Skip to content

Efficacy and Tolerance Evaluation of an Anti-age Food Supplement

Efficacy and Tolerance Evaluation of an Anti-age Food Supplement: a Randomized, Controlled Clinical Study Versus Untreated Group

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03274154
Enrollment
66
Registered
2017-09-06
Start date
2016-10-11
Completion date
2017-03-22
Last updated
2017-09-06

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Moderate-severe Skin Aging/Photoaging

Brief summary

Efficacy and Tolerance Evaluation of an Anti-age Food Supplement: a Randomized, Controlled Clinical Study Versus Untreated Group

Detailed description

Aim of the study was to evaluate the anti-age activity of Pre-Hyaluron 465 Innēov a food supplement, composed with a precursor of HA (glucosamine) and an enzymatic co-factor of HA synthesis (manganese), taken for 4 consecutive months by female subjects aged 35-60 years (with preference for subjects over 45 years), with moderate-severe skin aging/photoaging according to a reference photographic scale. The study foresaw the evaluation of the study product activity versus a control group, untreated.

Interventions

DIETARY_SUPPLEMENTPre-Hyaluron 465 Innēov

Food supplement consisting og a tablet and a capsule, composed with a precursor of HA (glucosamine) and an enzymatic co-factor of HA synthesis (manganese)

Sponsors

Derming SRL
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
35 Years to 60 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* female sex, * age 35-60 years (with preference for subjects over 45 years), * body mass index (BMI) 18-27, * caucasian healthy subjects with moderate-severe cutaneous aging/photoaging (score \> 3 of the reference photographic scale in appendix 8), * agreeing to present at each study visit without make-up, * accepting to follow the instructions received by the investigator, * accepting to not change their habits regarding food, physical activity, make-up use, face cosmetic and cleansing products, * agreeing not to apply any topical or take any oral product or nutritional supplementation (vitamins and minerals) other than the investigational products, or use face massages or other means known to improve skin wrinkles or skin qualities during the entire duration of the study, * accepting not to expose their face to strong UV irradiation (UV session, or sun bathes), during the entire duration of the study, * no participation in a similar study actually or during the previous 3 months * accepting to sign the Informed consent form.

