Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injury
Conditions
Keywords
Secondary ACL Injury Prevention, Visual Biofeedback, Tactile Biofeedback
Brief summary
ACL injuries are common among athletes and due to residual muscle weakness, limited knee motion and asymmetrical movement patterns after surgery many of these athletes will sustain secondary ACL injuries following return to sports. This project seeks to determine if a novel biofeedback-based rehabilitation approach can decrease a known risk factor for secondary injuries to the ACL. The project specifically focuses on correcting asymmetric movement patterns, a known risk factor for secondary injury that is not directly addressed by existing interventions through a 6 week therapy based biofeedback intervention.
Detailed description
Nearly 1 in 60 adolescent athletes will suffer ACL injuries. Approximately 90% of these injured athletes will undergo an ACL reconstruction at an estimated annual cost of $3 billion. While reconstruction and subsequent rehabilitation allow these athletes to return to sports, they have a 15 fold increased risk of secondary ACL injuries, a tear of the ACL graft or the contralateral ACL. As a result, development of an intervention to reduce the incidence of secondary ACL tears would meet a critical need. One area in which existing interventions might be improved is through an increased emphasis on correcting asymmetric movement patterns-a known risk factor for secondary injury. Thus, our long-term objective is to decrease the number of secondary ACL tears by decreasing side-to-side movement and loading asymmetry. The modification of post-operative rehabilitation to focus on movement and loading symmetry with shift the rehabilitation paradigm. Specifically, we propose to evaluate a novel biofeedback training program that focuses on altering loading and movement patterns to improve symmetry and overall lower extremity mechanics in a group of 40 (20 control, 20 intervention) adolescent ACL reconstructed patients. There are two core hypotheses of this study: 1) biofeedback training will decrease known risk factors for secondary ACL injuries immediately following the biofeedback program and these changes will be retained 6 week after the completion of the biofeedback program; and 2) we will be able to recruit and enroll 40 patients and retain 80% of the patients through the end of the follow-up assessment demonstrating the feasibility of the biofeedback intervention. Implementation of a biofeedback program prior to returning to dynamic athletic activities could improve physical performance outcomes, decrease secondary injury risk factors and ultimately decrease the long-term joint degeneration and development of osteoarthritis that has been associated with ACL reconstruction. Ultimately this work will lead to additional investigations to definitively determine the impact of this novel biofeedback program, which could shift the post-operative rehabilitation paradigm following ACL reconstruction to improve long-term joint health in these adolescent patients.
Interventions
Visual and Tactile Biofeedback
Sponsors
Study design
Masking description
To reduce the possibility of bias, the biofeedback intervention will be completed by a single individual (clinician - Athletic trainer) and the biomechanical assessments will be completed by a second individual who will be blinded to the subject's group assignment (research technician).
Intervention model description
This study involves one active intervention group and an attention control group
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
1. Provision of signed and dated informed consent form 2. ACL Reconstruction: primary, unilateral ACL reconstruction with no pain in the contralateral leg 3. Rehabilitation: need to have completed at least 4.5 months of post-operative physical therapy and be within approximately 6 weeks of being ready to be released by his/her treating orthopaedic surgeon to return to full sport participation 4. Stated willingness to comply with all study procedures and availability for the duration of the study 5. Male or female, aged 14-21 6. Willing to adhere to the ACL Biofeedback intervention regimen
Exclusion criteria
1. For females: currently pregnant or planning to become pregnant 2. History of more than one ACL reconstruction 3. Post-operative complications that required additional surgical intervention 4. Hospitalization for any reason other than the ACL reconstruction in the last 3 months 5. Plans for additional surgical procedures in the next 12 months 6. Live greater than 60 miles from the research lab 7. Have limitations that would prevent them from attending the biofeedback training sessions 8. Motor neuron diseases, Parkinson's disease, multiple sclerosis 9. Severely impaired hearing or speech (patients must be able to respond to phone calls) 10. No access to a telephone 11. Participating in another ACL intervention 12. Inability to understand or speak English (since this will be required for the patient-based intervention) 13. Other self-reported medical problem that would prohibit participation in the study 14. Other health condition or personal issue judged by a study team member or primary care physician to make the patient inappropriate for study participation 15. Knee extension moment limb symmetry index (LSI) greater than or equal to 90% at the time of the initial study assessment
