Skip to content

IPL and MGX Versus MGX Alone in the Treatment of Dry Eye Disease Secondary to MGD

Intense Pulsed Light and Meibomian Gland Expression (MGX) Versus MGX Alone in the Treatment of Dry Eye Disease Secondary to Meibomian Gland Dysfunction

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03265652
Enrollment
24
Registered
2017-08-29
Start date
2018-05-15
Completion date
2019-04-18
Last updated
2020-02-21

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Dry Eye, Meibomian Gland Dysfunction

Keywords

Intense Pulsed Light, Meibomian Gland Dysfunction, Dry Eye Disease

Brief summary

The aim of the current study is to examine the contribution of intense pulsed light (IPL) for relieving signs and symptoms of dry eye due to meibomian gland dysfunction. The effect of IPL will be examined in a study designed as a randomized controlled trial. In the study arm, subjects will undergo 4 treatment sessions, consisting of IPL pulses immediately followed by expression of the meibomian glands. In the control arm, subjects will undergo the same treatments, except that the IPL pulses will be disabled. For each subject, the duration of the study will be 10 weeks, as explained in the detailed description,

Detailed description

Outcome measures (tear break-up time, tear film osmolarity, meibomian gland assessment, number of meibomian glands yielding liquid secretion in lower eyelid , meibography, self-assessed symptoms and close up photos of the lid margins) will be measured at baseline. All subjects will receive 4 treatments at 2 weeks intervals. In each treatment session, a subject allocated to the study group will be treated with IPL administered in the malar region, from tragus to tragus including the nose, 2-3 mm below the lower eyelids. Immediately following the IPL administration, the meibomian glands will be manually expressed from both eyelids. Subjects in the control arm will receive exactly the same treatment, except that the IPL administration will be sham. A single follow-up will occur at 10 weeks after the baseline (or 4 weeks after the 4th treatment session). At the follow-up, the changes in the outcome measures will be evaluated, and compared between the two arms. For each subject, the duration of the study will be 10 weeks: 1st treatment at baseline; 2nd treatment at 2 weeks after baseline; 3rd treatment at 4 weeks after baseline; 4th treatment at 6 weeks after baseline; and a single follow-up at 10 weeks after baseline). Statistically significant differences between the two arms will support the study hypothesis that IPL treatment itself provides relief to both signs and symptoms of dry eye disease.

Interventions

Intense pulsed light therapy is a non-invasive and non-laser light treatment that is FDA-approved for various conditions in dermatology. Subjects will receive a total of 4 treatments over the course of the study, at intervals of 2 weeks. Each treatment will include applications on 10-15 IPL pulses in the malar region and close to the lower eyelids, followed by meibomian gland expression. Meibomian gland expression will be implemented by squeezing the meibomian glands with the aid of two Q-tips positioned on either side of the meibomian glands, or with a meibomian gland expressor forceps.

DEVICESham therapy

Subjects will receive a total of 4 treatments over the course of the study, at intervals of 2 weeks. Each treatment will include a sham application of IPL on 10-15 locations in the malar region and close to the lower eyelids, followed by meibomian gland expression. Meibomian gland expression will be implemented by squeezing the meibomian glands with the aid of two Q-tips positioned on either side of the meibomian glands, or with a meibomian gland expressor forceps.

Sponsors

Lumenis Be Ltd.
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Masking description

Subjects in the study arm will receive a series of IPL pulses using the M22 IPL handpiece. In subjects of the control arm, the device will be disabled. The subject will feel the lightguide on the skin, will hear clicking sounds, but no light will be actually produced by the M22 device. Since during treatment both eyes of the subject will be fully occluded, no subject will be able to see if the treatment is actual or sham. There is no way to completely mask the subjects, since the IPL generally causes slight redness of the skin, and in some patients is may also cause some discomfort

