Skip to content

Three-Chamber Bags Retrospective Study in Spain

Observational Retrospective Analysis Assessing the Influence of Three-Chamber Bags Compared to Hospital Compounded Parenteral Nutrition Bags on Blood Stream Infections

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03284398
Enrollment
3723
Registered
2017-09-15
Start date
2017-12-14
Completion date
2019-05-31
Last updated
2021-01-29

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Blood Stream Infection, Parenteral Nutrition

Keywords

parenteral nutrition, ICU, 3-chamber bags, ICD-9-CM, BSI, Medical records system, computerized

Brief summary

The primary study objective is to assess the rates of blood stream infection (BSI) from the use of Three-Chamber Bags (e.g., SmofKabiven®, Kabiven®, others) compared to Hospital Compounded Bags (HCBs) in patients requiring parenteral nutrition in Spanish hospitals.

Detailed description

This is a retrospective observational database study of patients receiving parenteral nutrition (PN) for at least 3 consecutive days with hospital admission date between January 1, 2013, and December 31, 2015 (study period). The study will use an as treated approach, where patients will be followed from the index date (hospital admission day of the hospitalization during which PN is administered) up to patient discharge or death (observation period). The study will be conducted using an initial EMR (Electronic Medical Record) data retrieval process, followed by manual data retrieval (chart review) that will complement data obtained from EMR. Data collection for manual data retrieval will be conducted through an eCRF. The documentation of patient data will comprise two sequential steps. The initial step will include data of 30% of patients and then an interim analysis (IA) will be conducted. If IA shows positive results, data for the remaining 70% of patients (step II) will be gathered. The study will be conducted in 10-14 sites in Spain. Data analysis: Baseline demographics, co-morbidities, and hospitalization characteristics will be reported descriptively by means of mean with standard deviations and medians with ranges for continuous variables and by counts and percentages for categorical variables. Incidence rates for BSI will be reported by treatment group.

Interventions

None listed

Sponsors

Fresenius Kabi
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Observational model
OTHER
Time perspective
RETROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Adult hospital inpatients ≥ 18 years 2. Treatment with PN for at least 3 consecutive days 3. PN containing all three major macronutrients, delivered from 3CB or HCB 4. Patients with hospital admission between January 1, 2013, and December 31, 2015 (study period)

Exclusion criteria

1. Bloodstream infection before or at the same day of first PN administration 2. Immunosuppression due to concomitant therapy (e.g., immunosuppressive therapy due to transplantation, concomitant oral or intravenous administration of glucocorticoids) or disease (e.g., HIV, leukaemia) 3. Permanent vascular access (port, shunts for dialysis) 4. Femoral venous placement of central venous line used for PN 5. Burns, extensive skin injuries (e.g., Lyell´s disease) 6. Chemo-/radiotherapy for up to 3 months before hospital admission 7. Change of PN bag type during observation period, e.g., from HCBs to 3CBs or vice-versa

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage of Patients Presenting With a Confirmed Microbial Blood Stream Infection During Treatment With PN for Each Group (3CB vs HCB)Entire study period, from January 1, 2013 and December 31, 2015Confirmation of BSI required fulfillment of all of the following criteria: * International Classification of Diseases, 9th Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-9-CM) code for sepsis (038.x), septicemia (995.91), severe sepsis (995.92), septic shock (785.52), bacteremia (790.7), unspecified infection due to central venous catheter (999.31), or BSI due to central venous catheter (999.32) * Positive blood culture collected during PN administration * Concomitant antimicrobial therapy

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Treatment With Antimicrobials During PNAny day during PN treatmentPercentage of patients receiving antimicrobial agents during treatment with PN for each group (3CB vs HCB)
Use of Vasopressor TreatmentPatients requiring vasopressor support at any time during treatment with PNPercentages of patients requiring vasopressor support during PN treatment
Use of Mechanical VentilationPatients requiring mechanical ventilation at any time during PN treatmentPercentage of patients requiring mechanical ventilation during PN treatment for each group (3CB vs HCB)
Renal Replacement TherapyPatients requiring renal replacement therapy for at least one day during PN treatmentPercentage of patients requiring Renal Replacement Therapy during PN treatment for each group (3CB vs HCB)
Sepsis During PNFrom date of admission to date of dischargePercentage of patients presenting at least one episode of Sepsis during treatment with PN for each group (3CB vs HCB)
Organ FailureAny time during PN treatmentPercentage of patients presenting at least one organ failure during treatment with PN for each group (3CB vs HCB)
Hospital Length of Stay (LOS)Duration in days from admission to death or discharge for each treatment armHospital length of stay in days for patients for each group (3CB vs HCB)
Length of Stay in the ICUAll patients admitted in the ICU at any time during PN treatmentTotal number of days in the ICU for each group (3CB vs HCB)
Newly-occurred Abnormal Laboratory Findings During PNDuring PN treatment inclusive day 1Percentage of patients presenting newly-occurred abnormal laboratory results during PN for each group (3CB vs HCB)

Countries

Spain

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Retrospective cohort study. Data collection from medical records

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Three-Chambered Bag (3CB)
Hospitalized adults (≥18 years) who received PN containing all three major macronutrients via industrially-compounded 3CB for ≥3 consecutive days during the observation period (January 1, 2013 to December 31, 2015).
2,753
Hospital-compounded Bag (HCB)
Hospitalized adults (≥18 years) who received PN containing all three major macronutrients via hospital-compounded all-in-one bag for ≥3 consecutive days during the observation period (January 1, 2013 to December 31, 2015).
970
Total3,723

