Skip to content

Prospective Randomized Trial of Stratafix vs. Vicryl in Total Hip Arthroplasty.

Prospective Randomized Trial of Stratafix vs. Vicryl on Operating Room Time and Wound Closure Time in Total Hip Arthroplasty.

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03285555
Enrollment
60
Registered
2017-09-18
Start date
2017-09-26
Completion date
2019-08-31
Last updated
2020-11-17

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Wound; Hip

Keywords

barbed suture, knoteless suture, closure, wound, time, total hip arthroplasty

Brief summary

The STRATAFIX (Ethicon, Johnson and Johnson, Somerville, New Jersey) Knotless Tissue Control suture device is a barbed suture that uses anchor technology to securely engage with the soft tissues while also eliminating the need for knots. The anchors, or barbs, are pressed out of the device core or formed within the core in a geometric pattern and arranged in a tapered manner to allow the device to pass through tissue in the direction toward the needle during closure. These knotless tissue control devices are deployed using a continuous technique, which is anticipated to be faster and more cost-effective than interrupted suturing.

Detailed description

Preclinical and biomechanical studies have demonstrated efficacy in cosmetic skin and deep tissue closures.\[1\], \[2\] In addition, barbed sutures have been shown to provide water-tight closure and wound strength comparable to or superior to closure with conventional sutures. Many comparative studies have been published contrasting barbed sutures to conventional closure techniques in multiple surgical fields. \[3\], \[4\] Various studies have evaluated the outcomes of different barbed suture devices, however there are no reports assessing the length of closure times using STRATAFIX (Ethicon, Johnson and Johnson, Somerville, New Jersey) Knotless Tissue Control Devices during deep closure in total hip arthroplasty. Stephens et al. \[5\] performed a prospective randomized study of 500 total knee arthroplasty patients who received either barbed suture (250) or conventional sutures (250) for deep closure of the surgical wound. The mean operating time was significantly shorter in the barbed group as compared to conventional group (64.3 vs 68.1 minutes, p=\<0.001). In a study of 80 TKA (61 barbed, 19 conventional deep sutures) and 54 THA patients (37 barbed, 17 conventional deep sutures), Smith et al. \[6\] found significantly shorter closure time in the barbed suture group (16.78 vs. 26.5 minutes, p\<0.001). One study reports one the use of Stratfix suture for intracorporeal suturing in myomectomy. Giampaolino et al. \[7\] performed a prospective randomized study on 47 patients and evaluated the mean operative time for laparoscopic posterior myomectomy using Stratafix or conventional suture for intracorporeal suturing. There was a significant decrease in mean operative time associated with use of Stratafix suture as compared to conventional suture (66.3 vs 73 minutes, p=0.005). This prospective randomized single-center study will examine the outcomes, mainly closure time, of deep closure during total hip arthroplasty using the STRATAFIX Symmetric PDS Plus (Ethicon, Johnson and Johnson, Somerville, New Jersey) barbed suture compared to interrupted VICRYL suture (Ethicon, Johnson and Johnson, Somerville, New Jersey).

Interventions

DEVICEVICRYL

Vicryl #1

DEVICESTRATIFIX

STRATIFIX symmetric PDS Plus; Stratifix knotless suture

Sponsors

The Cleveland Clinic
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 80 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Males and females, between the ages of 18 to 80 years at the time of signing the informed consent document. 2. Understand and voluntarily sign an informed consent document prior to any study-related assessments/procedures are conducted. 3. Able to adhere to the study visit schedule and other protocol requirements. 4. Able to fluently speak and understand the local language 5. If female, is non-pregnant (negative pregnancy test results at the baseline/randomization visit) and non-lactating. 6. End-stage osteoarthritis patients planning to undergo primary total hip arthroplasty 7. BMI less than 40 kg/m2

Exclusion criteria

1. BMI greater than or equal to 40 kg/m2. 2. History of known bleeding disorder. 3. History of medical co-morbidity that may result in poor wound healing (i.e. diabetes mellitus, peripheral vascular disease). 4. Patients \<18 or \>80 years of age. 5. Patients who are prisoners. 6. Mentally unable to sign informed consent. 7. Has an uncontrolled illness that, in the opinion of the investigator, is likely to cause the patient to be withdrawn from the trial or would otherwise interfere with interpreting the results of the study.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Time to Close, MinutesDay of surgeryTime from first needle insertion to complete skin closure per protocol

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Participants With Wound Complications90 days postoperativeSuperficial wound infection, deep wound infection, periprosthetic joint infection, wound hematoma, and wound dehiscence.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
STRATAFIX GROUP
For the active arm of the study, wound closure will be performed similarly in 3 layers with the use of barbed equivalents at every layer: STRATIFIX symmetric PDS Plus #1 will be used to close the deep fascia and muscles . The subcutaneous fat layer will be then closed with simple interrupted knots using number 2-0 braided absorbable sutures (Vicryl), followed by closure of the subcutaneous layer using a number 2-0 monofilament absorbable suture with inverted interrupted knots (Monocryl, Ethicon; Johnson & Johnson) followed by the use of steri-strips and glue STRATIFIX: STRATIFIX symmetric PDS Plus; Stratifix knotless suture
30
CONTROL GROUP
For the control arm of the study, wound closure will be performed similarly in 3 layers with the use of vicryl to closure the deep fascia and muscles. The subcutaneous fat layer will be then closed with simple interrupted knots using number 2-0 braided absorbable sutures (Vicryl), followed by closure of the subcutaneous layer using a number 2-0 monofilament absorbable suture with inverted interrupted knots (Monocryl, Ethicon; Johnson & Johnson) followed by the use of steri-strips and glue VICRYL: Vicryl #1
30
Total60

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicTotalSTRATAFIX GROUPCONTROL GROUP
Age, Continuous63 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12
61 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13
66 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10
Race and Ethnicity Not Collected0 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
32 Participants13 Participants19 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
28 Participants17 Participants11 Participants
Wound length, cm12 centimeters
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.6
12 centimeters
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.8
13 centimeters
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.4

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 300 / 30
other
Total, other adverse events
1 / 301 / 30
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 300 / 30

Outcome results

Primary

Time to Close, Minutes

Time from first needle insertion to complete skin closure per protocol

Time frame: Day of surgery

Population: total hip arthroplasty patients

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
STRATAFIX GROUPTime to Close, Minutes18.0 minutesStandard Deviation 0.35
CONTROL GROUPTime to Close, Minutes21.0 minutesStandard Deviation 0.43
Secondary

Number of Participants With Wound Complications

Superficial wound infection, deep wound infection, periprosthetic joint infection, wound hematoma, and wound dehiscence.

Time frame: 90 days postoperative

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
STRATAFIX GROUPNumber of Participants With Wound Complications1 Participants
CONTROL GROUPNumber of Participants With Wound Complications1 Participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 18, 2026