Skip to content

High Dose Intravenous Thiamine for the Prevention of Delirium in Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation

Randomized Placebo Controlled Trial of High Dose Intravenous Thiamine for the Prevention of Delirium in Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03263442
Enrollment
66
Registered
2017-08-28
Start date
2017-10-16
Completion date
2020-08-10
Last updated
2021-10-19

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Delirium, Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation, Thiamine Deficiency

Brief summary

Purpose: To conduct a randomized controlled pilot study investigating the use of high dose intravenous (IV) thiamine to prevent delirium and mitigate the long-term effects of delirium, including health-related quality of life (HRQOL), functional status, and neuropsychiatric outcomes, in patients admitted to University of North Carolina (UNC) Hospital for allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT). Participants: 60 adult inpatients admitted to the UNC Bone Marrow Transplant Unit for allogeneic stem cell transplant. Procedures (methods): Participants will be admitted for allogeneic HSCT and on the day after transplant randomized to seven days of high dose IV thiamine or placebo. Thiamine levels will be measured weekly and participants will be assessed for evidence of delirium using validated measures. Validated measures will also be used to assess cognitive function, depression, post-traumatic stress symptoms, functional status, and HRQOL prior to hospitalization and at one, three, and six months after transplant.

Detailed description

Delirium is a common and potentially preventable neuropsychiatric complication in cancer patients receiving hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) that has profound consequences. Among cancer patients hospitalized for HSCT, delirium occurs in approximately 40% of patients and increases the risk of mortality. Long-term, delirium in this population results in worse physical health, mental health, and quality of life. Though strategies to prevent delirium have the potential to significantly improve the lives of people living with cancer, research in this area is extremely limited. Thiamine deficiency is also ubiquitous during HSCT and a known contributor to the development of delirium in other patient populations. High dose intravenous (IV) thiamine is an evidence-based and promising treatment for delirium, but no one has studied IV thiamine as a prevention strategy. This is a randomized double-blind controlled trial in participants undergoing allogeneic HSCT to determine if high dose IV thiamine can prevent delirium and minimize the deleterious impact of delirium on health-related quality of life (HRQOL), functional status, and other neuropsychiatric outcomes. The investigators will recruit 60 patients admitted for allogeneic HSCT at UNC, randomize them to treatment with high dose IV thiamine (n = 30) versus placebo (n = 30), and systematically evaluate all participants for delirium and related comorbidities. The investigators will use the Delirium Rating Scale (DRS) to measure the severity and duration of delirium immediately prior to transplant and after HSCT until 30 days post-transplant or discharge. If delirium is identified, the DRS will be administered daily until delirium resolves. The investigators will obtain thiamine levels and other laboratory parameters associated with delirium the day after transplant, and continue to monitor thiamine levels weekly thereafter. The investigators will also monitor HRQOL, functional status, depression, post-traumatic stress symptoms, and cognitive function prior to transplant and at one, three, and six months after transplant to elucidate the persistent impact of delirium in this population and the potential for thiamine to mitigate these negative outcomes.

Interventions

DRUGThiamine

200 mg IV three times daily for seven days

DRUGNormal saline

Normal saline IV three times daily for seven days

Sponsors

Rising Tide Foundation
CollaboratorOTHER
UNC Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Admission to the UNC Hospital Bone Marrow Transplant Unit for allogeneic stem cell transplant * At least 18 years of age * Able to speak English * Able to provide informed consent

Exclusion criteria

* A history of adverse reaction to IV thiamine * Pregnancy, confirmed by a negative pregnancy test within 30 days of study enrollment

