Skip to content

Expanded Hemodialysis Versus Online Hemodiafiltration

Expanded Hemodialysis Versus Online Hemodiafiltration: a Pilot Study on Intradialytic Hemodynamics and Fluid Status

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03274518
Enrollment
16
Registered
2017-09-07
Start date
2017-11-13
Completion date
2019-03-11
Last updated
2019-09-30

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Dialysis Hypotension, Dialysis Related Complication, Hemodialysis-Induced Symptom

Keywords

Hemodialysis, Hemodiafiltration, fluid status, hemodynamics

Brief summary

Conventional hemodialysis (HD) is essential for the treatment of end-stage renal disease (ESRD) patients, by reducing serum concentration of uremic toxins and correcting fluid overload. Nevertheless, HD removes almost exclusively low-range uremic toxins. Therefore, medium-range molecules, such as beta-2-microglobulin might accumulate in tissues, leading to many clinical complications, such as neuropathies, tendinopathies, anemia, bone mineral disease and reduced growth in children. Convective methods might reduce incidence of these complications, by removing molecules of medium-range molecular weight. Online hemodiafiltration (olHDF) is the most extensively used method in this regard. Nevertheless, there are some barriers to the wider introduction of this method in clinical practice, since specific machines are needed for this procedure, the costs with dialysis lines are higher and water consumption increases. More recently, the development of new membranes for hemodialysis allowed removal of medium- and high-range uremic toxins, with albumin retention. Thus, they allow removal of a broad range of uremic toxins, without changing dialysis machine or increasing water consumption. Such therapy is known as expanded hemodialysis (HDx). The aim of this present study is to compare the extraction of middle-size molecules, the hemodynamic behavior, fluid and nutritional status of patients submitted to olHDF or HDx, in a crossover study.

Detailed description

Hypothesis Our hypothesis is that HDx is noninferior to olHDF in the following parameters: * Hemodynamic stability * Nutritional and fluid status * Removal of beta-2 microglobulin Objectives To evaluate each patient, through a prospective, randomized and cross-over study, the intradialytic hemodynamic behavior, fluid and nutritional status assessed by electrical bioimpedance and B2M removal in two dialytic modalities: HDFol versus HDx. Concise methods 1. Clinical and laboratorial data Clinical data will be collected from the institution's chart, recorded and filled with all necessary precautions to keep confidentiality of patient's information. They are: baseline renal disease, age, history of smoking, sedentary lifestyle, presence of comorbidities such as hypertension and diabetes mellitus, family history of cardiovascular disease, history of coronary and cerebrovascular disease and medications. Laboratory tests used to determine the biochemical, hematological and bone mineral profile characteristics will be obtained from routinely collected exams. Such exams are processed by the Central Laboratory of Hospital das Clínicas / FMUSP. 2. Dialysis All dialysis procedures will be performed by the Dialog+ Admea™ machine (BBraun Melsungen AG, Germany). The olHDF will be prescribed as follows: blood flow 350 - 400 ml/min, dialysate flow 800 ml/min, post-dilution flow (90-100 ml/min), with high-flux Xevonta™ (BBraun Melsungen AG, Germany) or CAHP/DICE™ (Baxter Healthcare Corporation, Germany) dialyzers, with surface area of 1.7-2.4 m². The duration of each session will be from 3,5h to 4h, depending on current dialysis prescription. Total substitution volume will be higher than 20 L per session. HDx will follow the same prescription of olHDF, regarding blood and dialysate flows and dialysis duration. There will be no substitution volume. Theranova™ dialyzers (Baxter Healthcare Corporation, Germany) will be used for each session. Before initiating protocol and during the washout period, patients will be submitted to high-flux HD, which is the standard treatment in our service. 3. Hemodynamic monitoring Cardiac output index (CI), stroke volume (SV - integrated mean of the flow waveform between the current upstroke and the dichotic notch), peripheral arterial resistance (PAR - ratio of mean arterial pressure to stroke volume multiplied by heart rate) and blood pressure (BP) will be accessed by finger beat to-beat monitor Finometer™ (Finapress Medical Systems BV, Arnhem, The Netherlands), within 15 minutes after starting olHDF or HDx sessions (predialysis) and again, 15 minutes before its end (post-dialysis). 4. Bioelectrical impedance Segmental tetrapolar bioelectrical impedance (BIS) will be performed in all patients while recumbent, before starting study protocol and before each phase of the study (HDx or olHDF), by the multifrequency InBody™ S10 (Biospace Co., Ltd., Korea) device. It allows assessment of the following parameters regarding body fluids: total body water, total extracellular body water, lower limbs total water content, lower limbs extracellular water content. Additionally, α-angle, which is a marker of cellular integrity and nutritional status, will be noted. 5. Blood and Effluent samples Blood samples will be collected pre-session, mid-session and post-dialysis sessions, both in the first and last dialysis sessions of each of the periods studied (HDFol or HDx). Pre-session blood samples will be collected immediately after arteriovenous fistula puncture and the middle and post-session samples will be collected from the arterial line, 2 minutes after reduction of blood flow to 50 ml/min and suspension of dialysate flow and/ or replacement. In addition, partial and homogeneous collection of the effluent will be performed by a drainage hose, with an infusion pump operating continuously at a rate of 1l/h. The whole effluent of dialysis session will be collected.

