Skip to content

A Randomized Trial of CT Fluoroscopy-guided Targeted Autologous Blood and Fibrin Glue Patching for Treatment

A Randomized Trial of CT Fluoroscopy-guided Targeted Autologous Blood and Fibrin Glue Patching for Treatment of Cerebrospinal Fluid Leaks in Spontaneous Intracranial Hypotension.

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03276975
Enrollment
15
Registered
2017-09-08
Start date
2017-12-18
Completion date
2020-03-19
Last updated
2021-06-18

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Cerebrospinal Fluid Leaks

Keywords

CT fluoroscopy, epidural patching, spontaneous intracranial hypotension

Brief summary

The goal of this randomized controlled trial (RCT) is to compare the efficacy of CT fluoroscopy-guided targeted epidural patching for treatment of imaging-confirmed spinal CSF leaks to that of a simulated procedure without patching material in patients with spontaneous intracranial hypotension.

Detailed description

Spontaneous intracranial hypotension (SIH) is a condition caused by non-iatrogenic spinal CSF leaks that classically presents with orthostatic headaches. These headaches, in conjunction with other presenting symptoms such as nausea, diplopia, tinnitus, and cognitive deficits, often result in profound disability. SIH is considerably underreported due to pervasive misdiagnosis. Thus, while the estimated annual incidence is reported to be 5 in 100,000, the actual number is likely considerably greater. The current standard-of-care treatment for SIH cases that are refractory to conservative measures (i.e. bed rest and hydration) is percutaneous epidural blood patching (EBP) of the spinal CSF leak. Percutaneous EBP can be performed in several ways: 1) with or without imaging guidance, 2) targeted to a site of known or suspected CSF leak or non-targeted, and 3) with or without the addition of fibrin glue sealant. The leading theory for the mechanism behind percutaneous EBP treatment of SIH is that it creates a durable seal of the CSF leak resulting in normalization of CSF hydrodynamics and a resultant diminution in symptoms. Fibrin glue, a sealant used for treatment of unintended durotomies during neurosurgery, is thought to improve the likelihood of a successful patch over patches containing blood alone. Therefore, imaging-guided targeted delivery of patching material containing both blood and fibrin glue directly to the site of CSF leak, a novel therapy, is presumed to be the optimal therapy. For this reason, this procedure has become standard-of-care at many tertiary-care institutions over the past several years. Our group has extensive experience with CT fluoroscopy-guided targeted blood and fibrin glue patching of proven CSF leaks in SIH patients. However, significant uncertainty remains with regard to the efficacy of this procedure due to a paucity of outcomes data and the absence of any prospective RCTs. In fact, nearly all of the current evidence for the treatment of SIH is found in the form of retrospective chart reviews. Given the growing recognition of SIH, the fact that a known subset of patients will have spontaneous resolution of symptoms, and the absence of clear evidence to guide treatment, there is a critical need to evaluate the efficacy of targeted patching with blood and fibrin glue with a prospective RCT. Fulfilling this unmet need forms the basis for this proposal. While determining the efficacy of the other types of EBPs is also important, we aim to begin by evaluating the efficacy of the presumed optimal therapy.

Interventions

TISSEEL is a fibrin sealant indicated for use as an adjunct to hemostasis in adult and pediatric patients (\>1 month of age) undergoing surgery when control of bleeding by conventional surgical techniques (such as suture, ligature, and cautery) is ineffective or impractical. TISSEEL is effective in heparinized patients

Sponsors

Duke University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Adult patients meeting International Classification of Headache Disorders 3rd Edition (ICHD-3) criteria for a diagnosis of SIH (Table 1) who have had a contrast-enhanced brain MRI and a myelogram confirming the presence of a CSF leak will be recruited from the Duke Radiology spine intervention clinic \[25\]

Exclusion criteria

* recent (i.e., \< 2 weeks) blood patch * contraindication or inability to undergo the procedure * inability to provide informed consent * expected inability to complete follow-up assessment * a contraindication to receiving contrast material (precluding an epidurogram) * contraindication to receiving fibrin glue (i.e., allergy).