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage of Participants With DeliriumAssessments will occur in the week prior to transplant, then 3 times weekly post-transplant until 30 days post-transplant or discharge, whichever comes first.Delirium incidence will be measured using the Delirium Rating Scale (DRS). The DRS is a is a 10-item, clinician-rated scale that rates the severity of delirium symptoms over a 24-hour period using all available information from the patient interview, mental status examination, medical history and tests, nursing observations, and family reports. The maximum possible score is 32. Higher scores suggest more severe symptoms. A cut-off score of \> 12 has been suggested to distinguish patients with delirium from patients with other neuropsychiatric disorders. Delirium incidence will be defined as at least one assessment with DRS \> 12.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Delirium DurationAssessments will occur in the week prior to transplant, then 3 times weekly post-transplant until 30 days post-transplant or discharge, whichever comes first.Delirium duration will be measured using the Delirium Rating Scale (DRS). The DRS is a is a 10-item, clinician-rated scale that rates the severity of delirium symptoms over a 24-hour period using all available information from the patient interview, mental status examination, medical history and tests, nursing observations, and family reports. The maximum possible score is 32. Higher scores suggest more severe symptoms. A cut-off score of \> 12 has been suggested to distinguish patients with delirium from patients with other neuropsychiatric disorders. Delirium duration will be reported as number of consecutive days during which DRS \> 12.
Concentration of Thiamine Status Stratified by Delirium StatusFrom end of 7-day intervention period until the development of delirium at any point during the post-transplant hospitalization up to a maximum of 30 daysThe relationship between thiamine levels at the end of the seven day administration of thiamine and the development of delirium at any point during the thirty days post-transplant or the post-transplant hospitalization, whichever comes first, will be examined. Thiamine levels (nmol/L) are presented in participants who did and did not experience delirium.
Change in Health-related Quality of Life Scores (Month 1)From baseline to one month post-transplantHRQOL will be assessed using the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Bone Marrow Transplant (FACT-BMT). The FACT-BMT is a 47-item self-administered assessment which asks individuals to rate questions related to physical, social/family, emotional, and functional well-being on a 5-point Likert Scale (0, not at all to 4, very much). Scores are summed across the items, resulting in a score from 0 to 148, with higher scores indicating better quality of life. Negative change scores indicate worse HRQOL with time.
Change in Health-related Quality of Life Scores (Month 3)Baseline to three months post-transplantHRQOL will be assessed using the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Bone Marrow Transplant (FACT-BMT). The FACT-BMT is a 47-item self-administered assessment which asks individuals to rate questions related to physical, social/family, emotional, and functional well-being on a 5-point Likert Scale (0, not at all to 4, very much). Scores are summed across the items, resulting in a score from 0 to 148, with higher scores indicating better quality of life. Negative change scores indicate worse HRQOL with time.
Change in Health-related Quality of Life Scores (Month 6)Baseline to six months post-transplantHRQOL will be assessed using the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Bone Marrow Transplant (FACT-BMT). The FACT-BMT is a 47-item self-administered assessment which asks individuals to rate questions related to physical, social/family, emotional, and functional well-being on a 5-point Likert Scale (0, not at all to 4, very much). Scores are summed across the items, resulting in a score from 0 to 148, with higher scores indicating better quality of life. Negative change scores indicate worse HRQOL with time.
Change in Depression Scores (Month 1)Baseline to one month post-transplantDepression will be assessed using the Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System - Depression (PROMIS-D) 8a short form. Scores for all PROMIS measures are reported on the T-score metric in which the mean=50 and standard deviation (SD) = 10 are centered on the general population means. Higher scores represent greater degrees of mood symptoms. Positive change scores indicate worse mood over time.
Change in Depression Scores (Month 3)Baseline to three months post-transplantDepression will be assessed using the Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System - Depression (PROMIS-D) 8a short form. Scores for all PROMIS measures are reported on the T-score metric in which the mean=50 and standard deviation (SD) = 10 are centered on the general population means. Higher scores represent greater degrees of mood symptoms. Positive change scores indicate worse mood over time.
Change in Depression Scores (Month 6)Baseline to six months post-transplantDepression will be assessed using the Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System - Depression (PROMIS-D) 8a short form. Scores for all PROMIS measures are reported on the T-score metric in which the mean=50 and standard deviation (SD) = 10 are centered on the general population means. Higher scores represent greater degrees of mood symptoms. Positive change scores indicate worse mood over time.