Interventions

Intervention: Conversion from conventional HD to expanded hemodialysis por 1 month. High cutoff with high retention onset dialyzers allow clearance of middle molecules, without reducing significantly serum concentration of albumin. It allows higher convective clearance in comparison to conventional hemodialysis, but it is unknown if such clearance is similar to online hemodiafiltration. Therefore, the aim of the present intervention is to compare this dialyzer with online hemodiafiltration

Intervention: Conversion from conventional HD to online Hemodiafiltration por 1 month. Online hemodiafiltration has been associated with lower incidence of intradialytic hypotension in comparison to conventional hemodialysis.

Sponsors

University of Sao Paulo
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Investigator)

Masking description

Investigator who collects laboratorial, hemodynamics and bioimpedance data will be blinded for intervention (online hemodiafiltration or expanded hemodialysis)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Adult patients who are on maintenance hemodialysis at Hospital das Clínicas and agree to participate in the study by signing the informed consent form.

Exclusion criteria

* Patients who cannot understand or who refuse to sign the informed consent form; Patients who are currently on daily hemodialysis or online hemodiafiltration.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Medium Molecule ClearanceOne month after starting protocolBeta-2-Microglobulin clearance
Medium Molecule RemovalOne month after starting protocolBeta-2-Microglobulin extraction

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Intradialytic HemodynamicsCardiac output (liters per minute) one month after starting protocolnoninvasive cardiac output assessment

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
Fluid StatusOne month after starting protocolnoninvasive assessment of extracellular and total body water

Countries

Brazil

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Online Hemodiafiltration
Patients were included in this study group per sequence: Online hemodiafiltration (olHDF) first for 1 month, then expanded hemodialysis (HDx) for 1 month. Baseline characteristics assessed: * Age * Gender * Ethnicity * Region of Enrollment * Serum Beta-2 Microglobulin
8
Expanded Hemodialysis
Patients were included in this study group per sequence: Expanded hemodialysis (HDx) first for 1 month, then online hemodiafiltration (olHDF) for 1 month. Baseline characteristics assessed: * Age * Gender * Ethnicity * Region of Enrollment * Serum Beta-2 Microglobulin
8
Total16

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicOnline HemodiafiltrationExpanded HemodialysisTotal
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
1 Participants0 Participants1 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
7 Participants8 Participants15 Participants
Age, Continuous39.5 years46 years39.5 years
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
8 Participants7 Participants15 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
0 Participants1 Participants1 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Brazil
8 participants8 participants16 participants
Serum Beta-2 Microglobulin23.2 mcg/ml
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.9
27.8 mcg/ml
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.5
25.2 mcg/ml
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.1
Sex: Female, Male
Female
3 Participants2 Participants5 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
5 Participants6 Participants11 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 80 / 8
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 80 / 8
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 80 / 8

Outcome results

Primary

Medium Molecule Clearance

Beta-2-Microglobulin clearance

Time frame: One month after starting protocol

Population: Beta-2 Microglobulin clearance (ml/min)

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Online HemodiafiltrationMedium Molecule Clearance53 ml/min
Expanded HemodialysisMedium Molecule Clearance59.5 ml/min
p-value: 0.4534t-test, 2 sided
Primary

Medium Molecule Removal

Beta-2-Microglobulin extraction

Time frame: One month after starting protocol

Population: Beta-2-microglobulin mass extraction (mg)

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Online HemodiafiltrationMedium Molecule Removal198 mgStandard Deviation 81
Expanded HemodialysisMedium Molecule Removal239 mgStandard Deviation 86
p-value: 0.1179t-test, 2 sided
Secondary

Intradialytic Hemodynamics

noninvasive cardiac output assessment

Time frame: Cardiac output (liters per minute) one month after starting protocol

Population: Intradialytic cardiac output variation (post-pre dialysis), l/min

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Online HemodiafiltrationIntradialytic Hemodynamics-1.3 l/min
Expanded HemodialysisIntradialytic Hemodynamics-1.4 l/min
p-value: 0.3054t-test, 2 sided
Other Pre-specified

Fluid Status

noninvasive assessment of extracellular and total body water

Time frame: One month after starting protocol

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Online HemodiafiltrationFluid Status0.39 liter/literStandard Deviation 0.01
Expanded HemodialysisFluid Status0.385 liter/literStandard Deviation 0.01
p-value: 0.045t-test, 2 sided

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026