Exclusion criteria

* Pregnancy, * lactation, * subjects not in menopause who do not use adequate contraceptive precautions in order to avoid pregnancies during the study, * subjects not in menopause who do not accept to perform the pregnancy test at T0, T1, T2 and T3, * sensitivity to the test product or its ingredients (to be assessed by the investigator during the baseline visit); * subjects whose insufficient adhesion to the study protocol is foreseeable. 4.4.2. Dependent on a clinical condition 4.4.2.1. Dermatological disease, * Presence of cutaneous disease on the tested area as lesions, scars, malformations, * recurrent facial/labial herpes, * clinical and significant skin condition on the test area (e.g. active eczema, dermatitis, psoriasis etc.). * Endocrine disease, * hepatic disorder, * renal disorder, * cardiac disorder, * pulmonary disease, * cancer, * neurological or psychological disease, * inflammatory/immunosuppressive disease, * drug allergy. * Anti-inflammatory drugs, anti-histaminic, topic (application on the face) and systemic corticosteroids, narcotic, antidepressant, immunosuppressive drugs (with the except of hormonal treatment starting more than 1 year ago), * assumption of drugs or dietary supplements able to influence the test results in the investigator opinion.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Crow's feet visual score variationBasal visit (T0), 1 month (T1), 2 months (T2), 3 months (T3), 4 months (T4), 5 months (T5)Wrinkles grade was determined according to l'Oreal clinical standardized photographic scales
Nasolabial folds visual score variationBasal visit (T0), 1 month (T1), 2 months (T2), 3 months (T3), 4 months (T4), 5 months (T5)Wrinkles grade was determined according to l'Oreal clinical standardized photographic scales
Surface microrelief regularity evaluationBasal visit (T0), 1 month (T1), 2 months (T2), 3 months (T3), 4 months (T4), 5 months (T5)Regularity grade was evaluated according to this score: 1. = very regular 2. = regular 3. = irregular 4. = very irregular
Skin resistance to pinching clinical score variationBasal visit (T0), 1 month (T1), 2 months (T2), 3 months (T3), 4 months (T4), 5 months (T5)The evaluation was performed at level of cheek (malar region) according to the following score: 0 = very important 1. = important 2. = moderate 3. = weak 4. = very weak
Skin resistance to traction clinical score variationBasal visit (T0), 1 month (T1), 2 months (T2), 3 months (T3), 4 months (T4), 5 months (T5)The evaluation was performed at level of cheek (malar region) according to the following score: 0 = very important 1. = important 2. = moderate 3. = weak 4. = very weak
Skin recovery after pinching clinical score variationBasal visit (T0), 1 month (T1), 2 months (T2), 3 months (T3), 4 months (T4), 5 months (T5)The evaluation was performed at level of cheek (malar region) according to the following score: 0 = very important 1. = important 2. = moderate 3. = weak 4. = very weak
Skin dryness clinical score variationBasal visit (T0), 1 month (T1), 2 months (T2), 3 months (T3), 4 months (T4), 5 months (T5)Clinical evaluation of skin dryness was performed according to the following score: 0 = very hydrated skin 1. = hydrated skin 2. = normal skin 3. = kindly dry skin 4. = dry skin 5. = very dry skin
Vascular homogeneity clinical score variationBasal visit (T0), 1 month (T1), 2 months (T2), 3 months (T3), 4 months (T4), 5 months (T5)Homogeneity grade was determined according to specific reference clinical and photographic scales and to the following clinical score: 0 = very homogeneous 1. = homogeneous 2. = quite not homogeneous 3. = not homogeneous 4. = very not homogeneous 5. = marked not homogeneous
Pigmentary homogeneity clinical score variationBasal visit (T0), 1 month (T1), 2 months (T2), 3 months (T3), 4 months (T4), 5 months (T5)Homogeneity grade was determined according to specific reference clinical and photographic scales and to the following clinical score: 0 = very homogeneous 1. = homogeneous 2. = quite not homogeneous 3. = not homogeneous 4. = very not homogeneous 5. = marked not homogeneous
Skin radiance clinical score variationBasal visit (T0), 1 month (T1), 2 months (T2), 3 months (T3), 4 months (T4), 5 months (T5)Skin radiance was evaluated using a 10 points scale from very poor to good
Skin plumpness clinical score variationBasal visit (T0), 1 month (T1), 2 months (T2), 3 months (T3), 4 months (T4), 5 months (T5)Skin plumpness was evaluated using a 10 points scale from very poor to good

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Superficial skin hydrationBasal visit (T0), 1 month (T1), 2 months (T2), 3 months (T3), 4 months (T4), 5 months (T5)Skin electrical capacitance value measured with Corneometer CM825 (Courage - Khazaka, Köln, Germany). The measure of the skin capacitance properties is an indirect expression of its hydration level.
Deep skin hydrationBasal visit (T0), 1 month (T1), 2 months (T2), 3 months (T3), 4 months (T4), 5 months (T5)Tissue dielectric constant value of superficial and deep skin layers measured with MoistureMeterD (Delfin Technologies, Kuopio - Finland)
Determination of roughness profilometric parametersBasal visit (T0), 1 month (T1), 2 months (T2), 3 months (T3), 4 months (T4), 5 months (T5)Nasolabial folds profilometric parameters measured by Primos compact portable device (GFMesstechnik). Ra is average roughness of the analysed profile, Rt is wrinkles total high, Rv is wrinkles maximum depth.
Tolerance evaluationBasal visit (T0), 1 month (T1), 2 months (T2), 3 months (T3), 4 months (T4), 5 months (T5)The food supplement tolerance will be evaluated considering: any adverse event related to the study treatment, which occurred during the study; any judgement reported by the volunteers.

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026