Delirium SeverityAssessments will occur in the week prior to transplant (baseline), then at least 3 times post-transplant on a weekly basis until 30 days post-transplant or discharge, whichever comes first, up to week 5Delirium severity will be measured using the Delirium Rating Scale (DRS). The DRS is a is a 10-item, clinician-rated scale that rates the severity of delirium symptoms over a 24-hour period using all available information from the patient interview, mental status examination, medical history and tests, nursing observations, and family reports. The score ranges from 0 to 32 with higher scores reflecting more severe symptoms. A cut-off score of \> 12 has been suggested to distinguish patients with delirium from patients with other neuropsychiatric disorders. The DRS medians and ranges are reported for each group at baseline and in each week of hospitalization for thiamine and placebo groups.
Change in Post-traumatic Stress Symptom Scores (Month 3)Baseline to three months post-transplantPost-traumatic stress symptoms will be measured using the Post Traumatic Stress Syndrome Scale 14 (PTSS-14). The PTSS-14 is a 14-item self-administered assessment. Questions are on a 7-point Likert-type Scale (1, never to 7, always) resulting in a total score between 14 and 98. Higher scores represent a more likely diagnosis of post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). Positive change scores indicate worse post-traumatic stress over time.
Change in Post-traumatic Stress Symptom Scores (Month 6)Baseline to six months post-transplantPost-traumatic stress symptoms will be measured using the Post Traumatic Stress Syndrome Scale 14 (PTSS-14). The PTSS-14 is a 14-item self-administered assessment. Questions are on a 7-point Likert-type Scale (1, never to 7, always) resulting in a total score between 14 and 98. Higher scores represent a more likely diagnosis of post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). Positive change scores indicate worse post-traumatic stress over time.
Change in Cognitive Function Scores (Month 1)From baseline to one month post-transplantCognitive function will be assessed using the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MOCA). The MOCA is a clinician-administered tool with scores ranging from 0 to 30. Lower scores indicate worse cognitive function. Scores ≤ 25 are considered clinically significant. Positive change scores indicate better function with time.
Change in Cognitive Function Scores (Month 3)Baseline to three months post-transplantCognitive function will be assessed using the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MOCA). The MOCA is a clinician-administered tool with scores ranging from 0 to 30. Lower scores indicate worse cognitive function. Scores ≤ 25 are considered clinically significant. Positive change scores indicate better function with time.
Change in Cognitive Function Scores (Month 6)From baseline to six months post-transplantCognitive function will be assessed using the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MOCA). The MOCA is a clinician-administered tool with scores ranging from 0 to 30. Lower scores indicate worse cognitive function. Scores ≤ 25 are considered clinically significant. Positive change scores indicate better function with time.
Change in Functional Status Scores (Month 1)Baseline to one month post-transplantFunctional status will be measured using the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance scale. ECOG performance status is a single question scored on a 6-point scale (range 0 to 5) with higher scores representing greater physical restriction due to illness. Negative change scores indicate better function with time.
Change in Functional Status Scores (Month 3)From baseline to three months post-transplantFunctional status will be measured using the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance scale. ECOG performance status is a single question scored on a 6-point scale (range 0 to 5) with higher scores representing greater physical restriction due to illness. Negative change scores indicate better function with time.
Change in Functional Status Scores (Month 6)Baseline to six months post-transplantFunctional status will be measured using the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance scale. ECOG performance status is a single question scored on a 6-point scale (range 0 to 5) with higher scores representing greater physical restriction due to illness. Negative change scores indicate better function with time.
Change in Post-traumatic Stress Symptom Scores (Month 1)Baseline to one month post-transplantPost-traumatic stress symptoms will be measured using the Post Traumatic Stress Syndrome Scale 14 (PTSS-14). The PTSS-14 is a 14-item self-administered assessment. Questions are on a 7-point Likert-type Scale (1, never to 7, always) resulting in a total score between 14 and 98. Higher scores represent a more likely diagnosis of post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). Positive change scores indicate worse post-traumatic stress over time.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Participants were recruited from the UNC Bone Marrow Transplant and Cellular Therapies Unit from October 2017 through February 2020.

