Skip to content

Assessing Leg Control in People With Chronic Stroke

Lower Extremity Selective Voluntary Motor Control in Adults With Chronic Stroke: Comparing the SCALE Assessment to the Fugl-Meyer Assessment

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03271463
Enrollment
16
Registered
2017-09-05
Start date
2018-08-05
Completion date
2020-11-05
Last updated
2021-04-14

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Chronic Stroke

Keywords

stroke, selective voluntary motor control

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to compare the clinometric (psychometric) properties of the SCALE and FMA-LE assessments in adults after stroke. A second purpose is to determine how well each measure predicts walking speed using the 10 meter walk test.

Detailed description

Selective voluntary motor control may be important in prognosticating future function in adults post stroke. It is therefore important to measure selective voluntary motor control using assessments that are valid, reliable and easy to perform and interpret. Current assessments are time consuming and complicated. Clinicians who work with patients post stroke will benefit from this research because they will have evidence supporting appropriate measurement of selective voluntary motor control. This evidence may inform their clinical decision making when working with patients. Patients who have survived a stroke will benefit because their therapists will be able to better measure their selective voluntary motor control which may one day lead to better prediction of functional outcomes and the selection of appropriate interventions. The Fugl-Meyer assessment (FMA) is the Gold Standard for the assessment of individuals with brain injury, most commonly those surviving cerebrovascular accident (stroke). The full assessment is complicated and can take more than an hour to complete. Clinicians have limited time to perform a full evaluation of their patients, the FMA is just one part of this evaluation. The lower extremity selective voluntary motor control component of the FMA (FMA-LE) is difficult for clinicians who are not experts to perform and interpret. For these reasons, few practicing clinicians use the FMA. However, measuring selective voluntary motor control may be important for prognosticating patients' future functional level and their need for continued therapeutic interventions. The Selective Control Assessment of Lower Extremity (SCALE) was developed for use with children who have cerebral palsy (CP), a condition that in some ways presents similar to stroke. The SCALE has been validated and deemed reliable in the pediatric population with CP. This study aims to determine inter-rater and intra-rater reliability for the FMA-LE and the SCALE. In addition, scores on the SCALE will be compared to scores on the FMA-LE to determine concurrent validity. Finally the scores on the SCALE and FMA-LE will be compared to the time it takes for stroke survivors to walk 10-meters (10-meter walk test) to determine how well each measure predicts functional status (predictive validity).

Interventions

BEHAVIORALSelective Control Assessment of Lower Extremity (SCALE)

Inter- and intra-rater reliability Validity: correlation analysis with Fugl-Meyer Assessment - Lower Extremity Component (FMA-LE) and 10 meter walk test (see below)

Sponsors

University of Minnesota
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 79 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Adults between 18 and 79 years of age who have sustained a chronic cerebrovascular accident (stroke) with known corticospinal tract damage * At least one year after onset * Ability to walk * Ability to understand and follow simple instructions * Written informed consent obtained from subject

Exclusion criteria

* History of cerebellar infarct, traumatic brain injury, tumor, etc. * Rigidity, ataxia, or other Cerebellar or Basal Ganglia signs or symptoms. * Hospitalizations in the past 6 months. * Neurosurgical or Musculoskeletal surgery in last 12 months. * Neurological or Musculoskeletal injury within the past month. * Pain that interferes with the ability to assume side-lying position. * Medication for hypertonicity: Participants may be on medicine for abnormal tone. However, there must not be any of the following: 1. Change in dosage or type of medication during the past 6 months 2. Botox injection(s) within 6 months.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Selective Control Assessment of Lower Extremity (SCALE)Baseline to 4 weeksEach item is rated 2-0, 2 being Normal and 0 being Unable to Move

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Fugl-Meyer Assessment-Lower Extremity component (FMA-LE)Baseline to 4 weeksThe complete Fugl-Meyer contains 155 items and each item is rated on a three-point ordinal scale, 2 points for the detail being performed completely, 1 point for the detail being partially completed, and 0 points for the detail not being performed. The maximum score for the motor performance is divided into 66 points for the upper extremity and 34 for the lower extremity. Only the lower extremity motor assessment component of the Fugl-Meyer will be used for this study, which consists of 17 items. Fugl-Meyer Assessment (Upper and lower extremity components). Available from: https://www.researchgate.net/publ
10-meter walk testBaseline to 4 weeksPerformance measure used to assess walking speed in meters per second over a short distance. It can be employed to determine functional mobility, gait, and vestibular function. Scoring is done by completing three trials and calculating the average of the three trials to obtain the velocity. The test may be completed at the subject's self-selected velocity and/or at the subject's fast velocity.

Countries

United States

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026