Skip to content

Efficacy, Safety and Tolerability of PF-06687234 as Add-on Therapy to Infliximab in Active UC Subjects Not in Remission.

A PHASE 2A, RANDOMIZED, DOUBLE-BLIND, PLACEBO-CONTROLLED STUDY TO EVALUATE THE EFFICACY, SAFETY, TOLERABILITY AND PHARMACOKINETICS OF PF-06687234 AS ADD-ON THERAPY TO INFLIXIMAB IN ACTIVE ULCERATIVE COLITIS SUBJECTS WHO ARE NOT IN REMISSION (BUILD UC)

Status
Terminated
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03269695
Enrollment
20
Registered
2017-09-01
Start date
2017-12-20
Completion date
2021-01-07
Last updated
2021-12-28

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Ulcerative Colitis

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to determine if PF-06687234 is effective and safe as add-on therapy to infliximab in subjects with active ulcerative colitis who are not in remission.

Detailed description

This is a Phase 2a, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel group study in subjects with active ulcerative colitis and a non-remission (partial) response to infliximab. All enrolled subjects must have been on infliximab for a minimum of 14 weeks with last dose 8 weeks prior to the date of randomization. Subjects will be randomly assigned to 1 of 2 treatment arms (PF-06687234 or placebo) administered subcutaneously every week for a total of 12 doses. Blood, stool and tissue samples will be collected at various time points throughout the study to evaluate efficacy, safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics and immunogenicity. Duration of participation for subjects will be approximately 6 months.

Interventions

SC QW

DRUGPlacebo

SC QW

Sponsors

Pfizer
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 75 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Male and/or female subjects 18 years to 75 years of age and weight \> 40 kg at the time of informed consent. * A diagnosis of active UC (histologic) for 4 months. * Subjects with active UC as defined by (via screening endoscopy) a total Mayo Score of 4 or more but 9 or less and an endoscopic subscore of 2.or more. * UC extending at least 15 cm proximal to the anal verge at the time of the screening endoscopy. * Must be on a stable dose 5-10 mg/kg of Remicade, Inflectra, or Remsima for a minimum of 14 weeks with no anticipation of need for change in infliximab treatment regimen throughout the study * Male subjects able to father children and female subjects of childbearing potential and at risk for pregnancy must agree to use two methods of contraception (at least one of which is considered as highly effective) throughout the study and until the Week 16 visit