Pre-assignment details

Of the 66 participants who enrolled in the study, 2 withdrew prior to randomization.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Intervention
Thiamine 200 mg IV Thiamine: 200 mg IV three times daily for seven days
28
Control
Normal saline IV Normal saline: Normal saline IV three times daily for seven days
33
Total61

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
1-month Follow-UpLost to Follow-up10
3-month Follow-UpLost to Follow-up13
6-month Follow-UpLost to Follow-up22
Inpatient PhaseDeath10
Inpatient PhaseInadequate Drug Exposure01
Inpatient PhaseWithdrawal by Subject10

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicInterventionControlTotal
Age, Continuous54.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.5
53.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.7
54.2 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.6
CIBMTR Disease Risk Index
high
5 Participants2 Participants7 Participants
CIBMTR Disease Risk Index
intermediate
3 Participants9 Participants12 Participants
CIBMTR Disease Risk Index
low
17 Participants19 Participants36 Participants
CIBMTR Disease Risk Index
N/A
3 Participants3 Participants6 Participants
Conditioning Regimen
Myeloablative
15 Participants13 Participants28 Participants
Conditioning Regimen
Reduced Intensity or Non-Myeloablative
13 Participants20 Participants33 Participants
Diagnosis
Acute leukemia
18 Participants19 Participants37 Participants
Diagnosis
Chronic leukemia
2 Participants5 Participants7 Participants
Diagnosis
Lymphoma
0 Participants2 Participants2 Participants
Diagnosis
Myelodysplastic Syndrome
5 Participants5 Participants10 Participants
Diagnosis
Myeloproliferative Disorder
2 Participants1 Participants3 Participants
Diagnosis
Other
1 Participants1 Participants2 Participants
Donor Type
Haploidentical
3 Participants5 Participants8 Participants
Donor Type
Matched Related Donor
9 Participants10 Participants19 Participants
Donor Type
Matched Unrelated Donor
16 Participants18 Participants34 Participants
ECOG Score
0
13 Participants18 Participants31 Participants
ECOG Score
1
15 Participants14 Participants29 Participants
ECOG Score
2
0 Participants1 Participants1 Participants
Education14.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.7
15.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.7
15.0 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.7
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
1 Participants1 Participants2 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
27 Participants32 Participants59 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
3 Participants6 Participants9 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
25 Participants27 Participants52 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
28 participants33 participants61 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
11 Participants13 Participants24 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
17 Participants20 Participants37 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
1 / 300 / 34
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 300 / 34
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 300 / 34

Outcome results

Primary

Percentage of Participants With Delirium

Delirium incidence will be measured using the Delirium Rating Scale (DRS). The DRS is a is a 10-item, clinician-rated scale that rates the severity of delirium symptoms over a 24-hour period using all available information from the patient interview, mental status examination, medical history and tests, nursing observations, and family reports. The maximum possible score is 32. Higher scores suggest more severe symptoms. A cut-off score of \> 12 has been suggested to distinguish patients with delirium from patients with other neuropsychiatric disorders. Delirium incidence will be defined as at least one assessment with DRS \> 12.

Time frame: Assessments will occur in the week prior to transplant, then 3 times weekly post-transplant until 30 days post-transplant or discharge, whichever comes first.

Population: The analysis population was defined a priori as those participants who: 1.) received at least 17 of 21 (80%) scheduled study drug doses; 2.) received at least one dose on each of the study drug administration days; and 3.) had no fewer than one DRS assessment per week until they were found to be delirious, reached 30 days post-transplant, or were discharged.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
InterventionPercentage of Participants With Delirium25 percentage of participants
ControlPercentage of Participants With Delirium21 percentage of participants
Secondary

Change in Cognitive Function Scores (Month 1)

Cognitive function will be assessed using the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MOCA). The MOCA is a clinician-administered tool with scores ranging from 0 to 30. Lower scores indicate worse cognitive function. Scores ≤ 25 are considered clinically significant. Positive change scores indicate better function with time.

Time frame: From baseline to one month post-transplant

Population: One participant in the control arm was unable to complete the MoCA due to restrictions on in-person human subjects research during the COVID-19 pandemic. Otherwise, all participants available at the 1-month follow-up time point were included.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
InterventionChange in Cognitive Function Scores (Month 1)-0.70 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.35
ControlChange in Cognitive Function Scores (Month 1)-0.09 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.76
Secondary

Change in Cognitive Function Scores (Month 3)

Cognitive function will be assessed using the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MOCA). The MOCA is a clinician-administered tool with scores ranging from 0 to 30. Lower scores indicate worse cognitive function. Scores ≤ 25 are considered clinically significant. Positive change scores indicate better function with time.

