Skip to content

Best Verbal Instruction to Obtain Voluntary Pelvic Floor Muscle Contraction

Verbal Instruction to Obtain Voluntary Pelvic Floor Muscle Contraction: Acceptability, Understanding and Best Instruction

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03272386
Enrollment
33
Registered
2017-09-05
Start date
2017-07-31
Completion date
2017-09-29
Last updated
2019-09-25

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms

Keywords

pelvic floor muscles, instruction, assessment, acceptability, understanding

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to determine the best verbal instruction to obtain a PFMC and to evaluate the understanding and acceptability of the proposed instructions.

Detailed description

Pelvic floor muscles contraction (PFMC) is usually recommended for evaluation and treatment of pelvic floor disorders. In clinical practice, many patients fail to achieve a voluntary PFMC and only about one-third of women perform an ideal PFMC after brief written or verbal instruction. When no PFMC is elicited, it might be explained by an anatomical or neurological issue but also by a lack of understanding of the instructions and / or poor knowledge of the anatomy. Pelvic floor muscles (PFM) evaluation may depends on the method used to elicit and assess the contraction including verbal instructions. There is no current gold standard methodology for quantifying PFM strength and the verbal instructions used to elicit the PFMC are rarely reported in the studies. There is few specific works about the instructions. One recent study report that the pattern of urethral movement is influenced by the instructions used to teach activation of the PFM in men. Another study showed that some specific instructions are most effective in eliciting a correct PFMC in women. Thus, an appropriate verbal instruction in terms of understanding, social and cultural acceptability, taking into account the anatomical knowledge of the patients, would probably allow a better evaluation of the PFM and even a better efficacy of pelvic floor training. The purpose of this study is to determine the best verbal instruction to obtain a PFMC and to evaluate the understanding and acceptability of the proposed instructions. This is a prospective observational study lead in two phases in the Neurourology Department of a University Hospital. Phase 1: survey carry out the health professionals. Members of the scientific committees of national academic societies in neuro-urology, pelvi-perineology and pelvic-floor neurophysiology would be invited to answer a questionnaire by mail. It will include open questions about the most frequently verbal instructions used to elicit a PFMC. These instructions will be collected, analysed and selected for the second phase. Phase 2: structured interviews with patients and with non-health professional subjects. Patients and non-health professionals subjects will be invited to answer a 3-parts questionnaire based on the gender: (i) demographic, social and medical data; (ii) evaluation of the anatomical knowledge of the perineum with a picture of the perineum and a sagittal section of the pelvic area of the corresponding sex. In the third part (iii), the participants will assess the instructions selected in the first phase according to their understanding and their acceptability (good, intermediate, poor). They finally will have to choose the best instruction i.e. which seems to be the more suitable to obtain a PFMC. Ethics: a local ethics committee approved this study. Since it is an observational study, the participant will have a newsletter.

Interventions

OTHERObservational study

Completing a questionnaire

Sponsors

Pierre and Marie Curie University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
OTHER
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Follow in neuro-urology * Lower urinary tract symptoms

Exclusion criteria

* Can't speak French

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Description of the instructions used by the professionals1 day during the consultationQualitative description of the instructions and selection of the most frequent instructions.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Acceptability, understanding and selection of the best instruction by the subjects1 day during the consultationDescription of the selected instructions by the subjects : their acceptability (poor / moderate / good), and understanding (poor / moderate / good) and the best instruction to obtain PFMC (among the selected instructions).

Countries

France

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026