Skip to content

Evaluation of Pain in Urinary Collections in Pediatric Emergencies in Children Who Have Not Acquired Cleanliness

Round-trip Survey or Urine Bag: Evaluation of Pain in Urinary Collections in Pediatric Emergencies in Children Who Have Not Acquired Cleanliness (SONDAPU)

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03263845
Acronym
SONDAPU
Enrollment
100
Registered
2017-08-28
Start date
2016-07-05
Completion date
2017-01-13
Last updated
2017-08-28

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Urinary Tract Infections in Children

Brief summary

Observational study.

Detailed description

Febrile urinary infections account for 5% of unexplained causes of fever in children up to 2 years of age. Urinary samples are therefore very common in pediatric emergencies. In children who have not acquired cleanliness, the most used method of collection is the placement of a sterile urine bag on the perineum. It allows a noninvasive urinary collection. However from a bacteriological point of view this method is debatable because the rate of contamination of the collections is important. This mode of collection is of interest only to exclude a urinary infection, by the realization of a urinary strip. Pocket-collected urine is not reliable for bacteriological analysis in culture. For example, if the urine strip is positive, the American Academy of Pediatrics recommends urine sampling by urine sampling (or other invasive methods) for culture. The urine bag should be changed every 30 minutes to avoid the risk of contamination. The technique is wait-and-see, the installation of several pockets is often necessary before obtaining urine. A study carried out in 2014 shows that in 39.4% of the cases the withdrawal of the urinary pouch was as much more painful than the urinary sounding, in the same patient. To our knowledge there is no other study dealing with the difference in pain engendered by these two methods. Since the urinary catheterization is faster, bacteriologically justified and necessary if the pocket collection is positive, it seems legitimate to ask ourselves if we should not aim at a generalization of the urinary catheterization, as first intention, Having not acquired cleanliness, requiring a withdrawal of urine for suspicion of urinary infection. Many centers continue to use urinary pocket collection mainly, as the survey technique seems too invasive and painful.

Interventions

None listed

Sponsors

Rennes University Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
CASE_ONLY
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
No minimum to 3 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

Children under 3 years of age who have not acquired the cleanliness present at the pediatric emergency department in Rennes, where urine sampling is necessary in case of suspected urinary tract infection.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Evaluation of painDay 0Score of the visual analog scale rated by the caregiver during the first performed gesture.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Evaluation of painDay 0Score of the visual analog scale rated by the parent during the first performed gesture.
The experience of the gesture by the parent and the caregiverDay 0Evaluation by a questionnaire by choosing from the following proposals: Very well spent, well spent, badly spent or very badly spent
Time needed to collect urineDay 0Duration between the first gesture and the final urine collection

Countries

France

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026