Skip to content

Study the Effect of Upper Expansion Appliances on Lower Jaw Forward Projection/Growth

Study the Effect of Upper Expansion Appliances on Lower Jaw Forward Projection/Growth

Status
Recruiting
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03286569
Enrollment
60
Registered
2017-09-18
Start date
2019-04-01
Completion date
2027-02-01
Last updated
2026-01-07

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Overbite (Excessive) Horizontal

Brief summary

Young children with backward positioned lower jaw/chin will be recruited to have an upper jaw expansion appliance. Previous research showed that the use of similar appliances can lead to lower jaw forward growth. 60 young children aged 9-11 will be recruited to have either active or non-active Wilson type upper arch expansion appliance. Patients will have special x-ray (Cone Beam computed tomography) before and after treatment (after 9 months) of starting the treatment. After participation, routine orthodontic treatment will be continued.

Detailed description

Previous research showed that the use of upper jaw expansion appliances can lead to lower jaw forward growth (1). 60 young children aged 9-11 with backward positioned lower jaw/chin will be recruited to have either active or non-active Wilson type upper arch expansion appliance. Patients will have special x-ray (Cone Beam computed tomography) before and after treatment (after 9 months) of starting the treatment. After participation, routine orthodontic treatment will be continued.

Interventions

DEVICEUpper arch Wilson quadhelex appliance

Upper arch Wilson quadhelex appliance

Sponsors

University of Alberta
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
9 Years to 11 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

1. Class II skeletal due to lower jaw backward projection 2. Class II malocclusion 3. Early mixed dentition (all first permanent molars erupted, as well as all erupting upper and lower permanent incisors)

Exclusion criteria

1. Other orthodontic treatment provided 2. Growth problems (craniofacial syndromes, etc.)

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Lower jaw size9 monthsLower jaw size will be evaluated by computed tomography.
Lower jaw projection9 monthsLower jaw projection will be evaluated by computed tomography.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Jaw joint size9 monthsJaw joint size will be evaluated by CBCT
Base of skull bone size9 monthsBase of skull bone size will be evaluated by CBCT
Base of skull bone position9 monthsBase of skull bone positions will be evaluated by CBCT
Jaw joint position9 monthsJaw joint will be evaluated by CBCT

Countries

Canada

Contacts

Primary ContactDr. Tarek El-Bialy, PhD
telbialy@ualberta.ca780-492-2751
Backup ContactRabia Njie, BDS
rnjie@ualberta.ca780-850-8752

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026