Emergency cases (Mechanical bowel obstruction, perforation) 5. Other previous or concurrent malignancies 6. Any contraindication for radiochemotherapy 7. Previous chemotherapy or radiotherapy to the pelvis 8. Tumor has arisen from chronic inflammatory bowel disease or hereditary polyposis disease 9. American Society of Anesthesiologists Score \>3 patients
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Pathological Complete Response Rate | 2 months | Complete pathological response, defined as the absence of viable tumor cells, may develop after neoadjuvant treatment for rectal cancer. Prognostic factors affecting pathological complete response will be evaluated. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Tumour Regression Grade | 30 days after surgery | All pathological examinations were undertaken by two experienced gastrointestinal pathologists. Pathological treatment response to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy was evaluated by a five-tiered system described by Mandard. Tumor regression grade groups were identified as: Grade 1: the absence of residual cancer Grade 2: the presence of residual cancer cells scattered throughout the fibrosis Grade 3: an increase in the number of residual cancer cells but fibrosis still predominant Grade 4: residual cancer outgrowing fibrosis Grade 5, the absence of regressive changes Grade 1 considered as complete response. Grade 2-4 considered as partial response and Grade 5 considered as no response. |
| Surgical Complications | 90 days after surgery | Morbidity will be assessed according to the classification of Clavien-Dindo as follows: Grade 1: Any deviation from the normal postoperative course without the need for pharmacological treatment or surgical, endoscopic, and radiological interventions. Allowed therapeutic regimens are: drugs as antiemetics, antipyretics, analgetics, diuretics, electrolytes, and physiotherapy. This grade also includes wound infections opened at the bedside Grade 2: Requiring pharmacological treatment with drugs other than such allowed for grade I complications. Blood transfusions and total parenteral nutrition are also included. Grade 3: Requiring surgical, endoscopic or radiological intervention (Grade 3a: Intervention not under general anesthesia, Grade 3b: Intervention under general anesthesia) Grade 4: Life-threatening complication requiring Intensive Care Unit management (Grade 4a: Single organ dysfunction (including dialysis), Grade 4b: Multiorgan dysfunction) Grade 5 Death |
| Completeness of the Mesorectal Dissection | 30 days after surgery | Examination will be made in a fresh state for completeness of the mesorectal dissection and will be graded according to the criteria of Quirke as follows: Low: (Grade 1) Little bulk of the mesorectum with defects down into the muscularis propria and/or very irregular circumferential resection margin. Moderate: (Grade 2) Moderate bulk of the mesorectum but there is irregularity in the mesorectal surface. Moderate coning of the specimen toward the distal margin. At no site is the muscularis propria visible with exception of the insertion of the levator muscles. Moderate irregularity of the circumferential resection margin. High: (Grade 3) Intact mesorectum with smooth mesorectal surface. No defect deeper than 5 mm. No coning on the specimen. Smooth circumferential resection margins on slicing. |
| Disease-free Survival | 5 years after surgery | Recurrence free survival |
| Overall Survival | 5 years after surgery | Total survival with or without disease |
| Recurrence | 5 years after surgery | Both pelvic recurrence and distant metastasis will be assessed. |
Participant flow
Participants by arm
| Arm | Count |
|---|---|
| Classic Interval Group İn this arm patients will go under surgery before eight weeks, after neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy.
Total mesorectal excision before 56 days (4-8 weeks): Low anterior resection or abdominoperineal resection | 160 |
| Long Interval Group İn this arm patients will go under surgery after eight weeks, after neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy.
Total mesorectal excision after 56 days (8-12 weeks): Low anterior resection or abdominoperineal resection | 167 |
| Total | 327 |
Baseline characteristics
| Characteristic | Classic Interval Group | Long Interval Group | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | 60.4 years | 61.7 years | 61.0 years |
| Sex: Female, Male Female | 65 Participants | 71 Participants | 136 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Male | 95 Participants | 96 Participants | 191 Participants |
Adverse events
| Event type | EG000 affected / at risk | EG001 affected / at risk |
|---|---|---|
| deaths Total, all-cause mortality | 1 / 160 | 4 / 167 |
| other Total, other adverse events | 0 / 160 | 0 / 167 |
| serious Total, serious adverse events | 36 / 160 | 33 / 167 |
Outcome results
Pathological Complete Response Rate
Complete pathological response, defined as the absence of viable tumor cells, may develop after neoadjuvant treatment for rectal cancer. Prognostic factors affecting pathological complete response will be evaluated.
Time frame: 2 months
| Arm | Measure | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|
| Classic Interval Group | Pathological Complete Response Rate | 16 Participants |
| Long Interval Group | Pathological Complete Response Rate | 31 Participants |
Completeness of the Mesorectal Dissection
Examination will be made in a fresh state for completeness of the mesorectal dissection and will be graded according to the criteria of Quirke as follows: Low: (Grade 1) Little bulk of the mesorectum with defects down into the muscularis propria and/or very irregular circumferential resection margin. Moderate: (Grade 2) Moderate bulk of the mesorectum but there is irregularity in the mesorectal surface. Moderate coning of the specimen toward the distal margin. At no site is the muscularis propria visible with exception of the insertion of the levator muscles. Moderate irregularity of the circumferential resection margin. High: (Grade 3) Intact mesorectum with smooth mesorectal surface. No defect deeper than 5 mm. No coning on the specimen. Smooth circumferential resection margins on slicing.
