Skip to content

Skin Incision Skewness at Cesarean Section

Comparison of Skin Incision Skewness With or Without Previous Measurement and Drawing of the Incision Line at Cesarean Section - a Randomized Controlled Trial

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03273777
Enrollment
86
Registered
2017-09-06
Start date
2018-07-01
Completion date
2021-06-30
Last updated
2021-02-23

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Cesarean Section

Keywords

Cesarean section, Skin incision, Skewness, Line drawing

Brief summary

Skin incision skewness, incision length on both sides of the midline and patient's perception of the scar after cesarean section will be compared between the following two groups: (1) Drawing of an incision line prior to skin incision and (2) no drawing of an incision line.

Detailed description

Some aspects of the surgical techniques employed during cesarean section have already been evaluated in regards to possible improvements of cosmetic outcome, such as the use of different skin closure materials or whether subcutaneous fat suture closure leads to better results than non-closure. Another point to be considered is the skewness of the scar. Many surgeons make the skin incision based on their experience without prior measurement and drawing of an incision line. However, following a predefined incision line may reduce the rate of skew incisions. Therefore, this study aims to compare these two approaches to the skin incision. Participating women will be recruited at the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology of the Medical University of Vienna. They will be included into the study after written informed consent and will be randomized into one of the two groups (drawing of an incision line prior to skin incision versus no drawing of an incision line) on the day of cesarean section. Skewness of the skin incision in each group will be assessed after cesarean section. Furthermore, it will be determined whether there are any differences in the incision length on both sides of an imaginary line from the umbilicus to the clitoris between these two techniques. Additionally, patient's perception of the scar before discharge from hospital will be assessed.

Interventions

PROCEDUREDrawing of an incision line

Drawing of an incision line prior to skin incision at cesarean section

Sponsors

Medical University of Vienna
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
18 Years to 60 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Age ≥ 18 years * First cesarean section

Exclusion criteria

* Performance of an acute cesarean section * Previous cesarean section * Body mass index \> 35 kg/m²

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Skin incision skewness10 minutes (from a photograph taken at the end of the operation)Skewness of the incision will be assessed using digital photos and an appropriate software.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Incision length on both sides of the midline2 minutes (1 minute for measurement at the end of the operation and 1 minute postoperatively from a photo taken at the end of the operation)The length will be measured in cm.
Patient's perception of the scar1 minute (before discharge from hospital)Skewness and length of the scar are rated by the patient.

Countries

Austria

Contacts

Primary ContactHeinrich Husslein
heinrich.husslein@meduniwien.ac.at0043140400

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026