Skip to content

Lacosamide Effects on Alcohol Self Administration and Craving in Heavy Drinkers

Lacosamide Effects on Alcohol Self Administration and Craving in Heavy Drinkers

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 1
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03271528
Enrollment
66
Registered
2017-09-05
Start date
2018-04-15
Completion date
2020-08-31
Last updated
2021-06-03

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Alcohol Use Disorder

Keywords

Lacosamide, Alcohol craving, Alcohol Urge Questionnaire, Obsessive-Compulsive Drinking Scale, Visual Analog Scale, Alcohol consumption, Alcohol use disorder

Brief summary

This is a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, crossover design trial tested the effect of lacosamide on alcohol self-administration and craving following a priming dose of alcohol. The specific objective of this study was to determine whether lacosamide, a novel anticonvulsant that is FDA-approved for treating partial seizures, has effects on alcohol craving and consumption.

Detailed description

The present proposal was intended to answer the call for accelerating drug development by exploring the potential of a novel anticonvulsant, lacosamide, as a candidate medication for the treatment of alcohol use disorder (AUD). This drug, which is approved for the treatment of seizure disorders, has unique pharmacological actions that include enhancement of slow sodium channel inactivation and inhibition of collapsin response mediator protein-2 (CRMP-2). Alcohol consumption in mice that had knockdown of CRMP-2 within the nucleus accumbens was decreased from levels seen in control animals. In rodent studies, lacosamide administration has produced reductions in 'excessive' drinking and has experimentally-induced decreased expression of the CRMP-2 protein. These findings implicate CRMP-2 as playing a role in the regulation of alcohol consumption. None of the FDA-approved AUD medications or medications commonly used off-label to treat AUD target this CRMP-2 pathway, making lacosamide a promising compound for AUD drug development. The aims of this study were to: 1) test the effects of lacosamide on alcohol self-administration and craving, 2) test the effects of 7 days of lacosamide administration on cognitive function, and 3) test the effects of lacosamide on alcohol consumption and craving during a 7-day period of exposure. The effects of 7 days of lacosamide (300mg) or placebo were evaluated in a human laboratory using an alcohol self-administration methodology. In this within-subjects crossover design, heavy drinkers (N=27) were randomized to the order of exposure (lacosamide or placebo) prior to completing two alcohol self-administration trials. Subjects received a priming drink of alcohol and had access to 8 alcoholic drinks over a 2-hour period. The investigators anticipated that subjects would consume less alcohol during an alcohol self-administration trial when receiving lacosamide compared to when they are receiving placebo. Significant lacosamide-induced reductions in the quantity of alcohol self-administered are considered to be an indication that this drug may have value as an AUD medication. This study may provide a rationale for phase II clinical studies testing lacosamide with a treatment-seeking AUD population. These results should also help to spur further pre-clinical investigation into the role play by CRMP-2 in regulating both alcohol consumption and alcohol seeking behaviors.

Interventions

DRUGLacosamide

Lacosamide titration was done to a target dose of 300mg. Participants took 100 mg of lacosamide once on day 1, 100 mg twice per day from day 2 through day 6 (200 mg daily total), on day 7 the lacosamide dose was increased to 150 mg twice daily (300 mg daily total), and on day 8 the participant took one dose of 150 mg.

DRUGPlacebo oral capsule

Participants took a placebo oral capsule once on day 1, twice per day from day 2 to day 7, and once on day 8.

Sponsors

National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (NIAAA)
CollaboratorNIH
Boston Medical Center
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Masking description

This study is double-blind. Medications are over-encapsulated.

Intervention model description

This is a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, crossover design trial to test the effect of lacosamide on alcohol self-administration and craving following a priming dose of alcohol.This study is a within subjects design in which each subject receives both study drug (lacosamide) and placebo during participation.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
21 Years to 55 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

Subject Inclusion Criteria 1. 21-55 years of age 2. Can provide proof of age with state-issued or federal picture ID 3. Exceeds safe weekly drinking limits (≥14 drinks for women or ≥21 drinks for men per week) 4. Reports at least an average of one episode per week of binge drinking (\>3 for women, \>4 for men) in the four weeks prior to baseline screening 5. Meets DSM-5 criteria for mild alcohol use disorder or greater severity. 6. Has a smartphone to complete some of the study assessments. Subject

