Skip to content

ITM + Bupivacaine QLB vs. ITM + Sham Saline QLB for Cesarean Delivery Pain

QL Block for Post-cesarean Delivery Pain

Status
Terminated
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03261193
Acronym
qlcsection
Enrollment
21
Registered
2017-08-24
Start date
2017-09-05
Completion date
2022-11-11
Last updated
2024-05-06

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Pain, Postoperative

Keywords

quadratus lumborum block, post-operative pain, cesarean section pain, analgesia, nerve block

Brief summary

Comparison of standard post-operative cesarean surgery pain management with regional post-op pain control.

Detailed description

The purpose of this trial is to determine the efficacy of a postoperative analgesia strategy that incorporates quadratus lumborum block (QLB) in conjunction with a multi-modal post-cesarean analgesia strategy. The investigators hypothesize that QLB will provide superior post-cesarean analgesia compared to the current standard of care, multi-modal analgesia. Thus, analgesia following cesarean section using QLB compared to the current standard of care alone will be further investigated. Current practice for cesarean surgical intervention consists of multi-modal analgesia (i.e., Intrathecal morphine (ITM) and scheduled post-operative non-opioid oral analgesics, with oral opioid analgesics reserved for breakthrough pain). Investigators will measure side-effects associated with each strategy: Standard of care methods consisting of intrathecal morphine (ITM) plus scheduled non-opioid analgesics in conjunction with prn opioid analgesics for breakthrough pain will be utilized for both. The experimental treatment arm will entail standard of care in addition to QLB. The sham comparator will entail standard of care in addition to QLB with saline. For each strategy, we will measure and model associated economic ramifications; such factors will include drug costs, procedure costs, and costs associated with length of stay and re-admissions. The quadratus lumborum block (QLB) is similar to the transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block, but differs slightly in regards to the anatomical region where local anesthetic is injected. Since the quadratus lumborum (QL) is more posteriorly located, it theoretically confers greater safety due to enhanced visualization. The TAP block has been studied extensively for post-cesarean delivery pain, consistently showing that it is not superior to ITM for post-operative analgesia; however, it may prove to be helpful in patients with breakthrough pain despite the use of ITM, or in patients who were unable to receive ITM (e.g. general anesthesia for cesarean, contraindications to neuraxial morphine). Thus, ITM is superior to TAP alone for post-cesarean analgesia, but it is associated with a dose-dependent increased risk for opioid related side effects. In 2015, Blanco et. al. published a study specifically using the QLB for postoperative pain after cesarean delivery. In this study, they compared a true QLB to a sham QLB all in patients who did not receive ITM, and found that the QLB provided improved pain control and decreased the need for post-operative opioids. Another study in 2016 demonstrated that the QLB is superior to the TAP block in regards to decreasing post-operative pain following c-section. Unfortunately, neither study compared the QLB to ITM (part of the current gold standard for post-cesarean delivery pain, multimodal analgesia). The gap in knowledge regarding the utility of QLB as part of a multimodal analgesic approach including ITM for cesarean section warrants further investigation. Clinicians are constantly searching for methods to provide patients with the most effective medical interventions that provide maximal benefit and minimal harm. Post-operative pain control following cesarean delivery is an area that is important to patients and to providers, and the introduction of the QLB for this purpose has the potential to improve analgesic benefit.

Interventions

DRUGITM + Sham QLB

Sham subcutaneous non-anesthetic infiltration with saline

DRUGITM + Bupivacaine QLB

QL plane block with local anesthesia

Sponsors

Nicholas Schott
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
18 Years to 45 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Elective cesarean planned under spinal anesthesia * Singleton pregnancy * American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) classification score of 2 (or less) * Gestational age of at least 37 weeks * Intention to breastfeed infant

Exclusion criteria

* Contraindications to neuraxial blockade (such as clinically relevant coagulopathy, recent anticoagulant use, patient refusal, or localized skin infection overlying the site of needle entry) * Anatomical abnormalities contraindicating spinal or QLB placement * Received/Conversion to general anesthesia * Received supplemental parenteral anesthesia (sedation) for any reason (e.g. unanticipated prolonged surgical procedure) * History of chronic pain * History of chronic opioid use/abuse * History of Subutex, methadone, other maintenance therapy

