Skip to content

Feasibility and Effectiveness of a Specialized Brief Intervention for Hazardous Drinkers in an Emergency Department.

Prevenció Dels Problemes Relacionats Amb Alcohol a urgències.

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03273283
Acronym
PPAU
Enrollment
200
Registered
2017-09-06
Start date
2016-06-01
Completion date
2018-05-01
Last updated
2020-05-15

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Alcohol Drinking

Brief summary

Alcohol use and its consequences represent an important public health problem. As well as alcohol dependence, hazardous drinking also contributes to a high burden in terms of morbidity and mortality. To improve these patients' prognosis and decrease associated social and health care costs, it is necessary to increase early detection, intervention and treatment for these problems. For these reasons, SBIRT programmes (Screening Brief Intervention and Referral to Treatment) have been developed, evaluated and shown to be effective, particularly in primary care and general practice. Nevertheless, effectiveness of SBIRT in emergency departments (ED) has not been clearly established. The investigators aimed to evaluate the feasibility and efficacy of an SBIRT programme in the ED of a tertiary hospital.

Detailed description

The investigators conducted a randomized controlled trial to study the feasibility and efficacy of an SBIRT programme for hazardous drinkers presenting in an ED. All patients older than 18 years old attending the emergency department were potentially eligible. Cognitively impaired or medically unstable patients were excluded. Patients seeking treatment for alcohol use were also excluded. Patients were randomized to two groups, with the control group receiving two leaflets - one regarding alcohol use, and the other giving information about the study protocol. The intervention group received the same leaflets as well as a brief motivational intervention on alcohol use; and, where appropriate, a referral to specialised treatment. The primary outcomes were the proportion of hazardous drinkers measured by AUDIT-C scale and the proportion of patients attending specialised treatment at 1.5 and 4.5 months and 1 year.

Interventions

BEHAVIORALBrief Intervention

Patient's received a brief intervention on alcohol use based on motivational techniques, and a referral to treatment when indicated.

Sponsors

Hospital Clinic of Barcelona
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* All patients aged 18 or older attending to the emergency department were potentially eligible patients * Patients with an AUDIT-C score higher than 6 points for men and 5 for woman were invited to participate

Exclusion criteria

* Cognitive impairment * Medically unstable * Patients explicitly demanding alcohol treatment

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Proportion of Risky Drinkers Measured by AUDIT-C6 weeksWe assessed participants with AUDIT-C (a tool to assess alcohol consumption). Main outcome 1 is the proportion of patients who score more than 6 i men and 5 in women in this scale. AUDIT-C is the short version of the AUDIT scale (Alcohol use disorders identification test). Consists of a three items scale ( frequency of alcohol consumption, amount of alcohol units per day of consumption and frequency of binge drinking), and ranges from 0 (abstinence) to 12 (very high alcohol use). The higher the score is, the more important the alcohol use is, and more risk of presenting an alcohol use disorder.
Proportion of Patients Attending to Specialized Treatment6 weeksProportion of patients that initate specialized treatment to reduce alcohol use

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Intervention
Patients received a brief intervention on alcohol use. This brief intervention was a little chat based on motivational techniques to enhance motivation to reduce alcohol use or to initiate treatment. Patients were referred to specialized treatment when indicated. Brief Intervention: Patient's received a brief intervention on alcohol use based on motivational techniques, and a referral to treatment when indicated.
99
Control
Informative leaflets regarding alcohol use
101
Total200

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicInterventionControlTotal
Age, Continuous41.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 16.2
44 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 17.1
42.81 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 16.8
Alcohol related presenting condition12 Participants11 Participants23 Participants
Race and Ethnicity Not Collected0 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
28 Participants28 Participants56 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
71 Participants73 Participants144 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
2 / 991 / 101
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 990 / 101
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 990 / 101

Outcome results

Primary

Proportion of Patients Attending to Specialized Treatment

Proportion of patients that initate specialized treatment to reduce alcohol use

Time frame: 6 weeks

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
InterventionProportion of Patients Attending to Specialized Treatment17 Participants
ControlProportion of Patients Attending to Specialized Treatment8 Participants
Primary

Proportion of Risky Drinkers Measured by AUDIT-C

We assessed participants with AUDIT-C (a tool to assess alcohol consumption). Main outcome 1 is the proportion of patients who score more than 6 i men and 5 in women in this scale. AUDIT-C is the short version of the AUDIT scale (Alcohol use disorders identification test). Consists of a three items scale ( frequency of alcohol consumption, amount of alcohol units per day of consumption and frequency of binge drinking), and ranges from 0 (abstinence) to 12 (very high alcohol use). The higher the score is, the more important the alcohol use is, and more risk of presenting an alcohol use disorder.

Time frame: 6 weeks

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
InterventionProportion of Risky Drinkers Measured by AUDIT-C20 Participants
ControlProportion of Risky Drinkers Measured by AUDIT-C39 Participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026