Exclusion criteria

1. Currently seeking treatment for alcohol problems 2. Clinical Institute Withdrawal Assessment at \>10 3. DSM-5 diagnosis of current major depression, bipolar disorder, schizophrenia, bulimia/anorexia, dementia, or a substance use disorder other than alcohol, nicotine, marijuana or caffeine 4. If female, pregnant, nursing, or have plans to become pregnant 5. If female, does not agree to use an accepted form of birth control 6. Is currently using medications for which alcohol is a contraindication 7. Has a medical or mental health condition for which further alcohol exposure at the planned dose range would be contraindicated. 8. Current risk of suicidality (MINI suicidality score greater than 8 (low risk) or Yes to the ideation question #4 of the C-SSRS) 9. Has a history of myocardial infarction, congestive heart failure, has a risk for the development of heart block, or are taking medications that can decrease conduction through the atrial ventricular node. 10. Has previous exposure to lacosamide 11. Has received any form of counseling, self-help, pharmacotherapy, or other intervention to treat AUD in the past 90 days. 12. Is unwilling to suspend use of multivitamins that contain riboflavin during study participation 13. Has urine toxicology results positive for cocaine, opioids, amphetamines, buprenorphine, methadone, or methamphetamines 14. Liver function values AST or ALT are twice the normal limit 15. GFR \<80 mL/min 16. Unable to comfortably abstain from nicotine for a period of 8 hours.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Alcohol Consumption in Alcohol Self-Administration Trials2 hoursAlcohol consumption will be measured by using a graduated cylinder to determine the amount of alcohol given to the subject that was consumed. This outcome will be measured as standard drink units. A standard drink contains approximately 0.6 fluid ounces of pure alcohol.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Cognitive Function: Spatial Span Forward10 minutesThe Wechsler Memory Scale (WMS-III) Spatial Span test will be used to assess subjects' working memory. Subjects will be shown a sequence of block tapping and asked to repeat back an increasing number of tapped blocks in the same order. Each of the 16 items on this test is scored 0 (incorrect answer) or 1 (correct answer). The total score is calculated by adding the scores for each of the 16 items. The total score range is 0-16. Higher scores are indicative of higher levels of working memory (better outcome) and lower scores are indicative of lesser working memory function (worse outcome).
Cognitive Function: Spatial Span Backward10 minutesThe Wechsler Memory Scale (WMS-III) Spatial Span test will be used to assess subjects' working memory. Subjects will be shown a sequence of block tapping and asked to repeat back an increasing number of tapped blocks in the opposite order. Each of the 16 items on this test is scored 0 (incorrect answer) or 1 (correct answer). The total score is calculated by adding the scores for each of the 16 items. The total score range is 0-16. Higher scores are indicative of higher levels of working memory (better outcome) and lower scores are indicative of lesser working memory function (worse outcome).
Cognitive Function: Digit Span Forward10 minutesThe Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale (WAIS-IV) Digit Span test will be used to assess subjects' working memory. Subjects will be read and asked to repeat back an increasing number of digits in the same order. Each of the 16 items on this test is scored 0 (incorrect answer) or 1 (correct answer). The total score is calculated by adding the scores for each of the 16 items. The total score range is 0-16. Higher scores are indicative of higher levels of working memory (better outcome) and lower scores are indicative of lesser working memory function (worse outcome).
Cognitive Function: Digit Span Backward10 minutesThe Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale (WAIS-IV) Digit Span test will be used to assess subjects' working memory. Subjects will be read and asked to repeat back an increasing number of digits in the opposite order. Each of the 16 items on this test is scored 0 (incorrect answer) or 1 (correct answer). The total score is calculated by adding the scores for each of the 16 items. The total score range is 0-16. Higher scores are indicative of higher levels of working memory (better outcome) and lower scores are indicative of lesser working memory function (worse outcome).
Cognitive Function: Digit Span Sequencing10 minutesThe Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale (WAIS-IV) Digit Span test will be used to assess subjects' working memory. Subjects will be read and asked to repeat back an increasing number of digits in ascending order. Each of the 16 items on this test is scored 0 (incorrect answer) or 1 (correct answer). The total score is calculated by adding the scores for each of the 16 items. The total score range is 0-16. Higher scores are indicative of higher levels of working memory (better outcome) and lower scores are indicative of lesser working memory function (worse outcome).
Alcohol Craving: Obsessive-Compulsive Drinking Scale (OCDS) Pretrial5 minutesThe Obsessive-Compulsive Drinking Scale (OCDS) is a quick and reliable 14-item self-rating instrument that provides a total score that measures some cognitive aspects of alcohol craving (obsessive and compulsive drinking). Each of the 14 items is scored from 0 to 4. The total score is calculated by adding the scores for each of the 14 items. The total score range is 0-56. Higher scores are indicative of more obsessive or compulsive drinking and lower scores are indicative of less obsessive or compulsive drinking.
Alcohol Craving: Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Pretrial1 minuteAlcohol craving was measured by self report with the Visual Analog Scale (VAS). The VAS is a straight horizontal line with one end indicating no alcohol craving and the other end indicating intense alcohol craving. The participant marks a point on the line that matches their present amount of alcohol craving. Location of the point on the line is measured for a score range of 0-100. A lower score indicates less craving for alcohol and a higher score indicated more craving for alcohol.
Alcohol Craving: Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Observation Period, Minute 101 minuteAlcohol craving was measured by self report with the Visual Analog Scale (VAS). The VAS is a straight horizontal line with one end indicating no alcohol craving and the other end indicating intense alcohol craving. The participant marks a point on the line that matches their present amount of alcohol craving. Location of the point on the line is measured for a score range of 0-100. A lower score indicates less craving for alcohol and a higher score indicated more craving for alcohol.
Alcohol Craving: Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Observation Period, Minute 201 minuteAlcohol craving was measured by self report with the Visual Analog Scale (VAS). The VAS is a straight horizontal line with one end indicating no alcohol craving and the other end indicating intense alcohol craving. The participant marks a point on the line that matches their present amount of alcohol craving. Location of the point on the line is measured for a score range of 0-100. A lower score indicates less craving for alcohol and a higher score indicated more craving for alcohol.
