Skip to content

Do Educational Digital Films Enhance Patient COPD Outcomes?

Do Patients With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Engaging With Educational Films in Addition to Pulmonary Rehabilitation Gain Health-related Improvements?

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03263754
Enrollment
55
Registered
2017-08-28
Start date
2016-09-01
Completion date
2018-07-31
Last updated
2019-01-11

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease

Brief summary

This study aims to assess the efficacy of Pocket Medic to promote self-management and pulmonary rehabilitation adherence in COPD patients.

Detailed description

Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) refers to a group of lung conditions characterized by airways inflammation, small airways obstruction and progressive loss of lung function. There are 900,000 people diagnosed with COPD in England and Wales but allowing for under-diagnosis, the true prevalence could be 1.5 million. Sufferers are extensive health care users; where COPD is the second most common cause of emergency hospital admission in the United Kingdom with direct National Health Service costs over £800 million per year. Pulmonary Rehabilitation programs (PRPs) aim to provide education and support for patients whilst improving clinical outcomes, however, attendance to these programs can be low. This study aims to trial a series of digital films aimed at educating patients about their condition from the comfort of their own home. Approximately 80 patients eligible for PR will be allocated to an experimental condition to receive a series of 10 digital films alongside their standard 7-week PR, solely to receive 10 digital films, or to a control condition in the form of standard PR (no digital films). Outcome measures such as PR attendance, hospital admissions, quality of life (QoL), disease knowledge, psychological need satisfaction and motivation will be measured pre and post. Analysis of this data between the experimental and control conditions pre-post intervention will provide useful information regarding the efficacy of digital film prescriptions as an adjunct to usual PR, or on its own, and the role this may play is encouraging PR attendance.

Interventions

BEHAVIORALPocket Medic

10 short digital films utilising self-determination theory aiming to increase patient self-management

BEHAVIORALPulmonary Rehabilitation

PR follows National Institute for Clinical Excellence guidelines delivering 14 sessions over 7 weeks utilising a multidisciplinary approach

Sponsors

Hywel Dda Health Board
CollaboratorOTHER
Aberystwyth University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
50 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Eligible for pulmonary rehabilitation in Hywel Dda University Health Board.

Exclusion criteria

* Unwilling or unable to give informed consent * life expectancy of less than 6 months * unstable cardiovascular disease, dementia, cancers other than non-melanoma skins cancer * any condition that precludes patients using laptops or mobile phones (e.g. blind, deaf)

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Patient engagement10 weeksThe level at which patients in the intervention arm watch the digital films
Patient Adherence10 weeksThe level at which patients attend pulmonary rehabilitation sessions

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Disease Knowledge10 weeks and 6 monthsScores on Bristol COPD Knowledge Questionnaire
Service UtilizationBaseline and 6 monthsNumber of General Practioner visits and hospitalizations
Psychological self-management10 weeks and 6 monthsPatient scores on self-determination theory questionnaires modified to be relevant to COPD
Understanding COPD self-management10 weeks and 6 monthsScores on the Understanding COPD self-management questionnaire

Countries

United Kingdom

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026