Skip to content

Relevance of Gastric Aspirate in HCMV Detection

Relevance of Gastric Aspirate in HCMV Detection

Status
Terminated
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03262194
Acronym
VIRULAG
Enrollment
44
Registered
2017-08-25
Start date
2017-09-19
Completion date
2019-06-07
Last updated
2023-08-01

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Cytomegalovirus Infections, Hypotrophic Newborns

Brief summary

Human cytomegalovirus (CMV) is the leading cause of neonatal viral infection and can have a significant impact on the neurosensory development of newborns and especially premature infants. CMV infection can result from materno-fetal transmission during pregnancy (congenital infection) or postnatal transmission. The prevalence of congenital CMV infection in the newborn is estimated to be between 0.1 and 0.5%. Among the newborns in utero infected by CMV, it is estimated that 10-15% will present symptoms at birth (hypoacousia / unilateral or bilateral deafness, microcephaly, chorioretinitis, psychomotor retardation, etc.) and 0.5% of them will die. 20% of infected infants, mainly symptomatic newborns, suffer permanent sequelae, mainly loss of hearing. Many asymptomatic children at birth will present hearing loss and other delayed neurological complications. A progressive neurosensory hearing loss may develop for 13-15% of asymptomatic newborns at birth. Deafness is bilateral in 50% of cases, severe in more than 50% of cases, and its occurrence is often delayed. The hearing loss has a significant impact on the future life of the child, mainly on language acquisition and school performance. A systematic CMV screening is not currently recommended at birth due to the frequency of asymptomatic forms, difficulty in fetal diagnosis and prognosis, lack of consensus for preventive and curative treatment of the infection. New treatments are being evaluated and encouraging results could revive the debate. PCR from urine is the gold standard for the diagnosis of CMV infection. Urine collection is not systematic in newborns and its realization can sometimes be difficult. On the other hand, in children at risk (hypotrophy, prematurity, infectious risks, fetal distress or respiratory distress at birth), gastric aspiration is systematically performed at birth to overcome obstruction of the upper aero-digestive tract, to prevent oesophageal atresia, to avoid inhalation by reflux and sometimes to make a bacteriological diagnosis. Our hypothesis is that this liquid could be used for the detection of CMV infection without adding any invasive action in newborns. Ultimately, gastric aspirate could allow for routine CMV screening in children at risk and thus allow for appropriate care by nursing staff.The occurrence of immediate or delayed sensory sequelae in these children would be then limited.

Interventions

None listed

Sponsors

Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Besancon
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
CASE_ONLY
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
1 Minutes to 7 Days
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

of the newborn: \- Child born in maternity and / or child hospitalized in the Neonatal Médicine Department of the University Hospital of Besançon for which a urine sample (minimum volume = 0.5 mL) and a gastric aspiration fluid sample (minimum volume = 0.7mL) were collected (regardless of gender, birth weight or pathology presented at admission).

Exclusion criteria

of the newborn: * Child died before the sampling * A volume of gastric aspiration fluid dedicated to the study less than 0.7 mL. * An impossible collection of urine (malformation, skin irritation of the perineum, contamination with meconium).

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Match between gastral aspirate PCR results and urine PCR resultsday 7Match between gastral aspirate polymerase chain reaction results and urine polymerase chain reaction results

Countries

France

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026