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in Median (Headache Impact Test-6) HIT-6 Score From BaselineBaseline, 1 monthAbsolute change in median HIT-6 score from pre-procedural baseline to 1 month post procedure for each group. The HIT-6 consists of six items: pain, social functioning, role functioning, vitality, cognitive functioning, and psychological distress. The patient answers each of the six related questions using one of the following five responses: never, rarely, sometimes, very often, or always. These responses are summed to produce a total HIT-6 score that ranges from 36 to 78, where a higher score indicates a greater impact of headache on the daily life of the respondent.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Reduction in Median Migraine Disability Assessment (MIDAS) Score From BaselineBaseline, 2 weeks, 1 month, 4 monthsThe MIDAS questionnaire assesses headache-related disability. Patients answer five questions, scoring the number of days, in the past 3 months, where their activity was limited due to headache. A higher score indicates greater headache-related disability. This tool has been shown to be internally consistent, highly reliable, valid, and correlates with physicians' clinical judgment. MIDAS Scale Range: 0 - 270
Change in Median NRS Score From BaselineBaseline, 2 weeks, 1 month, 4 monthsThe pain numerical rating scale (NRS) is a well-validated tool for quantitatively assessing patients' pain. The NRS asks patients to rate their current pain intensity on an 11-point scale ranging from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst possible pain). It has been found to be a valid measure of pain intensity with minimum clinically important difference noted to be a change of 2 points. The investigators will use NRS averaged over the past 24 hours for all time points in this trial. The Initiative on Methods, Measurement, and Pain Assessment in Clinical Trials (IMMPACT) consensus statement indicates that an NRS reduction of 30% (or 2 points) is associated with a meaningful or moderately important improvement in pain. Further, IMMPACT also indicates that an NRS reduction of 50% (or 4 points) is associated with a substantial improvement in pain. The investigators will follow their consensus recommendations and explicitly report these two categories of pain relief.
Change in Median HIT-6 Score From BaselineBaseline, 2 weeks, 4 monthsAbsolute change in median HIT-6 score from pre-procedural baseline to 2 weeks and 4 months post procedure for each group. The HIT-6 consists of six items: pain, social functioning, role functioning, vitality, cognitive functioning, and psychological distress. The patient answers each of the six related questions using one of the following five responses: never, rarely, sometimes, very often, or always. These responses are summed to produce a total HIT-6 score that ranges from 36 to 78, where a higher score indicates a greater impact of headache on the daily life of the respondent.
Change in Median WPAI (Work Productivity and Activity Impairment) Score From BaselineBaseline, 2 weeks, 1 month, 4 monthsThe WPAI is a validated instrument with good test-retest reliability used extensively in health research that quantifies impairment in daily activities and work productivity. Scores on the WPAI range from 0 - 100% with higher percentages indicating greater impact on work productivity and more severe activity impairment.
Change in PGIC (Patient Global Impression of Change) Score From BaselineBaseline, 2 weeks, 1 month, 4 monthsPGIC is a validated 7-point Likert-type scale assessing a patient's overall impression of improvement after intervention. Scores range from 1 - 7 (1: no change or worsening of condition; 2: almost the same, hardly any change at all; 3: a little better, but no noticeable change; 4: somewhat better, but the change has not made any real difference; 5: moderately better, and a slight but noticeable change; 6: better and a definite improvement that has made a real and worthwhile difference; 7: a great deal better, and a considerable improvement that has made all the difference) with higher scores indicating greater improvement.
Change in Median EQ-5D (European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions) Score From BaselineBaseline, 2 weeks, 1 month, 4 monthsThe EQ-5D is a standardized measure of health status that provides a simple, generic measure of health for clinical appraisal. It is well-validated for health status measurement and for quality-of-life in headache. Scores on the EQ-5D were calculated using the United States 3L, time trade off (TTO) valuation technique. Scores range from 0 to 1, with 1 indicating perfect health.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Targeted Epidural Patching of CSF Leaks With Autologous Blood and Fibrin Glue
CT-fluoroscopic guided epidural patching of the CSF leak or CSF to venous fistula with autologous blood and fibrin glue.
8
Simulated Patching Procedure
A simulated procedure in which CT fluoroscopy is used to place needles but instead of injection of blood and fibrin glue patching material, an equivalent volume of preservative free sterile saline is injected.
7
Total15