Exclusion criteria

* Subjects with a diagnosis or documented history of total colectomy and/or pouchitis, indeterminate colitis, microscopic colitis, ischemic colitis, infectious colitis, radiation colitis, and diverticular disease associated with colitis, or clinical findings suggestive of Crohn's disease. * Subjects need for surgery or with major elective surgery scheduled during the study. * Subjects with extensive colitis for at least 8 years who have not had a colonoscopy with surveillance biopsies within 2 years prior to baseline. * Subjects with history of or at screening endoscopy, biopsy documented colonic dysplasia or neoplasia. * Subjects who require infliximab dosing interval other than every 6 weeks or every 8 weeks. * Subjects displaying clinical signs of fulminant colitis or toxic megacolon, with primary sclerosing cholangitis, known colonic stricture, history of colonic, small bowel obstruction or resection, with history of or current colonic or small bowel stoma. * Cyclic neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, lymphopenia, leukopenia or history of chronic anemia. * Presence of active enteric infection. * Known history of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) based on documented history with positive serological test, or positive HIV serologic test. * Presence of transplanted organ. * Anticipated need for any live vaccine. * Class III or Class IV heart failure. * Acute coronary syndrome and any history of cerebrovascular disease. * Subjects with current, or a history of QT prolongation. * Subjects receiving the following therapies within the designated time period: * \>9 mg/day of oral budesonide or \>20 mg/day of prednisone or equivalent within 2 weeks prior to baseline. * IV, IM or topical (rectal) treatment of 5-ASA or corticosteroid enemas within 2 weeks prior to baseline. * Anti integrin inhibitors within 14 weeks prior to baseline. * Any use of natalizumab. * Interferon therapy within 8 weeks prior to baseline. * Prior treatment with lymphocyte depleting therapies and alkylating agents. * Received selective B lymphocyte depleting agents within 1 year prior to baseline. * Receiving leukocyte apheresis, granulocyte apheresis, or plasma exchange within 6 months of baseline. * JAK inhibitors within 3 months prior to baseline. * Any investigational procedures(s) or product(s)30 days prior to baseline. * History of sensitivity to heparin or heparin induced thrombocytopenia * Known history of hypersensitivity, intolerance, or allergic reaction to PF-06687234 or any constituent of the IP.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Participants With Categorical Electrocardiogram (ECG) DataFrom baseline through Week 16Twelve (12) lead ECGs were collected. All scheduled ECGs were performed after the participants had rested quietly for at least 10 minutes in a supine position. When the timing of these measurements coincided with a blood collection, the ECG was obtained prior to the nominal time of the blood collection, blood pressure, and pulse rate. ECG data were analyzed as per pre-specified categories. PR=pulse rate; QTc=QT interval corrected for heart rate; QTcF=QTc corrected using Fridericia's formula.
Percentage of Participants in Modified Clinical Remission at Week 12 (Traditional Endoscopic Subscore <=1, Observed Cases)Week 12The Mayo score consists of 4 subscores (Endoscopic, stool frequency, rectal bleeding and Physician's global assessment \[PGA\]), each graded 0 to 3 with the higher score indicating more severe disease activity. Modified clinical remission is defined as a modified total Mayo Score (total Mayo score excluding the PGA subscore) \<=2, no individual subscore \>1, traditional endoscopic subscore \<=1 (where mild friability was scored as of 1; moderate or severe friability was scored as 2) and rectal bleeding subscore=0. Participants with missing values were handled by observed case approach (the missing data were used as is). The percentage of participants achieving modified clinical remission was calculated based on the number of participants with observed data.
Percentage of Participants in Modified Clinical Remission at Week 12 (Traditional Mayo Endoscopic Subscore <=1, Treatment Failure Approach)Week 12The Mayo score consists of 4 subscores (Endoscopic, stool frequency, rectal bleeding and Physician's global assessment \[PGA\]), each graded 0 to 3 with the higher score indicating more severe disease activity. Modified clinical remission is defined as a modified total Mayo Score (total Mayo score excluding the PGA subscore) \<=2, no individual subscore \>1, traditional endoscopic subscore \<=1 (where mild friability was scored as of 1; moderate or severe friability was scored as 2) and rectal bleeding subscore=0. Participants with missing values were handled by treatment failure approach (participants who had missing value for any reasons were considered as treatment failures).
Percentage of Participants in Modified Clinical Remission at Week 12 (Modified Mayo Endoscopy Subscore = 0 or 1, Observed Cases)Week 12The Mayo score consists of 4 subscores (Endoscopic, stool frequency, rectal bleeding and Physician's global assessment), each graded 0 to 3 with the higher score indicating more severe disease activity. Modified clinical remission is defined as a modified total Mayo Score (total Mayo score excluding the PGA subscore) with endoscopic subscore = 0 or 1 (where any friability was scored as a mayo endoscopic subscore of 2), stool frequency subscore = 0 or 1, and rectal bleeding subscore = 0. Participants with missing values were handled by observed case approach (the missing data were used as is). The percentage of participants achieving modified clinical remission was calculated based on the number of participants with observed data.
Percentage of Participants in Modified Clinical Remission at Week 12 (Modified Mayo Endoscopy Subscore = 0 or 1, Treatment Failure Approach)Week 12The Mayo score consists of 4 subscores (Endoscopic, stool frequency, rectal bleeding and Physician's global assessment \[PGA\]), each graded 0 to 3 with the higher score indicating more severe disease activity. Modified clinical remission is defined as a modified total Mayo Score (total Mayo score excluding the PGA subscore) with endoscopic subscore = 0 or 1 (where any friability was scored as a mayo endoscopic subscore of 2), stool frequency subscore = 0 or 1, and rectal bleeding subscore = 0. Participants with missing values were handled by treatment failure approach (participants who had missing value for any reasons were considered as treatment failures).
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (AEs; All Causalities)Baseline (Day 1) through and including a minimum of 28 calendar days after the last administration of the investigational products (22 weeks in total)Treatment-emergent AEs are those with initial onset or that worsen in severity after the first dose of the study medication. All AEs in the table below were treatment-emergent AEs. An serious adverse event (SAE) is any untoward medical occurrence at any dose that: results in death; is life threatening (immediate risk of death); requires inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization; results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity (substantial disruption of the ability to conduct normal life functions); results in congenital anomaly/birth defect; or that is considered to be an important medical event that may jeopardize the participant or may require intervention to prevent one of the other AE outcomes. Severe AEs were defined as AEs that interfered significantly with participant's usual function. Both SAEs and severe AEs were according to the investigator's assessment.
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent AEs (Treatment Related)Baseline (Day 1) through and including a minimum of 28 calendar days after the last administration of the investigational products (22 weeks in total)Treatment-emergent AEs are those with initial onset or that worsen in severity after the first dose of the study medication. All AEs in the table below were treatment-emergent AEs. An SAE is any untoward medical occurrence at any dose that: results in death; is life threatening (immediate risk of death); requires inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization; results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity (substantial disruption of the ability to conduct normal life functions); results in congenital anomaly/birth defect; or that is considered to be an important medical event that may jeopardize the participant or may require intervention to prevent one of the other AE outcomes. Severe AEs were defined as AEs that interfered significantly with participant's usual function. Both SAEs and severe AEs were according to the investigator's assessment. Treatment-related AEs were also determined by the investigator.
Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities Without Regard to Baseline AbnormalityFrom baseline through Week 16The laboratory tests as defined in the protocol, including hematology, chemistry, urinalysis and other, were performed. Baseline was defined as the last measurement prior to first dosing (Day 1).
Number of Participants With Categorical Vital SignsFrom baseline through Week 16Single sitting blood pressure (BP), pulse rate, and temperature were measured. At Day 1 and Week 1, BP and pulse were collected approximately 30 minutes prior to dosing, approximately 30 minutes post dosing and approximately 1 hour post dosing. For participants with no safety issues (eg, severe injection site reactions, severe elevations BP and/or pulse), BP and pulse were collected approximately 30 minutes prior to dosing and approximately 30 minutes post dosing from Weeks 2-16. Vital signs were analyzed as per pre-specified categories.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage of Participants With Endoscopic Improvement at Week 12 ( Observed Cases)Week 12Endoscopic improvement is defined as a decrease of \>=1 point in a modified endoscopic subscore (any friability is scored as 2) or an absolute endoscopy score of \<=1 without friability. Participants with missing values were handled by observed case approach (the missing data were used as is). The percentage of participants achieving endoscopic improvement was calculated based on the number of participants with observed data.
Percentage of Participants With Endoscopic Improvement at Week 12 ( Treatment Failure Approach)Week 12Endoscopic improvement is defined as a decrease of \>=1 point in a modified endoscopic subscore (any friability is scored as 2) or an absolute endoscopy score of \<=1 without friability. Participants with missing values were handled by treatment failure approach (participants who had missing value for any reasons were considered as treatment failures).
Percentage of Participants Achieving Geboes Index Remission at Week 12 (Observed Cases)Week 12Geboes index is a structured six-grade classification system ordered as follows: 0, structural changes (sub-grade: 0-0.3); 1, chronic inflammatory infiltrate (sub-grade: 1-1.3); 2, lamina propria neutrophils and eosinophils (sub-grade: 2A-2B.3); 3, neutrophils in epithelium (sub-grade: 3-3.3); 4, crypt destruction (sub-grade: 4-4.3); and 5, erosion and ulceration (sub-grade: 5-5.4). The final index ranges from 0 to 5.4, with low score associated with no inflammation or less inflammation and high score associated with severe inflammation or ulceration. Geboes index remission was defined as Geboes index \< 3 and Grade 3 \< 3.1 at week 12. Participants with missing values were handled by observed case approach (the missing data were used as is). The percentage of participants achieving Geboes index remission was calculated based on the number of participants with observed data.
Change From Baseline in Robart's Histology Index at Week 12 (Observed Cases)Week 12Robart's histology index is based on the Geboes scores, and the final score is obtained by the summation of four main items (chronic inflammatory infiltrate level, lamina propria neutrophils, neutrophils in the epithelium, and erosion or ulceration), which are classified from 0 (no inflammation) to 3 (severe inflammation or ulceration), yielding a final score that ranges between 0 (no inflammation) and 33 (severe inflammation or ulceration). Participants with missing values were handled by observed case approach (the missing data were used as is).
Percentage of Participants With a Clinical Response at Week 12 (Observed Cases)Week 12The Mayo score consists of 4 subscores (Endoscopic, stool frequency, rectal bleeding and Physician's global assessment \[PGA\]), each graded 0 to 3 with the higher score indicating more severe disease activity. Clinical response is defined with a decrease from baseline of at least 3 points in total Mayo score with at least 30% change, accompanied by at least one-point decrease or absolute score of 0 or 1 in rectal bleeding subscore. Participants with missing values were handled by observed case approach (the missing data were used as is).
Percentage of Participants With a Clinical Response at Week 12 (Treatment Failure Approach)Week 12The Mayo score consists of 4 subscores (Endoscopic, stool frequency, rectal bleeding and Physician's global assessment \[PGA\]), each graded 0 to 3 with the higher score indicating more severe disease activity. Clinical response is defined with a decrease from baseline of at least 3 points in total Mayo score with at least 30% change, accompanied by at least one-point decrease or absolute score of 0 or 1 in rectal bleeding subscore. Participants with missing values were handled by treatment failure approach (participants who had missing value for any reasons were considered as treatment failures).
Percentage of Participants With Change From Baseline in Derived Partial Mayo Score of <=2 With no Individual Subscore >1 at Weeks 2, 4, 8 and 12 (Observed Cases)Baseline, Weeks 2, 4, 8 and 12The Mayo score is determined by the summation of 4 subscores (Endoscopic, stool frequency, rectal bleeding and Physician's global assessment \[PGA\]), each graded 0 (normal) to 3 (worst). Derived partial mayo score is defined as total Mayo score excluding the endoscopic subscore (stool frequency, rectal bleeding and PGA only), ranging from 0 (normal) to 9 (the most severe). The percentages of participants with change from baseline in derived partial Mayo score of \<=2 with no individual subscore \>1 at Weeks 2, 4, 8 and 12 were calculated for this endpoint. Participants with missing values were handled by observed case approach (the missing data were used as is). Generalized Linear Mixed Model (GLMM) was used with fixed effects of treatment, visit and treatment by visit interaction.
Serum Concentrations of PF-06687234 20 mgPrior to dosing on Day 1 and at Weeks 1, 3, 7, 11, 12 (168 hours post dose) and 16Samples for serum PF-06687234 concentration were collected approximately 30 minutes prior to dosing. Concentration values below the lower limit of quantification were excluded when calculating the geometric mean (geometric coefficient of variation).
Percentage of Participants With the Development of Human Anti-Fusion Antibodies (HAFAs) and Neutralizing Antibodies (NAbs) Against PF-06687234At screening, Day 1, Weeks 3, 7, 11, 12 and 16 (prior to dosing)Plasma samples were analyzed for anti PF-06687234, anti PF-06687234 IL-10 neutralizing antibody (AB) and anti PF-06687234 single chain variable fragment (scFv) neutralizing AB. Samples inadvertently analyzed were excluded.

Countries

Australia, Belgium, Germany, Israel, Italy, Saudi Arabia, Serbia, South Korea, Turkey (Türkiye), United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

A total of 46 participants were screened , of whom 20 were randomized and treated (10 participants each in the Placebo + Infliximab and PF-06687234 20 mg + Infliximab treatment groups). Fifteen participants completed the treatment.

