Skip to content

Evaluation of the Benefit Provided by Sessions of Sophrology on the Per Operative Management of Parkinsonian Patients Planned for a Deep Brain Stimulation Surgery.

Evaluation of the Benefit Provided by Sessions of Sophrology on the Intraoperative Management of Parkinsonian Patients in the Context of Deep Brain Stimulation Surgery.

Status
Terminated
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03273816
Acronym
SOPHROSTIM
Enrollment
24
Registered
2017-09-06
Start date
2017-12-14
Completion date
2022-03-01
Last updated
2023-02-21

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Deep Brain Stimulation, Parkinson Disease

Brief summary

Deep brain stimulation surgery, which consists of intracerebral implantation of electrodes, is considered one of the most effective techniques for controlling the motor fluctuations of Parkinson's disease. The particularity of this surgery is the necessity of the awakening of the patient for the correct positioning of the electrodes, it is therefore a difficult test for the patient. Medical sophrology is an ideal strategy to optimize the comfort of the patient during the operation thanks to its anxiolytic and analgesic virtues while guaranteeing the maintenance of a good patient vigilance favoring the cooperation with the operating room team. Indeed, sophrology is a body-mediated set of techniques, at the crossroads between hypnosis and yoga, which makes it possible to find a balance between emotions, thoughts and behaviors. It has already been applied in other fields such as oncology, pain management, preparation for childbirth, and for 5 years at the CHU of Rennes for preparation for the intervention of deep brain stimulation.

Interventions

BEHAVIORALsessions of sophrology

10 sessions of sophrology in preparation for the intervention 5 weeks before this one.

Sponsors

Rennes University Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Masking description

The primary endpoint is taken by a nurse who does not know the randomization arm.

Intervention model description

Randomized, controlled, bi-centric (national), superiority, open-label, blind-blind (evaluator) trial comparing sophrology to routine care in preparation for deep brain stimulation. The distribution of patients will be balanced between the two groups.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Adult patient (age greater than or equal to 18 years) * Patient with idiopathic Parkinson's disease with programmed deep brain stimulation (VIM target, NST, single or bilateral GPI); * Planned intervention in an awake patient (implying MOCA\> 21 (Montreal Cognitive Assessment)); * Patient understanding the course of the study; * Patient who has given informed consent in writing; * Patient benefiting from a system of social insurance.

Exclusion criteria

* \- Intervention under general anesthesia; * Pregnant or nursing women; * Major person under protective measures (safeguard of justice, curatorship and guardianship); * Person deprived of liberty. * Patient having already had a practice in yoga, sophrology, hypnotherapy superior or equal to 5 sessions

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Patient anxietyat one hour after the beginning of the interventionpatient anxiety evaluated by the STAI-YA (State Trait Anxiety Inventory), retranscribed by a caregiver of the block, the patient being unable in practice to fill in a questionnaire at that time

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Evaluation of the anxietyAt one hour before the procedureEvaluation of the anxiety measured by the STAI YA
Interaction between the patient and the surgical team during the procedureAt Day 0interaction is judged by a visual analogue scale to be completed by the neurologist and the neurosurgeon
The duration of the intervention in minutesintraoperativeThe duration of the intervention in minutes
Heart rateAt one hour after the beginning of the interventionHeart rate in beat per minute
Per operative painintraoperative (at the beginning of the intervention)Per operative pain judged by a visual scale analogous
Experience of the surgical interventionAt 24 hours after surgeryexperience of the surgical intervention by the patient evaluated on a visual analog scale
Experience of the perioperative period by the patientone week after surgeryQualitative analysis
Occurrence adverse eventThrough study completion (Day 0 to Week 1)Occurrence of hematoma
Inter-group comparison of the evolution of anxietybetween the inclusion (Month -3) and the beginning of the intervention (Hour O)Inter-group comparison of the evolution of anxiety by the STAI-YA
Blood pressureAt one hour after the beginning of the interventionBlood pressure in mmHg

Countries

France

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026