Time frame: Baseline to three months post-transplant

Population: Participants who completed the 3 month follow-up period and we able to participate in the cognitive assessment. Of the 26 participants active in the thiamine arm at the 3 month follow-up, 1 did not complete this measure due to barriers related to the COVID-19 pandemic.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
InterventionChange in Cognitive Function Scores (Month 3)-0.12 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.97
ControlChange in Cognitive Function Scores (Month 3)0.97 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.82
Secondary

Change in Cognitive Function Scores (Month 6)

Cognitive function will be assessed using the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MOCA). The MOCA is a clinician-administered tool with scores ranging from 0 to 30. Lower scores indicate worse cognitive function. Scores ≤ 25 are considered clinically significant. Positive change scores indicate better function with time.

Time frame: From baseline to six months post-transplant

Population: Participants who completed the 6 month follow-up period.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
InterventionChange in Cognitive Function Scores (Month 6)0.71 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.32
ControlChange in Cognitive Function Scores (Month 6)1.54 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.87
Secondary

Change in Depression Scores (Month 1)

Depression will be assessed using the Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System - Depression (PROMIS-D) 8a short form. Scores for all PROMIS measures are reported on the T-score metric in which the mean=50 and standard deviation (SD) = 10 are centered on the general population means. Higher scores represent greater degrees of mood symptoms. Positive change scores indicate worse mood over time.

Time frame: Baseline to one month post-transplant

Population: Participants who completed the 1 month follow-up period.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
InterventionChange in Depression Scores (Month 1)-1.34 T-scoreStandard Deviation 8.28
ControlChange in Depression Scores (Month 1)1.16 T-scoreStandard Deviation 6.12
Secondary

Change in Depression Scores (Month 3)

Depression will be assessed using the Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System - Depression (PROMIS-D) 8a short form. Scores for all PROMIS measures are reported on the T-score metric in which the mean=50 and standard deviation (SD) = 10 are centered on the general population means. Higher scores represent greater degrees of mood symptoms. Positive change scores indicate worse mood over time.

Time frame: Baseline to three months post-transplant

Population: Participants who completed the 3 month follow-up period

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
InterventionChange in Depression Scores (Month 3)0.93 T-scoreStandard Deviation 6.24
ControlChange in Depression Scores (Month 3)0.32 T-scoreStandard Deviation 9.53
Secondary

Change in Depression Scores (Month 6)

Depression will be assessed using the Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System - Depression (PROMIS-D) 8a short form. Scores for all PROMIS measures are reported on the T-score metric in which the mean=50 and standard deviation (SD) = 10 are centered on the general population means. Higher scores represent greater degrees of mood symptoms. Positive change scores indicate worse mood over time.

Time frame: Baseline to six months post-transplant

Population: Participants who completed the 6 month follow-up period

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
InterventionChange in Depression Scores (Month 6)0.14 T-scoreStandard Deviation 6.88
ControlChange in Depression Scores (Month 6)-1.66 T-scoreStandard Deviation 7.89
Secondary

Change in Functional Status Scores (Month 1)

Functional status will be measured using the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance scale. ECOG performance status is a single question scored on a 6-point scale (range 0 to 5) with higher scores representing greater physical restriction due to illness. Negative change scores indicate better function with time.

Time frame: Baseline to one month post-transplant

Population: Participants who completed the 1 month follow-up period

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
InterventionChange in Functional Status Scores (Month 1)0.70 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.67
ControlChange in Functional Status Scores (Month 1)0.88 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.93
Secondary

Change in Functional Status Scores (Month 3)

Functional status will be measured using the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance scale. ECOG performance status is a single question scored on a 6-point scale (range 0 to 5) with higher scores representing greater physical restriction due to illness. Negative change scores indicate better function with time.

Time frame: From baseline to three months post-transplant

Population: Participants who completed the 3 month follow-up.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
InterventionChange in Functional Status Scores (Month 3)0.69 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.62
ControlChange in Functional Status Scores (Month 3)0.60 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.89
Secondary

Change in Functional Status Scores (Month 6)

Functional status will be measured using the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance scale. ECOG performance status is a single question scored on a 6-point scale (range 0 to 5) with higher scores representing greater physical restriction due to illness. Negative change scores indicate better function with time.