Pre-assignment details

Participants with active histologic Ulcerative Colitis (as defined by a total Mayo Score \>= 4 but \<=9 and an endoscopic subscore \>=2) for \>=4 months, and on a stable dose 5 to 10 mg/kg of Remicade, or protocol specified infliximab biosimilars for a minimum of 14 weeks prior to study entry with no anticipation of need for change in infliximab treatment regimen throughout the study were enrolled.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Placebo + Infliximab
Placebo for PF-06687234 was administered as subcutaneous injection on Day 1, Week 1 (Day 8), Week 2 (Day 15), Week 3 (Day 22), Week 4 (Day 29), Week 5 (Day 36), Week 6 (Day 43), Week 7 (Day 50), Week 8 (Day 57), Week 9 (Day 64), Week 10 (Day 71) and Week 11 (Day 78) for a total 12 doses. Remicade or protocol specified infliximab biosimilar was administered as an IV infusion on Day 1, Week 8 and Week 16 for a total of 3 doses for participants on infliximab every 8 weeks, and Day 1, Week 6, Week 12 and Week 18 for participants on infliximab every 6 weeks.
10
PF-06687234 20 mg + Infliximab
PF-06687234 was administered as a 20 mg subcutaneous injection on Day 1, Week 1 (Day 8), Week 2 (Day 15), Week 3 (Day 22), Week 4 (Day 29), Week 5 (Day 36), Week 6 (Day 43), Week 7 (Day 50), Week 8 (Day 57), Week 9 (Day 64), Week 10 (Day 71) and Week 11 (Day 78) for a total 12 doses. Remicade or protocol specified infliximab biosimilar was administered as an IV infusion on Day 1, Week 8 and Week 16 for a total of 3 doses for participants on infliximab every 8 weeks, and Day 1, Week 6, Week 12 and Week 18 for participants on infliximab every 6 weeks.
10
Total20

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyAdverse Event21
Overall StudyLack of Efficacy01
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject01

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicPlacebo + InfliximabPF-06687234 20 mg + InfliximabTotal
Age, Continuous44.5 Years43.5 Years43.5 Years
Age, Customized
18-44 Years
5 Participants6 Participants11 Participants
Age, Customized
45-64 Years
2 Participants4 Participants6 Participants
Age, Customized
≥ 65 Years
3 Participants0 Participants3 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Not Hispanic or Latino
10 Participants10 Participants20 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Asian
2 Participants2 Participants4 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
White
8 Participants8 Participants16 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
3 Participants4 Participants7 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
7 Participants6 Participants13 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 100 / 10
other
Total, other adverse events
7 / 109 / 10
serious
Total, serious adverse events
1 / 100 / 10

Outcome results

Primary

Number of Participants With Categorical Electrocardiogram (ECG) Data

Twelve (12) lead ECGs were collected. All scheduled ECGs were performed after the participants had rested quietly for at least 10 minutes in a supine position. When the timing of these measurements coincided with a blood collection, the ECG was obtained prior to the nominal time of the blood collection, blood pressure, and pulse rate. ECG data were analyzed as per pre-specified categories. PR=pulse rate; QTc=QT interval corrected for heart rate; QTcF=QTc corrected using Fridericia's formula.

Time frame: From baseline through Week 16

Population: All participants who had received at least one dose of the randomized treatment (10 each for the Placebo + Infliximab arm and the PF-06687234 20mg + Infliximab arm).

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Placebo + InfliximabNumber of Participants With Categorical Electrocardiogram (ECG) DataPR Interval >=300 millisecond (msec)0 Participants
Placebo + InfliximabNumber of Participants With Categorical Electrocardiogram (ECG) DataChange in PR Interval (%) >=25/50%0 Participants
Placebo + InfliximabNumber of Participants With Categorical Electrocardiogram (ECG) DataQRS Complex >=140 msec0 Participants
Placebo + InfliximabNumber of Participants With Categorical Electrocardiogram (ECG) DataChange in QRS Complex (%) >=50%0 Participants
Placebo + InfliximabNumber of Participants With Categorical Electrocardiogram (ECG) DataQT Interval >=500 msec0 Participants
Placebo + InfliximabNumber of Participants With Categorical Electrocardiogram (ECG) Data450 msec ≤ QTcF < 480 msec0 Participants
Placebo + InfliximabNumber of Participants With Categorical Electrocardiogram (ECG) Data480 msec <= QTcF < 500 msec0 Participants
Placebo + InfliximabNumber of Participants With Categorical Electrocardiogram (ECG) DataQTcF >=500 msec0 Participants
Placebo + InfliximabNumber of Participants With Categorical Electrocardiogram (ECG) Data30 msec <= change in QTcF < 60 msec0 Participants
Placebo + InfliximabNumber of Participants With Categorical Electrocardiogram (ECG) DataChange in QTcF >=60 msec0 Participants
PF-06687234 20 mg + InfliximabNumber of Participants With Categorical Electrocardiogram (ECG) DataQTcF >=500 msec0 Participants
PF-06687234 20 mg + InfliximabNumber of Participants With Categorical Electrocardiogram (ECG) DataPR Interval >=300 millisecond (msec)0 Participants
PF-06687234 20 mg + InfliximabNumber of Participants With Categorical Electrocardiogram (ECG) Data450 msec ≤ QTcF < 480 msec0 Participants
PF-06687234 20 mg + InfliximabNumber of Participants With Categorical Electrocardiogram (ECG) DataChange in PR Interval (%) >=25/50%0 Participants
PF-06687234 20 mg + InfliximabNumber of Participants With Categorical Electrocardiogram (ECG) DataChange in QTcF >=60 msec0 Participants
PF-06687234 20 mg + InfliximabNumber of Participants With Categorical Electrocardiogram (ECG) DataQRS Complex >=140 msec0 Participants
PF-06687234 20 mg + InfliximabNumber of Participants With Categorical Electrocardiogram (ECG) Data480 msec <= QTcF < 500 msec0 Participants
PF-06687234 20 mg + InfliximabNumber of Participants With Categorical Electrocardiogram (ECG) DataChange in QRS Complex (%) >=50%0 Participants
PF-06687234 20 mg + InfliximabNumber of Participants With Categorical Electrocardiogram (ECG) Data30 msec <= change in QTcF < 60 msec1 Participants
PF-06687234 20 mg + InfliximabNumber of Participants With Categorical Electrocardiogram (ECG) DataQT Interval >=500 msec0 Participants
Primary

Number of Participants With Categorical Vital Signs

Single sitting blood pressure (BP), pulse rate, and temperature were measured. At Day 1 and Week 1, BP and pulse were collected approximately 30 minutes prior to dosing, approximately 30 minutes post dosing and approximately 1 hour post dosing. For participants with no safety issues (eg, severe injection site reactions, severe elevations BP and/or pulse), BP and pulse were collected approximately 30 minutes prior to dosing and approximately 30 minutes post dosing from Weeks 2-16. Vital signs were analyzed as per pre-specified categories.

Time frame: From baseline through Week 16

Population: All participants who had received at least one dose of the randomized treatment (10 each for the Placebo + Infliximab arm and the PF-06687234 20mg + Infliximab arm).

