Skip to content

Effectiveness of the Tiger Catheter on Transradial Coronariography: Randomized Compared to JudKins cathETers

Effectiveness of the Tiger Catheter as a Simple Multipurpuse Catheter in Transradial Coronariography: Randomized Comparerd to Judkins Catheters

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03273218
Acronym
TICKET
Enrollment
120
Registered
2017-09-06
Start date
2015-12-31
Completion date
2016-07-20
Last updated
2019-03-06

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Acute Coronary Syndrome

Keywords

coronary angiography, diagnosctic transradial catheter, transradial catheter

Brief summary

The aim of this study was to assess effectiveness and safety of Tiger (5Fr) vs Judkins (5Fr) catheters, in coronariography via the right transradial approach. This was a prospective, randomized, study of paralled design. Consecutive patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS), eligible for coronary angiography, was randomized after successuful cannulation of right artery and informed consent to either Tiger or Judkins catheters.

Detailed description

analyzed a total of 120 consective diagnostic coronary angioggraphy cases from the right radial approach. Of these 60 cases were performed with single catheter (Tiger) and 60 cases were performed with conventional catheters (Judkins). The patients of both group were overall well balanced for gender, age, risk factors, height, weight and body surface area. Diagnostic angiograms were successfully achieved in all cases via the radial approach.

Interventions

DEVICETiger catheter
DEVICEJudkins catheter

Sponsors

Marcelo Alberto OLIVA
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* written informed consent * indication for coronary angiography

Exclusion criteria

* negative Allen´s test * Chronic renal failure (to preserve the right radial artery for potencial arteriovenous shunting) * Hemodynamic instability * coronary artery bypass grafting

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Produce time for the coronary angiographyDay 0 (corresponding to time point of produce) assessed by intention - to - tresat analysis (IIT)Produce time (min) was defined as the time from the insertion of the first diagnostic coronary catheter in the sheath to the exist of the las diagnostic catheter the sheath.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Fluoroscopy timeDay 0 (corresponding to time point of produce)Fluoroscopy time (min)was defined as fluoroscopy time during the procedure (between groups)
Contrast Volume usedDay 0 (corresponding to time point of produce)contrast volume used (ml) was defined as the contrast volume between groups used for completion of coronary angiogram
Radial artery SpasmDay 0 (corresponding to time point of produce). The radial artery spasm was recorded like YES or NOT.(registry did by nurse from beginning to end of coronary angiography)Radial artery Spasm was defined as the discomfort or pain in the arm, between groups

Countries

Argentina

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026