Skip to content

Extension of EMDR vs. PC For Motor Vehicle Accident Trauma

Extension of EMDR vs. PC For Motor Vehicle Accident Trauma

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03271411
Enrollment
20
Registered
2017-09-05
Start date
2017-08-30
Completion date
2018-12-31
Last updated
2017-09-07

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Motor Vehicle Accident, Trauma, Psychological

Brief summary

This is an extension of a randomized clinical trial comparing eye movement desensitization and reprocessing (EMDR) to progressive counting (PC) for volunteers from the community who are distressed by the memory of a motor vehicle accident. The purpose of this extension is to add Phil Manfield's recently developed Flash technique as a precursor to both EMDR and PC, to see a) if that has any impact on participant retention, treatment effectiveness, or treatment efficiency; and b) if such impact is equivalent with EMDR and PC.

Interventions

BEHAVIORALEMDR-based Flash technique

Initial EMDR session (with Flash technique) of up to three hours; about one week later, follow-up session of up to one hour

BEHAVIORALPC-based Flash technique

Initial PC session (with Flash technique) of up to three hours; about one week later, follow-up session of up to one hour

Sponsors

Trauma Institute & Child Trauma Institute
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* adult reporting distress related to motor vehicle accident-related trauma * English-speaking

Exclusion criteria

* already in therapy in which the memory of interest is being actively addressed with a structured/focused trauma resolution method * any obvious/urgent need for more comprehensive psychotherapy (based on initial screening interview) * any indication of instability during interactions prior to the therapy session * an average score on the Dissociative Experiences Scale of 30 or greater, if (as per follow-up questions) indicating a likely dissociative disorder

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in SUDS following treatmentAdministered pre-treatment, two weeks post-treatment, and 12 weeks post-treatmentSubjective Units of Distress Scale
Change in PRS following treatmentAdministered pre-treatment, two weeks post-treatment, and 12 weeks post-treatmentProblem Rating Scale
Change in PDS following treatmentAdministered pre-treatment, two weeks post-treatment, and 12 weeks post-treatmentPTSD Diagnostic Scale

Countries

United States

Contacts

Primary ContactRicky Greenwald, PsyD
cti@childtrauma.com413-774-2340

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026