Time frame: Baseline to six months post-transplant

Population: Participants who completed the 6 month follow-up period.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
InterventionChange in Functional Status Scores (Month 6)0.46 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.93
ControlChange in Functional Status Scores (Month 6)0.21 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.63
Secondary

Change in Health-related Quality of Life Scores (Month 1)

HRQOL will be assessed using the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Bone Marrow Transplant (FACT-BMT). The FACT-BMT is a 47-item self-administered assessment which asks individuals to rate questions related to physical, social/family, emotional, and functional well-being on a 5-point Likert Scale (0, not at all to 4, very much). Scores are summed across the items, resulting in a score from 0 to 148, with higher scores indicating better quality of life. Negative change scores indicate worse HRQOL with time.

Time frame: From baseline to one month post-transplant

Population: Participants who completed the 1 month follow-up period.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
InterventionChange in Health-related Quality of Life Scores (Month 1)-7.53 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.66
ControlChange in Health-related Quality of Life Scores (Month 1)-5.69 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.59
Secondary

Change in Health-related Quality of Life Scores (Month 3)

HRQOL will be assessed using the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Bone Marrow Transplant (FACT-BMT). The FACT-BMT is a 47-item self-administered assessment which asks individuals to rate questions related to physical, social/family, emotional, and functional well-being on a 5-point Likert Scale (0, not at all to 4, very much). Scores are summed across the items, resulting in a score from 0 to 148, with higher scores indicating better quality of life. Negative change scores indicate worse HRQOL with time.

Time frame: Baseline to three months post-transplant

Population: Participants who completed the 3 month follow-up period

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
InterventionChange in Health-related Quality of Life Scores (Month 3)-3.96 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.11
ControlChange in Health-related Quality of Life Scores (Month 3)-1.43 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 16.79
Secondary

Change in Health-related Quality of Life Scores (Month 6)

HRQOL will be assessed using the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Bone Marrow Transplant (FACT-BMT). The FACT-BMT is a 47-item self-administered assessment which asks individuals to rate questions related to physical, social/family, emotional, and functional well-being on a 5-point Likert Scale (0, not at all to 4, very much). Scores are summed across the items, resulting in a score from 0 to 148, with higher scores indicating better quality of life. Negative change scores indicate worse HRQOL with time.

Time frame: Baseline to six months post-transplant

Population: Participants who completed the 6 month follow-up period

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
InterventionChange in Health-related Quality of Life Scores (Month 6)-4.36 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 14.09
ControlChange in Health-related Quality of Life Scores (Month 6)0.28 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 12.17
Secondary

Change in Post-traumatic Stress Symptom Scores (Month 1)

Post-traumatic stress symptoms will be measured using the Post Traumatic Stress Syndrome Scale 14 (PTSS-14). The PTSS-14 is a 14-item self-administered assessment. Questions are on a 7-point Likert-type Scale (1, never to 7, always) resulting in a total score between 14 and 98. Higher scores represent a more likely diagnosis of post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). Positive change scores indicate worse post-traumatic stress over time.

Time frame: Baseline to one month post-transplant

Population: Participants who completed the 1 month follow-up period.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
InterventionChange in Post-traumatic Stress Symptom Scores (Month 1)-0.52 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.88
ControlChange in Post-traumatic Stress Symptom Scores (Month 1)1.55 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.92
Secondary

Change in Post-traumatic Stress Symptom Scores (Month 3)

Post-traumatic stress symptoms will be measured using the Post Traumatic Stress Syndrome Scale 14 (PTSS-14). The PTSS-14 is a 14-item self-administered assessment. Questions are on a 7-point Likert-type Scale (1, never to 7, always) resulting in a total score between 14 and 98. Higher scores represent a more likely diagnosis of post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). Positive change scores indicate worse post-traumatic stress over time.