Verbal Fluency: Controlled Word Association (COWAT)3 minutesThe Controlled Word Association (COWAT) is a verbal fluency test that measures the spontaneous production of words beginning with some designated letter. The participant is asked to name words beginning with a given letter, excluding proper nouns, for one minute and this procedure is repeated three times with a different letter each time. A different set of letters was used in each of the two alcohol self-administration trials: C-F-L and P-R-W. The examiner writes down the words provided by the participant on a piece of paper. This test is scored by counting the number of words generated by the subject for each letter, then adding the scores for each of the three letters to calculate a total test score. The lowest possible score is 0 and there is no upper limit to the score range. A higher score is indicative of better outcomes (I.e. better verbal fluency).
Alcohol Craving: Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Observation Period, Minute 401 minuteAlcohol craving was measured by self report with the Visual Analog Scale (VAS). The VAS is a straight horizontal line with one end indicating no alcohol craving and the other end indicating intense alcohol craving. The participant marks a point on the line that matches their present amount of alcohol craving. Location of the point on the line is measured for a score range of 0-100. A lower score indicates less craving for alcohol and a higher score indicated more craving for alcohol.
Alcohol Craving: Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Self-Administration Blocks 1 and 2, Minute 301 minuteAlcohol craving was measured by self report with the Visual Analog Scale (VAS). The VAS is a straight horizontal line with one end indicating no alcohol craving and the other end indicating intense alcohol craving. The participant marks a point on the line that matches their present amount of alcohol craving. Location of the point on the line is measured for a score range of 0-100. A lower score indicates less craving for alcohol and a higher score indicated more craving for alcohol.
Alcohol Craving: Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Self-Administration Blocks 1 and 2, Minute 601 minuteAlcohol craving was measured by self report with the Visual Analog Scale (VAS). The VAS is a straight horizontal line with one end indicating no alcohol craving and the other end indicating intense alcohol craving. The participant marks a point on the line that matches their present amount of alcohol craving. Location of the point on the line is measured for a score range of 0-100. A lower score indicates less craving for alcohol and a higher score indicated more craving for alcohol.
Alcohol Craving: Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Self-Administration Blocks 1 and 2, Minute 901 minuteAlcohol craving was measured by self report with the Visual Analog Scale (VAS). The VAS is a straight horizontal line with one end indicating no alcohol craving and the other end indicating intense alcohol craving. The participant marks a point on the line that matches their present amount of alcohol craving. Location of the point on the line is measured for a score range of 0-100. A lower score indicates less craving for alcohol and a higher score indicated more craving for alcohol.
Alcohol Craving: Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Self-Administration Blocks 1 and 2, Minute 1201 minuteAlcohol craving was measured by self report with the Visual Analog Scale (VAS). The VAS is a straight horizontal line with one end indicating no alcohol craving and the other end indicating intense alcohol craving. The participant marks a point on the line that matches their present amount of alcohol craving. Location of the point on the line is measured for a score range of 0-100. A lower score indicates less craving for alcohol and a higher score indicated more craving for alcohol.
Alcohol Craving: Alcohol Urge Questionnaire (AUQ) Self-Administration Blocks 1 and 2, Minute 301 minuteThe Alcohol Urge Questionnaire (AUQ) is an 8-item self report that measures the participant's urge for an alcoholic drink at the time the questionnaire is completed. Questions are in the form of a 7-point Likert scale (from strongly disagree to strongly agree) and the participant selects the extent to which they disagree or agree with the 8 statements relating to desire to drink, expectation of a desired outcome from drinking, and inability to avoid drinking if alcohol was available. Each of the 8 items is scored 1-7. The total score is calculated by adding the scores for each of the items. The total score range is 8-56. Lower scores indicate less urge for alcohol and higher scores indicate more urge for alcohol.
Alcohol Craving: Alcohol Urge Questionnaire (AUQ) Self-Administration Blocks 1 and 2, Minute 601 minuteThe Alcohol Urge Questionnaire (AUQ) is an 8-item self report that measures the participant's urge for an alcoholic drink at the time the questionnaire is completed. Questions are in the form of a 7-point Likert scale (from strongly disagree to strongly agree) and the participant selects the extent to which they disagree or agree with the 8 statements relating to desire to drink, expectation of a desired outcome from drinking, and inability to avoid drinking if alcohol was available. Each of the 8 items is scored 1-7. The total score is calculated by adding the scores for each of the items. The total score range is 8-56. Lower scores indicate less urge for alcohol and higher scores indicate more urge for alcohol.
Alcohol Craving: Alcohol Urge Questionnaire (AUQ) Self-Administration Blocks 1 and 2, Minute 901 minuteThe Alcohol Urge Questionnaire (AUQ) is an 8-item self report that measures the participant's urge for an alcoholic drink at the time the questionnaire is completed. Questions are in the form of a 7-point Likert scale (from strongly disagree to strongly agree) and the participant selects the extent to which they disagree or agree with the 8 statements relating to desire to drink, expectation of a desired outcome from drinking, and inability to avoid drinking if alcohol was available. Each of the 8 items is scored 1-7. The total score is calculated by adding the scores for each of the items. The total score range is 8-56. Lower scores indicate less urge for alcohol and higher scores indicate more urge for alcohol.
Alcohol Craving: Alcohol Urge Questionnaire (AUQ) Self-Administration Blocks 1 and 2, Minute 1201 minuteThe Alcohol Urge Questionnaire (AUQ) is an 8-item self report that measures the participant's urge for an alcoholic drink at the time the questionnaire is completed. Questions are in the form of a 7-point Likert scale (from strongly disagree to strongly agree) and the participant selects the extent to which they disagree or agree with the 8 statements relating to desire to drink, expectation of a desired outcome from drinking, and inability to avoid drinking if alcohol was available. Each of the 8 items is scored 1-7. The total score is calculated by adding the scores for each of the items. The total score range is 8-56. Lower scores indicate less urge for alcohol and higher scores indicate more urge for alcohol.
Alcohol Craving: Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Observation Period, Minute 301 minuteAlcohol craving was measured by self report with the Visual Analog Scale (VAS). The VAS is a straight horizontal line with one end indicating no alcohol craving and the other end indicating intense alcohol craving. The participant marks a point on the line that matches their present amount of alcohol craving. Location of the point on the line is measured for a score range of 0-100. A lower score indicates less craving for alcohol and a higher score indicated more craving for alcohol.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Pre-assignment details

