Skip to content

Optimized Admission to the Intensive Care Unit by Using Crisis Resource Management (CRM)

Optimized Admission to the Intensive Care Unit by Using Crisis Resource Management (CRM)

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03268967
Enrollment
1800
Registered
2017-08-31
Start date
2014-04-01
Completion date
2018-12-31
Last updated
2018-03-09

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Critical Illness

Keywords

intensive care, crisis resource management, simulation training, before and after study

Brief summary

Admission to the intensive care unit (ICU) is vital for surviving critical illness. An admission to ICU without having a consistent structure, structured review of the patient and a solid team organization lead to unclear communication and responsibility. Factors that correlate with patient acceptance and safety, morbidity and mortality. The hypothesize was that a structured admission can improve patients safety, reduce delays in treatment, reduce ICU length of stay, and improve mortality rate. The overall objective was to optimize patient safety, and effectively use available resources to reduce admission time, delays in treatment and procedures and mortality by using both quantitative and qualitative methods.

Detailed description

The quantitative before-data is a one-year observational period prior to the intervention measured by different perspectives; patients and staff outcomes. After the intervention, was qualititive data collected from participants, who received simulation training. The quantitative after-data is a one-year observational period post-intervention with same outcomes as before starting the intervention. Data is already collected registry data from hospital quality assurance board. Data will be compared before and after with assessor blinded analysis. Missing data will not be replaced but reported as missing. The investigators will try to compare the results with data from an approximately comparative ICU in Denmark due to the implementation of a new patient management system called the Health Portal. The statistical analysis plan is based on descriptive and comparative analyses of the group before and after the trial. The quantitative results are explained in in-depths description from participants.

Interventions

BEHAVIORALStructured admission procedure

A structured ICU admission was inspired by principles of Crisis Resource Management and simulation training of ICU staff members. The Principles of Crisis Resource Management consisted of a treatment manual, a learning video, clear precise communication tool based on Identification-Situation-Background-Analysis-Recommendations (ISBAR) and Closed loop, actions cards, and ABCDE-evaluation of the patient including debriefing, and training in the simulation environment.

Sponsors

Holbaek Sygehus
CollaboratorOTHER
Hillerod Hospital, Denmark
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
SEQUENTIAL
Primary purpose
HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Masking description

Data analysis

Intervention model description

Before and after interventional study

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* ICU admissions

Exclusion criteria

* None * Drop-out are deaths

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
ICU length of stay (LOS)through study completion, an average of 1 yearDays admitted at the ICU using registre data

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Line Sepsisthrough study completion, an average of 1 yearTreatment package of number of the line sepsis after ICU admission covering the number of patients with line sepsis using registre data on Lactat \<1 hour, bacteria samples ≤1 hour taken, time between diagnosis of sepsis and taken bacteria samples, time between diagnosis and given antibiotics measured by registre data
Ventilated associated pneumonia (VAP)through study completion, an average of 1 yearNumber of VAP measured by registre data
Re-intubationsthrough study completion, an average of 1 yearNumber of re-intubations measured by registre data
Hospital length of stay (LOS)At Hospital discharge within one-year before and after the intervention implementationDays admitted to the hospital using registre data
90-days Mortality90 days through study completion, an average of 1 year90-days mortality rates after ICU discharge measured by registre data
Staff turn-overthrough study completion, an average of 1 yearStaff turn-over before and after the intervention measured by registre data
Sick Leavethrough study completion, an average of 1 yearSick leave amongst staff members measured by registre data
30-days Mortality30 days through study completion, an average of 1 year30-days mortality rates after ICU discharge measured by registre data

Countries

Denmark

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026