Skip to content

Gabapentin for the Reduction of Radiation Therapy Induced Pain During the Treatment of Oropharyngeal Cancer

Randomized Phase III, Double-Blind, Placebo Controlled Study of Prophylactic Gabapentin for the Reduction of Radiation Therapy Induced Pain During the Treatment of Oropharyngeal Squamous Cell Carcinoma

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03269344
Enrollment
65
Registered
2017-08-31
Start date
2017-06-05
Completion date
2020-12-09
Last updated
2022-01-26

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Oropharynx Cancer

Brief summary

Strategies to minimize and mitigate external beam radiation therapy related mucositis and pain during the treatment of head and neck cancer remain limited. The investigators hypothesize that gabapentin could be used to delay or reduce treatment-related pain, reliance on opioid medication, and improve the quality of life for these patients.

Detailed description

The specific aims of this proposed study include the following: * Evaluate the reduction or delay of mucositis related pain and morbidity with the use of gabapentin in patients with stage III or IV oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma undergoing definitive radiation with concurrent chemotherapy as part of their cancer management, compared to standard supportive side effect mitigation - using patient reported quality of life endpoints such as the Patient-Reported Oral Mucositis Symptoms (PROMS) scale. * Assess morphine-equivalent opioid use in both treatment arms by collecting the patient's narcotic use in the previous 24-hour period at each weekly evaluation during radiation treatment. * Report on change in Speech and swallow performance, as measured by the Performance Status Scale (PSS) for Head and Neck Cancer Patients * Evaluate changes in weight from baseline throughout treatment between the two arms. * Assess feeding tube requirements during treatment. * Evaluate the adverse events associated with gabapentin. * Evaluate the severity of radiation mucositis (grade 3-4, CTCAE, v. 4)

Interventions

DRUGGabapentin

Gabapentin is an anticonvulsant and has been used to manage neuropathic pain and is FDA-approved for the treatment of post-herpetic neuralgia and partial onset seizures

DRUGPlacebo Oral Capsule

Placebo

Sponsors

Henry Ford Health System
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Patients being treated with combination chemotherapy and radiation therapy daily for locally advanced (stage III-IV) squamous cell carcinoma of the oropharynx. * Age ≥ 18. * ECOG performance status ≤ 1. * Patients must provide study specific informed consent prior to study entry and be able to fill out toxicity and quality of life related questionnaires.

Exclusion criteria

* Patients may not be receiving gabapentin, any other investigational agents, or other anticonvulsants. * Patients with metastatic disease are excluded from this clinical trial. * Patient with allergies or hypersensitivity to gabapentin. * Patients receiving surgery as part of their definitive management. * Patients who have received prior chemotherapy or radiation therapy. * Patients unable to complete the required forms; however, verbal completion is adequate if recorded on the form daily. * Uncontrolled serious illness including, but not limited to, ongoing or serious active infection requiring IV antibiotics for over 30 days, symptomatic congestive heart failure, unstable angina pectoris, cardiac arrhythmia other than chronic, stable atrial fibrillation, or psychiatric illness/social situations that would limit compliance with study requirements.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in Quality of Life From Mucositis-related Pain Measured by the Patient-Reported Oral Mucositis Symptoms (PROMS) Scale From Baseline to Follow-upEvaluated change in scores from baseline to 6 weeks post-treatment, approximately 13 weeksScale tile: Patient Reported Oral Mucositis Symptoms scale, range 0-1000, higher scores indicate worse outcomes

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in Total FACT-HN Scores From Baseline to Follow-upAdministered at baseline and at 6-week follow-up endpoint, approximately 13 weeksScale: Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Trial Outcome (FACT-HN), range 0-148, higher scores indicate better outcomes
Average Opioid Use, Measured in Morphine Equivalents Per Day.Over the entire study period from baseline to follow-up, approximately 13 weeks
Change in PRO-CTCAE Scores From Baseline to Follow-upEvaluated change in scores from baseline to 6 weeks post-treatment, approximately 13 weeksScale: Patient-reported outcomes of Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (PRO-CTCAE), 5-point Likert scale, higher scores indicate worse outcomes. Range of scores 0-40 (min-max).
Percent Weight LostPercent change from baseline to week 7 of treatmentPercent weight lost from baseline to week 7 of treatment (end of treatment)
Feeding Tube PlacementEvaluated placement of feeding tube from baseline (start of radiation) to 6 weeks post-treatment, approximately 13 weeksMeasure of number of patients who required feeding tube placement at any time during the study period

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Pre-assignment details

After 65 patients were enrolled, 7 more were excluded from analysis, leaving 58 patients analyzed. These patients were excluded because they received immunotherapy (n=1), pursued treatment elsewhere (n=2), developed acute kidney injury (n=1), and refused to take medication during the first two weeks of treatment (n=3).