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Pain Score With Movement24 hours after surgical procedure (cesarean delivery)Post-operative pain accompanied with patient movement will be measured using a 10-point pain scale (VAS). The VAS scale is measured with 0=no pain at all and 10=most severe pain possible.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Pain Score at Rest1 hour after interventionVAS pain score reported by the patient at rest post-operatively using a 10-point pain scale (VAS). The VAS scale is measured with 0=no pain at all and 10=most severe pain possible.
First Request for Pain MedicationFrom post-operative until the patient is either withdrawn from the study or requests analgesic medication up until 72 hoursTime to first opioid dose (measured in hours)
Sedation24-hours post-operativePresence or absence will be noted. Will be measured via Ramsay Sedation Score which ranges on a scale of 1 to 6 as follows: 1-patient is anxious, agitated, or restless. 2-patient is co-operative and oriented. 3-patient responds to commands only. 4-patient exhibits brisk response to light stimuli or loud auditory stimuli. 5-patient exhibits sluggish response to light or auditory stimuli. 6-patient exhibits no response.
Pruritis4-hours post-operativePresence or absence will be noted via standard pruritus scale (0-3). 0 being no evidence of pruritus, group 1 being pruritus on diseased skin, group 2 being pruritus on non-diseased skin, and group 3 being chronic reactive lesions acquired from skin manipulation, such as rubbing, picking, or scratching
Nausea/Vomiting4-hours post-operativePresence or absence will be noted via a scale of 0-3 as follows: 0-no nausea, 1-mild nausea not requesting pharmacological rescue, 2-moderate nausea requesting pharmacological rescue, and 3-severe nausea resistant to pharmacological treatment
Breast Feeding Success/Quality24-hours post-operativelyLimited breastfeeding resulting from pain or opioid side effects
Respiratory Rate4-hours post-operativeWill be measured in rate/min per standard of care and documented by study staff
Oxygen Saturation4-hours post-operativeWill be measured in % per standard of care and documented by study staff
Heart Rate4-hours post-operativeStandard heart rate obtained
Diastolic Blood Pressure4-hours post-operativeWill be measured in mmHG per standard of care and documented by study staff.
Systolic Blood Pressure4-hours post-operativeWill be measured in mmHG per standard of care and documented by study staff.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
ITM + Sham QLB
Standard spinal with intrathecal morphine for surgical anesthetic with sham saline block. Saline will be administered as a quadratus lumborum block prior to cesarean section. ITM + Sham QLB: Sham subcutaneous non-anesthetic infiltration with saline
10
ITM + Bupivacaine QLB
Standard spinal with intrathecal morphine for surgical anesthetic with ql block with bupivacaine local anesthetic. Interventional drug will be administered prior to cesarean section. ITM + Bupivacaine QLB: QL plane block with local anesthesia
11
Total21

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicTotalITM + Sham QLBITM + Bupivacaine QLB
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
21 Participants10 Participants11 Participants
Age, Continuous32.55 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.66
31.80 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.16
33.35 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.17
Gravidity2.79 Number of pregnancies
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.4
2.93 Number of pregnancies
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.67
2.64 Number of pregnancies
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.08
Parity1.10 Number of births
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.67
1.27 Number of births
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.8
0.93 Number of births
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.47
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
American Indian / Alaskan Native (not Hispanic or Latino)
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Asian (not Hispanic or Latino)
1 Participants1 Participants0 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Black or African American (not Hispanic or Latino)
6 Participants4 Participants2 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Declined to answer
1 Participants0 Participants1 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Hispanic or Latino
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
White, Caucasian (not Hispanic or Latino)
21 Participants10 Participants11 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
29 participants15 participants14 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
21 Participants10 Participants11 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 100 / 11
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 100 / 11
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 100 / 11

Outcome results

Primary

Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Pain Score With Movement

Post-operative pain accompanied with patient movement will be measured using a 10-point pain scale (VAS). The VAS scale is measured with 0=no pain at all and 10=most severe pain possible.

Time frame: 24 hours after surgical procedure (cesarean delivery)

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
ITM + Sham QLBVisual Analogue Scale (VAS) Pain Score With Movement4.85 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.23
ITM + Bupivacaine QLBVisual Analogue Scale (VAS) Pain Score With Movement3.14 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.83
Secondary

Breast Feeding Success/Quality

Limited breastfeeding resulting from pain or opioid side effects

Time frame: 24-hours post-operatively

Population: This data was not collected during the duration of this study.

Secondary

Diastolic Blood Pressure

Will be measured in mmHG per standard of care and documented by study staff.