66 subjects were consented but 39 dropped out prior to randomization in the study (ineligible after screening or lost to follow-up). A total of 27 subjects were randomized.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Lacosamide Then Placebo
This is a within subjects design study in which each subject receives both study drug and placebo. Subjects in this group received 7 days of lacosamide before the first alcohol self-administration trial and 7 days of placebo before the second alcohol self-administration trial.
7
Placebo Then Lacosamide
This is a within subjects design study in which each subject receives both study drug and placebo. Subjects in this group received 7 days of placebo before the first alcohol self-administration trial and 7 days of lacosamide before the second alcohol self-administration trial.
9
Total16

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Alcohol Trial 1, Washout Period 1Failed urine drug screen at time of Alcohol Trial 110
Alcohol Trial 1, Washout Period 1Lost to Follow-up11
Medication Dispense/Exposure Period 1Adverse Event10
Medication Dispense/Exposure Period 1Lost to Follow-up01
Medication Dispense/Exposure Period 1Participation discontinued due to COVID-19 research pause01
Medication Dispense/Exposure Period 1Protocol Violation10
Medication Dispense/Exposure Period 2Lost to Follow-up10

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicLacosamide Then PlaceboPlacebo Then LacosamideTotal
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
7 Participants9 Participants16 Participants
Age, Continuous34.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.4
37.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.2
36.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.2
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
1 Participants1 Participants2 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
6 Participants8 Participants14 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
3 Participants6 Participants9 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
1 Participants1 Participants2 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants1 Participants1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
3 Participants1 Participants4 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
7 Participants9 Participants16 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
6 Participants8 Participants14 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
1 Participants1 Participants2 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 160 / 16
other
Total, other adverse events
7 / 166 / 16
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 160 / 16

Outcome results

Primary

Alcohol Consumption in Alcohol Self-Administration Trials

Alcohol consumption will be measured by using a graduated cylinder to determine the amount of alcohol given to the subject that was consumed. This outcome will be measured as standard drink units. A standard drink contains approximately 0.6 fluid ounces of pure alcohol.

Time frame: 2 hours

Population: 66 subjects were consented, 27 subjects were randomized, and 19 subjects completed the study. Three subjects that completed the study were omitted from statistical analysis due to not consuming any alcohol during either alcohol self-administration session.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
LacosamideAlcohol Consumption in Alcohol Self-Administration Trials3.02 Standard Drink Units (SDU)Standard Deviation 3
Placebo Oral CapsuleAlcohol Consumption in Alcohol Self-Administration Trials2.35 Standard Drink Units (SDU)Standard Deviation 2.31
Secondary

Alcohol Craving: Alcohol Urge Questionnaire (AUQ) Self-Administration Blocks 1 and 2, Minute 120

The Alcohol Urge Questionnaire (AUQ) is an 8-item self report that measures the participant's urge for an alcoholic drink at the time the questionnaire is completed. Questions are in the form of a 7-point Likert scale (from strongly disagree to strongly agree) and the participant selects the extent to which they disagree or agree with the 8 statements relating to desire to drink, expectation of a desired outcome from drinking, and inability to avoid drinking if alcohol was available. Each of the 8 items is scored 1-7. The total score is calculated by adding the scores for each of the items. The total score range is 8-56. Lower scores indicate less urge for alcohol and higher scores indicate more urge for alcohol.

