Skip to content

Perturbed-balance Training During Treadmill Walking for Stroke Subjects

Feasibility of Perturbed-balance Training During Treadmill Walking in a High-functioning Chronic Stroke Subject: a Case-control Study

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03285919
Acronym
BALANCESI
Enrollment
2
Registered
2017-09-18
Start date
2016-12-05
Completion date
2017-06-02
Last updated
2017-09-18

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Stroke

Keywords

perturbed walking, stepping response

Brief summary

A control and a post-stroke subject with right-side chronic hemiparesis were studied. The post-stroke subject underwent 30 sessions of balance-perturbed training while walking on an instrumented treadmill where the Balance Assessment Robot (BAR™) randomly delivered pushes to pelvis in various directions at various speeds and at various perturbation amplitudes. The investigators assessed kinematics, kinetics, electromiography and spatio-temporal responses to outward-directed perturbations commencing either at foot contact of the left or the right leg.

Detailed description

For a detailed description of the study, see the Arms and Interventions section.

Interventions

DEVICEBalance Assessment Robot (BAR™)

The BAR™ has got six degrees of freedom (DOF) that interface to the pelvis of a walking subject. Five DOFs (translation of pelvis in sagittal, lateral and vertical directions; pelvic rotation and pelvic list) are actuated and admittance-controlled, providing transparent haptic interaction with negligible power transfer; the remaining DOF (pelvic tilt) is passive. The BAR™ is capable of delivering perturbations in the directions forward/backward and left/right, but for the purpose of this study only outward perturbations in the frontal plane were considered.

Sponsors

University Rehabilitation Institute, Republic of Slovenia
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
DEVICE_FEASIBILITY
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
MALE
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Case: community-dwelling, high-functioning stroke survivor * Control: healthy volunteer, height- and weight-matched to the Case

Exclusion criteria

* any disease or injury affecting cognition * any disease or injury affecting balance or gait

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in centre of mass of the CaseAssessment at session no. 3 (during week 1) and session no. 30 (during week 10)For the purpose of qualitative assessment of kinematics and kinetics
Change in ground reaction force of the CaseAssessment at session no. 3 (during week 1) and session no. 30 (during week 10)For the purpose of qualitative assessment of kinematics and kinetics
Change in centre of pressure of the CaseAssessment at session no. 3 (during week 1) and session no. 30 (during week 10)For the purpose of qualitative assessment of kinematics and kinetics

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Centre of pressure of the ControlDuring the only session (i.e., session 1 on day 1)For the purpose of qualitative assessment of spatio-temporal characteristics of stepping
Centre of mass of the ControlDuring the only session (i.e., session 1 on day 1)For the purpose of qualitative assessment of spatio-temporal characteristics of stepping
Ground reaction force of the ControlDuring the only session (i.e., session 1 on day 1)For the purpose of qualitative assessment of spatio-temporal characteristics of stepping

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
Step widthDuring both assessment sessions for the Case (i.e., session no. 3 during week 1, and session no. 30 during week 10); during the only session (i.e., session 1 on day 1) for the ControlFor the purpose of qualitative assessment of spatio-temporal characteristics of stepping
Electromiography (at M. tibialis anterior, M. soleus, M. gastrocnemius lat., M. gastrocnemius med., M. rectus femoris, M. semitendinosus, M. gluteus med., M. gluteus max.)During both assessment sessions for the Case (i.e., session no. 3 during week 1, and session no. 30 during week 10); during the only session (i.e., session 1 on day 1) for the ControlFor the purpose of qualitative assessment
Step timeDuring both assessment sessions for the Case (i.e., session no. 3 during week 1, and session no. 30 during week 10); during the only session (i.e., session 1 on day 1) for the ControlFor the purpose of qualitative assessment of spatio-temporal characteristics of stepping
Step lengthDuring both assessment sessions for the Case (i.e., session no. 3 during week 1, and session no. 30 during week 10); during the only session (i.e., session 1 on day 1) for the ControlFor the purpose of qualitative assessment of spatio-temporal characteristics of stepping

Countries

Slovenia

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 24, 2026