Time frame: 4-hours post-operative

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
ITM + Sham QLBDiastolic Blood Pressure71.15 mmHgStandard Deviation 9.21
ITM + Bupivacaine QLBDiastolic Blood Pressure70.36 mmHgStandard Deviation 2.29
Secondary

Diastolic Blood Pressure

Will be measured in mmHG per standard of care and documented by study staff.

Time frame: 48-hours post-operative

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
ITM + Sham QLBDiastolic Blood Pressure75.80 mmHgStandard Deviation 9.09
ITM + Bupivacaine QLBDiastolic Blood Pressure76.50 mmHgStandard Deviation 7.78
Secondary

Diastolic Blood Pressure

Will be measured in mmHG per standard of care and documented by study staff.

Time frame: 24-hours post-operative

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
ITM + Sham QLBDiastolic Blood Pressure68.00 mmHgStandard Deviation 7.96
ITM + Bupivacaine QLBDiastolic Blood Pressure70.67 mmHgStandard Deviation 8.96
Secondary

First Request for Pain Medication

Time to first opioid dose (measured in hours)

Time frame: From post-operative until the patient is either withdrawn from the study or requests analgesic medication up until 72 hours

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
ITM + Sham QLBFirst Request for Pain Medication17.30 HoursStandard Deviation 14.9
ITM + Bupivacaine QLBFirst Request for Pain Medication17.37 HoursStandard Deviation 14.29
Secondary

Heart Rate

Standard heart rate obtained

Time frame: 24-hours post-operative

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
ITM + Sham QLBHeart Rate86.86 Heartbeats/minuteStandard Deviation 10.24
ITM + Bupivacaine QLBHeart Rate91.33 Heartbeats/minuteStandard Deviation 6.15
Secondary

Heart Rate

Standard heart rate obtained

Time frame: 48-hours post-operative

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
ITM + Sham QLBHeart Rate87.00 Heartbeats/minuteStandard Deviation 7.55
ITM + Bupivacaine QLBHeart Rate86.50 Heartbeats/minuteStandard Deviation 3.54
Secondary

Heart Rate

Standard heart rate obtained

Time frame: 4-hours post-operative

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
ITM + Sham QLBHeart Rate82.62 Heartbeats/minuteStandard Deviation 10.63
ITM + Bupivacaine QLBHeart Rate78.86 Heartbeats/minuteStandard Deviation 15.94
Secondary

Nausea/Vomiting

Presence or absence will be noted via a scale of 0-3 as follows: 0-no nausea, 1-mild nausea not requesting pharmacological rescue, 2-moderate nausea requesting pharmacological rescue, and 3-severe nausea resistant to pharmacological treatment

Time frame: 48-hours post-operative

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
ITM + Sham QLBNausea/VomitingScore 30 Participants
ITM + Sham QLBNausea/VomitingScore 12 Participants
ITM + Sham QLBNausea/VomitingScore 08 Participants
ITM + Sham QLBNausea/VomitingScore 20 Participants
ITM + Bupivacaine QLBNausea/VomitingScore 30 Participants
ITM + Bupivacaine QLBNausea/VomitingScore 20 Participants
ITM + Bupivacaine QLBNausea/VomitingScore 011 Participants
ITM + Bupivacaine QLBNausea/VomitingScore 10 Participants
Secondary

Nausea/Vomiting

Presence or absence will be noted via a scale of 0-3 as follows: 0-no nausea, 1-mild nausea not requesting pharmacological rescue, 2-moderate nausea requesting pharmacological rescue, and 3-severe nausea resistant to pharmacological treatment

Time frame: 4-hours post-operative

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
ITM + Sham QLBNausea/VomitingScore 06 Participants
ITM + Sham QLBNausea/VomitingScore 12 Participants
ITM + Sham QLBNausea/VomitingScore 22 Participants
ITM + Sham QLBNausea/VomitingScore 30 Participants
ITM + Bupivacaine QLBNausea/VomitingScore 30 Participants
ITM + Bupivacaine QLBNausea/VomitingScore 010 Participants
ITM + Bupivacaine QLBNausea/VomitingScore 21 Participants
ITM + Bupivacaine QLBNausea/VomitingScore 10 Participants
Secondary

Nausea/Vomiting

Presence or absence will be noted via a scale of 0-3 as follows: 0-no nausea, 1-mild nausea not requesting pharmacological rescue, 2-moderate nausea requesting pharmacological rescue, and 3-severe nausea resistant to pharmacological treatment