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Change in Peak Knee Extension Moment Symmetry | Baseline (week 0) and Post-intervention (week 6) | The peak knee extension moment asymmetry will be assessed during the first landing of a stop-jump task |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Change in Frontal Plane Knee Range of Motion | Baseline (week 0) and Post-intervention (week 6) | The frontal plane knee range of motion will be assessed during the first landing of a stop-jump task |
| Change in Peak Vertical Ground Reaction Force Symmetry | Baseline (week 0) and Post-intervention (week 6) | The peak vertical ground reaction force symmetry will be assessed during the first landing of a stop-jump task |
Countries
United States
Participant flow
Participants by arm
| Arm | Count |
|---|---|
| Biofeedback Intervention The 6-week biofeedback training program is focused on altering loading and movement asymmetry during biweekly sessions on non-consecutive days (12 sessions). The biofeedback training program will provide sensory (visual and tactile) feedback to the subject to heighten awareness of asymmetrical movement strategies (e.g. load shift, movement asymmetry) during a squat. The two exercises that will be completed during the biofeedback training program will be a visual feedback squat and a resisted squat (tactile feedback). Each of these tasks will be completed 30 (3 sets of 10 repetitions) times per session. We will provide a 20 second rest between trials, and a 10 minute break between the visual and tactile feedback exercises to decrease the effect of fatigue.
Biofeedback Intervention: Visual and Tactile Biofeedback | 18 |
| Control The 6-week attention control group program will focus on providing educational information to the participants related to the clinical and sports expectations as they are released to return to sport. These participants will be asked to meet 6 times during the 6-week intervention time period. Three of these visits will be completed in person and three will be completed using an online educational module (6 sessions). The online sessions will be completed in week 1, week 3, and week 5 while the in person sessions will be completed during week 2, week 4, and week 6. | 22 |
| Total | 40 |
Baseline characteristics
| Characteristic | Biofeedback Intervention | Control | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | 16.2 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.6 | 16.4 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.2 | 16.3 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.9 |
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) Hispanic or Latino | 1 Participants | 1 Participants | 2 Participants |
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) Not Hispanic or Latino | 17 Participants | 19 Participants | 36 Participants |
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) Unknown or Not Reported | 0 Participants | 2 Participants | 2 Participants |
| Peak Knee Extension Moment Symmetry | 47.9 % Symmetry STANDARD_DEVIATION 28.4 | 41.4 % Symmetry STANDARD_DEVIATION 16.3 | 44.3 % Symmetry STANDARD_DEVIATION 22.5 |
| Race (NIH/OMB) American Indian or Alaska Native | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Asian | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Black or African American | 0 Participants | 1 Participants | 1 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) More than one race | 3 Participants | 0 Participants | 3 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Unknown or Not Reported | 1 Participants | 0 Participants | 1 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) White | 14 Participants | 21 Participants | 35 Participants |
| Region of Enrollment United States | 18 participants | 22 participants | 40 participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Female | 6 Participants | 10 Participants | 16 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Male | 12 Participants | 12 Participants | 24 Participants |
Adverse events
| Event type | EG000 affected / at risk | EG001 affected / at risk |
|---|---|---|
| deaths Total, all-cause mortality | 0 / 18 | 0 / 22 |
| other Total, other adverse events | 0 / 18 | 0 / 22 |
| serious Total, serious adverse events | 0 / 18 | 0 / 22 |
Outcome results
Change in Peak Knee Extension Moment Symmetry
The peak knee extension moment asymmetry will be assessed during the first landing of a stop-jump task