Time frame: 1 minute

Population: 66 subjects were consented, 27 subjects were randomized, and 19 subjects completed the study. Three subjects that completed the study were omitted from statistical analysis due to not consuming any alcohol during either alcohol self-administration session.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
LacosamideAlcohol Craving: Alcohol Urge Questionnaire (AUQ) Self-Administration Blocks 1 and 2, Minute 12024.94 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.45
Placebo Oral CapsuleAlcohol Craving: Alcohol Urge Questionnaire (AUQ) Self-Administration Blocks 1 and 2, Minute 12025.44 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.34
Secondary

Alcohol Craving: Alcohol Urge Questionnaire (AUQ) Self-Administration Blocks 1 and 2, Minute 30

The Alcohol Urge Questionnaire (AUQ) is an 8-item self report that measures the participant's urge for an alcoholic drink at the time the questionnaire is completed. Questions are in the form of a 7-point Likert scale (from strongly disagree to strongly agree) and the participant selects the extent to which they disagree or agree with the 8 statements relating to desire to drink, expectation of a desired outcome from drinking, and inability to avoid drinking if alcohol was available. Each of the 8 items is scored 1-7. The total score is calculated by adding the scores for each of the items. The total score range is 8-56. Lower scores indicate less urge for alcohol and higher scores indicate more urge for alcohol.

Time frame: 1 minute

Population: 66 subjects were consented, 27 subjects were randomized, and 19 subjects completed the study. Three subjects that completed the study were omitted from statistical analysis due to not consuming any alcohol during either alcohol self-administration session.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
LacosamideAlcohol Craving: Alcohol Urge Questionnaire (AUQ) Self-Administration Blocks 1 and 2, Minute 3024.00 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.54
Placebo Oral CapsuleAlcohol Craving: Alcohol Urge Questionnaire (AUQ) Self-Administration Blocks 1 and 2, Minute 3023.94 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.65
Secondary

Alcohol Craving: Alcohol Urge Questionnaire (AUQ) Self-Administration Blocks 1 and 2, Minute 60

The Alcohol Urge Questionnaire (AUQ) is an 8-item self report that measures the participant's urge for an alcoholic drink at the time the questionnaire is completed. Questions are in the form of a 7-point Likert scale (from strongly disagree to strongly agree) and the participant selects the extent to which they disagree or agree with the 8 statements relating to desire to drink, expectation of a desired outcome from drinking, and inability to avoid drinking if alcohol was available. Each of the 8 items is scored 1-7. The total score is calculated by adding the scores for each of the items. The total score range is 8-56. Lower scores indicate less urge for alcohol and higher scores indicate more urge for alcohol.

Time frame: 1 minute

Population: 66 subjects were consented, 27 subjects were randomized, and 19 subjects completed the study. Three subjects that completed the study were omitted from statistical analysis due to not consuming any alcohol during either alcohol self-administration session.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
LacosamideAlcohol Craving: Alcohol Urge Questionnaire (AUQ) Self-Administration Blocks 1 and 2, Minute 6024.88 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.49
Placebo Oral CapsuleAlcohol Craving: Alcohol Urge Questionnaire (AUQ) Self-Administration Blocks 1 and 2, Minute 6026.25 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.7
Secondary

Alcohol Craving: Alcohol Urge Questionnaire (AUQ) Self-Administration Blocks 1 and 2, Minute 90

The Alcohol Urge Questionnaire (AUQ) is an 8-item self report that measures the participant's urge for an alcoholic drink at the time the questionnaire is completed. Questions are in the form of a 7-point Likert scale (from strongly disagree to strongly agree) and the participant selects the extent to which they disagree or agree with the 8 statements relating to desire to drink, expectation of a desired outcome from drinking, and inability to avoid drinking if alcohol was available. Each of the 8 items is scored 1-7. The total score is calculated by adding the scores for each of the items. The total score range is 8-56. Lower scores indicate less urge for alcohol and higher scores indicate more urge for alcohol.

Time frame: 1 minute

Population: 66 subjects were consented, 27 subjects were randomized, and 19 subjects completed the study. Three subjects that completed the study were omitted from statistical analysis due to not consuming any alcohol during either alcohol self-administration session.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
LacosamideAlcohol Craving: Alcohol Urge Questionnaire (AUQ) Self-Administration Blocks 1 and 2, Minute 9022.94 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.46
Placebo Oral CapsuleAlcohol Craving: Alcohol Urge Questionnaire (AUQ) Self-Administration Blocks 1 and 2, Minute 9022.00 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.98
Secondary

Alcohol Craving: Obsessive-Compulsive Drinking Scale (OCDS) Pretrial

The Obsessive-Compulsive Drinking Scale (OCDS) is a quick and reliable 14-item self-rating instrument that provides a total score that measures some cognitive aspects of alcohol craving (obsessive and compulsive drinking). Each of the 14 items is scored from 0 to 4. The total score is calculated by adding the scores for each of the 14 items. The total score range is 0-56. Higher scores are indicative of more obsessive or compulsive drinking and lower scores are indicative of less obsessive or compulsive drinking.

