Skip to content

Sit-to-stand Training in Stroke Patient

Does Self-initiated Sit-to-stand Training With Assistive Device Regain the Independence of Sit-to-stand in Stroke Patient? A Single-blinded Randomised Controlled Trial.

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03273101
Enrollment
52
Registered
2017-09-06
Start date
2015-01-31
Completion date
2018-05-31
Last updated
2018-09-06

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Stroke

Brief summary

Background: It is unknown whether the self-initiated sit-to-stand training with assistive device is effective to regain the independence of sit-to-stand in stroke patients. Objective: To compare the effectiveness of self-initiated sit-to-stand training by assistive device, with manual sit-to-stand training. Design: Parallel randomised controlled and assessor blinded trial between Jan 2015 and May 2018. Randomisation was performed by drawing lots to allocate treatment to patient. Setting: A rehabilitation hospital in Hong Kong Participants: 69 patients in medical wards with unilateral hemiparetic stroke. 52 patients fulfilled the study requirements. Intervention: Ten sessions of intervention with conventional physiotherapy program followed, by self-initiated sit-to-stand training with assistive device, or by manual sit-to-stand training. Main outcome measure: Number of patients regained the independence of sit-to-stand, Sit-to-stand test from the balance master® and Five-repetitions sit-to-stand test. Results: 69 patients (intervention n=36; control n=33) were randomized (mean age 69.8 (SD, 10.6), mean post stroke days 18.6 (SD 16.0)) for intention to treat analysis. 17 patients were excluded because of dropout before 10 sessions of training, leaving 52 (n=26; n=26) patients for per protocol analysis. 18 patients in intervention group and 10 patients in control group had regained the independence of sit-to-stand (Phil and Cramer's V: -0.31 and 0.31). The patients in intervention group were faster to complete the Five-repetition sit-to-stand test than the control group (32.7 secs (SD, 1.93) v 48.4 secs (SD, 6.8); 95% confidence interval, -30.8 to -0.7; p\<0.05). No adverse side effects occurred during and after the training across groups. Conclusions: Self-initiated sit-to-stand training by assistive device can help more stroke patients regain the independence of sit-to-stand.

Interventions

DEVICEMechanical assisted sit-to-stand training group

Mechanical assisted sit-to-stand training 100 repetitions or 10 mins / session 10 sessions

OTHERManual assisted sit-to-stand training group

Manual assisted sit-to-stand training 100 repetitions or 10 mins / session 10 sessions

Sponsors

Tai Po Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER_GOV

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* first episode of unilateral stroke with hemiparesis, * able to understand and follow simple verbal instructions, * able to sit unsupported for at least two minutes * require lifting assistance to stand up from a 18 inches high plinth

Exclusion criteria

* severe pain in the lower extremities when weight bearing or performing movement * any other acute comorbid diseases such as unstable angina, recent myocardial infarction * unstable medical / psychological condition

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of patients regained the independence of sit-to-standAfter 10 sessions of trainingTo compare how many patients can regain the independence of sit-to-stand between groups
Sit-to-Stand Test (SST) from the Balance Master®After 10 sessions of trainingTo assess the quality of sit-to-stand of patient
Five-Repetition Sit-to-Stand TestAfter 10 sessions of trainingTo assess the functional strength of lower limb, balance and transition move of patient

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026