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject10

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicTargeted Epidural Patching of CSF Leaks With Autologous Blood and Fibrin GlueSimulated Patching ProcedureTotal
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
1 Participants2 Participants3 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
7 Participants5 Participants12 Participants
Age, Continuous46.0 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.1
57.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.7
51.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.9
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
7 Participants7 Participants14 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
1 Participants0 Participants1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
1 Participants0 Participants1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
3 Participants2 Participants5 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants1 Participants1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
1 Participants0 Participants1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
3 Participants4 Participants7 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
8 Participants7 Participants15 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
7 Participants5 Participants12 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
1 Participants2 Participants3 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 150 / 7
other
Total, other adverse events
1 / 151 / 7
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 150 / 7

Outcome results

Primary

Change in Median (Headache Impact Test-6) HIT-6 Score From Baseline

Absolute change in median HIT-6 score from pre-procedural baseline to 1 month post procedure for each group. The HIT-6 consists of six items: pain, social functioning, role functioning, vitality, cognitive functioning, and psychological distress. The patient answers each of the six related questions using one of the following five responses: never, rarely, sometimes, very often, or always. These responses are summed to produce a total HIT-6 score that ranges from 36 to 78, where a higher score indicates a greater impact of headache on the daily life of the respondent.

Time frame: Baseline, 1 month

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Targeted Epidural Patching of CSF Leaks With Autologous Blood and Fibrin GlueChange in Median (Headache Impact Test-6) HIT-6 Score From Baseline-12 score on a scale
Simulated Patching ProcedureChange in Median (Headache Impact Test-6) HIT-6 Score From Baseline-7 score on a scale
Secondary

Change in Median EQ-5D (European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions) Score From Baseline

The EQ-5D is a standardized measure of health status that provides a simple, generic measure of health for clinical appraisal. It is well-validated for health status measurement and for quality-of-life in headache. Scores on the EQ-5D were calculated using the United States 3L, time trade off (TTO) valuation technique. Scores range from 0 to 1, with 1 indicating perfect health.

Time frame: Baseline, 2 weeks, 1 month, 4 months

Population: All patients at the 4 month time point in the Simulated Patching Procedure Arm/Group had crossed over to the Targeted Epidural Patching of CSF Leaks With Autologous Blood and Fibrin Glue Arm/Group

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)
Targeted Epidural Patching of CSF Leaks With Autologous Blood and Fibrin GlueChange in Median EQ-5D (European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions) Score From Baseline2 weeks0.1 units on a scale
Targeted Epidural Patching of CSF Leaks With Autologous Blood and Fibrin GlueChange in Median EQ-5D (European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions) Score From Baseline1 month0 units on a scale
Targeted Epidural Patching of CSF Leaks With Autologous Blood and Fibrin GlueChange in Median EQ-5D (European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions) Score From Baseline4 months0 units on a scale
Simulated Patching ProcedureChange in Median EQ-5D (European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions) Score From Baseline2 weeks0.1 units on a scale
Simulated Patching ProcedureChange in Median EQ-5D (European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions) Score From Baseline1 month0.1 units on a scale
Simulated Patching ProcedureChange in Median EQ-5D (European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions) Score From Baseline4 months0.2 units on a scale
Secondary

Change in Median HIT-6 Score From Baseline

Absolute change in median HIT-6 score from pre-procedural baseline to 2 weeks and 4 months post procedure for each group. The HIT-6 consists of six items: pain, social functioning, role functioning, vitality, cognitive functioning, and psychological distress. The patient answers each of the six related questions using one of the following five responses: never, rarely, sometimes, very often, or always. These responses are summed to produce a total HIT-6 score that ranges from 36 to 78, where a higher score indicates a greater impact of headache on the daily life of the respondent.