Time frame: 5 minutes

Population: 66 subjects were consented, 27 subjects were randomized, and 19 subjects completed the study. Three subjects that completed the study were omitted from statistical analysis due to not consuming any alcohol during either alcohol self-administration session.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
LacosamideAlcohol Craving: Obsessive-Compulsive Drinking Scale (OCDS) Pretrial10.19 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.79
Placebo Oral CapsuleAlcohol Craving: Obsessive-Compulsive Drinking Scale (OCDS) Pretrial12.25 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.35
Secondary

Alcohol Craving: Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Observation Period, Minute 10

Alcohol craving was measured by self report with the Visual Analog Scale (VAS). The VAS is a straight horizontal line with one end indicating no alcohol craving and the other end indicating intense alcohol craving. The participant marks a point on the line that matches their present amount of alcohol craving. Location of the point on the line is measured for a score range of 0-100. A lower score indicates less craving for alcohol and a higher score indicated more craving for alcohol.

Time frame: 1 minute

Population: 66 subjects were consented, 27 subjects were randomized, and 19 subjects completed the study. Three subjects that completed the study were omitted from statistical analysis due to not consuming any alcohol during either alcohol self-administration session.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
LacosamideAlcohol Craving: Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Observation Period, Minute 1026.75 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 20.07
Placebo Oral CapsuleAlcohol Craving: Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Observation Period, Minute 1041.87 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 33.42
Secondary

Alcohol Craving: Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Observation Period, Minute 20

Alcohol craving was measured by self report with the Visual Analog Scale (VAS). The VAS is a straight horizontal line with one end indicating no alcohol craving and the other end indicating intense alcohol craving. The participant marks a point on the line that matches their present amount of alcohol craving. Location of the point on the line is measured for a score range of 0-100. A lower score indicates less craving for alcohol and a higher score indicated more craving for alcohol.

Time frame: 1 minute

Population: 66 subjects were consented, 27 subjects were randomized, and 19 subjects completed the study. Three subjects that completed the study were omitted from statistical analysis due to not consuming any alcohol during either alcohol self-administration session.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
LacosamideAlcohol Craving: Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Observation Period, Minute 2035.31 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 28.33
Placebo Oral CapsuleAlcohol Craving: Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Observation Period, Minute 2039.75 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 34.95
Secondary

Alcohol Craving: Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Observation Period, Minute 30

Alcohol craving was measured by self report with the Visual Analog Scale (VAS). The VAS is a straight horizontal line with one end indicating no alcohol craving and the other end indicating intense alcohol craving. The participant marks a point on the line that matches their present amount of alcohol craving. Location of the point on the line is measured for a score range of 0-100. A lower score indicates less craving for alcohol and a higher score indicated more craving for alcohol.

Time frame: 1 minute

Population: 66 subjects were consented, 27 subjects were randomized, and 19 subjects completed the study. Three subjects that completed the study were omitted from statistical analysis due to not consuming any alcohol during either alcohol self-administration session.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
LacosamideAlcohol Craving: Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Observation Period, Minute 3035.19 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 28.85
Placebo Oral CapsuleAlcohol Craving: Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Observation Period, Minute 3037.81 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 36.5
Secondary

Alcohol Craving: Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Observation Period, Minute 40

Alcohol craving was measured by self report with the Visual Analog Scale (VAS). The VAS is a straight horizontal line with one end indicating no alcohol craving and the other end indicating intense alcohol craving. The participant marks a point on the line that matches their present amount of alcohol craving. Location of the point on the line is measured for a score range of 0-100. A lower score indicates less craving for alcohol and a higher score indicated more craving for alcohol.

Time frame: 1 minute

Population: 66 subjects were consented, 27 subjects were randomized, and 19 subjects completed the study. Three subjects that completed the study were omitted from statistical analysis due to not consuming any alcohol during either alcohol self-administration session.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
LacosamideAlcohol Craving: Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Observation Period, Minute 4036.87 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 26.71
Placebo Oral CapsuleAlcohol Craving: Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Observation Period, Minute 4036.69 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 34.5
Secondary

Alcohol Craving: Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Pretrial

Alcohol craving was measured by self report with the Visual Analog Scale (VAS). The VAS is a straight horizontal line with one end indicating no alcohol craving and the other end indicating intense alcohol craving. The participant marks a point on the line that matches their present amount of alcohol craving. Location of the point on the line is measured for a score range of 0-100. A lower score indicates less craving for alcohol and a higher score indicated more craving for alcohol.

