Skip to content

Evaluation of the Applicability of Personalized Tools About Nutrition Education for Malnourished Older People

Evaluation of the Applicability of Personalized Tools About Nutrition Education for Malnourished Older People

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03269500
Acronym
AlimAge
Enrollment
42
Registered
2017-08-31
Start date
2017-09-05
Completion date
2018-08-07
Last updated
2022-05-13

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Malnutrition of Mild Degree

Brief summary

Describe the frequency of use of nutrition education tools for undernourished older people

Detailed description

The description of the population will identify the characteristics of patients who use the tools and guide their use in patient care. To realize an impact assessment, It necessary to identify specific criteria for inclusion. It is important initially to assess the use of the nutritional tools. The assessment of performance (obstacles and understanding), will be used to improve tools to optimize their use.

Interventions

OTHERuse of nutrition education tools

Use of different nutrition education tools : * General advice: feeding seniors * Oral supplementation: instructions for use * Information about enriched food * Food modified in texture: chopped masticatory disorders, chopped swallowing disorders, co-mingled * How should I drink? : With stimulus, texture syrup / nectar, velvety texture, texture compote / cream * Recipe booklets for people to easily eat (chewing disorders) or recipe with molded texture (swallowing disorders)

Sponsors

University Hospital, Bordeaux
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
75 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Subject of 75 years or more. * Hospitalized geriatric day hospital. * Living at home, within a radius of 40 km around the hospital Xavier Arnozan. * Subject or caregiver (s) read, understand and speak the french. * Undernutrition (criteria of the French high authority for health (HAS) 2007) * Agreed to participate in the study: compendium of the opposition

Exclusion criteria

* Subject not wishing to participate in the study, * MMSE (Mini Mental State Examination) \< 20, without presence of a caregiver with no cognitive problems scoring. * Identified palliative care. * Presenting a contraindication to oral feeding. * Presence of supply of enteral or parenteral. * Presence with a diagnosis of severe psychiatric pathology. * Already participating in a study on undernutrition. * One against medical advice.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Frequency of use of the booklet and plateletsDay 14number of use per week

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Evaluation of the knowledge following the delivery of the toolsDay 14Number of response Yes for 24 items about the tools
Instrumental Activities of Daily LivingDay 1Score of Instrumental Activities of Daily Living
Assessment of quality of life scaleDay 1Score of EQ-5D

Countries

France

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026