Skip to content

Safety and Efficacy of dRug-ElutiNg beADs Trans-arterial chemoEmbolization for Hepatocellular Carcinoma in Taiwan

Safety and Efficacy of dRug-ElutiNg beADs Trans-arterial chemoEmbolization for Hepatocellular Carcinoma in Taiwan (SERENADE-T)

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03283956
Acronym
SERENADE-T
Enrollment
500
Registered
2017-09-15
Start date
2017-09-13
Completion date
2018-08-31
Last updated
2017-09-15

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Chemoembolization, Therapeutic, Hepatocellular Carcinoma Non-resectable

Brief summary

To evaluate efficacy and safety profile of DC bead® TACE in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma in Taiwan.

Detailed description

To evaluate efficacy and safety profile of DC bead TACE in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma in Taiwan. This is a multi-center, retrospective, single arm study to explore safety and efficacy of DC bead TACE in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in Taiwan Retrospective analysis of medical records of all patients who underwent DC Bead TACE at National Taiwan University Hospital, National Cheng Kung University Hospital, and Taichung Veterans General Hospital from 2010-2017/7. All statistical data were analyzed with SPSS software (SPSS, IBM North America, New York, NY, USA). Demographic and baseline lab data are presented by using descriptive statistics Student's t-test. Survival analysis will includes all patients.

Interventions

DEVICEPatient records

Retrospective analysis of medical records of all patients who underwent DC Bead TACE at National Taiwan University Hospital, National Cheng Kung University Hospital, and Taichung Veterans General Hospital from 2010-2017/7

Sponsors

National Cheng-Kung University Hospital
CollaboratorOTHER
Taichung Veterans General Hospital
CollaboratorOTHER
National Taiwan University Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
CASE_CONTROL
Time perspective
RETROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patients with a diagnosis of HCC, according to the AASLD diagnosis criteria for HCC. * Patient received DC bead TACE.

Exclusion criteria

* Patients with current any other cancer except non-melanomatous skin cancer. * Infiltrative HCC * Patients received ≥2 consecutive sessions of TACE (≥2 TACE at the same admission, no matter it is cTACE or DC bead TACE) * Patients received DC bead TACE and simultaneously received other therapy, such as radiotherapy, sorafenib etc. * Presence of collateral vessel pathways potentially endangering normal territories during embolization. * Presence of arteries supplying the lesion not large enough to accept DC Bead® microspheres.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Safety of the DC bead TACEOne year.Safety of the DC bead TACE is evaluated based on the incidence of Grade 3 and Grade 4 toxicities up to 8 weeks following the procedure according to National Cancer Institute's Common Terminology Criteria for adverse events (CTCAE Version 4.03).

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Tumor responseOne year.Tumor response is assessed on triphase CT or contrast-enhanced MR study according to modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (mRECIST) criteria.

Countries

Taiwan

Contacts

Primary ContactChien-Hung Chen, MD
chenhcc@ntuh.gov.tw886-2-23123456

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026