Time frame: Baseline, 2 weeks, 4 months

Population: All patients at the 4 month time point in the Simulated Patching Procedure Arm/Group had crossed over to the Targeted Epidural Patching of CSF Leaks With Autologous Blood and Fibrin Glue Arm/Group

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)
Targeted Epidural Patching of CSF Leaks With Autologous Blood and Fibrin GlueChange in Median HIT-6 Score From Baseline2 weeks-5.5 units on a scale
Targeted Epidural Patching of CSF Leaks With Autologous Blood and Fibrin GlueChange in Median HIT-6 Score From Baseline4 months-4.5 units on a scale
Simulated Patching ProcedureChange in Median HIT-6 Score From Baseline4 months-12 units on a scale
Simulated Patching ProcedureChange in Median HIT-6 Score From Baseline2 weeks-7 units on a scale
Secondary

Change in Median NRS Score From Baseline

The pain numerical rating scale (NRS) is a well-validated tool for quantitatively assessing patients' pain. The NRS asks patients to rate their current pain intensity on an 11-point scale ranging from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst possible pain). It has been found to be a valid measure of pain intensity with minimum clinically important difference noted to be a change of 2 points. The investigators will use NRS averaged over the past 24 hours for all time points in this trial. The Initiative on Methods, Measurement, and Pain Assessment in Clinical Trials (IMMPACT) consensus statement indicates that an NRS reduction of 30% (or 2 points) is associated with a meaningful or moderately important improvement in pain. Further, IMMPACT also indicates that an NRS reduction of 50% (or 4 points) is associated with a substantial improvement in pain. The investigators will follow their consensus recommendations and explicitly report these two categories of pain relief.

Time frame: Baseline, 2 weeks, 1 month, 4 months

Population: All patients at the 4 month time point in the Simulated Patching Procedure Arm/Group had crossed over to the Targeted Epidural Patching of CSF Leaks With Autologous Blood and Fibrin Glue Arm/Group

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)
Targeted Epidural Patching of CSF Leaks With Autologous Blood and Fibrin GlueChange in Median NRS Score From Baseline2 weeks-0.5 units on a scale
Targeted Epidural Patching of CSF Leaks With Autologous Blood and Fibrin GlueChange in Median NRS Score From Baseline1 month-2.5 units on a scale
Targeted Epidural Patching of CSF Leaks With Autologous Blood and Fibrin GlueChange in Median NRS Score From Baseline4 months-1.5 units on a scale
Simulated Patching ProcedureChange in Median NRS Score From Baseline2 weeks-1 units on a scale
Simulated Patching ProcedureChange in Median NRS Score From Baseline1 month0 units on a scale
Simulated Patching ProcedureChange in Median NRS Score From Baseline4 months-2 units on a scale
Secondary

Change in Median WPAI (Work Productivity and Activity Impairment) Score From Baseline

The WPAI is a validated instrument with good test-retest reliability used extensively in health research that quantifies impairment in daily activities and work productivity. Scores on the WPAI range from 0 - 100% with higher percentages indicating greater impact on work productivity and more severe activity impairment.

Time frame: Baseline, 2 weeks, 1 month, 4 months

Population: Patients were only analyzed with respect to WPAI if they were currently employed at the time of the outcome measure acquisition (for each time point). Thus, there were fewer patients for whom data was recorded than were enrolled in each arm (number analyzed).~All patients at the 4 month time point in the Simulated Patching Procedure Arm/Group had crossed over to the Targeted Epidural Patching of CSF Leaks With Autologous Blood and Fibrin Glue Arm/Group

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)
Targeted Epidural Patching of CSF Leaks With Autologous Blood and Fibrin GlueChange in Median WPAI (Work Productivity and Activity Impairment) Score From Baseline2 weeks1.3 units on a scale
Targeted Epidural Patching of CSF Leaks With Autologous Blood and Fibrin GlueChange in Median WPAI (Work Productivity and Activity Impairment) Score From Baseline1 month-13.8 units on a scale
Targeted Epidural Patching of CSF Leaks With Autologous Blood and Fibrin GlueChange in Median WPAI (Work Productivity and Activity Impairment) Score From Baseline4 months-9 units on a scale
Simulated Patching ProcedureChange in Median WPAI (Work Productivity and Activity Impairment) Score From Baseline2 weeks-0.3 units on a scale
Simulated Patching ProcedureChange in Median WPAI (Work Productivity and Activity Impairment) Score From Baseline1 month-2.3 units on a scale
Simulated Patching ProcedureChange in Median WPAI (Work Productivity and Activity Impairment) Score From Baseline4 months-28.5 units on a scale
Secondary

