Skip to content

The Differential Impact of Proton Beam Irradiation Versus Conventional Radiation on Organs-at-risk in Stage II-III Breast Cancer Patients

The Differential Impact of Proton Beam Irradiation Versus Conventional Radiation on Organs-at-risk in Stage II-III Breast Cancer Patients

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03270072
Enrollment
100
Registered
2017-09-01
Start date
2017-10-26
Completion date
2026-12-31
Last updated
2026-09-02

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Breast Cancer Stage II, Breast Cancer Stage III

Brief summary

The objective of the study is to serve as a correlative study for patients enrolled on the RadCOMP trial (NCT02603341), a randomized phase III study of stage II and III breast cancer patients treated with either conventional photon radiation or proton beam radiation

Interventions

None listed

Sponsors

Massachusetts General Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
21 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Eligible for and scheduled to receive radiation therapy on Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) Trial 3510 (Pragmatic Phase III Randomized Trial of Proton vs Photon Therapy for Patients with Non-Metastatic Breast Cancer Receiving Comprehensive Nodal Radiation: A Radiotherapy Comparative Effectiveness (RADCOMP) Consortium Trial). (NCT02603341) * Ability to understand and the willingness to sign a study-specific written informed consent document

Exclusion criteria

* There are no

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in Global Longitudinal Strain (GLS)Baseline, 6 MonthsComparison of the change in GLS between conventional radiation and proton beam radiation groups. Participants who decrease their GLS by at least 2% 6-8 months following radiation therapy will be considered to demonstrate a significant decrement in GLS.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Using EchocardiographyBaseline, end of treatment (approximately 10 weeks), then 6, 12, 24, 36, and 60 months post treatmentComparison of the change in LVEF between conventional radiation and proton beam radiation groups. Reduced cardiac function is defined as an ejection fraction \<50%.
Radiation-induced Lung Parenchymal Changes Using CT ImagingBaseline, 3,6,12, months post treatmentRadiation-induced lung parenchymal changes will be assess with non-contrast enhanced computerized tomography (CT) scans and incidence will be estimated in each radiation group by the cumulative incidence function and compared using Gray's test. Among patients who do not have any changes detected, death and disease progression will be considered as competing risks.
Incidence of Thyroid DysfunctionBaseline, end of treatment (approximately 10 weeks), then 12, 24, 36, and 60 months post treatmentIncidence of thyroid insufficiency will be estimated in each radiation group by the cumulative incidence function and compared using Gray's test. In the absence of thyroid dysfunction, death and disease progression will be considered as competing risks.
Incidence of Ipsilateral Arm LymphedemaBaseline, end of treatment (approximately 10 weeks), then 6, 12, 24, 36, and 60 months post treatmentIncidence of ipsilateral arm lymphedema will be estimated in each radiation group by the cumulative incidence function and compared using Gray's test.
Severity of Ipsilateral Arm LymphedemaBaseline, end of treatment (approximately 10 weeks), then 6, 12, 24, 36, and 60 months post treatmentSerial arm measurements may be analyzed using mixed effects model to compare the severity of ipsilateral arm lymphedema over time between the radiation groups.
Ipsilateral Breast/Chest Wall CosmesisBaseline, end of treatment (approximately 10 weeks), then 6, 12, 24, 36, and 60 months post treatmentBreast cosmesis will be assessed with characteristics graded on a four-point scale. Assessments will be performed by a trained nurse/nurse practitioner using the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Cosmetic Rating System for Breast Cancer. Incidence of adverse cosmesis (2=fair or 3=poor score) will be estimated in each radiation group by the cumulative incidence function and compared using Gray's test. Among patients without adverse breast cosmesis, death and disease progression will be considered as competing risks.

Countries

United States

Contacts

PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORRachel Jimenez, MD

Massachusetts General Hospital

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Sep 3, 2026