Skip to content

Comparison of Bleeding Risk Between Rivaroxaban and Apixaban for the Treatment of Acute Venous Thromboembolism

Comparison of Bleeding Risk Between Rivaroxaban and Apixaban for the Treatment of Acute Venous Thromboembolism

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03266783
Acronym
COBRRA
Enrollment
2760
Registered
2017-08-30
Start date
2017-12-13
Completion date
2025-10-15
Last updated
2026-06-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Venous Thromboembolism

Brief summary

Apixaban and rivaroxaban have been compared to standard therapy for treatment of acute symptomatic venous thromboembolism (VTE) in randomized controlled trials (RCTs), and are both approved by Health Canada. No safety or efficacy data is available from direct head-to-head comparison of these two anticoagulants. Lawsuits in the United States over bleeding events, patient perceptions, and concerns with medication adherence are additional factors highlighting the importance of a comparison trial. This multi-center, pragmatic, prospective, randomized, open-label, blinded end-point (PROBE) trial aims to compare the safety of apixaban and rivaroxaban for the treatment of VTE.

Detailed description

VTE is the third leading cause of mortality by cardiovascular disease. Standard treatment for acute VTE uses a combination of parenteral Low-Molecular-Weight Heparin (LMWH) and oral vitamin K antagonists (VKA) for 3 months, and carries significant bleeding risk. The major and/or clinically-relevant non-major bleeding (CRNMB) event rate is reported between 8.1-9.7% during initial treatment. This treatment is burdensome owing to subcutaneous injections, drug interactions, and laboratory monitoring. Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are simpler to use and do not require laboratory monitoring. Rivaroxaban and apixaban are two DOACs targeting Factor Xa. Each DOAC was separately proven effective and safe when compared to standard treatment. Comparison of the bleeding rates between studies would favour use of apixaban over rivaroxaban; however, trial limitations and lack of direct comparison between these two agents makes it impossible to draw firm conclusions. This represents a dilemma in clinical practice because the absence of convincing differences in safety has led to genuine uncertainty about which DOAC has the best risk-to-benefit ratio. To address these limitations, a head-to-head randomized controlled trial (RCT) is needed to determine the safety (i.e. bleeding risk) of twice daily apixaban over once daily rivaroxaban during the first 3 months of acute VTE treatment. Eligibility criteria will be less stringent than the COBRRA pilot study and reflect real-world patients. Cost-effective analysis of apixaban twice daily compared to rivaroxaban once daily will also be performed.

Interventions

DRUGApixaban

Refer to Apixaban group

DRUGRivaroxaban

Refer to Rivaroxaban group

Sponsors

Ottawa Hospital Research Institute
Lead SponsorOTHER
Canadian Venous Thromboembolism Clinical Trials and Outcomes Research (CanVECTOR) Network
CollaboratorNETWORK
Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR)
CollaboratorOTHER_GOV

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Confirmed newly diagnosed symptomatic acute venous thromboembolism (VTE) \[proximal lower extremity deep vein thrombosis (DVT) or segmental or greater pulmonary embolism (PE)\] * Age ≥ 18 years old * Informed consent obtained

Exclusion criteria

* Have received \> 72 hours of therapeutic anticoagulation * Creatinine clearance \< 30 ml/min calculated with the Cockcroft-Gault formula * Any contraindication for anticoagulation with apixaban or rivaroxaban as determined by the treating physician such as, but not limited to: * active bleeding, * active malignancy, defined as a) diagnosed with cancer within the past 6 months; or b) recurrent, regionally advanced or metastatic disease; or c) currently receiving treatment or have received any treatment for cancer during the 6 months prior to randomization; or d) a hematologic malignancy not in complete remission, * weight \> 120 kg, * liver disease (Child-Pugh Class B or C), * use of contraindicated medications * another indication for long-term anticoagulation (e.g. atrial fibrillation) * pregnant (note below) or breastfeeding (Note: as reported by the patient or a pregnancy test will be ordered at the discretion of the treating physician for women of childbearing potential as per standard of care)