Time frame: Baseline (week 0) and Post-intervention (week 6)
Population: Analysis completed with participants with \>80% adherence
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Biofeedback Intervention | Change in Peak Knee Extension Moment Symmetry | Baseline | 50.1 % Symmetry | Standard Deviation 33.8 |
| Biofeedback Intervention | Change in Peak Knee Extension Moment Symmetry | Post-intervention | 44.6 % Symmetry | Standard Deviation 24.2 |
| Control | Change in Peak Knee Extension Moment Symmetry | Baseline | 44.2 % Symmetry | Standard Deviation 26 |
| Control | Change in Peak Knee Extension Moment Symmetry | Post-intervention | 40.6 % Symmetry | Standard Deviation 16.7 |
Change in Peak Knee Extension Moment Symmetry
The peak knee extension moment asymmetry will be assessed during the first landing of a stop-jump task
Time frame: Post-intervention (week 6) and Retention (week 12)
Population: Analysis completed with participants with \>80% adherence
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Biofeedback Intervention | Change in Peak Knee Extension Moment Symmetry | Post-intervention | 44.6 % Symmetry | Standard Deviation 24.2 |
| Biofeedback Intervention | Change in Peak Knee Extension Moment Symmetry | Retention | 38.7 % Symmetry | Standard Deviation 22.5 |
| Control | Change in Peak Knee Extension Moment Symmetry | Post-intervention | 40.6 % Symmetry | Standard Deviation 16.7 |
| Control | Change in Peak Knee Extension Moment Symmetry | Retention | 33.3 % Symmetry | Standard Deviation 13.5 |
Change in Frontal Plane Knee Range of Motion
The frontal plane knee range of motion will be assessed during the first landing of a stop-jump task
Time frame: Baseline (week 0) and Post-intervention (week 6)
Population: Analysis completed with participants with \>80% adherence
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Biofeedback Intervention | Change in Frontal Plane Knee Range of Motion | Baseline | 6.4 Degree | Standard Deviation 2.7 |
| Biofeedback Intervention | Change in Frontal Plane Knee Range of Motion | Post-Intervention | 7.5 Degree | Standard Deviation 4.5 |
| Control | Change in Frontal Plane Knee Range of Motion | Baseline | 10.1 Degree | Standard Deviation 4.4 |
| Control | Change in Frontal Plane Knee Range of Motion | Post-Intervention | 9.1 Degree | Standard Deviation 4.3 |
Change in Frontal Plane Knee Range of Motion
The frontal plane knee range of motion will be assessed during the first landing of a stop-jump task
Time frame: Post-intervention (week 6) and Retention (week 12)
Population: Analysis completed with participants with \>80% adherence
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Biofeedback Intervention | Change in Frontal Plane Knee Range of Motion | Post-intervention | 7.5 Degree | Standard Deviation 4.5 |
| Biofeedback Intervention | Change in Frontal Plane Knee Range of Motion | Retention | 7.9 Degree | Standard Deviation 4.2 |
| Control | Change in Frontal Plane Knee Range of Motion | Post-intervention | 9.1 Degree | Standard Deviation 4.3 |
| Control | Change in Frontal Plane Knee Range of Motion | Retention | 10.1 Degree | Standard Deviation 4.6 |
Change in Peak Vertical Ground Reaction Force Symmetry
The peak vertical ground reaction force symmetry will be assessed during the first landing of a stop-jump task
Time frame: Baseline (week 0) and Post-intervention (week 6)
Population: Analysis completed with participants with \>80% adherence
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Biofeedback Intervention | Change in Peak Vertical Ground Reaction Force Symmetry | Baseline | 34.1 % Symmetry | Standard Deviation 23 |
| Biofeedback Intervention | Change in Peak Vertical Ground Reaction Force Symmetry | Post-intervention | 24.6 % Symmetry | Standard Deviation 14 |
| Control | Change in Peak Vertical Ground Reaction Force Symmetry | Baseline | 28 % Symmetry | Standard Deviation 9.4 |
| Control | Change in Peak Vertical Ground Reaction Force Symmetry | Post-intervention | 25.7 % Symmetry | Standard Deviation 12.9 |
Change in Peak Vertical Ground Reaction Force Symmetry
The peak vertical ground reaction force symmetry will be assessed during the first landing of a stop-jump task
Time frame: Post-intervention (week 6) and Retention (week 12)
Population: Analysis completed with participants with \>80% adherence
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Biofeedback Intervention | Change in Peak Vertical Ground Reaction Force Symmetry | Post-intervention | 24.6 % Symmetry | Standard Deviation 14 |
| Biofeedback Intervention | Change in Peak Vertical Ground Reaction Force Symmetry | Retention | 32.5 % Symmetry | Standard Deviation 14.5 |
| Control | Change in Peak Vertical Ground Reaction Force Symmetry | Post-intervention | 25.7 % Symmetry | Standard Deviation 12.9 |
| Control | Change in Peak Vertical Ground Reaction Force Symmetry | Retention | 22.7 % Symmetry | Standard Deviation 9.2 |