Skip to content

A Study of Multiple Immunotherapy-Based Treatment Combinations in Patients With Locally Advanced Unresectable or Metastatic Gastric or Gastroesophageal Junction Cancer (G/GEJ) or Esophageal Cancer (Morpheus-Gastric and Esophageal Cancer)

A Phase Ib/II, Open-Label, Multicenter, Randomized, Umbrella Study Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of Multiple Immunotherapy-Based Treatment Combinations in Patients With Locally Advanced Unresectable or Metastatic Gastric or Gastroesophageal Junction Cancer or Esophageal Cancer (Morpheus-Gastric and Esophageal Cancer)

Status
Terminated
Phases
Phase 1Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03281369
Enrollment
219
Registered
2017-09-13
Start date
2017-10-13
Completion date
2025-10-09
Last updated
2026-08-03

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Gastric Adenocarcinoma or Gastroesophageal Junction Adenocarcinoma or Esophageal Carcinoma

Brief summary

A Phase Ib/II, open label, multi-center, randomized study designed to assess the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics and preliminary anti-tumor activity of immunotherapy-based treatment combinations in patients with locally advanced unresectable or metastatic G/GEJ cancer (hereafter referred to as gastric cancer) and esophageal cancer. Two cohorts of patients with gastric cancer have been enrolled in parallel in this study: the second-line (2L) Gastric Cancer Cohort consists of patients with gastric cancer who have progressed after receiving a platinum-containing or fluoropyrimide-containing chemotherapy regimen in the first-line setting, and the first-line (1L) Gastric Cancer Cohort consists of patients with gastric cancer who have not received prior chemotherapy in this setting. In each cohort, eligible patients will be assigned to one of several treatment arms. Additionally, a cohort of patients with esophageal cancer who have not received prior systemic treatment for their disease will be enrolled in this study. Eligible patients will be randomized to chemotherapy or the combination of chemotherapy with checkpoint inhibitor immunotherapy.

Interventions

DRUG5-Fluorouracil (5-FU)

5-FU 2400 milligrams per square meter (mg/m\^2) by continuous intravenous (IV) infusion over 46 hours on Days 1 and 2 and Days 15 and 16 of every 28-day cycle.

DRUGLeucovorin

Leucovorin: 100 mg/m\^2 IV over 2 hours on Days 1 and 15 of every 28-day cycle.

DRUGOxaliplatin

Oxaliplatin: 100 mg/m\^2 administered by IV infusion over 2 hours on Days 1 and 15 of every 28-day cycle.

DRUGAtezolizumab

Atezolizumab: 840 mg by IV infusion on Days 1 and 15 of every 28-day cycle.

DRUGCobimetinib

Cobimetinib: 60 mg by mouth once a day on Days 1-21 of every 28-day cycle

BIOLOGICALRamucirumab

Ramucirumab: 8 mg/kg administered by IV infusion over 60 minutes on Days 1 and 15 of every 28-day cycle.

DRUGPaclitaxel

Paclitaxel: 80 mg/m\^2 administered by IV infusion on Days 1, 8, and 15 of every 28-day cycle.

PEGPH20: 3 micrograms per kilogram (mcg/kg) administered by IV infusion on Days 1, 8, and 15 of every 21-day cycle.

BL-8040: 1.25 mg/kg administered by subcutaneous (SC) injection on Days 1-5 during the 5-day priming period prior to Cycle 1; 1.25 mg/kg administered by SC injection three times a week (Days 1, 3, 5, 8, 10, 12, 15, 17, and 19 of every 21-day cycle).

DRUGLinagliptin

Linagliptin: 5 mg orally once a day of every 21-day cycle.

DRUGCisplatin

Cisplatin: 80 mg/m\^2 administered by IV infusion on Day 1 of each 21 day cycle. Treatment will be capped after 6 doses.

DRUGTiragolumab

Tiragolumab: 600 mg administered by IV infusion on Day 1 of every 21 day cycle.