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicHospital-compounded Bag (HCB)TotalThree-Chambered Bag (3CB)
Age, Continuous66.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.8
66.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 15.2
66.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 15.2
Race and Ethnicity Not Collected0 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Spain
970 participants3723 participants2753 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
354 Participants1498 Participants1144 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
616 Participants2225 Participants1609 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 00 / 0
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 00 / 0
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 00 / 0

Outcome results

Primary

Percentage of Patients Presenting With a Confirmed Microbial Blood Stream Infection During Treatment With PN for Each Group (3CB vs HCB)

Confirmation of BSI required fulfillment of all of the following criteria: * International Classification of Diseases, 9th Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-9-CM) code for sepsis (038.x), septicemia (995.91), severe sepsis (995.92), septic shock (785.52), bacteremia (790.7), unspecified infection due to central venous catheter (999.31), or BSI due to central venous catheter (999.32) * Positive blood culture collected during PN administration * Concomitant antimicrobial therapy

Time frame: Entire study period, from January 1, 2013 and December 31, 2015

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Three-Chambered BagPercentage of Patients Presenting With a Confirmed Microbial Blood Stream Infection During Treatment With PN for Each Group (3CB vs HCB)127 Participants
Hospital-compounded BagPercentage of Patients Presenting With a Confirmed Microbial Blood Stream Infection During Treatment With PN for Each Group (3CB vs HCB)106 Participants
Secondary

Hospital Length of Stay (LOS)

Hospital length of stay in days for patients for each group (3CB vs HCB)

Time frame: Duration in days from admission to death or discharge for each treatment arm

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Three-Chambered BagHospital Length of Stay (LOS)26,601 Days
Hospital-compounded BagHospital Length of Stay (LOS)30,384 Days
Secondary

Length of Stay in the ICU

Total number of days in the ICU for each group (3CB vs HCB)

Time frame: All patients admitted in the ICU at any time during PN treatment

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Three-Chambered BagLength of Stay in the ICU3,017 Days
Hospital-compounded BagLength of Stay in the ICU3,772 Days
Secondary

Newly-occurred Abnormal Laboratory Findings During PN

Percentage of patients presenting newly-occurred abnormal laboratory results during PN for each group (3CB vs HCB)

Time frame: During PN treatment inclusive day 1

Population: Simultaneous occurring laboratory abnormalities

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Three-Chambered BagNewly-occurred Abnormal Laboratory Findings During PNMetabolic impairment1193 Participants
Three-Chambered BagNewly-occurred Abnormal Laboratory Findings During PNAny hepatic dysfunction1414 Participants
Three-Chambered BagNewly-occurred Abnormal Laboratory Findings During PNAny abnormal electrolytes1444 Participants
Hospital-compounded BagNewly-occurred Abnormal Laboratory Findings During PNMetabolic impairment584 Participants
Hospital-compounded BagNewly-occurred Abnormal Laboratory Findings During PNAny hepatic dysfunction651 Participants
Hospital-compounded BagNewly-occurred Abnormal Laboratory Findings During PNAny abnormal electrolytes699 Participants
Secondary

Organ Failure

Percentage of patients presenting at least one organ failure during treatment with PN for each group (3CB vs HCB)

Time frame: Any time during PN treatment

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Three-Chambered BagOrgan FailureSingle organ failure593 Participants
Three-Chambered BagOrgan FailureMultiple organ failure312 Participants
Three-Chambered BagOrgan FailureAny organ failure905 Participants
Hospital-compounded BagOrgan FailureAny organ failure562 Participants
Hospital-compounded BagOrgan FailureSingle organ failure255 Participants
Hospital-compounded BagOrgan FailureMultiple organ failure307 Participants
Secondary

Renal Replacement Therapy

Percentage of patients requiring Renal Replacement Therapy during PN treatment for each group (3CB vs HCB)

Time frame: Patients requiring renal replacement therapy for at least one day during PN treatment

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Three-Chambered BagRenal Replacement Therapy78 Participants
Hospital-compounded BagRenal Replacement Therapy89 Participants
Secondary

Sepsis During PN

Percentage of patients presenting at least one episode of Sepsis during treatment with PN for each group (3CB vs HCB)

Time frame: From date of admission to date of discharge

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Three-Chambered BagSepsis During PN431 Participants
Hospital-compounded BagSepsis During PN228 Participants
Secondary

Treatment With Antimicrobials During PN

Percentage of patients receiving antimicrobial agents during treatment with PN for each group (3CB vs HCB)

Time frame: Any day during PN treatment

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Three-Chambered BagTreatment With Antimicrobials During PN831 Participants
Hospital-compounded BagTreatment With Antimicrobials During PN370 Participants
Secondary

Use of Mechanical Ventilation

Percentage of patients requiring mechanical ventilation during PN treatment for each group (3CB vs HCB)

Time frame: Patients requiring mechanical ventilation at any time during PN treatment

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Three-Chambered BagUse of Mechanical Ventilation410 Participants
Hospital-compounded BagUse of Mechanical Ventilation299 Participants
Secondary

Use of Vasopressor Treatment

Percentages of patients requiring vasopressor support during PN treatment

Time frame: Patients requiring vasopressor support at any time during treatment with PN

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Three-Chambered BagUse of Vasopressor Treatment410 Participants
Hospital-compounded BagUse of Vasopressor Treatment291 Participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026