Pain, Radicular; Neuropathic, Cervical
Conditions
Brief summary
This study evaluates the incidence of intravascular injection during cervical transforaminal epidural block using blunt needle, compared to the sharp needle. The investigators will performed cervical transforaminal epidural block using blunt-type block needle in half of participants or sharp-type block needle in the other half.
Detailed description
Cervical transforaminal epidural block is an effective treatment option of radiating pain. There are potential risks associated with transforaminal epidural block such as infection, dural puncture, bleeding, and intravascular injection. Although the risk is low, intravascular injection should be carefully monitored because intravascular injection of particulate steroids can cause fatal neurologic deficits such as spinal infarction and cerebral infarction. The incidence of intravascular injection during transforaminal epidural block with real time fluoroscopy guidance depends on spinal level. The previous studies using real time fluoroscopy demonstrated that the incidence of intravascular injection of cervical transforaminal epidural block is higher than that of lumbosacral transforaminal epidural block. In this study, therefore, the investigators investigate the incidence of intravascular injection during cervical transforaminal epidural block using blunt needle, compared to the sharp needle.
Interventions
PROCEDUREblock with Blunt-type block needle.
Under fluoroscopic guidance, cervical transforaminal epidural injections were performed using 22 gauge blunt needle. The needle position was confirmed using biplanar fluoroscopy and 2 ml of nonionic contrast media was injected to detect intravascular injection.
PROCEDUREblock with sharp-type block needle.
Under fluoroscopic guidance, cervical transforaminal epidural injections were performed using 22 gauge sharp needle. The needle position was confirmed using biplanar fluoroscopy and 2 ml of nonionic contrast media was injected to detect intravascular injection.
Sponsors
Kyungpook National University Hospital
Study design
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
SCREENING
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No
Inclusion criteria
* Patients with radiating pain from cervical spinal stenosis and herniated nucleus pulposus.
Exclusion criteria
* Pregnancy, allergic to contrast media, patient refusal, and patients with persistent contraindication to nerve block such as coagulopathy and infection of the injection site.
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Intravascular injection | During procedure | Intravascular injection was defined as contrast media spreading out through the vascular channel during injection of contrast media under real time fluoroscopy. The investigators observed the intravascular injection during the procedure. The intravascular injection rate was calculated based on the total number of treated levels. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Needling time | During procedure | Needling time for both the sharp and blunt needles was started upon insertion of the needle through the skin and ended upon injection of contrast media under real time fluoroscopy. |
Outcome results
None listed