Sponsors

Hoffmann-La Roche
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY
Halozyme Therapeutics
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
BioLineRx, Ltd.
CollaboratorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

Gastric Cancer Cohorts Inclusion Criteria: * Age \>/= 18 years; * Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status of 0 or 1; * Life expectancy \>/= 3 months, as determined by the investigator; * Histologically or cytologically confirmed locally advanced unresectable or metastatic adenocarcinoma of gastric or gastroesophageal junction; (for the 1L Gastric Cancer Cohort: no prior systemic therapy for the locally advanced or metastatic disease; for the 2L Gastric Cancer Cohort: disease progression during or following a first-line platinum-containing or fluoropyrimidine-containing chemotherapy regimen); * Availability of a representative tumor specimen that is suitable for determination of PD-L1 and TIGIT levels by IHC and/or additional biomarker status by means of retrospective central testing; * Only for the 1L Gastric Cancer Cohort: human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative tumors; * Measurable disease (at least one target lesion) according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors, Version 1.1 (RECIST v1.1); * Adequate hematologic and end organ function based on laboratory results obtained within 14 days prior to initiation of study treatment; * For women of childbearing potential: agreement to remain abstinent (refrain from heterosexual intercourse) or use contraceptive measures as outlined for each specific treatment arm; * For men: agreement to remain abstinent (refrain from heterosexual intercourse) or use contraceptive measures, and agreement to refrain from donating sperm, as outlined for each specific treatment arm. Esophageal Cancer Cohort Inclusion Criteria: * Histologically or cytologically confirmed diagnosis of squamous cell carcinoma or adenocarcinoma of the esophagus in locally advanced or metastatic disease; * No prior systemic treatment for esophageal cancer, with the following exception: For patients treated with chemotherapy in the locally advanced setting: occurrence of metastasis after 6 months from the last dose of chemotherapy; * For patients with adenocarcinoma: absence of HER2 expression; * Life expectancy \>/=3 months as determined by the investigator; * Measurable disease per RECIST v1.1; * Adequate hematologic and end-organ function; * For women of childbearing potential: agreement to remain abstinent (refrain from heterosexual intercourse) or use contraceptive measures, and agreement to refrain from donating eggs; * For men: agreement to remain abstinent (refrain from heterosexual intercourse) or use contraceptive measures, and agreement to refrain from donating sperm; * ECOG Performance Status of 0, 1, or 2.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Stage 1: Percentage of Participants With Objective Response (OR), as Determined by Investigator According to RECIST v1.1From randomization up to approximately 84.2 monthsOR was defined as a complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) on two consecutive occasions ≥ 4 weeks apart during Stage 1, as determined by the investigator using RECIST v.1.1. Objective response rate (ORR) was defined as the percentage of participants with OR. CR was defined as the disappearance of all target and non-target lesions. Any pathological lymph nodes (whether target or non-target) must have a reduction in short axis to \<10 millimeters (mm). PR was defined as at least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters (SOD) of all target lesions, taking as reference the baseline SOD, in the absence of CR. 95% confidence intervals (CI) for rates were constructed using Clopper-Pearson method. Percentages have been rounded off.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Stage 1: Progression Free Survival (PFS) After Randomization, as Determined by Investigator According to RECIST v1.1From randomization to the first occurrence of PD or death (up to approximately 84.2 months)PFS was defined as the time from randomization to the first occurrence of documented PD, as determined by the investigator according to RECIST v1.1 or death from any cause, whichever occurred first. PD was defined as at least a 20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum in the study, including baseline, in addition to the relative increase of 20%, the sum must also demonstrate an absolute increase of at least 5 mm or unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions. Participants who did not have documented PD or death, PFS was censored at the day of the last tumor assessment. Kaplan-Meier (K-M) method was used to estimate PFS.
Stage 1: Overall Survival (OS) After RandomizationFrom randomization to death (up to approximately 84.2 months)OS was defined as the time from randomization to death from any cause. Participants who were still alive at the time of OS analysis were censored at the last date they were known to be alive. K-M methodology was used to estimate the median OS.
Stage 1: OS at Month 6 and Month 12At Months 6 and 12OS was defined as the time from randomization to death from any cause. Participants who were still alive at the time of OS analysis were censored at the last date they were known to be alive. The K-M approach was used to estimate the percentage of participants who were event-free for OS at Month 6 and Month 12. Percentages have been rounded off.
