Skip to content

PREVALENCE OF Anti-CCP POSITIVITY AND SUBCLINICAL SIGNS OF INFLAMMATION IN PATIENTS WITH NEW ONSET OF NON-SPECIFIC MUSCULOSKELETAL SYMPTOMS

PREVALENCE OF ANTI-CYCLIC CITRULLINATED PEPTIDE (Anti-CCP) POSITIVITY AND SUBCLINICAL SIGNS OF INFLAMMATION IN PATIENTS WITH NEW ONSET OF NON-SPECIFIC MUSCULOSKELETAL SYMPTOMS POSSIBLY RELATED TO EARLY RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS IN GENERAL PRACTICES IN GERMANY

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03267147
Acronym
PANORA
Enrollment
986
Registered
2017-08-30
Start date
2017-04-27
Completion date
2022-02-15
Last updated
2022-03-02

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Rheumatoid Arthritis

Keywords

Anti-CCP, rheumatoid arthritis

Brief summary

Non-interventional, prospective, observational study to assess the relative risk of anti-CCP positive patients to develop (subclinical) signs of inflammation in accordance with early Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA) in a population without pre-classified RA but new1 onset of non-specific musculoskeletal (MSK) symptoms in general practices in Germany and subsequent 36 months follow-up by rheumatologists

Detailed description

Studies of early arthritis cohorts have shown that a large number of early arthritis patients cannot be accurately diagnosed at their first visit, and hence are often referred as undifferentiated arthritis patients. If patients are found to be anti-CCP(+) when referred to the clinician, however, more than 90% develop RA within 3 years - in contrast to only 30% of the anti-CCP(-) patients. The presence of anti-CCP antibodies in undifferentiated arthritis therefore accurately predicts development of RA. Anti-CCP antibodies are very specific for RA, and they are produced at significant level very early in disease. The specificity of anti-CCP antibodies for the diagnosis of RA is high (94.1-99.0%). Moreover, it has been reported that anti-CCP antibodies can be present many years before the first visit to the clinic (up to 18 years). Furthermore, the presence of anti-CCP antibodies at the first visit to the clinician predicts radiographic progression, as demonstrated by many studies that have shown a strong association of anti-CCP positivity with the development of bone erosions.Early diagnosis of RA coupled with rational use of disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARD) has been shown to have a favourable effect on the course of the disease. Early and accurate diagnosis has therefore become increasingly important. Implementing anti-CCP quick tests in general practices could facilitate an early detection of RA or the allocation to a high risk RA group. This, in turn, would guarantee an early referral of the patient to a rheumatologist and together with other clinical examinations can aid in the early diagnosis and treatment. As has been shown in many studies an early intervention is vital to preserve joint function and to improve patient care. In this study, we want to assess the relative risk for patients derived from GPs in Germany with new onset of non-specific MSK symptoms and anti-CCP test positivity to develop (subclinical) signs of inflammation in accordance with early RA. Those patients will be identified in general practices and will be tested for anti-CCP status. Anti-CCP positive patients will then be introduced to a rheumatologist to validate anti-CCP status and examine presence of clinical signs of early RA in addition to subclinical signs of MSK inflammation. Furthermore, to focus on the possibility of early detection of anti-CCP before the onset of clinically active arthritis, patients will be followed-up by a rheumatologist until detection of early RA or up to 36 months in total. Early RA will be examined using standard of care for signs of inflammation including clinical examination for swollen and tender joints. In addition, ultrasound will be performed to assess joint inflammation as well as fluorescence optical imaging technique (Xiralite®) to sensitively illustrate changes in microvascularisation as a marker of subclinical inflammation. In cases of RA diagnosis, the study ends with the date of diagnosis and patients will receive treatment according to local guidelines earlier and medical care will be continued in clinical routine care conditions outside of the study. Moreover, the cooperation status between GPs and rheumatologists will be evaluated using qualitative interviews. Feasibility of the diagnosis of early RA in at risk patients as well as the feasibility of the transferral of these patients from the general practice to the rheumatologist will be assessed. Training of GPs for detection of early RA will be improved. Overall, the hypothesis of the study is that patients with new onset of unspecific MSK-symptoms and who are positive for anti-CCP, which both are risk factors for developing RA, will be earlier introduced to and monitored by a rheumatologist for proper clinical examination and potential treatment when establishing RA, which in turn will not only improve patient care, disease outcomes and quality of life, but might also be cost effective.

Interventions

no intervention is given

Sponsors

Fraunhofer Institute for Translational Medicine and Pharmacology ITMP
Lead SponsorOTHER
Bristol-Myers Squibb
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
Goethe University
CollaboratorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* New onset of non-specific MSK symptoms, including, but not limited to, arthralgia of the hands and the large joints such as wrists, knees, and shoulders * Written informed consent obtained prior to the initiation of any study protocol-required procedures * General understanding of study procedure and informed consent * Age ≥ 18 and ≤ 65 years

Exclusion criteria

* RA diagnosed according to modified EULAR/ACR (american college of rheumatology)-criteria * Other known arthritis * Other known reasons for MSK symptoms, e.g. mechanical, traumatic, etc. * MSK symptoms previously reported at another (general) practice * Alcohol, drug or chemical abuse * Underage or incapable patients

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Determination of the relative risk in patients with new onset of non-specific MSK symptoms who are anti-CCP positive to develop (subclinical) signs of inflammation in accordance with early RA in general practices in Germanyevery 6 months up to 3 yearsDetermination if RA symptoms are present

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
assessment of grade of disability in anti-CCP positive patientsevery 6 months up to 3 years
diagnosis of RA in the group of anti-CCP positive patients with new onset of non-specific MSK symptomsevery 6 months up to 3 years
subclinical signs of inflammation using routine examination methods in anti-CCP positive patientsevery 6 months up to 3 years
subclinical signs of inflammation using fluorescence optical imaging technique in anti-CCP positive patientsevery 6 months up to 3 years
subclinical signs of inflammation using ultrasound in anti-CCP positive patientsevery 6 months up to 3 years
anti-CCP level over time in anti-CCP positive patientsover 3 years
EQ5Devery 6 months up to 3 yearsQuestionnaire to assess Quality of Life profile of anti-CCP positive patients
SF36every 6 months up to 3 yearsQuestionnaire to assess Quality of Life profile of anti-CCP positive patients
HAQevery 6 months up to 3 yearsQuestionnaire to assess disability profile of anti-CCP positive patients
assessment risk of depression in anti-CCP positive patientsevery 6 months up to 3 years
WPAIevery 6 months up to 3 yearsQuestionnaire to assess work ability profile of anti-CCP positive patients
assessment of time to disease in anti-CCP positive patientsevery 6 months up to 3 years
assessment of correlation of anti-CCP level in anti-CCP positive patientsevery 6 months up to 3 years
assessment quality of life (QoL) in anti-CCP positive patientsevery 6 months up to 3 years
assessment work ability profile in anti-CCP positive patientsevery 6 months up to 3 years
assessment subclinical signs of inflammation in anti-CCP positive patientsevery 6 months up to 3 years
diagnosis of RA in the group of ELISA test anti-CCP negative patients with new onset of non-specific MSK symptoms1 year
diagnosis of RA in the group of quick test anti-CCP negative patients with new onset of non-specific MSK symptoms1 year
Qualitative assessment of general practitioners' (GP) routine care1 yearqualitative interviews with the GP to evaluate current status of how patients with MSK symptoms are treated/forwarded in general practices
PHQ-9every 6 months up to 3 yearsQuestionnaire to assess depression profile of anti-CCP positive patients

Countries

Germany

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026