Skip to content

Reduction of Risk Factors for ACL Re-injuries Using a Novel Biofeedback Approach

Reduction of Risk Factors for ACL Re-injuries Using an Innovative Biofeedback Approach

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03273673
Enrollment
40
Registered
2017-09-06
Start date
2018-03-20
Completion date
2020-05-05
Last updated
2020-12-04

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injury

Keywords

Secondary ACL Injury Prevention, Visual Biofeedback, Tactile Biofeedback

Brief summary

ACL injuries are common among athletes and due to residual muscle weakness, limited knee motion and asymmetrical movement patterns after surgery many of these athletes will sustain secondary ACL injuries following return to sports. This project seeks to determine if a novel biofeedback-based rehabilitation approach can decrease a known risk factor for secondary injuries to the ACL. The project specifically focuses on correcting asymmetric movement patterns, a known risk factor for secondary injury that is not directly addressed by existing interventions through a 6 week therapy based biofeedback intervention.

Detailed description

Nearly 1 in 60 adolescent athletes will suffer ACL injuries. Approximately 90% of these injured athletes will undergo an ACL reconstruction at an estimated annual cost of $3 billion. While reconstruction and subsequent rehabilitation allow these athletes to return to sports, they have a 15 fold increased risk of secondary ACL injuries, a tear of the ACL graft or the contralateral ACL. As a result, development of an intervention to reduce the incidence of secondary ACL tears would meet a critical need. One area in which existing interventions might be improved is through an increased emphasis on correcting asymmetric movement patterns-a known risk factor for secondary injury. Thus, our long-term objective is to decrease the number of secondary ACL tears by decreasing side-to-side movement and loading asymmetry. The modification of post-operative rehabilitation to focus on movement and loading symmetry with shift the rehabilitation paradigm. Specifically, we propose to evaluate a novel biofeedback training program that focuses on altering loading and movement patterns to improve symmetry and overall lower extremity mechanics in a group of 40 (20 control, 20 intervention) adolescent ACL reconstructed patients. There are two core hypotheses of this study: 1) biofeedback training will decrease known risk factors for secondary ACL injuries immediately following the biofeedback program and these changes will be retained 6 week after the completion of the biofeedback program; and 2) we will be able to recruit and enroll 40 patients and retain 80% of the patients through the end of the follow-up assessment demonstrating the feasibility of the biofeedback intervention. Implementation of a biofeedback program prior to returning to dynamic athletic activities could improve physical performance outcomes, decrease secondary injury risk factors and ultimately decrease the long-term joint degeneration and development of osteoarthritis that has been associated with ACL reconstruction. Ultimately this work will lead to additional investigations to definitively determine the impact of this novel biofeedback program, which could shift the post-operative rehabilitation paradigm following ACL reconstruction to improve long-term joint health in these adolescent patients.

Interventions

Visual and Tactile Biofeedback

Sponsors

National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases (NIAMS)
CollaboratorNIH
Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Caregiver, Outcomes Assessor)

Masking description

To reduce the possibility of bias, the biofeedback intervention will be completed by a single individual (clinician - Athletic trainer) and the biomechanical assessments will be completed by a second individual who will be blinded to the subject's group assignment (research technician).

Intervention model description

This study involves one active intervention group and an attention control group

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
14 Years to 21 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Provision of signed and dated informed consent form 2. ACL Reconstruction: primary, unilateral ACL reconstruction with no pain in the contralateral leg 3. Rehabilitation: need to have completed at least 4.5 months of post-operative physical therapy and be within approximately 6 weeks of being ready to be released by his/her treating orthopaedic surgeon to return to full sport participation 4. Stated willingness to comply with all study procedures and availability for the duration of the study 5. Male or female, aged 14-21 6. Willing to adhere to the ACL Biofeedback intervention regimen