Stage 1: Duration of Response (DOR), as Determined by Investigator According to RECIST v1.1Up to approximately 84.2 monthsDOR was defined as time from first occurrence of a documented OR until the time of documented PD as determined by investigator assessment using RECIST v1.1 or death from any cause, whichever occurs first. CR was defined as the disappearance of all target \& non-target lesions or any pathological lymph nodes (whether target or non-target) having a reduction in short axis to \<10 mm. PR was defined as at least a 30% decrease in the SOD of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline SOD, in the absence of CR. PD=at least a 20% increase in the SOD of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum on the study including baseline (nadir). In addition to the relative increase of 20%, the sum must also demonstrate an absolute increase of at least 5 mm or unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions. Participants who did not have documented PD or death, DOR was censored at the day of the last tumor assessment. K-M method was used to estimate DOR.
Stage 1: Percentage of Participants With Disease Control (DC), as Determined by Investigator According to RECIST v1.1Up to approximately 84.2 monthsDC was defined as stable disease (SD) for ≥16 weeks for GC cohort or ≥ 12 weeks for esophageal cancer cohort, or CR/PR, as determined by investigator per RECIST v1.1. Disease control rate (DCR) was defined as percentage of participants with DC. CR was defined as disappearance of all target \& non-target lesions. Any pathological lymph nodes (whether target or non-target) must have reduction in short axis to \<10 mm. PR was defined as at least 30% decrease in SOD of target lesions, taking as reference baseline SOD. SD was defined as neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for PR nor sufficient increase to qualify for PD. PD was defined as at least 20% increase in SOD of target lesions, taking as reference smallest sum on study including baseline (nadir). Additionally, the sum must also demonstrate absolute increase of at least 5 mm or unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions. Percentages have been rounded off.
Stages 1 and 2: Percentage of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)Stage 1: Up to 84.2 months; Stage 2: Up to 42.6 monthsAn AE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a pharmaceutical product and which does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship with the treatment. An AE can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign (including abnormal laboratory values or abnormal clinical test results), symptoms, or disease temporally associated with the use of a pharmaceutical product, whether or not considered related to the pharmaceutical product.
Stage 1: Serum Concentration of AtezolizumabPre-dose, 30 minutes (min) post-dose (infusion=60 min) on Day 1 of Cycle 1; pre-dose on Day 1 of Cycles 2, 3, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, & 28; Stage 1 treatment discontinuation (TD) (up to approximately 82.7 months)1 cycle = 21 days for the all three reported arms: Stage 1 Cohort 2: Atezolizumab + PEGPH20, Stage 1: Atezolizumab + Cisplatin + 5-FU" cohorts and Stage 1: Atezolizumab +Tiragolumab + Cisplatin +5-FU" cohort. The protocol pre-specified that PK assessments could be conducted only for treatment combinations selected by the sponsor for further development. As the sponsor decided not to continue further development of the mFOLFOX6 + atezolizumab + cobimetinib, atezolizumab + linagliptin, and atezolizumab + BL-8040 combinations, PK data were not reported for these cohorts.
Stage 1: Serum Concentration of TiragolumabPre-dose, 30 min post-dose on Day 1 of Cycle 1; pre-dose on Day 1 of Cycles 2, 3, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, & 28 (1 Cycle=28 days); Stage 1 TD (up to approximately 46.7 months)
Stage 1: Plasma Concentration of PEGPH20Pre-dose: Day 1 of Cycles 1, 2, 3, 4 & Days 8, 15 of Cycle 1; 5 minutes & 1-3 hours post-dose: Day 1 Cycle 1; 5 min post-dose: Day 1 Cycle 2; Stage 1: TD (up to approx 3.3 months) & Day 120 post last dose of atezo (up to approx 6.8 months)1 Cycle=21 days
Stage 1: Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Anti-drug Antibodies (ADAs) to AtezolizumabUp to approximately 82.7 monthsParticipants who received atezolizumab were considered to be treatment-emergent ADA-positive if they were ADA-negative or had missing data at baseline but developed an ADA response following atezolizumab exposure (treatment-induced ADA response), or if they were ADA-positive at baseline and the titer of one or more post-baseline samples was at least 0.60 titer units (t.u.) greater than the titer of the baseline sample (treatment-enhanced ADA response). Participants with a positive post-baseline sample have been reported here. The protocol pre-specified that ADA assessments could be conducted only for treatment combinations selected by the sponsor for further development. As the sponsor decided not to continue further development of the mFOLFOX6 + atezolizumab + cobimetinib, atezolizumab + linagliptin, and atezolizumab + BL-8040 combinations, ADA data were not reported for these cohorts.
Stage 1: Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent ADAs to TiragolumabUp to approximately 46.7 monthsParticipants who received tiragolumab were considered to be treatment-emergent ADA-positive if they were ADA-negative or had missing data at baseline but developed an ADA response following tiragolumab exposure (treatment-induced ADA response), or if they were ADA-positive at baseline and the titer of one or more post-baseline samples was at least 0.60 t.u. greater than the titer of the baseline sample (treatment-enhanced ADA response). Participants with a positive post-baseline sample has been reported here.
Stage 1: Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent ADAs to PEGPH20Up to approximately 3.3 monthsParticipants who received PEGPH20 were considered to be treatment-emergent ADA-positive if they were ADA-negative or had missing data at baseline but developed an ADA response following PEGPH20 exposure (treatment-induced ADA response), or if they were ADA-positive at baseline and the titer of one or more post-baseline samples was at least 0.60 t.u. greater than the titer of the baseline sample (treatment-enhanced ADA response). Participants with a positive post-baseline sample has been reported here.