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Placebo + InfliximabNumber of Participants With Categorical Vital SignsSitting systolic blood pressure (SBP) < 90 mmHg0 Participants
Placebo + InfliximabNumber of Participants With Categorical Vital SignsIncrease in Sitting SBP >=30 mmHg2 Participants
Placebo + InfliximabNumber of Participants With Categorical Vital SignsDecrease in Sitting SBP >=30 mmHg0 Participants
Placebo + InfliximabNumber of Participants With Categorical Vital SignsSitting diastolic blood pressure (DBP) < 50 mmHg0 Participants
Placebo + InfliximabNumber of Participants With Categorical Vital SignsIncrease in Sitting DBP >=20 mmHg2 Participants
Placebo + InfliximabNumber of Participants With Categorical Vital SignsDecrease in Sitting DBP >=20 mmHg3 Participants
Placebo + InfliximabNumber of Participants With Categorical Vital SignsSitting Pulse Rate < 40 beats/minute0 Participants
Placebo + InfliximabNumber of Participants With Categorical Vital SignsSitting Pulse Rate > 120 beats/minute0 Participants
PF-06687234 20 mg + InfliximabNumber of Participants With Categorical Vital SignsSitting Pulse Rate > 120 beats/minute0 Participants
PF-06687234 20 mg + InfliximabNumber of Participants With Categorical Vital SignsSitting systolic blood pressure (SBP) < 90 mmHg0 Participants
PF-06687234 20 mg + InfliximabNumber of Participants With Categorical Vital SignsIncrease in Sitting DBP >=20 mmHg2 Participants
PF-06687234 20 mg + InfliximabNumber of Participants With Categorical Vital SignsIncrease in Sitting SBP >=30 mmHg0 Participants
PF-06687234 20 mg + InfliximabNumber of Participants With Categorical Vital SignsSitting Pulse Rate < 40 beats/minute0 Participants
PF-06687234 20 mg + InfliximabNumber of Participants With Categorical Vital SignsDecrease in Sitting SBP >=30 mmHg0 Participants
PF-06687234 20 mg + InfliximabNumber of Participants With Categorical Vital SignsDecrease in Sitting DBP >=20 mmHg2 Participants
PF-06687234 20 mg + InfliximabNumber of Participants With Categorical Vital SignsSitting diastolic blood pressure (DBP) < 50 mmHg0 Participants
Primary

Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities Without Regard to Baseline Abnormality

The laboratory tests as defined in the protocol, including hematology, chemistry, urinalysis and other, were performed. Baseline was defined as the last measurement prior to first dosing (Day 1).

Time frame: From baseline through Week 16

Population: All participants with at least one observation of the given laboratory test while on study treatment or during lag time (10 each for the Placebo + Infliximab arm and the PF-06687234 20mg + Infliximab arm).

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Placebo + InfliximabNumber of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities Without Regard to Baseline AbnormalityCreatinine (mg/dL) > 1.3 x ULN0 Participants
Placebo + InfliximabNumber of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities Without Regard to Baseline AbnormalityHemoglobin (g/dL) < 0.8 x lower limit of normal (LLN)0 Participants
Placebo + InfliximabNumber of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities Without Regard to Baseline AbnormalityHematocrit (%) < 0.8 x LLN0 Participants
Placebo + InfliximabNumber of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities Without Regard to Baseline AbnormalityErythrocytes (10^6/mm^3) < 0.8 x LLN0 Participants
Placebo + InfliximabNumber of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities Without Regard to Baseline AbnormalityReticulocytes (10^3/mm^3) > 1.5 x upper limit of normal (ULN)0 Participants
Placebo + InfliximabNumber of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities Without Regard to Baseline AbnormalityReticulocytes/Erythrocytes (%) > 1.5 x ULN0 Participants
Placebo + InfliximabNumber of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities Without Regard to Baseline AbnormalityLeukocytes (10^3/mm^3) > 1.5 x ULN0 Participants
Placebo + InfliximabNumber of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities Without Regard to Baseline AbnormalityLymphocytes (10^3/mm^3) < 0.8 x LLN2 Participants
Placebo + InfliximabNumber of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities Without Regard to Baseline AbnormalityLymphocytes/Leukocytes (%) < 0.8 x LLN1 Participants
Placebo + InfliximabNumber of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities Without Regard to Baseline AbnormalityNeutrophils (10^3/mm^3) < 0.8 x LLN1 Participants
Placebo + InfliximabNumber of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities Without Regard to Baseline AbnormalityNeutrophils (10^3/mm^3) > 1.2 x ULN0 Participants
Placebo + InfliximabNumber of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities Without Regard to Baseline AbnormalityNeutrophils/Leukocytes (%) < 0.8 x LLN0 Participants
Placebo + InfliximabNumber of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities Without Regard to Baseline AbnormalityNeutrophils/Leukocytes (%) > 1.2 x ULN0 Participants
Placebo + InfliximabNumber of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities Without Regard to Baseline AbnormalityBasophils/Leukocytes (%) > 1.2 x ULN1 Participants
Placebo + InfliximabNumber of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities Without Regard to Baseline AbnormalityEosinophils (10^3/mm^3) > 1.2 x ULN0 Participants
Placebo + InfliximabNumber of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities Without Regard to Baseline AbnormalityEosinophils/Leukocytes (%) > 1.2 x ULN1 Participants
Placebo + InfliximabNumber of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities Without Regard to Baseline AbnormalityMonocytes/Leukocytes (%) > 1.2 x ULN2 Participants
Placebo + InfliximabNumber of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities Without Regard to Baseline AbnormalityProtein (g/dL) < 0.8 x LLN0 Participants
Placebo + InfliximabNumber of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities Without Regard to Baseline AbnormalityAlbumin (g/dL) < 0.8 x LLN1 Participants
Placebo + InfliximabNumber of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities Without Regard to Baseline AbnormalityGlucose (mg/dL) > 1.5 x ULN0 Participants
Placebo + InfliximabNumber of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities Without Regard to Baseline AbnormalityKetones (Scalar) >= 11 Participants
Placebo + InfliximabNumber of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities Without Regard to Baseline AbnormalityUrine Protein (mg/dL) >= 11 Participants
Placebo + InfliximabNumber of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities Without Regard to Baseline AbnormalityUrine Hemoglobin (Scalar) >= 13 Participants
Placebo + InfliximabNumber of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities Without Regard to Baseline AbnormalityLeukocyte Esterase (Scalar) >= 14 Participants
Placebo + InfliximabNumber of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities Without Regard to Baseline AbnormalityHyaline Casts (/low-power field [LPF]) > 10 Participants
PF-06687234 20 mg + InfliximabNumber of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities Without Regard to Baseline AbnormalityCreatinine (mg/dL) > 1.3 x ULN1 Participants
PF-06687234 20 mg + InfliximabNumber of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities Without Regard to Baseline AbnormalityBasophils/Leukocytes (%) > 1.2 x ULN0 Participants
PF-06687234 20 mg + InfliximabNumber of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities Without Regard to Baseline AbnormalityHemoglobin (g/dL) < 0.8 x lower limit of normal (LLN)2 Participants
PF-06687234 20 mg + InfliximabNumber of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities Without Regard to Baseline AbnormalityUrine Protein (mg/dL) >= 11 Participants
PF-06687234 20 mg + InfliximabNumber of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities Without Regard to Baseline AbnormalityHematocrit (%) < 0.8 x LLN2 Participants
PF-06687234 20 mg + InfliximabNumber of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities Without Regard to Baseline AbnormalityEosinophils (10^3/mm^3) > 1.2 x ULN1 Participants
PF-06687234 20 mg + InfliximabNumber of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities Without Regard to Baseline AbnormalityErythrocytes (10^6/mm^3) < 0.8 x LLN2 Participants
PF-06687234 20 mg + InfliximabNumber of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities Without Regard to Baseline AbnormalityGlucose (mg/dL) > 1.5 x ULN1 Participants
PF-06687234 20 mg + InfliximabNumber of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities Without Regard to Baseline AbnormalityReticulocytes (10^3/mm^3) > 1.5 x upper limit of normal (ULN)1 Participants
PF-06687234 20 mg + InfliximabNumber of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities Without Regard to Baseline AbnormalityEosinophils/Leukocytes (%) > 1.2 x ULN0 Participants
PF-06687234 20 mg + InfliximabNumber of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities Without Regard to Baseline AbnormalityReticulocytes/Erythrocytes (%) > 1.5 x ULN1 Participants
PF-06687234 20 mg + InfliximabNumber of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities Without Regard to Baseline AbnormalityLeukocyte Esterase (Scalar) >= 13 Participants
PF-06687234 20 mg + InfliximabNumber of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities Without Regard to Baseline AbnormalityLeukocytes (10^3/mm^3) > 1.5 x ULN1 Participants
PF-06687234 20 mg + InfliximabNumber of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities Without Regard to Baseline AbnormalityMonocytes/Leukocytes (%) > 1.2 x ULN2 Participants
PF-06687234 20 mg + InfliximabNumber of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities Without Regard to Baseline AbnormalityLymphocytes (10^3/mm^3) < 0.8 x LLN2 Participants
PF-06687234 20 mg + InfliximabNumber of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities Without Regard to Baseline AbnormalityKetones (Scalar) >= 11 Participants
PF-06687234 20 mg + InfliximabNumber of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities Without Regard to Baseline AbnormalityLymphocytes/Leukocytes (%) < 0.8 x LLN4 Participants
PF-06687234 20 mg + InfliximabNumber of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities Without Regard to Baseline AbnormalityProtein (g/dL) < 0.8 x LLN1 Participants
PF-06687234 20 mg + InfliximabNumber of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities Without Regard to Baseline AbnormalityNeutrophils (10^3/mm^3) < 0.8 x LLN0 Participants
PF-06687234 20 mg + InfliximabNumber of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities Without Regard to Baseline AbnormalityHyaline Casts (/low-power field [LPF]) > 12 Participants
PF-06687234 20 mg + InfliximabNumber of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities Without Regard to Baseline AbnormalityNeutrophils (10^3/mm^3) > 1.2 x ULN2 Participants
PF-06687234 20 mg + InfliximabNumber of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities Without Regard to Baseline AbnormalityAlbumin (g/dL) < 0.8 x LLN1 Participants
PF-06687234 20 mg + InfliximabNumber of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities Without Regard to Baseline AbnormalityNeutrophils/Leukocytes (%) < 0.8 x LLN1 Participants
PF-06687234 20 mg + InfliximabNumber of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities Without Regard to Baseline AbnormalityUrine Hemoglobin (Scalar) >= 13 Participants
PF-06687234 20 mg + InfliximabNumber of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities Without Regard to Baseline AbnormalityNeutrophils/Leukocytes (%) > 1.2 x ULN2 Participants
Primary

Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (AEs; All Causalities)

Treatment-emergent AEs are those with initial onset or that worsen in severity after the first dose of the study medication. All AEs in the table below were treatment-emergent AEs. An serious adverse event (SAE) is any untoward medical occurrence at any dose that: results in death; is life threatening (immediate risk of death); requires inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization; results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity (substantial disruption of the ability to conduct normal life functions); results in congenital anomaly/birth defect; or that is considered to be an important medical event that may jeopardize the participant or may require intervention to prevent one of the other AE outcomes. Severe AEs were defined as AEs that interfered significantly with participant's usual function. Both SAEs and severe AEs were according to the investigator's assessment.

Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) through and including a minimum of 28 calendar days after the last administration of the investigational products (22 weeks in total)

Population: All participants who had received at least one dose of the randomized treatment (10 each for the Placebo + Infliximab arm and the PF-06687234 20mg + Infliximab arm).

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Placebo + InfliximabNumber of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (AEs; All Causalities)Participants discontinued from study due to AEs0 Participants
Placebo + InfliximabNumber of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (AEs; All Causalities)Participants with SAEs1 Participants
Placebo + InfliximabNumber of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (AEs; All Causalities)Participants discontinued study drug due to AEs and continued study2 Participants
Placebo + InfliximabNumber of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (AEs; All Causalities)Participants with AEs8 Participants
Placebo + InfliximabNumber of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (AEs; All Causalities)Participants with temporary discontinuation due to AEs1 Participants
Placebo + InfliximabNumber of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (AEs; All Causalities)Participants with severe AEs2 Participants
PF-06687234 20 mg + InfliximabNumber of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (AEs; All Causalities)Participants with temporary discontinuation due to AEs1 Participants
PF-06687234 20 mg + InfliximabNumber of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (AEs; All Causalities)Participants with AEs9 Participants
PF-06687234 20 mg + InfliximabNumber of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (AEs; All Causalities)Participants with SAEs0 Participants
PF-06687234 20 mg + InfliximabNumber of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (AEs; All Causalities)Participants discontinued from study due to AEs0 Participants
PF-06687234 20 mg + InfliximabNumber of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (AEs; All Causalities)Participants discontinued study drug due to AEs and continued study1 Participants
PF-06687234 20 mg + InfliximabNumber of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (AEs; All Causalities)Participants with severe AEs0 Participants
Primary

Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent AEs (Treatment Related)

Treatment-emergent AEs are those with initial onset or that worsen in severity after the first dose of the study medication. All AEs in the table below were treatment-emergent AEs. An SAE is any untoward medical occurrence at any dose that: results in death; is life threatening (immediate risk of death); requires inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization; results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity (substantial disruption of the ability to conduct normal life functions); results in congenital anomaly/birth defect; or that is considered to be an important medical event that may jeopardize the participant or may require intervention to prevent one of the other AE outcomes. Severe AEs were defined as AEs that interfered significantly with participant's usual function. Both SAEs and severe AEs were according to the investigator's assessment. Treatment-related AEs were also determined by the investigator.

Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) through and including a minimum of 28 calendar days after the last administration of the investigational products (22 weeks in total)

Population: All participants who had received at least one dose of the randomized treatment (10 each for the Placebo + Infliximab arm and the PF-06687234 20mg + Infliximab arm).

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Placebo + InfliximabNumber of Participants With Treatment-Emergent AEs (Treatment Related)Participants with AEs1 Participants
Placebo + InfliximabNumber of Participants With Treatment-Emergent AEs (Treatment Related)Participants with SAEs0 Participants
Placebo + InfliximabNumber of Participants With Treatment-Emergent AEs (Treatment Related)Participants with severe AEs0 Participants
Placebo + InfliximabNumber of Participants With Treatment-Emergent AEs (Treatment Related)Participants discontinued from study due to AEs0 Participants
Placebo + InfliximabNumber of Participants With Treatment-Emergent AEs (Treatment Related)Participants discontinued study drug due to AEs and continued study1 Participants
Placebo + InfliximabNumber of Participants With Treatment-Emergent AEs (Treatment Related)Participants with temporary discontinuation due to AEs0 Participants
PF-06687234 20 mg + InfliximabNumber of Participants With Treatment-Emergent AEs (Treatment Related)Participants discontinued study drug due to AEs and continued study0 Participants
PF-06687234 20 mg + InfliximabNumber of Participants With Treatment-Emergent AEs (Treatment Related)Participants with AEs7 Participants
PF-06687234 20 mg + InfliximabNumber of Participants With Treatment-Emergent AEs (Treatment Related)Participants discontinued from study due to AEs0 Participants
PF-06687234 20 mg + InfliximabNumber of Participants With Treatment-Emergent AEs (Treatment Related)Participants with SAEs0 Participants
PF-06687234 20 mg + InfliximabNumber of Participants With Treatment-Emergent AEs (Treatment Related)Participants with temporary discontinuation due to AEs0 Participants
PF-06687234 20 mg + InfliximabNumber of Participants With Treatment-Emergent AEs (Treatment Related)Participants with severe AEs0 Participants
Primary

Percentage of Participants in Modified Clinical Remission at Week 12 (Modified Mayo Endoscopy Subscore = 0 or 1, Observed Cases)

The Mayo score consists of 4 subscores (Endoscopic, stool frequency, rectal bleeding and Physician's global assessment), each graded 0 to 3 with the higher score indicating more severe disease activity. Modified clinical remission is defined as a modified total Mayo Score (total Mayo score excluding the PGA subscore) with endoscopic subscore = 0 or 1 (where any friability was scored as a mayo endoscopic subscore of 2), stool frequency subscore = 0 or 1, and rectal bleeding subscore = 0. Participants with missing values were handled by observed case approach (the missing data were used as is). The percentage of participants achieving modified clinical remission was calculated based on the number of participants with observed data.

Time frame: Week 12

Population: All participants who had received at least one dose of the randomized treatment (10 each for the Placebo + Infliximab arm and the PF-06687234 20mg + Infliximab arm).