Exclusion criteria

1. For females: currently pregnant or planning to become pregnant 2. History of more than one ACL reconstruction 3. Post-operative complications that required additional surgical intervention 4. Hospitalization for any reason other than the ACL reconstruction in the last 3 months 5. Plans for additional surgical procedures in the next 12 months 6. Live greater than 60 miles from the research lab 7. Have limitations that would prevent them from attending the biofeedback training sessions 8. Motor neuron diseases, Parkinson's disease, multiple sclerosis 9. Severely impaired hearing or speech (patients must be able to respond to phone calls) 10. No access to a telephone 11. Participating in another ACL intervention 12. Inability to understand or speak English (since this will be required for the patient-based intervention) 13. Other self-reported medical problem that would prohibit participation in the study 14. Other health condition or personal issue judged by a study team member or primary care physician to make the patient inappropriate for study participation 15. Knee extension moment limb symmetry index (LSI) greater than or equal to 90% at the time of the initial study assessment

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in Peak Knee Extension Moment SymmetryBaseline (week 0) and Post-intervention (week 6)The peak knee extension moment asymmetry will be assessed during the first landing of a stop-jump task

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in Frontal Plane Knee Range of MotionBaseline (week 0) and Post-intervention (week 6)The frontal plane knee range of motion will be assessed during the first landing of a stop-jump task
Change in Peak Vertical Ground Reaction Force SymmetryBaseline (week 0) and Post-intervention (week 6)The peak vertical ground reaction force symmetry will be assessed during the first landing of a stop-jump task

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Biofeedback Intervention
The 6-week biofeedback training program is focused on altering loading and movement asymmetry during biweekly sessions on non-consecutive days (12 sessions). The biofeedback training program will provide sensory (visual and tactile) feedback to the subject to heighten awareness of asymmetrical movement strategies (e.g. load shift, movement asymmetry) during a squat. The two exercises that will be completed during the biofeedback training program will be a visual feedback squat and a resisted squat (tactile feedback). Each of these tasks will be completed 30 (3 sets of 10 repetitions) times per session. We will provide a 20 second rest between trials, and a 10 minute break between the visual and tactile feedback exercises to decrease the effect of fatigue. Biofeedback Intervention: Visual and Tactile Biofeedback
18
Control
The 6-week attention control group program will focus on providing educational information to the participants related to the clinical and sports expectations as they are released to return to sport. These participants will be asked to meet 6 times during the 6-week intervention time period. Three of these visits will be completed in person and three will be completed using an online educational module (6 sessions). The online sessions will be completed in week 1, week 3, and week 5 while the in person sessions will be completed during week 2, week 4, and week 6.
22
Total40

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicBiofeedback InterventionControlTotal
Age, Continuous16.2 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.6
16.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.2
16.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.9
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
1 Participants1 Participants2 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
17 Participants19 Participants36 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants2 Participants2 Participants
Peak Knee Extension Moment Symmetry47.9 % Symmetry
STANDARD_DEVIATION 28.4
41.4 % Symmetry
STANDARD_DEVIATION 16.3
44.3 % Symmetry
STANDARD_DEVIATION 22.5
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
0 Participants1 Participants1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
3 Participants0 Participants3 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
1 Participants0 Participants1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
14 Participants21 Participants35 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
18 participants22 participants40 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
6 Participants10 Participants16 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
12 Participants12 Participants24 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 180 / 22
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 180 / 22
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 180 / 22

Outcome results

Primary

Change in Peak Knee Extension Moment Symmetry

The peak knee extension moment asymmetry will be assessed during the first landing of a stop-jump task

Time frame: Baseline (week 0) and Post-intervention (week 6)

Population: Analysis completed with participants with \>80% adherence

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Biofeedback InterventionChange in Peak Knee Extension Moment SymmetryBaseline50.1 % SymmetryStandard Deviation 33.8
Biofeedback InterventionChange in Peak Knee Extension Moment SymmetryPost-intervention44.6 % SymmetryStandard Deviation 24.2
ControlChange in Peak Knee Extension Moment SymmetryBaseline44.2 % SymmetryStandard Deviation 26
ControlChange in Peak Knee Extension Moment SymmetryPost-intervention40.6 % SymmetryStandard Deviation 16.7
Primary