Countries

Australia, Israel, South Korea, Spain, Taiwan, United Kingdom, United States

Contacts

STUDY_DIRECTORClinical Trials

Hoffmann-La Roche

Participant flow

Recruitment details

A total of 219 participants with metastatic gastric or esophageal cancer took part in the study from 13 Oct 2017 to 09 Oct 2025. The study enrolled participants with gastric cancer (GC) in 2 cohorts: Cohort 1: received no prior systemic therapy for GC & Cohort 2: received 1 prior line of systemic therapy for GC and participants with esophageal cancer in 1 cohort (received no prior systemic treatment).

Pre-assignment details

Eligible participants were assigned to one of several treatment arms in Stage 1. Cohort 2 participants with disease progression (PD), loss of clinical benefit, or unacceptable toxicity in Stage 1 were eligible for a different treatment combination in Stage 2. Results include only those cohorts that enrolled participants. Planned cohorts that did not enroll participants or were never opened are not presented.

Baseline characteristics

Characteristic
Age, Customized
Stage 1: 85 years and over
1 Participants
Age, Customized
Stage 1: Adults (18-64 years)
137 Participants
Age, Customized
Stage 1: From 65-84 years
81 Participants
Age, Customized
Stage 2: 85 years and over
0 Participants
Age, Customized
Stage 2: Adults (18-64 years)
11 Participants
Age, Customized
Stage 2: From 65-84 years
3 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Stage 1
Hispanic or Latino
0 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Stage 1
Not Hispanic or Latino
16 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Stage 1
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Stage 2
Hispanic or Latino
0 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Stage 2
Not Hispanic or Latino
14 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Stage 2
Unknown or Not Reported
1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Stage 1
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Stage 1
Asian
18 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Stage 1
Black or African American
1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Stage 1
More than one race
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Stage 1
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Stage 1
Unknown or Not Reported
1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Stage 1
White
7 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Stage 2
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Stage 2
Asian
12 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Stage 2
Black or African American
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Stage 2
More than one race
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Stage 2
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Stage 2
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Stage 2
White
3 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Stage 1
Female
28 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Stage 1
Male
24 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Stage 2
Female
0 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Stage 2
Male
15 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
EG003
affected / at risk
EG004
affected / at risk
EG005
affected / at risk
EG006
affected / at risk
EG007
affected / at risk
EG008
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
4 / 512 / 1613 / 1511 / 1513 / 168 / 2456 / 6545 / 6311 / 15
other
Total, other adverse events
5 / 512 / 1213 / 1313 / 1314 / 1423 / 2365 / 6562 / 6214 / 14
serious
Total, serious adverse events
2 / 56 / 121 / 135 / 134 / 1411 / 2334 / 6538 / 627 / 14

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Aug 4, 2026