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Control Arm
Standard supportive care during definitive treatment plus placebo Placebo Oral Capsule: Placebo
29
Experimental Arm
Gabapentin plus standard supportive care Gabapentin: Gabapentin is an anticonvulsant and has been used to manage neuropathic pain and is FDA-approved for the treatment of post-herpetic neuralgia and partial onset seizures
29
Total58

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyProtocol Violation43

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicExperimental ArmTotalControl Arm
Age, Continuous60.2 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.4
59.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.5
59.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.5
Clinical N Stage
0
2 Participants2 Participants0 Participants
Clinical N Stage
1
15 Participants32 Participants17 Participants
Clinical N Stage
2
6 Participants13 Participants7 Participants
Clinical N Stage
2a
1 Participants1 Participants0 Participants
Clinical N Stage
2b
1 Participants4 Participants3 Participants
Clinical N Stage
2c
1 Participants3 Participants2 Participants
Clinical N Stage
3
3 Participants3 Participants0 Participants
Clinical T Stage
1
6 Participants14 Participants8 Participants
Clinical T Stage
2
10 Participants21 Participants11 Participants
Clinical T Stage
3
7 Participants12 Participants5 Participants
Clinical T Stage
4
4 Participants6 Participants2 Participants
Clinical T Stage
4a
1 Participants2 Participants1 Participants
Clinical T Stage
4b
0 Participants1 Participants1 Participants
Clinical T Stage
Tx or T0
1 Participants2 Participants1 Participants
Gross Tumor Volume of Primary Tumor21.5 cubic centimeter (cc)
STANDARD_DEVIATION 18.5
21.8 cubic centimeter (cc)
STANDARD_DEVIATION 17.9
22.0 cubic centimeter (cc)
STANDARD_DEVIATION 17.2
Gross Tumor Volume Total (cc)49.2 cc
STANDARD_DEVIATION 31.5
49.8 cc
STANDARD_DEVIATION 36.2
50.3 cc
STANDARD_DEVIATION 40.8
HPV Status
Negative
3 Participants8 Participants5 Participants
HPV Status
Positive
26 Participants49 Participants23 Participants
HPV Status
Unknown
0 Participants1 Participants1 Participants
Opioid Use at Baseline4 Participants7 Participants3 Participants
Primary Site
Oropharynx-base of tongue
11 Participants21 Participants10 Participants
Primary Site
Oropharynx-not specified
1 Participants4 Participants3 Participants
Primary Site
Oropharynx-soft palate
0 Participants1 Participants1 Participants
Primary Site
Oropharynx-tonsil
17 Participants29 Participants12 Participants
Primary Site
Oropharynx-vallecula
0 Participants2 Participants2 Participants
Primary Site
Unknown primary
0 Participants1 Participants1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
3 Participants6 Participants3 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
1 Participants2 Participants1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
25 Participants50 Participants25 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
5 Participants9 Participants4 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
24 Participants49 Participants25 Participants
Smoking Status9 Participants16 Participants7 Participants
Type of Chemotherapy
Carboplatin-based
4 Participants7 Participants3 Participants
Type of Chemotherapy
Cisplatin every 3 weeks
16 Participants32 Participants16 Participants
Type of Chemotherapy
Cisplatin weekly
9 Participants19 Participants10 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 290 / 29
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 290 / 29
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 290 / 29

Outcome results

Primary

Change in Quality of Life From Mucositis-related Pain Measured by the Patient-Reported Oral Mucositis Symptoms (PROMS) Scale From Baseline to Follow-up

Scale tile: Patient Reported Oral Mucositis Symptoms scale, range 0-1000, higher scores indicate worse outcomes

Time frame: Evaluated change in scores from baseline to 6 weeks post-treatment, approximately 13 weeks

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Control ArmChange in Quality of Life From Mucositis-related Pain Measured by the Patient-Reported Oral Mucositis Symptoms (PROMS) Scale From Baseline to Follow-up20.1 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 16.8
Experimental ArmChange in Quality of Life From Mucositis-related Pain Measured by the Patient-Reported Oral Mucositis Symptoms (PROMS) Scale From Baseline to Follow-up29.1 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 22.5
p-value: 0.11ANOVA
Secondary

Average Opioid Use, Measured in Morphine Equivalents Per Day.

Time frame: Over the entire study period from baseline to follow-up, approximately 13 weeks

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Control ArmAverage Opioid Use, Measured in Morphine Equivalents Per Day.15.6 Daily morphine equivalents
Experimental ArmAverage Opioid Use, Measured in Morphine Equivalents Per Day.22.2 Daily morphine equivalents
p-value: 0.32Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)
Secondary

Change in PRO-CTCAE Scores From Baseline to Follow-up

Scale: Patient-reported outcomes of Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (PRO-CTCAE), 5-point Likert scale, higher scores indicate worse outcomes. Range of scores 0-40 (min-max).

Time frame: Evaluated change in scores from baseline to 6 weeks post-treatment, approximately 13 weeks

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Control ArmChange in PRO-CTCAE Scores From Baseline to Follow-up1.0 units on a scale
Experimental ArmChange in PRO-CTCAE Scores From Baseline to Follow-up6.5 units on a scale
p-value: <0.01Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)
Secondary

Change in Total FACT-HN Scores From Baseline to Follow-up

Scale: Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Trial Outcome (FACT-HN), range 0-148, higher scores indicate better outcomes

Time frame: Administered at baseline and at 6-week follow-up endpoint, approximately 13 weeks

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Control ArmChange in Total FACT-HN Scores From Baseline to Follow-up-15.0 units on a scale
Experimental ArmChange in Total FACT-HN Scores From Baseline to Follow-up-20.0 units on a scale
p-value: 0.08Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)
Secondary

Feeding Tube Placement

Measure of number of patients who required feeding tube placement at any time during the study period

Time frame: Evaluated placement of feeding tube from baseline (start of radiation) to 6 weeks post-treatment, approximately 13 weeks

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Control ArmFeeding Tube Placement6 Participants
Experimental ArmFeeding Tube Placement18 Participants
p-value: <0.01Chi-squared
Secondary

Percent Weight Lost

Percent weight lost from baseline to week 7 of treatment (end of treatment)

Time frame: Percent change from baseline to week 7 of treatment

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Control ArmPercent Weight Lost-10.7 Percent change
Experimental ArmPercent Weight Lost-11.4 Percent change
p-value: 0.81Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026