Skip to content

Establish Implant Accuracy With X-PSI Knee System

Establish Implant Accuracy With X-PSI Knee System - A Multi-center, Prospective, Non-controlled Post Market Study

Status
Terminated
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03275246
Acronym
X-PSI
Enrollment
8
Registered
2017-09-07
Start date
2018-10-05
Completion date
2020-11-17
Last updated
2021-10-06

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Knee Osteoarthritis, Post-traumatic Osteoarthritis

Keywords

Primary total knee replacement

Brief summary

The goal of this study is to establish the accuracy of the new X-PSI Knee System guides by analyzing early postoperative (4-6 weeks) imaging data with regards to the mechanical alignment and compare them with preoperative planning imaging data. Mechanical alignment in the hip-knee-ankle (HKA) frontal plane with X-PSI Knee System will be measured and compared with results reported in the literature using a conventional (non-guided) approach. Hypothesis: The use of the new X-PSI Knee System achieves the same accuracy with respect to mechanical alignment as with conventional instrumentation.

Detailed description

Patient-specific instruments (PSI) provide surgeons with an anatomically personalized surgery tool. The newly developed and CE-marked X-PSI Knee System is based on long leg x-rays that are used to generate a pre-operative 3D model of the knee. The total knee replacement surgery will be planned according to this 3D model. The aim of this multi-center, prospective, non-controlled post-market study is to scientifically document the accuracy, cost-effectiveness and subsequent clinical performance of the X-PSI Knee System. The X-PSI pin guides are designed to facilitate a more simplified, efficient and customized TKA procedure compared to conventional, non-guided instrumentation. To evaluate the accuracy of the X-PSI Knee System, early postoperative (4-6 weeks) imaging data will be analysed with regards to the mechanical alignment (hip-knee-ankle angle) of the leg and matched to preoperative planning imaging data. The X-PSI Knee System cohort will then be compared with current literature (70% of cases within ±3 degrees) where patients were conventionally operated with non-guided surgery. No control group will be studied. The cost-effectiveness of the X-PSI Knee System will be evaluated with an efficiency matrix to record OR set-up time, surgery time and post-processing time. Clinical outcome data of the patients will be evaluated 4-6 weeks and 1 year post-surgery with the help of patient questionnaires (VAS pain scale, EQ-5D and Oxford Knee Score), a physical exam and the assessment of radiographs. The study population will be compromised of males and females requiring total knee arthroplasty and satisfy the inclusion/exclusion criteria. The study will last one (1) year from the time of surgery. The collected data aim to improve the treatment and quality of life of patients suffering from degenerative joint diseases. In addition, shorter surgery times possibly result in reduced risk of infection, decreased time of anaesthesia and better cost-effectiveness.

Interventions

DEVICEX-PSI Knee System

Patients are operated with X-PSI Knee System guides

Sponsors

Zimmer, GmbH
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patient is 18 years of age or older. * Patient can follow the X-PSI Knee System imaging protocol as part of standard of care procedures. * Patient gets TKA treatment which follows the criteria of the appropriate Instruction for Use. * Patient is willing and able to cooperate in the required postoperative standard of care. * Patient is willing and able to complete scheduled follow-up evaluations as described in the Informed Consent. * Patient has participated in the study-related Informed Consent process and has signed the Ethics Committee approved Informed Consent

Exclusion criteria

* Patient is unwilling or unable to give consent or to comply with the follow-up program. * Patient meets

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Mechanical Leg Alignment4-6 weeks post-surgeryAchievement of mechanical leg alignment in HKA frontal plane (± 3 degrees) with X-PSI Knee System is as accurate as with standard instrumentation at 4-6 weeks post operation. The X-PSI Knee System cohort will be compared with current literature (70% of cases within ± 3 degrees). No control group will be studied.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Cost-effectiveness of the X-PSI Knee System Using an Efficiency MatrixDuring surgery, immediate pre- and post-surgery processing timeThe cost-effectiveness of the X-PSI Knee System will be measured using an efficiency matrix where OR set-up time, surgery time and tray sterilization times will be collected and compared to conventional TKA procedures.