Change in PGIC (Patient Global Impression of Change) Score From Baseline

PGIC is a validated 7-point Likert-type scale assessing a patient's overall impression of improvement after intervention. Scores range from 1 - 7 (1: no change or worsening of condition; 2: almost the same, hardly any change at all; 3: a little better, but no noticeable change; 4: somewhat better, but the change has not made any real difference; 5: moderately better, and a slight but noticeable change; 6: better and a definite improvement that has made a real and worthwhile difference; 7: a great deal better, and a considerable improvement that has made all the difference) with higher scores indicating greater improvement.

Time frame: Baseline, 2 weeks, 1 month, 4 months

Population: All patients at the 4 month time point in the Simulated Patching Procedure Arm/Group had crossed over to the Targeted Epidural Patching of CSF Leaks With Autologous Blood and Fibrin Glue Arm/Group

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)
Targeted Epidural Patching of CSF Leaks With Autologous Blood and Fibrin GlueChange in PGIC (Patient Global Impression of Change) Score From Baseline4 months4.5 score on a scale
Targeted Epidural Patching of CSF Leaks With Autologous Blood and Fibrin GlueChange in PGIC (Patient Global Impression of Change) Score From Baseline2 weeks3.5 score on a scale
Targeted Epidural Patching of CSF Leaks With Autologous Blood and Fibrin GlueChange in PGIC (Patient Global Impression of Change) Score From Baseline1 month4 score on a scale
Simulated Patching ProcedureChange in PGIC (Patient Global Impression of Change) Score From Baseline2 weeks2 score on a scale
Simulated Patching ProcedureChange in PGIC (Patient Global Impression of Change) Score From Baseline1 month3 score on a scale
Simulated Patching ProcedureChange in PGIC (Patient Global Impression of Change) Score From Baseline4 months6 score on a scale
Secondary

Reduction in Median Migraine Disability Assessment (MIDAS) Score From Baseline

The MIDAS questionnaire assesses headache-related disability. Patients answer five questions, scoring the number of days, in the past 3 months, where their activity was limited due to headache. A higher score indicates greater headache-related disability. This tool has been shown to be internally consistent, highly reliable, valid, and correlates with physicians' clinical judgment. MIDAS Scale Range: 0 - 270

Time frame: Baseline, 2 weeks, 1 month, 4 months

Population: All patients at the 4 month time point in the Simulated Patching Procedure Arm/Group had crossed over to the Targeted Epidural Patching of CSF Leaks With Autologous Blood and Fibrin Glue Arm/Group

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)
Targeted Epidural Patching of CSF Leaks With Autologous Blood and Fibrin GlueReduction in Median Migraine Disability Assessment (MIDAS) Score From Baseline2 weeks-25 units on a scale
Targeted Epidural Patching of CSF Leaks With Autologous Blood and Fibrin GlueReduction in Median Migraine Disability Assessment (MIDAS) Score From Baseline1 month-62.5 units on a scale
Targeted Epidural Patching of CSF Leaks With Autologous Blood and Fibrin GlueReduction in Median Migraine Disability Assessment (MIDAS) Score From Baseline4 months-87 units on a scale
Simulated Patching ProcedureReduction in Median Migraine Disability Assessment (MIDAS) Score From Baseline2 weeks16 units on a scale
Simulated Patching ProcedureReduction in Median Migraine Disability Assessment (MIDAS) Score From Baseline1 month-40 units on a scale
Simulated Patching ProcedureReduction in Median Migraine Disability Assessment (MIDAS) Score From Baseline4 months-53 units on a scale

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026