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Placebo + InfliximabPercentage of Participants in Modified Clinical Remission at Week 12 (Modified Mayo Endoscopy Subscore = 0 or 1, Observed Cases)Participants with missing dataNA Percentage of participants (%)
Placebo + InfliximabPercentage of Participants in Modified Clinical Remission at Week 12 (Modified Mayo Endoscopy Subscore = 0 or 1, Observed Cases)Participants with observed data0 Percentage of participants (%)
PF-06687234 20 mg + InfliximabPercentage of Participants in Modified Clinical Remission at Week 12 (Modified Mayo Endoscopy Subscore = 0 or 1, Observed Cases)Participants with missing dataNA Percentage of participants (%)
PF-06687234 20 mg + InfliximabPercentage of Participants in Modified Clinical Remission at Week 12 (Modified Mayo Endoscopy Subscore = 0 or 1, Observed Cases)Participants with observed data14.3 Percentage of participants (%)
p-value: 0.4795% CI: [-23.8, 57.9]Chan and Zhang (1999)
Primary

Percentage of Participants in Modified Clinical Remission at Week 12 (Modified Mayo Endoscopy Subscore = 0 or 1, Treatment Failure Approach)

The Mayo score consists of 4 subscores (Endoscopic, stool frequency, rectal bleeding and Physician's global assessment \[PGA\]), each graded 0 to 3 with the higher score indicating more severe disease activity. Modified clinical remission is defined as a modified total Mayo Score (total Mayo score excluding the PGA subscore) with endoscopic subscore = 0 or 1 (where any friability was scored as a mayo endoscopic subscore of 2), stool frequency subscore = 0 or 1, and rectal bleeding subscore = 0. Participants with missing values were handled by treatment failure approach (participants who had missing value for any reasons were considered as treatment failures).

Time frame: Week 12

Population: All participants who had received at least one dose of the randomized treatment (10 each for the Placebo + Infliximab arm and the PF-06687234 20mg + Infliximab arm).

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Placebo + InfliximabPercentage of Participants in Modified Clinical Remission at Week 12 (Modified Mayo Endoscopy Subscore = 0 or 1, Treatment Failure Approach)0 Percentage of participants (%)
PF-06687234 20 mg + InfliximabPercentage of Participants in Modified Clinical Remission at Week 12 (Modified Mayo Endoscopy Subscore = 0 or 1, Treatment Failure Approach)10 Percentage of participants (%)
p-value: 0.522195% CI: [-20.7, 45.6]Chan and Zhang (1999)
Primary

Percentage of Participants in Modified Clinical Remission at Week 12 (Traditional Endoscopic Subscore <=1, Observed Cases)

The Mayo score consists of 4 subscores (Endoscopic, stool frequency, rectal bleeding and Physician's global assessment \[PGA\]), each graded 0 to 3 with the higher score indicating more severe disease activity. Modified clinical remission is defined as a modified total Mayo Score (total Mayo score excluding the PGA subscore) \<=2, no individual subscore \>1, traditional endoscopic subscore \<=1 (where mild friability was scored as of 1; moderate or severe friability was scored as 2) and rectal bleeding subscore=0. Participants with missing values were handled by observed case approach (the missing data were used as is). The percentage of participants achieving modified clinical remission was calculated based on the number of participants with observed data.

Time frame: Week 12

Population: All participants who had received at least one dose of the randomized treatment (10 each for the Placebo + Infliximab arm and the PF-06687234 20mg + Infliximab arm).

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Placebo + InfliximabPercentage of Participants in Modified Clinical Remission at Week 12 (Traditional Endoscopic Subscore <=1, Observed Cases)Participants with missing dataNA Percentage of participants (%)
Placebo + InfliximabPercentage of Participants in Modified Clinical Remission at Week 12 (Traditional Endoscopic Subscore <=1, Observed Cases)Participants with observed data12.5 Percentage of participants (%)
PF-06687234 20 mg + InfliximabPercentage of Participants in Modified Clinical Remission at Week 12 (Traditional Endoscopic Subscore <=1, Observed Cases)Participants with missing dataNA Percentage of participants (%)
PF-06687234 20 mg + InfliximabPercentage of Participants in Modified Clinical Remission at Week 12 (Traditional Endoscopic Subscore <=1, Observed Cases)Participants with observed data14.3 Percentage of participants (%)
p-value: 195% CI: [-41, 47.2]Chan and Zhang (1999)
Primary

Percentage of Participants in Modified Clinical Remission at Week 12 (Traditional Mayo Endoscopic Subscore <=1, Treatment Failure Approach)

The Mayo score consists of 4 subscores (Endoscopic, stool frequency, rectal bleeding and Physician's global assessment \[PGA\]), each graded 0 to 3 with the higher score indicating more severe disease activity. Modified clinical remission is defined as a modified total Mayo Score (total Mayo score excluding the PGA subscore) \<=2, no individual subscore \>1, traditional endoscopic subscore \<=1 (where mild friability was scored as of 1; moderate or severe friability was scored as 2) and rectal bleeding subscore=0. Participants with missing values were handled by treatment failure approach (participants who had missing value for any reasons were considered as treatment failures).

Time frame: Week 12

Population: All participants who had received at least one dose of the randomized treatment (10 each for the Placebo + Infliximab arm and the PF-06687234 20mg + Infliximab arm).

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Placebo + InfliximabPercentage of Participants in Modified Clinical Remission at Week 12 (Traditional Mayo Endoscopic Subscore <=1, Treatment Failure Approach)10 Percentage of participants (%)
PF-06687234 20 mg + InfliximabPercentage of Participants in Modified Clinical Remission at Week 12 (Traditional Mayo Endoscopic Subscore <=1, Treatment Failure Approach)10 Percentage of participants (%)
p-value: 195% CI: [-37, 37]Chan and Zhang (1999)
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Robart's Histology Index at Week 12 (Observed Cases)

Robart's histology index is based on the Geboes scores, and the final score is obtained by the summation of four main items (chronic inflammatory infiltrate level, lamina propria neutrophils, neutrophils in the epithelium, and erosion or ulceration), which are classified from 0 (no inflammation) to 3 (severe inflammation or ulceration), yielding a final score that ranges between 0 (no inflammation) and 33 (severe inflammation or ulceration). Participants with missing values were handled by observed case approach (the missing data were used as is).

Time frame: Week 12

Population: All participants who had received at least one dose of the randomized treatment (10 each for the Placebo + Infliximab arm and the PF-06687234 20mg + Infliximab arm).

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)
Placebo + InfliximabChange From Baseline in Robart's Histology Index at Week 12 (Observed Cases)Participants with missing dataNA Scores on a scale
Placebo + InfliximabChange From Baseline in Robart's Histology Index at Week 12 (Observed Cases)Participants with observed data-12.96 Scores on a scale
PF-06687234 20 mg + InfliximabChange From Baseline in Robart's Histology Index at Week 12 (Observed Cases)Participants with missing dataNA Scores on a scale
PF-06687234 20 mg + InfliximabChange From Baseline in Robart's Histology Index at Week 12 (Observed Cases)Participants with observed data-7.16 Scores on a scale
p-value: 0.270595% CI: [-5.08, 16.67]ANCOVA
Secondary

Percentage of Participants Achieving Geboes Index Remission at Week 12 (Observed Cases)

Geboes index is a structured six-grade classification system ordered as follows: 0, structural changes (sub-grade: 0-0.3); 1, chronic inflammatory infiltrate (sub-grade: 1-1.3); 2, lamina propria neutrophils and eosinophils (sub-grade: 2A-2B.3); 3, neutrophils in epithelium (sub-grade: 3-3.3); 4, crypt destruction (sub-grade: 4-4.3); and 5, erosion and ulceration (sub-grade: 5-5.4). The final index ranges from 0 to 5.4, with low score associated with no inflammation or less inflammation and high score associated with severe inflammation or ulceration. Geboes index remission was defined as Geboes index \< 3 and Grade 3 \< 3.1 at week 12. Participants with missing values were handled by observed case approach (the missing data were used as is). The percentage of participants achieving Geboes index remission was calculated based on the number of participants with observed data.

Time frame: Week 12

Population: All participants who had received at least one dose of the randomized treatment (10 each for the Placebo + Infliximab arm and the PF-06687234 20mg + Infliximab arm).