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
Patient Clinical Outcome Measure: Visual Analog Score PainBaseline, 4-6 weeks and 1 year post-surgeryObtain clincal outcome data on patients treated using the X-PSI Knee System in primary TKA procedures. The pain level will be measured using a 10 cm long scale indicating no pain (0) and worst imaginable pain (10).
Patient Clinical Outcome Measure: Oxford Knee ScoreBaseline, 4-6 weeks and 1 year post-surgeryThe Oxford Knee Score (OKS) is a 12-item patient-reported patient reported outcome specifically designed and developed to assess function and pain after total knee replacement (TKR) surgery (arthroplasty). The OKS provides a single summed score which reflects the severity of problems that the respondent has with their knee. Each question (item) is scored from 0 to 4 with 0 being the worst outcome and 4 being the best outcome. The scores are then summed to produce an overall score running from 0 (worst possible) to 48 (best outcome).
Patient Clinical Outcome Measure: EQ-5D Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)Baseline, 4-6 weeks and 1 year post-surgeryObtain clincal outcome data on patients treated using the X-PSI Knee System in primary TKA procedures. The EQ-5D VAS is a score to measure general quality of life. The general health state will be assessed on a patient self-reported Visual Analog Scale (VAS) where the endpoints are labelled 0 (worst imaginable health state) to 100 (best imaginable health state). The VAS is used as a quantitative measure of health outcome that reflects the patient's own judgement.
Patient Clinical Outcome Measure: EQ-5D-3L Descriptive SystemBaseline, 4-6 weeks and 1 year post-surgeryThe EQ-5D-3L descriptive system comprises the following five dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression. Each dimension has 3 levels: no problems, some problems, and extreme problems.

Countries

Germany, Netherlands, United Kingdom

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Total Knee Arthroplasty
Patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty X-PSI Knee System: Patients are operated with X-PSI Knee System guides
3
Total3

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000
Overall StudyProtocol Violation5
Overall StudyThe study was stopped before the patient reached the final 1 year follow-up1

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicTotal Knee Arthroplasty
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
1 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
2 Participants
Race and Ethnicity Not Collected— Participants
Region of Enrollment
Germany
3 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
0 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
3 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 3
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 3
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 3

Outcome results

Primary

Mechanical Leg Alignment

Achievement of mechanical leg alignment in HKA frontal plane (± 3 degrees) with X-PSI Knee System is as accurate as with standard instrumentation at 4-6 weeks post operation. The X-PSI Knee System cohort will be compared with current literature (70% of cases within ± 3 degrees). No control group will be studied.

Time frame: 4-6 weeks post-surgery

Population: Mechanical alignment data were not collected from any participant.

Secondary

Cost-effectiveness of the X-PSI Knee System Using an Efficiency Matrix

The cost-effectiveness of the X-PSI Knee System will be measured using an efficiency matrix where OR set-up time, surgery time and tray sterilization times will be collected and compared to conventional TKA procedures.

Time frame: During surgery, immediate pre- and post-surgery processing time

Population: No data on cost-effectiveness and efficiency were collected from any participant.

Other Pre-specified

Patient Clinical Outcome Measure: EQ-5D-3L Descriptive System

The EQ-5D-3L descriptive system comprises the following five dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression. Each dimension has 3 levels: no problems, some problems, and extreme problems.

Time frame: Baseline, 4-6 weeks and 1 year post-surgery

Population: Data should be interpreted with caution, as too few participants were followed to assess endpoints (N=3 for baseline and 4-6 weeks; N=2 for 1 year)

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Total Knee ArthroplastyPatient Clinical Outcome Measure: EQ-5D-3L Descriptive System1 year post-OP patients reprting any problem (i.e some problems/ extreme problems) : Mobility0 participants
Total Knee ArthroplastyPatient Clinical Outcome Measure: EQ-5D-3L Descriptive SystemBaseline - patients reprting any problem (i.e some problems/ extreme problems) : Mobility2 participants
Total Knee ArthroplastyPatient Clinical Outcome Measure: EQ-5D-3L Descriptive SystemBaseline - patients reprting any problem (i.e some problems/ extreme problems) : Self-Care1 participants
Total Knee ArthroplastyPatient Clinical Outcome Measure: EQ-5D-3L Descriptive SystemBaseline - patients reprting any problem (i.e some problems/ extreme problems) : Usual Activities2 participants
Total Knee ArthroplastyPatient Clinical Outcome Measure: EQ-5D-3L Descriptive SystemBaseline - patients reprting any problem (i.e some problems/ extreme problems) : Pain/Discomfort3 participants
Total Knee ArthroplastyPatient Clinical Outcome Measure: EQ-5D-3L Descriptive SystemBaseline - patients reprting any problem (i.e some problems/ extreme problems) : Anxiety1 participants
Total Knee ArthroplastyPatient Clinical Outcome Measure: EQ-5D-3L Descriptive System4- weeks post-surgery patients reprting any problem (i.e some problems/ extreme problems) : Mobility2 participants
Total Knee ArthroplastyPatient Clinical Outcome Measure: EQ-5D-3L Descriptive System4- wks post-OP patients reprting any problem (i.e some problems/ extreme problems) : Self-Care0 participants
Total Knee ArthroplastyPatient Clinical Outcome Measure: EQ-5D-3L Descriptive System4- wks post-OP patients reprting any problem (i.e some problems/ extreme problems): Usual Activities2 participants
Total Knee ArthroplastyPatient Clinical Outcome Measure: EQ-5D-3L Descriptive System4- wks post-OP patients reprting any problem (i.e some problems/ extreme problems) : Pain/Discomfort3 participants
Total Knee ArthroplastyPatient Clinical Outcome Measure: EQ-5D-3L Descriptive System4- wks post-OP patients reprting any problem (i.e some problems/ extreme problems) : Anxiety2 participants
Total Knee ArthroplastyPatient Clinical Outcome Measure: EQ-5D-3L Descriptive System1 year post-surgery patients reprting any problem (i.e some problems/ extreme problems) : Self-Care0 participants
Total Knee ArthroplastyPatient Clinical Outcome Measure: EQ-5D-3L Descriptive System1 year post-OP patients reprting any problem (i.e some problems/ extreme problems): Usual Activities0 participants
Total Knee ArthroplastyPatient Clinical Outcome Measure: EQ-5D-3L Descriptive System1 year post-OP patients reprting any problem (i.e some problems/ extreme problems) : Pain/Discomfort1 participants
Total Knee ArthroplastyPatient Clinical Outcome Measure: EQ-5D-3L Descriptive System1 year post-OP patients reprting any problem (i.e some problems/ extreme problems) : Anxiety0 participants
Other Pre-specified