Intervention model description

Subjects will be randomized 1:1 to a study arm and a control arm. Subjects in the study arm will be treated with IPL and meibomian gland expression. Subjects in the control arm will be treated with sham and meibomian gland expression.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Subject is able to read, understand and sign an Informed Consent (IC) form 2. Subject is 18 years or older 3. Subject has Fitzpatrick skin type I to IV 4. SPEED questionnaire equal or more than 10 5. OSDI questionnaire equal or more than 23 6. In both eyes, at least 5 non-atrophied meibomian glands on the lower eyelid. 7. In both eyes, Tear break up time equal or less than 7 seconds 8. In both eyes, MGA (the total meibomian gland score for 15 glands of the lower eyelid) is smaller or equal to 12

Exclusion criteria

1. Contact lens wear within the month prior to screening 2. Unwilling to discontinue use of contact lenses for the duration of the study 3. Ocular surgery or eyelid surgery within 6 months prior to screening 4. Neuro-paralysis in the planned treatment area within 6 months prior to screening 5. Other uncontrolled eye disorders affecting the ocular surface, for example active allergies 6. Current use of punctal plugs 7. Pre-cancerous lesions, skin cancer or pigmented lesions in the planned treatment area 8. Uncontrolled infections or uncontrolled immunosuppressive diseases 9. Subjects with ocular infections within 6 months prior to screening 10. Prior history of cold sores or rashes in the perioral area or in the planned treatment area that could be stimulated by light at a wavelength of 560 nm to 1200 nm (e.g., Herpes simplex 1 & 2, Systemic Lupus erythematosus, porphyria) 11. Use of photosensitive medication and/or herbs that may cause sensitivity to 560-1200 nm light exposure, such as Isotretinoin, Tetracycline, Doxycycline, or St. John's Wort within 3 months prior to screening 12. Over exposure to sun within 4 weeks prior to screening, in the judgment of the investigator 13. Administration of prescription eye drops for dry eye within 7 days prior to screening, excluding artificial tears and glaucoma drops 14. Radiation therapy to the head or neck within 12 months prior to screening, or planned radiation therapy within 8 weeks after completion of all IPL treatments 15. Treatment with chemotherapeutic agent within 8 weeks prior to screening, or planned chemotherapy within 8 weeks after completion of all IPL treatments 16. New topical treatments within the area to be treated, or oral therapies within 3 months prior to screening, except over-the-counter acetaminophen-based analgesics (such as Extra Strength Tylenol®) for pain management after study treatment, new oral omega 3 fatty acid supplements and topical artificial tears 17. Change in dosage of any systemic medication within 3 months prior to screening 18. Anticipated relocation or extensive travel outside of the local study area preventing compliance with follow-up over the study period 19. Legally blind in either or both eyes 20. History of migraines, seizures or epilepsy 21. IPL treatment within 12 months prior to screening 22. Lipiflow treatment, or any other thermal treatment of the eyelids, within 6 months prior to screening 23. Expression of the meibomian glands within 6 months prior to screening 24. Any condition revealed during the eligibility screening process whereby the investigator deems the subject inappropriate for this study 25. Women below the age of menopause (50 years of age)

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change of baseline TBUT10 weeksChange of Tear break up time in the study eye, from baseline to follow-up

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change from baseline MGA10 weeksChange of Meibomian gland secretion score, from baseline to follow-up, in both eyes
Change from baseline OSDI10 weeksChange of self-assessed symptoms with the OSDI questionnaire, from baseline to follow-up, in both eyes

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage of study eyes with normal TBUT10 weeksPercentage of study eyes with TBUT \> 10 seconds at the follow-up
Percentage of subjects with normal OSDI10 weeksPercentage of subjects with OSDI \< 23 at the follow-up
Change from baseline MGYLS10 weeksChange of the number of meibomian glands yielding liquid secretion, from baseline to the follow-up
Qualitative assessment of eyelid appearance10 weeksHigh resolution photos of the upper and lower eyelids in both eyes
Percentage of subjects with normal MGA10 weeksPercentage of eyes with MGA \> 12 at the follow-up
Change from baseline TFO10 weeksChange of the tear film osmolarity, from baseline to the follow-up
Change from baseline Meiboscore10 weeksChange of the Meiboscore evaluated with meibography, from baseline to the follow-up

Countries

Israel

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026