Skip to content

Using Technology to Scale-Up an Occupational Sun Protection Policy Program

Using Technology to Scale-Up an Occupational Sun Protection Policy Program

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03278340
Acronym
SSW-T
Enrollment
2644
Registered
2017-09-11
Start date
2017-07-14
Completion date
2024-07-31
Last updated
2024-11-14

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Skin Cancer

Keywords

Skin Cancer, Prevention, Policy, Worksite, Scale-up, Cost and Effectiveness

Brief summary

Comprehensive approaches that combine sun protection policy and education for outdoor workers can reduce their risk for skin cancer by reducing their exposure to solar ultraviolet radiation on the job. To effectively disseminate the investigators' evidence-based sun protection policy and education intervention, Sun Safe Workplaces, a balance of effectiveness and cost of scale-up methods is required. The investigators propose to translate the intervention using a technology-based delivery method and compare the cost effectiveness of the original intervention and the intervention delivered by technology in a study that models national distribution strategies to public safety and public works sectors.

Detailed description

A key goal in the Affordable Care Act is building a national culture of prevention through workplace health and safety initiatives. To achieve this goal, methods for scaling up evidence-based programs from research to wide-scale dissemination are needed to help balance effectiveness and cost. In many cases, there are pressures to reduce scale-up costs but at the expense of lower program implementation and effectiveness. A scale-up method that sacrifices effectiveness but reduces costs and reaches a larger number of employers may be acceptable. The investigators will model the effectiveness and cost trade-off, along with the extent and representativeness of reach, when scaling up the evidence-based occupational sun protection intervention, Sun Safe Workplaces (SSW), for national distribution. The intervention, which relies on personal contact with managers and in-person employee training (SSW-IP), created large improvements in comprehensive workplace sun safety (i.e., policy adoption and employee education) in a randomized controlled trial. The investigators will compare the existing in-person program delivery methods (SSW-IP) to a lower-cost dissemination method that utilizes Internet technology (SSW-T), i.e., virtual meetings, social networking, online training, and program materials. The aims of the research are to: 1) estimate the program reach (number and representativeness) and implementation rates (i.e., adoption of policies and delivery of education on occupational sun protection) achieved by the SSW-IP and SSW-T in a model of national distribution to public safety and public works industries; 2) estimate the costs associated with the SSW-IP and SSW-T (i.e., intervention costs and induced employer costs) and compare the estimated program benefits (i.e., policy and education) to cost; and 3) estimate the effect and cost-effectiveness of SSW-IP and SSW-T in secondary outcomes of a) changes in workplace environments and procedures for sun safety and b) workers' sun safety practices. In a 5-year project, SSW-T will be created by redesigning the very effective SSW-IP methods to use the latest web conferencing, social networking, and online training technology for dissemination. The implementation rates (defined as policy adoption and education delivery) and costs associated with SSW-IP (n=50 employers) and SSW-T (n=150 employers) will be modeled in a randomized two-group pretest-posttest design, enrolling a national sample of 200 employers (i.e., firefighting departments and state departments of transportation). Unlike traditional randomized trials, the primary analysis will be of cost effectiveness to test the hypothesis that SSW-T can be delivered cost-effectively to an expanded group of worksites producing a lower implementation rate than SSW-IP but at substantially lower cost. Secondary analyses will compare the two scale-up strategies on implementation rate, differences in rate by employer groups (e.g., size and region), changes to workplace environment/procedures, and employee sun safety practices. The findings will have high impact by helping public health practitioners select the best strategy for scaling up evidence-based workplace health and safety programs to achieve this ACA goal.

Interventions

BEHAVIORALSun Safe Workplaces - Technology

After randomization, program staff will contact managers at the recruited employer and schedule the initial web-enabled visit in the first 6 months. Follow-up meetings will be scheduled as needed to discuss policy adoption, and managers will schedule employee education using the SSW-T online training. Staff will follow-up with managers through Month 34 (Wave 1) or Month 46 (Wave 2). Electronic materials will be published on KB's state-of-the-art web server for employers to access and use.