Time frame: Baseline to three months post-transplant

Population: Participants who completed the 3 month follow-up period

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
InterventionChange in Post-traumatic Stress Symptom Scores (Month 3)-1.50 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.58
ControlChange in Post-traumatic Stress Symptom Scores (Month 3)0.83 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.63
Secondary

Change in Post-traumatic Stress Symptom Scores (Month 6)

Post-traumatic stress symptoms will be measured using the Post Traumatic Stress Syndrome Scale 14 (PTSS-14). The PTSS-14 is a 14-item self-administered assessment. Questions are on a 7-point Likert-type Scale (1, never to 7, always) resulting in a total score between 14 and 98. Higher scores represent a more likely diagnosis of post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). Positive change scores indicate worse post-traumatic stress over time.

Time frame: Baseline to six months post-transplant

Population: Participants who completed the 6 month follow-up period.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
InterventionChange in Post-traumatic Stress Symptom Scores (Month 6)1.79 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.14
ControlChange in Post-traumatic Stress Symptom Scores (Month 6)1.32 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 7
Secondary

Concentration of Thiamine Status Stratified by Delirium Status

The relationship between thiamine levels at the end of the seven day administration of thiamine and the development of delirium at any point during the thirty days post-transplant or the post-transplant hospitalization, whichever comes first, will be examined. Thiamine levels (nmol/L) are presented in participants who did and did not experience delirium.

Time frame: From end of 7-day intervention period until the development of delirium at any point during the post-transplant hospitalization up to a maximum of 30 days

Population: Only those participants in whom thiamine levels were obtained at the end of the seven day administration were included.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
InterventionConcentration of Thiamine Status Stratified by Delirium Status115.6 nmol/LStandard Deviation 69.3
ControlConcentration of Thiamine Status Stratified by Delirium Status93.8 nmol/LStandard Deviation 28.5
Secondary

Delirium Duration

Delirium duration will be measured using the Delirium Rating Scale (DRS). The DRS is a is a 10-item, clinician-rated scale that rates the severity of delirium symptoms over a 24-hour period using all available information from the patient interview, mental status examination, medical history and tests, nursing observations, and family reports. The maximum possible score is 32. Higher scores suggest more severe symptoms. A cut-off score of \> 12 has been suggested to distinguish patients with delirium from patients with other neuropsychiatric disorders. Delirium duration will be reported as number of consecutive days during which DRS \> 12.

Time frame: Assessments will occur in the week prior to transplant, then 3 times weekly post-transplant until 30 days post-transplant or discharge, whichever comes first.

Population: These analyses are exclusive to those participants who experienced delirium.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
InterventionDelirium Duration2.0 daysStandard Deviation 1.2
ControlDelirium Duration4.4 daysStandard Deviation 4.7
Secondary

Delirium Severity

Delirium severity will be measured using the Delirium Rating Scale (DRS). The DRS is a is a 10-item, clinician-rated scale that rates the severity of delirium symptoms over a 24-hour period using all available information from the patient interview, mental status examination, medical history and tests, nursing observations, and family reports. The score ranges from 0 to 32 with higher scores reflecting more severe symptoms. A cut-off score of \> 12 has been suggested to distinguish patients with delirium from patients with other neuropsychiatric disorders. The DRS medians and ranges are reported for each group at baseline and in each week of hospitalization for thiamine and placebo groups.

Time frame: Assessments will occur in the week prior to transplant (baseline), then at least 3 times post-transplant on a weekly basis until 30 days post-transplant or discharge, whichever comes first, up to week 5

Population: Attrition over time is due to hospital discharge (primary reason), withdrawal, or death.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)
InterventionDelirium SeverityWeek 36.33 score on a scale
InterventionDelirium SeverityBaseline4.0 score on a scale
InterventionDelirium SeverityWeek 45.50 score on a scale
InterventionDelirium SeverityWeek 26.50 score on a scale
InterventionDelirium SeverityWeek 520.00 score on a scale
InterventionDelirium SeverityWeek 14.83 score on a scale
ControlDelirium SeverityWeek 57.50 score on a scale
ControlDelirium SeverityWeek 14.67 score on a scale
ControlDelirium SeverityWeek 25.33 score on a scale
ControlDelirium SeverityWeek 35.17 score on a scale
ControlDelirium SeverityWeek 46.00 score on a scale
ControlDelirium SeverityBaseline4.0 score on a scale

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 23, 2026