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Placebo + InfliximabPercentage of Participants Achieving Geboes Index Remission at Week 12 (Observed Cases)Participants with missing dataNA Percentage of participants (%)
Placebo + InfliximabPercentage of Participants Achieving Geboes Index Remission at Week 12 (Observed Cases)Participant with observed data62.5 Percentage of participants (%)
PF-06687234 20 mg + InfliximabPercentage of Participants Achieving Geboes Index Remission at Week 12 (Observed Cases)Participants with missing dataNA Percentage of participants (%)
PF-06687234 20 mg + InfliximabPercentage of Participants Achieving Geboes Index Remission at Week 12 (Observed Cases)Participant with observed data37.5 Percentage of participants (%)
p-value: 0.739395% CI: [-69.6, 29.1]Chan and Zhang (1999)
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With a Clinical Response at Week 12 (Observed Cases)

The Mayo score consists of 4 subscores (Endoscopic, stool frequency, rectal bleeding and Physician's global assessment \[PGA\]), each graded 0 to 3 with the higher score indicating more severe disease activity. Clinical response is defined with a decrease from baseline of at least 3 points in total Mayo score with at least 30% change, accompanied by at least one-point decrease or absolute score of 0 or 1 in rectal bleeding subscore. Participants with missing values were handled by observed case approach (the missing data were used as is).

Time frame: Week 12

Population: All participants who have received at least one dose of the randomized treatment. The number of participants with observed data were 8 for the Placebo + Infliximab arm and 7 for PF-06687234 20mg + Infliximab arm. The percentage of participants achieving clinical response was calculated based on the number of participants with observed data.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Placebo + InfliximabPercentage of Participants With a Clinical Response at Week 12 (Observed Cases)Participants with missing dataNA Percentage of participants (%)
Placebo + InfliximabPercentage of Participants With a Clinical Response at Week 12 (Observed Cases)Participants with observed data37.5 Percentage of participants (%)
PF-06687234 20 mg + InfliximabPercentage of Participants With a Clinical Response at Week 12 (Observed Cases)Participants with missing dataNA Percentage of participants (%)
PF-06687234 20 mg + InfliximabPercentage of Participants With a Clinical Response at Week 12 (Observed Cases)Participants with observed data85.7 Percentage of participants (%)
p-value: 0.073295% CI: [-4.4, 84.7]Chan and Zhang (1999)
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With a Clinical Response at Week 12 (Treatment Failure Approach)

The Mayo score consists of 4 subscores (Endoscopic, stool frequency, rectal bleeding and Physician's global assessment \[PGA\]), each graded 0 to 3 with the higher score indicating more severe disease activity. Clinical response is defined with a decrease from baseline of at least 3 points in total Mayo score with at least 30% change, accompanied by at least one-point decrease or absolute score of 0 or 1 in rectal bleeding subscore. Participants with missing values were handled by treatment failure approach (participants who had missing value for any reasons were considered as treatment failures).

Time frame: Week 12

Population: All participants who have received at least one dose of the randomized treatment.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Placebo + InfliximabPercentage of Participants With a Clinical Response at Week 12 (Treatment Failure Approach)30.0 Percentage of participants (%)
PF-06687234 20 mg + InfliximabPercentage of Participants With a Clinical Response at Week 12 (Treatment Failure Approach)60.0 Percentage of participants (%)
p-value: 0.263395% CI: [-18.4, 69.2]Chan and Zhang (1999)
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Change From Baseline in Derived Partial Mayo Score of <=2 With no Individual Subscore >1 at Weeks 2, 4, 8 and 12 (Observed Cases)

The Mayo score is determined by the summation of 4 subscores (Endoscopic, stool frequency, rectal bleeding and Physician's global assessment \[PGA\]), each graded 0 (normal) to 3 (worst). Derived partial mayo score is defined as total Mayo score excluding the endoscopic subscore (stool frequency, rectal bleeding and PGA only), ranging from 0 (normal) to 9 (the most severe). The percentages of participants with change from baseline in derived partial Mayo score of \<=2 with no individual subscore \>1 at Weeks 2, 4, 8 and 12 were calculated for this endpoint. Participants with missing values were handled by observed case approach (the missing data were used as is). Generalized Linear Mixed Model (GLMM) was used with fixed effects of treatment, visit and treatment by visit interaction.

Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 2, 4, 8 and 12

Population: All participants who have received at least one dose of the randomized treatment.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Placebo + InfliximabPercentage of Participants With Change From Baseline in Derived Partial Mayo Score of <=2 With no Individual Subscore >1 at Weeks 2, 4, 8 and 12 (Observed Cases)Week 250.0 Percentage of participants (%)
Placebo + InfliximabPercentage of Participants With Change From Baseline in Derived Partial Mayo Score of <=2 With no Individual Subscore >1 at Weeks 2, 4, 8 and 12 (Observed Cases)Week 450.0 Percentage of participants (%)
Placebo + InfliximabPercentage of Participants With Change From Baseline in Derived Partial Mayo Score of <=2 With no Individual Subscore >1 at Weeks 2, 4, 8 and 12 (Observed Cases)Week 862.5 Percentage of participants (%)
Placebo + InfliximabPercentage of Participants With Change From Baseline in Derived Partial Mayo Score of <=2 With no Individual Subscore >1 at Weeks 2, 4, 8 and 12 (Observed Cases)Week 1264.9 Percentage of participants (%)
PF-06687234 20 mg + InfliximabPercentage of Participants With Change From Baseline in Derived Partial Mayo Score of <=2 With no Individual Subscore >1 at Weeks 2, 4, 8 and 12 (Observed Cases)Week 1264.8 Percentage of participants (%)
PF-06687234 20 mg + InfliximabPercentage of Participants With Change From Baseline in Derived Partial Mayo Score of <=2 With no Individual Subscore >1 at Weeks 2, 4, 8 and 12 (Observed Cases)Week 250.0 Percentage of participants (%)
PF-06687234 20 mg + InfliximabPercentage of Participants With Change From Baseline in Derived Partial Mayo Score of <=2 With no Individual Subscore >1 at Weeks 2, 4, 8 and 12 (Observed Cases)Week 850.8 Percentage of participants (%)
PF-06687234 20 mg + InfliximabPercentage of Participants With Change From Baseline in Derived Partial Mayo Score of <=2 With no Individual Subscore >1 at Weeks 2, 4, 8 and 12 (Observed Cases)Week 460.0 Percentage of participants (%)
Comparison: At Week 2p-value: 195% CI: [0.15, 6.54]Generalized Linear Mixed Model
Comparison: At Week 4p-value: 0.669195% CI: [0.23, 10]Generalized Linear Mixed Model
Comparison: At Week 8p-value: 0.624895% CI: [0.09, 4.4]Generalized Linear Mixed Model
Comparison: At Week 12p-value: 0.996595% CI: [0.12, 8.3]Generalized Linear Mixed Model
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Endoscopic Improvement at Week 12 ( Observed Cases)

Endoscopic improvement is defined as a decrease of \>=1 point in a modified endoscopic subscore (any friability is scored as 2) or an absolute endoscopy score of \<=1 without friability. Participants with missing values were handled by observed case approach (the missing data were used as is). The percentage of participants achieving endoscopic improvement was calculated based on the number of participants with observed data.

Time frame: Week 12

Population: All participants who had received at least one dose of the randomized treatment (10 each for the Placebo + Infliximab arm and the PF-06687234 20mg + Infliximab arm).

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Placebo + InfliximabPercentage of Participants With Endoscopic Improvement at Week 12 ( Observed Cases)Participants with missing dataNA Percentage of participants (%)
Placebo + InfliximabPercentage of Participants With Endoscopic Improvement at Week 12 ( Observed Cases)Participants with observed data25.0 Percentage of participants (%)
PF-06687234 20 mg + InfliximabPercentage of Participants With Endoscopic Improvement at Week 12 ( Observed Cases)Participants with missing dataNA Percentage of participants (%)
PF-06687234 20 mg + InfliximabPercentage of Participants With Endoscopic Improvement at Week 12 ( Observed Cases)Participants with observed data57.1 Percentage of participants (%)
p-value: 0.316695% CI: [-23.7, 74.1]Chan and Zhang (1999)
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Endoscopic Improvement at Week 12 ( Treatment Failure Approach)

Endoscopic improvement is defined as a decrease of \>=1 point in a modified endoscopic subscore (any friability is scored as 2) or an absolute endoscopy score of \<=1 without friability. Participants with missing values were handled by treatment failure approach (participants who had missing value for any reasons were considered as treatment failures).