Time frame: 24-hours post-operative

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
ITM + Sham QLBNausea/VomitingScore 09 Participants
ITM + Sham QLBNausea/VomitingScore 11 Participants
ITM + Sham QLBNausea/VomitingScore 20 Participants
ITM + Sham QLBNausea/VomitingScore 30 Participants
ITM + Bupivacaine QLBNausea/VomitingScore 30 Participants
ITM + Bupivacaine QLBNausea/VomitingScore 010 Participants
ITM + Bupivacaine QLBNausea/VomitingScore 21 Participants
ITM + Bupivacaine QLBNausea/VomitingScore 10 Participants
Secondary

Oxygen Saturation

Will be measured in % per standard of care and documented by study staff

Time frame: 4-hours post-operative

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
ITM + Sham QLBOxygen Saturation96.6 percentage of SpO2Standard Deviation 2.07
ITM + Bupivacaine QLBOxygen Saturation98.4 percentage of SpO2Standard Deviation 2.07
Secondary

Pruritis

Presence or absence will be noted via standard pruritus scale (0-3). 0 being no evidence of pruritus, group 1 being pruritus on diseased skin, group 2 being pruritus on non-diseased skin, and group 3 being chronic reactive lesions acquired from skin manipulation, such as rubbing, picking, or scratching

Time frame: 24-hours post-operative

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
ITM + Sham QLBPruritisGroup 05 Participants
ITM + Sham QLBPruritisGroup 31 Participants
ITM + Sham QLBPruritisGroup 12 Participants
ITM + Sham QLBPruritisGroup 22 Participants
ITM + Bupivacaine QLBPruritisGroup 31 Participants
ITM + Bupivacaine QLBPruritisGroup 22 Participants
ITM + Bupivacaine QLBPruritisGroup 13 Participants
ITM + Bupivacaine QLBPruritisGroup 05 Participants
Secondary

Pruritis

Presence or absence will be noted via standard pruritus scale (0-3). 0 being no evidence of pruritus, group 1 being pruritus on diseased skin, group 2 being pruritus on non-diseased skin, and group 3 being chronic reactive lesions acquired from skin manipulation, such as rubbing, picking, or scratching

Time frame: 4-hours post-operative

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
ITM + Sham QLBPruritisGroup 04 Participants
ITM + Sham QLBPruritisGroup 12 Participants
ITM + Sham QLBPruritisGroup 23 Participants
ITM + Sham QLBPruritisGroup 31 Participants
ITM + Bupivacaine QLBPruritisGroup 31 Participants
ITM + Bupivacaine QLBPruritisGroup 03 Participants
ITM + Bupivacaine QLBPruritisGroup 22 Participants
ITM + Bupivacaine QLBPruritisGroup 15 Participants
Secondary

Pruritis

Presence or absence will be noted via standard pruritus scale (0-3). 0 being no evidence of pruritus, group 1 being pruritus on diseased skin, group 2 being pruritus on non-diseased skin, and group 3 being chronic reactive lesions acquired from skin manipulation, such as rubbing, picking, or scratching

Time frame: 48-hours post-operative

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
ITM + Sham QLBPruritisGroup 08 Participants
ITM + Sham QLBPruritisGroup 11 Participants
ITM + Sham QLBPruritisGroup 21 Participants
ITM + Sham QLBPruritisGroup 30 Participants
ITM + Bupivacaine QLBPruritisGroup 30 Participants
ITM + Bupivacaine QLBPruritisGroup 010 Participants
ITM + Bupivacaine QLBPruritisGroup 21 Participants
ITM + Bupivacaine QLBPruritisGroup 10 Participants
Secondary

Respiratory Rate

Will be measured in rate/min per standard of care and documented by study staff

Time frame: 48-hours post-operative

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
ITM + Sham QLBRespiratory Rate16.40 Breaths/minuteStandard Deviation 2.19
ITM + Bupivacaine QLBRespiratory Rate18.00 Breaths/minuteStandard Deviation 0
Secondary

Respiratory Rate

Will be measured in rate/min per standard of care and documented by study staff

Time frame: 4-hours post-operative

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
ITM + Sham QLBRespiratory Rate16.54 Breaths/minuteStandard Deviation 1.76
ITM + Bupivacaine QLBRespiratory Rate16.07 Breaths/minuteStandard Deviation 1.27
Secondary