Change in Peak Knee Extension Moment Symmetry

The peak knee extension moment asymmetry will be assessed during the first landing of a stop-jump task

Time frame: Post-intervention (week 6) and Retention (week 12)

Population: Analysis completed with participants with \>80% adherence

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Biofeedback InterventionChange in Peak Knee Extension Moment SymmetryPost-intervention44.6 % SymmetryStandard Deviation 24.2
Biofeedback InterventionChange in Peak Knee Extension Moment SymmetryRetention38.7 % SymmetryStandard Deviation 22.5
ControlChange in Peak Knee Extension Moment SymmetryPost-intervention40.6 % SymmetryStandard Deviation 16.7
ControlChange in Peak Knee Extension Moment SymmetryRetention33.3 % SymmetryStandard Deviation 13.5
Secondary

Change in Frontal Plane Knee Range of Motion

The frontal plane knee range of motion will be assessed during the first landing of a stop-jump task

Time frame: Baseline (week 0) and Post-intervention (week 6)

Population: Analysis completed with participants with \>80% adherence

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Biofeedback InterventionChange in Frontal Plane Knee Range of MotionBaseline6.4 DegreeStandard Deviation 2.7
Biofeedback InterventionChange in Frontal Plane Knee Range of MotionPost-Intervention7.5 DegreeStandard Deviation 4.5
ControlChange in Frontal Plane Knee Range of MotionBaseline10.1 DegreeStandard Deviation 4.4
ControlChange in Frontal Plane Knee Range of MotionPost-Intervention9.1 DegreeStandard Deviation 4.3
Secondary

Change in Frontal Plane Knee Range of Motion

The frontal plane knee range of motion will be assessed during the first landing of a stop-jump task

Time frame: Post-intervention (week 6) and Retention (week 12)

Population: Analysis completed with participants with \>80% adherence

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Biofeedback InterventionChange in Frontal Plane Knee Range of MotionPost-intervention7.5 DegreeStandard Deviation 4.5
Biofeedback InterventionChange in Frontal Plane Knee Range of MotionRetention7.9 DegreeStandard Deviation 4.2
ControlChange in Frontal Plane Knee Range of MotionPost-intervention9.1 DegreeStandard Deviation 4.3
ControlChange in Frontal Plane Knee Range of MotionRetention10.1 DegreeStandard Deviation 4.6
Secondary

Change in Peak Vertical Ground Reaction Force Symmetry

The peak vertical ground reaction force symmetry will be assessed during the first landing of a stop-jump task

Time frame: Baseline (week 0) and Post-intervention (week 6)

Population: Analysis completed with participants with \>80% adherence

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Biofeedback InterventionChange in Peak Vertical Ground Reaction Force SymmetryBaseline34.1 % SymmetryStandard Deviation 23
Biofeedback InterventionChange in Peak Vertical Ground Reaction Force SymmetryPost-intervention24.6 % SymmetryStandard Deviation 14
ControlChange in Peak Vertical Ground Reaction Force SymmetryBaseline28 % SymmetryStandard Deviation 9.4
ControlChange in Peak Vertical Ground Reaction Force SymmetryPost-intervention25.7 % SymmetryStandard Deviation 12.9
Secondary

Change in Peak Vertical Ground Reaction Force Symmetry

The peak vertical ground reaction force symmetry will be assessed during the first landing of a stop-jump task

Time frame: Post-intervention (week 6) and Retention (week 12)

Population: Analysis completed with participants with \>80% adherence

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Biofeedback InterventionChange in Peak Vertical Ground Reaction Force SymmetryPost-intervention24.6 % SymmetryStandard Deviation 14
Biofeedback InterventionChange in Peak Vertical Ground Reaction Force SymmetryRetention32.5 % SymmetryStandard Deviation 14.5
ControlChange in Peak Vertical Ground Reaction Force SymmetryPost-intervention25.7 % SymmetryStandard Deviation 12.9
ControlChange in Peak Vertical Ground Reaction Force SymmetryRetention22.7 % SymmetryStandard Deviation 9.2

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 14, 2026