Time frame: Week 12

Population: All participants who had received at least one dose of the randomized treatment (10 each for the Placebo + Infliximab arm and the PF-06687234 20mg + Infliximab arm).

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Placebo + InfliximabPercentage of Participants With Endoscopic Improvement at Week 12 ( Treatment Failure Approach)20.0 Percentage of participants (%)
PF-06687234 20 mg + InfliximabPercentage of Participants With Endoscopic Improvement at Week 12 ( Treatment Failure Approach)40.0 Percentage of participants (%)
p-value: 0.523495% CI: [-22.9, 58.5]Chan and Zhang (1999)
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With the Development of Human Anti-Fusion Antibodies (HAFAs) and Neutralizing Antibodies (NAbs) Against PF-06687234

Plasma samples were analyzed for anti PF-06687234, anti PF-06687234 IL-10 neutralizing antibody (AB) and anti PF-06687234 single chain variable fragment (scFv) neutralizing AB. Samples inadvertently analyzed were excluded.

Time frame: At screening, Day 1, Weeks 3, 7, 11, 12 and 16 (prior to dosing)

Population: HAFA and NAb analyses were performed to characterize immunogenicity against PF-06687234, hence only participants who received at least one dose of PF-06687234 and with at least one post treatment HAFA determination were included.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Placebo + InfliximabPercentage of Participants With the Development of Human Anti-Fusion Antibodies (HAFAs) and Neutralizing Antibodies (NAbs) Against PF-06687234Anti PF-06687234 (Screening)0 Percentage of participants (%)
Placebo + InfliximabPercentage of Participants With the Development of Human Anti-Fusion Antibodies (HAFAs) and Neutralizing Antibodies (NAbs) Against PF-06687234Anti PF-06687234 (Day 1)10.0 Percentage of participants (%)
Placebo + InfliximabPercentage of Participants With the Development of Human Anti-Fusion Antibodies (HAFAs) and Neutralizing Antibodies (NAbs) Against PF-06687234Anti PF-06687234 (Week 3)30.0 Percentage of participants (%)
Placebo + InfliximabPercentage of Participants With the Development of Human Anti-Fusion Antibodies (HAFAs) and Neutralizing Antibodies (NAbs) Against PF-06687234Anti PF-06687234 (Week 7)50.0 Percentage of participants (%)
Placebo + InfliximabPercentage of Participants With the Development of Human Anti-Fusion Antibodies (HAFAs) and Neutralizing Antibodies (NAbs) Against PF-06687234Anti PF-06687234 (Week 11)28.6 Percentage of participants (%)
Placebo + InfliximabPercentage of Participants With the Development of Human Anti-Fusion Antibodies (HAFAs) and Neutralizing Antibodies (NAbs) Against PF-06687234Anti PF-06687234 (Week 12)28.6 Percentage of participants (%)
Placebo + InfliximabPercentage of Participants With the Development of Human Anti-Fusion Antibodies (HAFAs) and Neutralizing Antibodies (NAbs) Against PF-06687234Anti PF-06687234 (Week 16)12.5 Percentage of participants (%)
Placebo + InfliximabPercentage of Participants With the Development of Human Anti-Fusion Antibodies (HAFAs) and Neutralizing Antibodies (NAbs) Against PF-06687234Anti PF-06687234 IL-10 neutralizing AB (Day 1)0 Percentage of participants (%)
Placebo + InfliximabPercentage of Participants With the Development of Human Anti-Fusion Antibodies (HAFAs) and Neutralizing Antibodies (NAbs) Against PF-06687234Anti PF-06687234 IL-10 neutralizing AB (Week 3)0 Percentage of participants (%)
Placebo + InfliximabPercentage of Participants With the Development of Human Anti-Fusion Antibodies (HAFAs) and Neutralizing Antibodies (NAbs) Against PF-06687234Anti PF-06687234 IL-10 neutralizing AB (Week 7)0 Percentage of participants (%)
Placebo + InfliximabPercentage of Participants With the Development of Human Anti-Fusion Antibodies (HAFAs) and Neutralizing Antibodies (NAbs) Against PF-06687234Anti PF-06687234 IL-10 neutralizing AB (Week 11)0 Percentage of participants (%)
Placebo + InfliximabPercentage of Participants With the Development of Human Anti-Fusion Antibodies (HAFAs) and Neutralizing Antibodies (NAbs) Against PF-06687234Anti PF-06687234 IL-10 neutralizing AB (Week 12)0 Percentage of participants (%)
Placebo + InfliximabPercentage of Participants With the Development of Human Anti-Fusion Antibodies (HAFAs) and Neutralizing Antibodies (NAbs) Against PF-06687234Anti PF-06687234 IL-10 neutralizing AB (Week 16)0 Percentage of participants (%)
Placebo + InfliximabPercentage of Participants With the Development of Human Anti-Fusion Antibodies (HAFAs) and Neutralizing Antibodies (NAbs) Against PF-06687234Anti PF-06687234 scFv neutralizing AB (Dany 1)0 Percentage of participants (%)
Placebo + InfliximabPercentage of Participants With the Development of Human Anti-Fusion Antibodies (HAFAs) and Neutralizing Antibodies (NAbs) Against PF-06687234Anti PF-06687234 scFv neutralizing AB (Week 3)0 Percentage of participants (%)
Placebo + InfliximabPercentage of Participants With the Development of Human Anti-Fusion Antibodies (HAFAs) and Neutralizing Antibodies (NAbs) Against PF-06687234Anti PF-06687234 scFv neutralizing AB (Week 7)50.0 Percentage of participants (%)
Placebo + InfliximabPercentage of Participants With the Development of Human Anti-Fusion Antibodies (HAFAs) and Neutralizing Antibodies (NAbs) Against PF-06687234Anti PF-06687234 scFv neutralizing AB (Week 11)0 Percentage of participants (%)
Placebo + InfliximabPercentage of Participants With the Development of Human Anti-Fusion Antibodies (HAFAs) and Neutralizing Antibodies (NAbs) Against PF-06687234Anti PF-06687234 scFv neutralizing AB (Week 12)0 Percentage of participants (%)
Placebo + InfliximabPercentage of Participants With the Development of Human Anti-Fusion Antibodies (HAFAs) and Neutralizing Antibodies (NAbs) Against PF-06687234Anti PF-06687234 scFv neutralizing AB (Week 16)0 Percentage of participants (%)
Secondary

Serum Concentrations of PF-06687234 20 mg

Samples for serum PF-06687234 concentration were collected approximately 30 minutes prior to dosing. Concentration values below the lower limit of quantification were excluded when calculating the geometric mean (geometric coefficient of variation).

Time frame: Prior to dosing on Day 1 and at Weeks 1, 3, 7, 11, 12 (168 hours post dose) and 16

Population: All participants who received at least one dose of PF-06687234, had data on at least one PK concentration (above or equal to lower limit of quantification) and did not participate in PK substudy.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (GEOMETRIC_MEAN)Dispersion
Placebo + InfliximabSerum Concentrations of PF-06687234 20 mgWeek 30.4537 ng/mLGeometric Coefficient of Variation 42
Placebo + InfliximabSerum Concentrations of PF-06687234 20 mgWeek 70.4494 ng/mLGeometric Coefficient of Variation 27
Placebo + InfliximabSerum Concentrations of PF-06687234 20 mgWeek 110.4713 ng/mLGeometric Coefficient of Variation 2
Placebo + InfliximabSerum Concentrations of PF-06687234 20 mgWeek 120.5140 ng/mLGeometric Coefficient of Variation 40
UnknownSerum Concentrations of PF-06687234 20 mgWeek 1 ng/mL
UnknownSerum Concentrations of PF-06687234 20 mgWeek 16 ng/mL
UnknownSerum Concentrations of PF-06687234 20 mgDay 1 ng/mL

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026