Skip to content

Flu Vaccine Response in Patients on Biologic Therapies

Booster Vaccine Strategy to Improve Serologic Responses to Influenza Vaccination in Children With Rheumatic Diseases and Inflammatory Bowel Disease Who Are Receiving Immunosuppressive Therapies

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03277703
Enrollment
30
Registered
2017-09-11
Start date
2017-11-03
Completion date
2019-12-30
Last updated
2026-08-06

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Immune Complex Diseases, Inflammatory Bowel Diseases, Rheumatologic Disorder

Keywords

Influenza vaccine, Booster dose, immunocompromised, Biologic therapy, Rheumatologic disease, inflammatory bowel disease

Brief summary

This proposed study will assess the immunogenicity, safety, and clinical efficacy of an influenza vaccine booster dose strategy in patients with autoimmune diseases who are receiving immunosuppressive therapies. Investigators will compare serologic responses to single versus a booster dose of influenza vaccine in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD- Crohn's Disease or Ulcerative Colitis) or rheumatologic diseases who are receiving immunosuppressive therapies. Subjects will be randomized to receive either one or two doses of influenza vaccination in year #1. In year# 2, all participants will be given two doses of influenza vaccine. Serologic responses will be measured pre and 4-6 weeks post vaccination. This study will also assess the immunogenicity and safety of a booster vaccine strategy in the prevention of influenza-like illness (ILI). Investigators anticipate that booster dose strategy will improve both clinical and serologic responses in this vulnerable population.

Detailed description

Patients receiving immunosuppressive therapies for rheumatologic diseases and inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) are at increased risk of serious infections, including influenza. Infections can also trigger flares of the underlying disease. Although newer biologic treatments are improving disease outcomes, these medications reduce vaccine responses, placing patients at high risk for vaccine-preventable illnesses. In a case-cohort study by Flannery et al. looking at influenza vaccine effectiveness from 2010-2014, only one in four children who died of laboratory-confirmed influenza were vaccinated, while a high prevalence (53%) had an underlying condition that put them at risk for severe influenza-related complications. Yearly influenza vaccination is recommended for all patients with rheumatologic diseases and IBD. However, these recommendations are based on studies that did not include patients receiving newer biologic therapies. Recent studies in organ transplant recipients, a group known to have suboptimal vaccine responses, have suggested a booster influenza vaccine strategy as a way of enhancing vaccine responses. SPECIFIC AIMS: The primary aim of this study is to assess the immunogenicity of booster dose influenza vaccine strategy in patients with rheumatologic diseases and IBD who are receiving immunosuppressive therapies. Secondary aims of this study include assessment of the safety and clinical efficacy, of booster dose influenza vaccine in the prevention of influenza-like illnesses (ILI) in this patient population.

Interventions

BIOLOGICALInfluenza vaccine

The primary aim of this study is to assess the immunogenicity of booster dose influenza vaccine strategy in patients with rheumatologic diseases and IBD who are receiving immunosuppressive therapies. Secondary aims of this study include assessment of the safety and clinical efficacy, of booster dose influenza vaccine in the prevention of influenza-like illnesses (ILI) in this patient population

Sponsors

Stony Brook University
Lead SponsorOTHER
University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill
CollaboratorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Primary purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

In Year 1, Group 1 receives influenza booster dose strategy whereas Group 2 receives influenza standard dose strategy. Then in Year 2 Group 1 receives booster dose strategy and Group 2 now also receives booster dose strategy

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
3 Years to 22 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Children ages 3-22 years * Rheumatologic condition (JIA, Uveitis, SLE and other rheumatologic disorders) or inflammatory bowel disease (Crohn's disease or ulcerative colitis) and who are receiving immunosuppressive therapies as follows: * TNF inhibitors \[etanercept (Enbrel), adalimumab (Humira®), infliximab (Remicade®)\] * anti IL -1 \[anakinra (Kineret®) or canakinumab (Ilaris®)\] * IL-6 tocilizumab (Actemra®) * anti IL-12/23 ustekinumab (Stelara®) * anti CTLA-4 \[abatacept (Orencia®)\] * vedolizumab (Entyvio®) * azathioprine (Imuran®) * 6 mercaptopurine (Purinethol®) * Cyclosporine * Leflunomide * Mycophenolate * methotrexate (Otrexup® or Rasuvo®)

Exclusion criteria

* Prior allergic reaction to any vaccine components * Other contraindication to influenza vaccination * Severe egg allergy * Pregnancy * Prior Guillain-Barre syndrome * Therapy with oral corticosteroids ≥2 mg/mg/day within 4 weeks of study entry * Prior rituximab * Prior cyclophosphamide * Prior IVIG within 8 weeks * Acute febrile illness at time of study evaluation * No prior history of two doses of influenza in the past for ages 3-8 years

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Influenza Hemagglutination Inhibition (HAI) Titer4-6 weeks post final influenza vaccination dose (if participants received a booster, this was after the booster dose) in Year 1 and Year 2immunological vaccine response

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Participants With Decreased Influenza Rates Per Strainthrough study completion, an average of 2 yearsdecreased influenza rates - seroprotection

Countries

United States

Contacts

PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORChristy A Beneri, DO

Stony Brook Children's Hospital

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Patients were recruited at the beginning of the 2017-2018 flu season and 2018-2019 flu season. Recruitment ended end of the flu season. First patient was enrolled 11/3/2027and last patient completed last visit 12/30/2019. Patients were screened during routine outpatient clinic visits at Pediatric Rheumatology or Pediatric Gastroenterology.

Pre-assignment details

One patient consented to study and was enrolled and was randomized to Group but withdrew prior to vaccination.

Baseline characteristics

Characteristic
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
8 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
0 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
8 Participants
Age, Continuous17 years
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
24 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
16 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
7 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
7 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
EG003
affected / at risk
EG004
affected / at risk
EG005
affected / at risk
EG006
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 130 / 130 / 160 / 130 / 130 / 160 / 16
other
Total, other adverse events
2 / 130 / 130 / 160 / 130 / 130 / 161 / 16
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 130 / 130 / 160 / 130 / 130 / 160 / 16

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Aug 7, 2026