Time frame: 1 minute

Population: 66 subjects were consented, 27 subjects were randomized, and 19 subjects completed the study. Three subjects that completed the study were omitted from statistical analysis due to not consuming any alcohol during either alcohol self-administration session.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
LacosamideAlcohol Craving: Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Pretrial30.25 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 31
Placebo Oral CapsuleAlcohol Craving: Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Pretrial31.60 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 35.65
Secondary

Alcohol Craving: Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Self-Administration Blocks 1 and 2, Minute 120

Alcohol craving was measured by self report with the Visual Analog Scale (VAS). The VAS is a straight horizontal line with one end indicating no alcohol craving and the other end indicating intense alcohol craving. The participant marks a point on the line that matches their present amount of alcohol craving. Location of the point on the line is measured for a score range of 0-100. A lower score indicates less craving for alcohol and a higher score indicated more craving for alcohol.

Time frame: 1 minute

Population: 66 subjects were consented, 27 subjects were randomized, and 19 subjects completed the study. Three subjects that completed the study were omitted from statistical analysis due to not consuming any alcohol during either alcohol self-administration session.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
LacosamideAlcohol Craving: Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Self-Administration Blocks 1 and 2, Minute 12023.62 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 28.78
Placebo Oral CapsuleAlcohol Craving: Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Self-Administration Blocks 1 and 2, Minute 12029.00 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 32.55
Secondary

Alcohol Craving: Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Self-Administration Blocks 1 and 2, Minute 30

Alcohol craving was measured by self report with the Visual Analog Scale (VAS). The VAS is a straight horizontal line with one end indicating no alcohol craving and the other end indicating intense alcohol craving. The participant marks a point on the line that matches their present amount of alcohol craving. Location of the point on the line is measured for a score range of 0-100. A lower score indicates less craving for alcohol and a higher score indicated more craving for alcohol.

Time frame: 1 minute

Population: 66 subjects were consented, 27 subjects were randomized, and 19 subjects completed the study. Three subjects that completed the study were omitted from statistical analysis due to not consuming any alcohol during either alcohol self-administration session.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
LacosamideAlcohol Craving: Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Self-Administration Blocks 1 and 2, Minute 3028.00 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 19.73
Placebo Oral CapsuleAlcohol Craving: Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Self-Administration Blocks 1 and 2, Minute 3031.87 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 30.66
Secondary

Alcohol Craving: Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Self-Administration Blocks 1 and 2, Minute 60

Alcohol craving was measured by self report with the Visual Analog Scale (VAS). The VAS is a straight horizontal line with one end indicating no alcohol craving and the other end indicating intense alcohol craving. The participant marks a point on the line that matches their present amount of alcohol craving. Location of the point on the line is measured for a score range of 0-100. A lower score indicates less craving for alcohol and a higher score indicated more craving for alcohol.

Time frame: 1 minute

Population: 66 subjects were consented, 27 subjects were randomized, and 19 subjects completed the study. Three subjects that completed the study were omitted from statistical analysis due to not consuming any alcohol during either alcohol self-administration session.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
LacosamideAlcohol Craving: Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Self-Administration Blocks 1 and 2, Minute 6024.94 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 20.78
Placebo Oral CapsuleAlcohol Craving: Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Self-Administration Blocks 1 and 2, Minute 6030.37 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 30.38
Secondary

Alcohol Craving: Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Self-Administration Blocks 1 and 2, Minute 90

Alcohol craving was measured by self report with the Visual Analog Scale (VAS). The VAS is a straight horizontal line with one end indicating no alcohol craving and the other end indicating intense alcohol craving. The participant marks a point on the line that matches their present amount of alcohol craving. Location of the point on the line is measured for a score range of 0-100. A lower score indicates less craving for alcohol and a higher score indicated more craving for alcohol.

Time frame: 1 minute

Population: 66 subjects were consented, 27 subjects were randomized, and 19 subjects completed the study. Three subjects that completed the study were omitted from statistical analysis due to not consuming any alcohol during either alcohol self-administration session.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
LacosamideAlcohol Craving: Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Self-Administration Blocks 1 and 2, Minute 9021.62 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 21.6
Placebo Oral CapsuleAlcohol Craving: Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Self-Administration Blocks 1 and 2, Minute 9027.81 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 29.52
Secondary

Cognitive Function: Digit Span Backward

The Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale (WAIS-IV) Digit Span test will be used to assess subjects' working memory. Subjects will be read and asked to repeat back an increasing number of digits in the opposite order. Each of the 16 items on this test is scored 0 (incorrect answer) or 1 (correct answer). The total score is calculated by adding the scores for each of the 16 items. The total score range is 0-16. Higher scores are indicative of higher levels of working memory (better outcome) and lower scores are indicative of lesser working memory function (worse outcome).