BEHAVIORALSun Safe Workplaces -In Person

After randomization, program staff will contact managers the recruited employer and schedule the initial in-person visit in the first 6 months. Follow-up meetings will be scheduled as needed to discuss policy adoption; managers will schedule employee education with SSW-IP project staff. Printed materials will be sent to SSW-IP employers 3 times during the intervention. Staff will follow-up with managers through Month 34 (Wave 1) or Month 46 (Wave 2).

Sponsors

Kaiser Permanente
CollaboratorOTHER
National Cancer Institute (NCI)
CollaboratorNIH
Klein Buendel, Inc.
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Masking description

Participants will not be aware of the condition in which their organization is assigned.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Fire Departments and State DOTs in the United States, agreeing to participate, providing written policies at pretest and having at least 6 managers and 50 workers complete the pretest. * Being a senior manager of a fire department or state DOT located in the United States. Criteria include a) being in a senior management position; b) responsible for work-site safety/health policy and education; c) consenting to participate, and d) completing the pretest. This includes city/county managers, human resources directors, risk managers, and managers of facilities, fire, roads and transportation departments * Being an employee of a fire department or state DOT located in the United States. Criteria includes a) being employed part/full-time at the employer, b) working at least part of daytime hours outdoors, c) consenting to participate, and d) completing the pretest survey.

Exclusion criteria

* Prior participation in the Sun Safe Workplaces program

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Implementation of Occupational Sun Protection PolicyBaseline to 2 years followupPolicies will be collected from work sites and coded at both before and after the intervention period. Project staff will code written workplace policy documents on the presence of 15 content categories in three domains: 1) environmental controls; 2) administrative procedures; and 3) personal protection practices. Presence of policy is defined as having one or more policy components present in the written workplace policy documents (value = 1) versus no content components present (value = 0).
Implementation of Sun Safety EducationBaseline to 2 year followupSenior managers and employees will report on sun safety education provided to employees. The primary measure will be managers' reports of any training or any sun safety messages/materials distributed (e.g., newsletter articles, SSW website, or emails). Employees' reports of sun safety education will be secondary, validating managers' reports. These measures will be obtained in senior manager and employee pretest and posttest surveys, conducted online and by mail

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Economic Evaluation of the SSW-IP and SSW-T Intervention ProgramsBaseline to 2 year followupProject staff will record costs associated with the SSW-IP and SSW-T, following protocols from prior projects. Project staff will identify resource allocations and both labor and non labor elements for each component of the SSW-IP and SSW-T (in-person and virtual visits; follow-up communications; staff-delivered and virtual training, web resources, and mailed materials). For personnel, the proportion of FTE across activities will be estimated by contemporaneous staff self-report. Senior manager and employee survey data will identify organizational changes induced by SSW-IP and SSW-T and attach cost estimates to each. The investigators will use the accounting systems of the trial itself, supplemented with survey responses and additional primary data collection or external sources. Costs will be recorded in custom-made spreadsheets and summed to produce overall cost estimates.
Changes in Workplace Environment for Sun SafetyBaseline to 2 year followupManagers will report changes in the work environments (providing shade and adjusting outdoor work schedules) or procedures (risk assessment, posting UV Index, and providing sunscreen, hats, protective clothing, and sunglasses) for sun safety. To validate, trained staff (blind to condition) will visit 18 randomly-selected employers at post-test and record shade, posting of UV Index, sunscreen availability, employee clothing, hats, and sunglasses, and educational materials, using a protocol from our Go Sun Smart trial.
Other Policy-related MeasuresBaseline to 2 year followupThe investigators will measure two ancillary policy outcomes in the senior manager surveys, the content of informal procedures (not written) and enforcement of any sun protection policies (i.e., how well is policy being implemented and how well are staff complying with policy \[very well, well, about average, poorly, or very poorly\]).
Employees Sun Protection PracticesBaseline to 2 year followupEmployees will report a) frequency of sun protection at work, i.e., sunscreen with SPF 15+, long-sleeved shirts, long pants, hat with brim, sunglasses, shade use, limit exposure to midday sun, and have sunscreen, hat and eye protection at all times (1=never, 5=always) and b) prevalence of sunburn in the past three months on the job (yes/no; number of times) from SSW and GSS trials. These are standard, validated, and reliable measures from past studies.

Countries

United States

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 25, 2026