Skip to content

A Study of Improving Education of Community Chain of Survival

Improving Education of Community Chain of Survival Through Innovative Teaching, Implementing Teamwork Skills, and Survey on Attitude and Willingness: A Pilot Study

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03266263
Enrollment
500
Registered
2017-08-30
Start date
2016-08-01
Completion date
2019-07-31
Last updated
2017-08-30

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Cardiac Arrest Circulatory

Brief summary

High-quality cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) and early defibrillation are the most important parts of the chain of survival, and they are highly associated with the survival rate and life quality of patients with cardiac arrest. It needs the witness to perform bystander CPR and use the automated external defibrillator (AED) if CPR and defibrillation are expected to be performed earlier. Nevertheless, few patients with cardiac arrest received bystander CPR in Taiwan. It might be caused by some reasons. First, traditional training programs were inefficient and ineffective in the retention of skills and thus students were not confident in their CPR skills after receiving training programs. Second, the current training module focused on personal skill training only and lacked teamwork skills training. It led to poor performance of the students in actual resuscitation scene, where on-scene resuscitators were usually more than one. Third, the current training contents did not improve the attitudes and willingness of performing bystander CPR and it caused people who had received training program did not resuscitate the patients finally. To improve the above-mentioned problem, a three-year research project will be implemented. The aims of the project are the following: 1. to explore the effect of different teaching contents and hand-on practice feedback methods on the students' performance of chest compressing, ventilating and using AED in the CPR and AED training courses. 2. to analyze the current situation of teamwork when CPR and AED were performed, to build up the collaborating module accordingly and evaluate the effect of the new module on the students' performance of chest compressing, ventilating and using AED after the module is introduced into the training course. 3. to understand the factors affecting the motivations and willingness of people to learn and practice CPR and AED by utilizing questionnaires, and then to evaluate the effect of the creative program, which was modified according to the results of the questionnaires, on the motivations and willingness of people to learn and practice CPR and AED. The investigators expect to design a more efficient resuscitation skill training course by implementing the research project and further to improve the motivations and willingness of people to learn and practice CPR and AED in the future.

Interventions

DEVICEautomatic computer-led feedback

automated feedback software for CPR quality, including compression depth, rate, recoil, hands-off time, and ventilation volume

OTHERinstructor-led feedback

feedback for CPR quality by instructors

Sponsors

National Taiwan University Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
16 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* healthy laypersons without CPR training within two years

Exclusion criteria

* non

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
chest compression rateimmediately after the training coursedifferences of chest compression rates
chest compression depthimmediately after the training coursedifferences of chest compression depth
hands-off time of chest compressionimmediately after the training coursedifferences of hands-off time of chest compression
score of checklistimmediately after the training coursedifferences of scores of checklists

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
score of satisfaction questionnaireimmediately after the training coursedifferences of scores of satisfaction questionnaire

Countries

Taiwan

Contacts

Primary ContactChih-Wei Yang
cwyang0413@gmail.com886-23123456

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026