Pain
Conditions
Brief summary
Pain assessment is crucial in clinical practice. Currently, subjective self-report is considered the most appropriate method to evaluate pain. Although several methods to assess pain objectively exist, the lack of a golden standard still remains. This pilot study assesses the changes in pupil dilation (PD) and the analgesia nociception index (ANI) as a measure of pain in healthy, conscious, male volunteers in a highly standardized and individualized environment. Nineteen subjects received three blocks of 4 individualized electrical stimulus intensities, ranging from no to severe pain. Subjects reported their perceived severity of each individual stimulus, enabling the comparison of changes in PD and ANI in relation to both administered stimulus intensities and perceived pain severities. PD and ANI were measured before and after each administration of a stimulus.
Interventions
painful electrical stimuli of various intensities were administered to the subjects after which changes in pupil diameter and analgesia nociception index were measured
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
* good health * no acute or chronic pain conditions * well rested
Exclusion criteria
* chronic treatment * bad health * daily use of analgetics or other medication * weekly tobacco use * weekly use of recreational drugs * more than 10 alcohol consumptions a week
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Pupil dilation in relation to pain | 2sec before until 4sec after each painful stimulus | measurement of pupil dilation |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Analgesia nociception index in relation to pain | 30sec before until 60sec after each painful stimulus | measurement of analgesia nociception index |
Countries
Belgium