Time frame: 30 days after surgery
| Arm | Measure | Category | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Classic Interval Group | Completeness of the Mesorectal Dissection | Low | 5 Participants |
| Classic Interval Group | Completeness of the Mesorectal Dissection | Moderate | 11 Participants |
| Classic Interval Group | Completeness of the Mesorectal Dissection | High | 144 Participants |
| Long Interval Group | Completeness of the Mesorectal Dissection | Low | 8 Participants |
| Long Interval Group | Completeness of the Mesorectal Dissection | High | 149 Participants |
| Long Interval Group | Completeness of the Mesorectal Dissection | Moderate | 10 Participants |
Disease-free Survival
Recurrence free survival
Time frame: 5 years after surgery
Overall Survival
Total survival with or without disease
Time frame: 5 years after surgery
Recurrence
Both pelvic recurrence and distant metastasis will be assessed.
Time frame: 5 years after surgery
Surgical Complications
Morbidity will be assessed according to the classification of Clavien-Dindo as follows: Grade 1: Any deviation from the normal postoperative course without the need for pharmacological treatment or surgical, endoscopic, and radiological interventions. Allowed therapeutic regimens are: drugs as antiemetics, antipyretics, analgetics, diuretics, electrolytes, and physiotherapy. This grade also includes wound infections opened at the bedside Grade 2: Requiring pharmacological treatment with drugs other than such allowed for grade I complications. Blood transfusions and total parenteral nutrition are also included. Grade 3: Requiring surgical, endoscopic or radiological intervention (Grade 3a: Intervention not under general anesthesia, Grade 3b: Intervention under general anesthesia) Grade 4: Life-threatening complication requiring Intensive Care Unit management (Grade 4a: Single organ dysfunction (including dialysis), Grade 4b: Multiorgan dysfunction) Grade 5 Death
Time frame: 90 days after surgery
| Arm | Measure | Category | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Classic Interval Group | Surgical Complications | Clavien Dindo 3a | 4 Participants |
| Classic Interval Group | Surgical Complications | Clavien Dindo 2 | 15 Participants |
| Classic Interval Group | Surgical Complications | Clavien Dindo 4b | 0 Participants |
| Classic Interval Group | Surgical Complications | Clavien Dindo 3b | 8 Participants |
| Classic Interval Group | Surgical Complications | Clavien Dindo 5 | 1 Participants |
| Classic Interval Group | Surgical Complications | Clavien Dindo 4a | 4 Participants |
| Classic Interval Group | Surgical Complications | No complication | 124 Participants |
| Classic Interval Group | Surgical Complications | Clavien Dindo 1 | 4 Participants |
| Long Interval Group | Surgical Complications | No complication | 134 Participants |
| Long Interval Group | Surgical Complications | Clavien Dindo 1 | 7 Participants |
| Long Interval Group | Surgical Complications | Clavien Dindo 2 | 14 Participants |
| Long Interval Group | Surgical Complications | Clavien Dindo 3a | 3 Participants |
| Long Interval Group | Surgical Complications | Clavien Dindo 3b | 2 Participants |
| Long Interval Group | Surgical Complications | Clavien Dindo 4a | 2 Participants |
| Long Interval Group | Surgical Complications | Clavien Dindo 4b | 1 Participants |
| Long Interval Group | Surgical Complications | Clavien Dindo 5 | 4 Participants |
Tumour Regression Grade
All pathological examinations were undertaken by two experienced gastrointestinal pathologists. Pathological treatment response to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy was evaluated by a five-tiered system described by Mandard. Tumor regression grade groups were identified as: Grade 1: the absence of residual cancer Grade 2: the presence of residual cancer cells scattered throughout the fibrosis Grade 3: an increase in the number of residual cancer cells but fibrosis still predominant Grade 4: residual cancer outgrowing fibrosis Grade 5, the absence of regressive changes Grade 1 considered as complete response. Grade 2-4 considered as partial response and Grade 5 considered as no response.
Time frame: 30 days after surgery
| Arm | Measure | Category | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Classic Interval Group | Tumour Regression Grade | Mandard Grade 5 | 3 Participants |
| Classic Interval Group | Tumour Regression Grade | Mandard Grade 1 | 16 Participants |
| Classic Interval Group | Tumour Regression Grade | Mandard Grade 2 | 37 Participants |
| Classic Interval Group | Tumour Regression Grade | Mandard Grade 3 | 73 Participants |
| Classic Interval Group | Tumour Regression Grade | Mandard Grade 4 | 31 Participants |
| Long Interval Group | Tumour Regression Grade | Mandard Grade 3 | 67 Participants |
| Long Interval Group | Tumour Regression Grade | Mandard Grade 4 | 29 Participants |
| Long Interval Group | Tumour Regression Grade | Mandard Grade 5 | 4 Participants |
| Long Interval Group | Tumour Regression Grade | Mandard Grade 2 | 36 Participants |
| Long Interval Group | Tumour Regression Grade | Mandard Grade 1 | 31 Participants |