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
The Rate of Adjudicated Clinically Relevant Bleeding (CRB) EventsFor the duration of the study: 3 monthsCRB events are defined as the composite of major bleeding (MB) events and clinically relevant non-major bleeding (CRNMB) events.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Participants With Adjudicated Major Bleeding EventsFor the duration of the study: 3 monthsMajor bleeding will be defined as fatal bleeding, and/or, Symptomatic bleeding in a critical area or organ, such as intracranial, intraspinal, intraocular, retroperitoneal, intra-articular or pericardial, or intramuscular with compartment syndrome, and/or bleeding causing a fall in hemoglobin of ≥20 g/L, or leading to transfusion of ≥2 units of whole blood or red cells.
Number of Participants With Adjudicated Clinically Relevant Non-Major Bleeding EventsFor the duration of the study: 3 monthsClinically relevant non-major bleeding will be defined as any sign or symptom of hemorrhage (e.g., more bleeding than would be expected for a clinical circumstance, including bleeding found by imaging alone) that does not fit the criteria for the International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis (ISTH) definition of major bleeding but does meet at least one of the following criteria: * Requiring medical intervention by a healthcare professional * Leading to hospitalization or increased level of care * Prompting a face to face (i.e., not just a telephone or electronic communication) evaluation
Number of Participants With Adjudicated Recurrent Venous Thromboembolism (VTE) EventsFor the duration of the study: 3 monthsRecurrent VTE will be confirmed with investigational reports including clinic notes, D-dimer results and imaging as per standard of care. Recurrent Deep Vein Thrombosis (DVT) will be confirmed by compression ultrasound revealing a new (compared to baseline/index ultrasound) area of non-compressibility in the popliteal vein or more proximal vein, or venography demonstrating a constant intraluminal filling defect in the popliteal vein or more proximal veins. Recurrent Pulmonary Embolism (PE) will be diagnosed if the Ventilation-Perfusion (VQ) scan is non-normal and a new unmatched segmental or greater perfusion defect is documented, or an intraluminal filling defect is seen on Computed Tomography Pulmonary Angiogram (CTPA) in a segmental or greater vessel that was previously free of thrombus, or pulmonary angiography demonstrating a constant intraluminal filling defect or a cutoff of a vessel \>2.5 mm in diameter will be considered diagnostic for PE.
Number of Participants With Adjudicated VTE-Related DeathsFor the duration of the study: 3 monthsVTE-related death (fatal PE or unexplained deaths) will be confirmed using death certificates and/or autopsy findings.
All-cause MortalityFor the duration of the study: 3 monthsUsing a binary outcome of an event or no event (Individual rates of death related to VTE, bleeding or other causes).
Medication AdherenceFor the duration of the study: 3 monthsReported as the number of patients self-reporting full medication adherence.
Quality-Adjusted Life Years (QALYs) GainedFor the duration of the study: 3 monthsWe will measure health utility values using the EQ-5D-5L (EuroQoL-5 Dimension-5 Level) Questionnaire at baseline, 2 week (± 7 days), and 90 days (+14 days). We will model the prognosis of a cohort of patients receiving rivaroxaban as a baseline against the potential impact of apixaban. The results will be presented as incremental cost per QALY gained, incremental costs per one CRB cases prevented, and incremental cost per one life year saved.
Incremental Cost-effectiveness RatioFor the duration of the study: 3 monthsIncremental cost-effectiveness ratios including cost per one CRB case prevented, cost per one life year saved, cost per one quality-adjusted life year (QALY) gained, which will be analyzed as part of the health economic analysis plan.
Impact of Verbal Consent on Patient Participation in Comparison With Participants From Sites Using Written Informed ConsentFor the duration of the study: 3 monthsImpact of verbal consent on patient participation in comparison with participants from sites using written informed consent. Due to the qualitative nature of this outcome, it will be presented descriptively.

Countries

Australia, Canada, Ireland

Contacts

PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORLana Castellucci, MD, FRCPC

Ottawa Hospital Research Institute

Baseline characteristics

Characteristic
Age, Continuous58.0 years
Body Mass Index29 kg/m^2
Body Weight85.2 kg
Continued Antiplatelet Use71 Participants
Creatinine Clearance105.6 ml/min
History of Venous Thromboembolism210 Participants
Provoked or Unprovoked Venous Thromboembolism
Provoked
612 Participants
Provoked or Unprovoked Venous Thromboembolism
Unknown
1 Participants
Provoked or Unprovoked Venous Thromboembolism
Unprovoked
1022 Participants
Qualifying Venous Thromboembolism diagnosis
Deep vein thrombosis alone
691 Participants
Qualifying Venous Thromboembolism diagnosis
Pulmonary embolism with or without deep vein thrombosis
637 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
8 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
67 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
95 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
2 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
64 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
2400 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Australia
100 participants
Region of Enrollment
Canada
2498 participants
Region of Enrollment
Ireland
4 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
578 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
748 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
1 / 1,3454 / 1,355
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 00 / 0
serious
Total, serious adverse events
36 / 1,34530 / 1,355

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Jun 25, 2026