Skip to content

The Effect of a Single Spinal Manipulation on Cardiovascular Autonomic Activity

The Effect of a Single Spinal Manipulation on Cardiovascular Autonomic Activity in Healthy Subjects: a Randomized, Cross-over, Sham-controlled Trial

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03273868
Enrollment
51
Registered
2017-09-06
Start date
2017-09-11
Completion date
2018-10-30
Last updated
2019-03-05

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Manipulation, Spinal

Brief summary

This study evaluates the effect of a single high-velocity low-amplitude spinal manipulation on both cardiovascular autonomic activity and pressure pain thresholds. It is a cross-over study, thus each participant will undergo both interventions (spinal manipulation and sham manipulation). Both interventions will be separated by a 48 h wash-out period.

Detailed description

Several systematic reviews have shown that spinal manipulations may have an immediate effect on autonomic nervous system activity (e.g. increase in skin sympathetic nerve activity) and on sensitivity to experimentally-induced pain (e.g. increase in pressure pain threshold). It is generally unknown i) if these supposed effects last after the immediate post intervention period and ii) if there is a statistical relationship between them, considering that pain and autonomic networks are closely connected and interact at the peripheral, spinal and supra-spinal levels. The primary aim of the study is to assess every single effect immediatly and at short-term after the intervention. The secondary aim is to assess the bivariate statistical relationship between cardiovascular autonomic activity and sensitivity to experimentally-induced pain after the intervention. Cardiovascular autonomic nervous system activity is assessed with both heart rate and systolic blood variabilities Sensitivity to experimentally-induced pain is measured using pressure pain threshold.

Interventions

OTHERHigh velocity low amplitude manipulation

The researcher manually applies a preload force on the T5/T6 level followed by a single posterior to anterior thrust.

OTHERSham manipulation

The researcher manually applies a preload force on the right scapula followed by a single lateral thrust.

Sponsors

French chiropractic research fund
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
Institut Franco Europeen de Chiropratique
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Primary purpose
BASIC_SCIENCE
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 40 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* First-year chiropractic student at IFEC * Volunteer * Healthy (no pain, no disease)

Exclusion criteria

* Counter indications to spinal manipulation * Drugs intakes (pain killers or beta-blockers) * Food, Caffeine and tobacco intakes during the previous hour * Alcohol intake and performance of strenuous physical activity the day of the experimentation

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Heart rate variability (HRV)Baseline, + 5 minutes, + 15 minutes, + 30 minutesFrequency and Time-domain analyses of HRV from 5-minutes ECG recording
Local (T5) and distal (L4) Pressure pain thresholds (PPT)Baseline, immediatly after intervention, + 12 minutes, + 25 minutes, + 35 minutesThe mean of 3 successives PPT in kilopascal

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Systolic blood pressure variabilityBaseline, + 5 minutes, + 15 minutes, + 30 minutesFrequency analysis in the low frequency band of systolic blood pressure variability from 5-minutes recording

Countries

France

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 19, 2026