Skip to content

Esophageal Deviation in Atrial Fibrillation Ablation

Esophageal Deviation in Atrial Fibrillation Ablation

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03261973
Enrollment
47
Registered
2017-08-25
Start date
2017-11-17
Completion date
2020-06-15
Last updated
2021-06-30

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Atrial Fibrillation

Brief summary

Catheter ablation with pulmonary vein (PV) isolation is a commonly performed strategy employed for the treatment of atrial fibrillation (AF). However, ablation in the posterior wall of the left atrium can cause thermal injury to the esophagus. Thermal injury is very common and occurs in up to 40% of AF ablations per some studies. When significant thermal injury to the esophagus occurs, two significant complications can arise: 1) the formation of an atrio-esophageal fistula, and 2) gastrointestinal dysmotility. While the occurrence of fistula is rare, it is a very important complication since it is often fatal. Currently luminal esophageal temperature monitoring is the most commonly employed modality to prevent such injury. However, there are limitations to its use, and atrio-esophageal fistulas continue to be a major problem in AF ablation even when using esophageal temperature monitoring. Esophageal deviation using either a Transesophageal echocardiogram (TEE) or Esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) probe has been described in the literature, but the effectiveness and practicality of these techniques are suboptimal, and have therefore precluded their use in routine clinical practice. Recently, esophageal deviation using off-the-shelf equipment (a soft thoracic tube and endotracheal stylet) was tested in the randomized double-blind multicenter study Deviating the Esophagus in Atrial Fibrillation Ablation (DEVIATE-AF). In that study the standard practice (i.e., use of luminal esophageal temperature monitoring) was compared to esophageal deviation using off-the-shelf equipment. The results were very encouraging showing that esophageal deviation allowed for significant reductions in esophageal temperature and proportion of premature ablation terminations. Importantly, esophageal deviation allowed the isolation all PVs in the treatment group, which was not the case in the control group. One major limitation in the DEVIATE-AF trial was that off-the-shelf equipment tool was challenging to use. The aim of the Esophageal Deviation in Atrial Fibrillation Ablation study is to test the feasibility and safety of moving the esophagus using a specialized esophageal deviation tool (DV8, Manual Surgical Sciences, Minneapolis, MN).

Interventions

DEVICEDV8

DV8 esophageal deviation tool

Sponsors

Massachusetts General Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 80 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* A maximum of up to 54 patients will be enrolled in this prospective single-center single-arm study. Patients undergoing AF ablation (including paroxysmal and persistent AF) will be included in this study. Consistent with the current definitions, paroxysmal AF are episodes that will self-terminate in less than 24 hours. Persistent AF, is defined as ≥1 documented AF lasting \>1week in duration or lasting less than 7 days but requiring electrical or pharmacological cardioversion to sinus rhythm. * Age \>18 - Age \< 80 yr * Documentation of atrial fibrillation (AF) * General anesthesia * All patients must understand and adhere to the requirements of the study and be willing to comply with the post study follow-up requirements.

Exclusion criteria

* Any reversible cause of AF (post-surgery, thyroid disorder, etc.) * INR (international normalized ratio) \> 4.0 at the time of the procedure * History of (H/o) of severe esophageal ulcers, strictures, varices, bleeding, laceration or perforation, esophagitis * Severe Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease (GERD) * H/o esophageal surgery or any esophageal banding or cautery * H/o chest radiation * Significant abnormality on Swallowing Impairment Score * Mental impairment precluding signing consent or completing follow up * Patients with any other significant uncontrolled or unstable medical condition * Women who are known to be pregnant or have had a positive β-HCG (Human Chorionic Gonadotropin) test within 7 days prior to procedure * Presence of left atrial thrombus

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Number of Participants With a Minimum Distance of 1 cm Esophageal Deviation Between the Ablation Line for the Ipsilateral Pulmonary Vein (PV) Pairs and the Trailing Edge of the Esophagus.during Atrial Fibrillation (AF) ablation procedure (intraoperative)

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Number of Participants Who Experienced Esophageal Lacerationwithin 1-90 days of the procedure
Number of Participants With PV Reconnection Assessed by Adenosine Infusionduring AF ablation procedure
Number of Participants With an Average Distance of 2 cm Esophageal Deviation From the Ablation Line for the Ipsilateral PV Pairs.during AF ablation procedure
Procedure Duration Measured From the Initial Groin Stick to Catheter Removalduring the AF ablation procedure
Ablation Time Assessed by the Total Duration of Radiofrequency Energy Deliveryduring the AF ablation procedure
Fluoroscopy Time Measured for the Whole Procedureduring AF ablation procedure

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
DV8 Esophageal Deviation Tool
This is a non-randomized one arm study. Arm: usage of the DV8 esophageal deviation tool during the ablation procedure
43
Total43

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicDV8 Esophageal Deviation Tool
Age, Continuous61.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.1
Race and Ethnicity Not Collected— Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
12 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
31 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 43
other
Total, other adverse events
2 / 43
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 43

Outcome results

Primary

Number of Participants With a Minimum Distance of 1 cm Esophageal Deviation Between the Ablation Line for the Ipsilateral Pulmonary Vein (PV) Pairs and the Trailing Edge of the Esophagus.

Time frame: during Atrial Fibrillation (AF) ablation procedure (intraoperative)

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
DV8 Esophageal Deviation ToolNumber of Participants With a Minimum Distance of 1 cm Esophageal Deviation Between the Ablation Line for the Ipsilateral Pulmonary Vein (PV) Pairs and the Trailing Edge of the Esophagus.42 Participants
Secondary

Ablation Time Assessed by the Total Duration of Radiofrequency Energy Delivery

Time frame: during the AF ablation procedure

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
DV8 Esophageal Deviation ToolAblation Time Assessed by the Total Duration of Radiofrequency Energy Delivery53.2 minutesStandard Deviation 16.2
Secondary

Fluoroscopy Time Measured for the Whole Procedure

Time frame: during AF ablation procedure

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
DV8 Esophageal Deviation ToolFluoroscopy Time Measured for the Whole Procedure23.8 minutesStandard Deviation 8.1
Secondary

Number of Participants Who Experienced Esophageal Laceration

Time frame: within 1-90 days of the procedure

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
DV8 Esophageal Deviation ToolNumber of Participants Who Experienced Esophageal Laceration0 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With an Average Distance of 2 cm Esophageal Deviation From the Ablation Line for the Ipsilateral PV Pairs.

Time frame: during AF ablation procedure

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
DV8 Esophageal Deviation ToolNumber of Participants With an Average Distance of 2 cm Esophageal Deviation From the Ablation Line for the Ipsilateral PV Pairs.9 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With PV Reconnection Assessed by Adenosine Infusion

Time frame: during AF ablation procedure

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
DV8 Esophageal Deviation ToolNumber of Participants With PV Reconnection Assessed by Adenosine Infusion10 Participants
Secondary

Procedure Duration Measured From the Initial Groin Stick to Catheter Removal

Time frame: during the AF ablation procedure

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
DV8 Esophageal Deviation ToolProcedure Duration Measured From the Initial Groin Stick to Catheter Removal212 minutesStandard Deviation 32

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026