Patient Clinical Outcome Measure: EQ-5D Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)

Obtain clincal outcome data on patients treated using the X-PSI Knee System in primary TKA procedures. The EQ-5D VAS is a score to measure general quality of life. The general health state will be assessed on a patient self-reported Visual Analog Scale (VAS) where the endpoints are labelled 0 (worst imaginable health state) to 100 (best imaginable health state). The VAS is used as a quantitative measure of health outcome that reflects the patient's own judgement.

Time frame: Baseline, 4-6 weeks and 1 year post-surgery

Population: Data should be interpreted with caution, as too few participants were followed to assess endpoints (N=3 for baseline and 4-6 weeks; N=2 for 1 year)

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Total Knee ArthroplastyPatient Clinical Outcome Measure: EQ-5D Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)Baseline73.3 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 24.9
Total Knee ArthroplastyPatient Clinical Outcome Measure: EQ-5D Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)4-6 weeks post-surgery63.3 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 12.5
Total Knee ArthroplastyPatient Clinical Outcome Measure: EQ-5D Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)1 year post-surgery91.5 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.5
Other Pre-specified

Patient Clinical Outcome Measure: Oxford Knee Score

The Oxford Knee Score (OKS) is a 12-item patient-reported patient reported outcome specifically designed and developed to assess function and pain after total knee replacement (TKR) surgery (arthroplasty). The OKS provides a single summed score which reflects the severity of problems that the respondent has with their knee. Each question (item) is scored from 0 to 4 with 0 being the worst outcome and 4 being the best outcome. The scores are then summed to produce an overall score running from 0 (worst possible) to 48 (best outcome).

Time frame: Baseline, 4-6 weeks and 1 year post-surgery

Population: Data should be interpreted with caution, as too few participants were followed to assess endpoints (N=3 for baseline and 4-6 weeks; N=2 for 1 year)

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Total Knee ArthroplastyPatient Clinical Outcome Measure: Oxford Knee ScoreBaseline18.3 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.6
Total Knee ArthroplastyPatient Clinical Outcome Measure: Oxford Knee Score4-6 weeks post-surgery30.3 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.3
Total Knee ArthroplastyPatient Clinical Outcome Measure: Oxford Knee Score1 year post-surgery45.0 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2
Other Pre-specified

Patient Clinical Outcome Measure: Visual Analog Score Pain

Obtain clincal outcome data on patients treated using the X-PSI Knee System in primary TKA procedures. The pain level will be measured using a 10 cm long scale indicating no pain (0) and worst imaginable pain (10).

Time frame: Baseline, 4-6 weeks and 1 year post-surgery

Population: Data should be interpreted with caution, as too few participants were followed to assess endpoints (N=3 for baseline and 4-6 weeks; N=2 for 1 year)

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Total Knee ArthroplastyPatient Clinical Outcome Measure: Visual Analog Score Pain4-6 weeks post-surgery3.7 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.4
Total Knee ArthroplastyPatient Clinical Outcome Measure: Visual Analog Score PainBaseline8.2 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.9
Total Knee ArthroplastyPatient Clinical Outcome Measure: Visual Analog Score Pain1 year post-surgery1.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.4

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026