Respiratory Rate

Will be measured in rate/min per standard of care and documented by study staff

Time frame: 24-hours post-operative

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
ITM + Sham QLBRespiratory Rate16.29 Breaths/minuteStandard Deviation 2.93
ITM + Bupivacaine QLBRespiratory Rate16.67 Breaths/minuteStandard Deviation 1.51
Secondary

Sedation

Presence or absence will be noted. Will be measured via Ramsay Sedation Score which ranges on a scale of 1 to 6 as follows: 1-patient is anxious, agitated, or restless. 2-patient is co-operative and oriented. 3-patient responds to commands only. 4-patient exhibits brisk response to light stimuli or loud auditory stimuli. 5-patient exhibits sluggish response to light or auditory stimuli. 6-patient exhibits no response.

Time frame: 24-hours post-operative

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
ITM + Sham QLBSedationScore 10 Participants
ITM + Sham QLBSedationScore 210 Participants
ITM + Sham QLBSedationScore 30 Participants
ITM + Sham QLBSedationScore 40 Participants
ITM + Sham QLBSedationScore 50 Participants
ITM + Sham QLBSedationScore 60 Participants
ITM + Bupivacaine QLBSedationScore 50 Participants
ITM + Bupivacaine QLBSedationScore 10 Participants
ITM + Bupivacaine QLBSedationScore 40 Participants
ITM + Bupivacaine QLBSedationScore 211 Participants
ITM + Bupivacaine QLBSedationScore 60 Participants
ITM + Bupivacaine QLBSedationScore 30 Participants
Secondary

Systolic Blood Pressure

Will be measured in mmHG per standard of care and documented by study staff.

Time frame: 24-hours post-operative

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
ITM + Sham QLBSystolic Blood Pressure109.29 mmHgStandard Deviation 9.41
ITM + Bupivacaine QLBSystolic Blood Pressure111.00 mmHgStandard Deviation 11.4
Secondary

Systolic Blood Pressure

Will be measured in mmHG per standard of care and documented by study staff.

Time frame: 48-hours post-operative

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
ITM + Sham QLBSystolic Blood Pressure117.6 mmHgStandard Deviation 13.15
ITM + Bupivacaine QLBSystolic Blood Pressure124.00 mmHgStandard Deviation 5.66
Secondary

Systolic Blood Pressure

Will be measured in mmHG per standard of care and documented by study staff.

Time frame: 4-hours post-operative

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
ITM + Sham QLBSystolic Blood Pressure113.69 mmHgStandard Deviation 12.94
ITM + Bupivacaine QLBSystolic Blood Pressure116.21 mmHgStandard Deviation 12.05
Secondary

Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Pain Score at Rest

VAS pain score reported by the patient at rest post-operatively using a 10-point pain scale (VAS). The VAS scale is measured with 0=no pain at all and 10=most severe pain possible.

Time frame: 4 hours after intervention

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
ITM + Sham QLBVisual Analogue Scale (VAS) Pain Score at Rest3.5 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.77
ITM + Bupivacaine QLBVisual Analogue Scale (VAS) Pain Score at Rest1.36 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.65
Secondary

Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Pain Score at Rest

VAS pain score reported by the patient at rest post-operatively using a 10-point pain scale (VAS). The VAS scale is measured with 0=no pain at all and 10=most severe pain possible.

Time frame: 1 hour after intervention

Population: Data was not collected at the specified timepoint for this outcome.

Secondary

Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Pain Score at Rest

VAS pain score reported by the patient at rest post-operatively using a 10-point pain scale (VAS). The VAS scale is measured with 0=no pain at all and 10=most severe pain possible.

Time frame: 48 hours after intervention

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
ITM + Sham QLBVisual Analogue Scale (VAS) Pain Score at Rest3.73 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.57
ITM + Bupivacaine QLBVisual Analogue Scale (VAS) Pain Score at Rest3.4 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.63
Secondary

Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Pain Score at Rest

VAS pain score reported by the patient at rest post-operatively using a 10-point pain scale (VAS). The VAS scale is measured with 0=no pain at all and 10=most severe pain possible.

Time frame: 24 hours after intervention

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
ITM + Sham QLBVisual Analogue Scale (VAS) Pain Score at Rest3.14 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.83
ITM + Bupivacaine QLBVisual Analogue Scale (VAS) Pain Score at Rest2.38 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.14

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026