Time frame: 10 minutes

Population: 66 subjects were consented, 27 subjects were randomized, and 19 subjects completed the study. Three subjects that completed the study were omitted from statistical analysis due to not consuming any alcohol during either alcohol self-administration session.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
LacosamideCognitive Function: Digit Span Backward8.06 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.48
Placebo Oral CapsuleCognitive Function: Digit Span Backward7.62 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.16
Secondary

Cognitive Function: Digit Span Forward

The Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale (WAIS-IV) Digit Span test will be used to assess subjects' working memory. Subjects will be read and asked to repeat back an increasing number of digits in the same order. Each of the 16 items on this test is scored 0 (incorrect answer) or 1 (correct answer). The total score is calculated by adding the scores for each of the 16 items. The total score range is 0-16. Higher scores are indicative of higher levels of working memory (better outcome) and lower scores are indicative of lesser working memory function (worse outcome).

Time frame: 10 minutes

Population: 66 subjects were consented, 27 subjects were randomized, and 19 subjects completed the study. Three subjects that completed the study were omitted from statistical analysis due to not consuming any alcohol during either alcohol self-administration session.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
LacosamideCognitive Function: Digit Span Forward10.81 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.97
Placebo Oral CapsuleCognitive Function: Digit Span Forward10.81 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.1
Secondary

Cognitive Function: Digit Span Sequencing

The Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale (WAIS-IV) Digit Span test will be used to assess subjects' working memory. Subjects will be read and asked to repeat back an increasing number of digits in ascending order. Each of the 16 items on this test is scored 0 (incorrect answer) or 1 (correct answer). The total score is calculated by adding the scores for each of the 16 items. The total score range is 0-16. Higher scores are indicative of higher levels of working memory (better outcome) and lower scores are indicative of lesser working memory function (worse outcome).

Time frame: 10 minutes

Population: 66 subjects were consented, 27 subjects were randomized, and 19 subjects completed the study. Three subjects that completed the study were omitted from statistical analysis due to not consuming any alcohol during either alcohol self-administration session.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
LacosamideCognitive Function: Digit Span Sequencing8.12 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.33
Placebo Oral CapsuleCognitive Function: Digit Span Sequencing7.62 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.36
Secondary

Cognitive Function: Spatial Span Backward

The Wechsler Memory Scale (WMS-III) Spatial Span test will be used to assess subjects' working memory. Subjects will be shown a sequence of block tapping and asked to repeat back an increasing number of tapped blocks in the opposite order. Each of the 16 items on this test is scored 0 (incorrect answer) or 1 (correct answer). The total score is calculated by adding the scores for each of the 16 items. The total score range is 0-16. Higher scores are indicative of higher levels of working memory (better outcome) and lower scores are indicative of lesser working memory function (worse outcome).

Time frame: 10 minutes

Population: 66 subjects were consented, 27 subjects were randomized, and 19 subjects completed the study. Three subjects that completed the study were omitted from statistical analysis due to not consuming any alcohol during either alcohol self-administration session.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
LacosamideCognitive Function: Spatial Span Backward7.19 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.49
Placebo Oral CapsuleCognitive Function: Spatial Span Backward7.62 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.14
Secondary

Cognitive Function: Spatial Span Forward

The Wechsler Memory Scale (WMS-III) Spatial Span test will be used to assess subjects' working memory. Subjects will be shown a sequence of block tapping and asked to repeat back an increasing number of tapped blocks in the same order. Each of the 16 items on this test is scored 0 (incorrect answer) or 1 (correct answer). The total score is calculated by adding the scores for each of the 16 items. The total score range is 0-16. Higher scores are indicative of higher levels of working memory (better outcome) and lower scores are indicative of lesser working memory function (worse outcome).

Time frame: 10 minutes

Population: 66 subjects were consented, 27 subjects were randomized, and 19 subjects completed the study. Three subjects that completed the study were omitted from statistical analysis due to not consuming any alcohol during either alcohol self-administration session.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
LacosamideCognitive Function: Spatial Span Forward8.44 correct itemsStandard Deviation 2.53
Placebo Oral CapsuleCognitive Function: Spatial Span Forward7.75 correct itemsStandard Deviation 3.7
Secondary

Verbal Fluency: Controlled Word Association (COWAT)

The Controlled Word Association (COWAT) is a verbal fluency test that measures the spontaneous production of words beginning with some designated letter. The participant is asked to name words beginning with a given letter, excluding proper nouns, for one minute and this procedure is repeated three times with a different letter each time. A different set of letters was used in each of the two alcohol self-administration trials: C-F-L and P-R-W. The examiner writes down the words provided by the participant on a piece of paper. This test is scored by counting the number of words generated by the subject for each letter, then adding the scores for each of the three letters to calculate a total test score. The lowest possible score is 0 and there is no upper limit to the score range. A higher score is indicative of better outcomes (I.e. better verbal fluency).

Time frame: 3 minutes

Population: 66 subjects were consented, 27 subjects were randomized, and 19 subjects completed the study. Three subjects that completed the study were omitted from statistical analysis due to not consuming any alcohol during either alcohol self-administration session.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
LacosamideVerbal Fluency: Controlled Word Association (COWAT)38.19 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.26
Placebo Oral CapsuleVerbal Fluency: Controlled Word Association (COWAT)42.25 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.75

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026