Skip to content

EnSite Precision Observational Study

A Clinical Evaluation Using EnSite Precision Cardiac Mapping System (Software Version 2.0.1 or Higher) in a Real-World Environment

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03260244
Enrollment
1065
Registered
2017-08-24
Start date
2017-09-12
Completion date
2020-03-31
Last updated
2024-11-08

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Cardiac Arrhythmia

Keywords

atrial fibrillation, atrial flutter, supraventricular tachycardia, ventricular tachycardia, premature ventricular contractions, cardiac mapping system

Brief summary

This document is a clinical investigation plan (CIP) for the EnSite Precision Observational Study. This clinical study is intended to quantify and characterize the usage of the EnSite Precision™ Cardiac Mapping System (Software version 2.0.1 or higher) in a real-world environment. This study will be conducted in patients who are indicated for a cardiac electrophysiological (EP) mapping and radio frequency ablation procedure using a three-dimensional system.

Detailed description

The EnSite Precision™ Cardiac Mapping System is a newly developed system that introduces features such as Delayed Enhancement Magnetic Resonance Imaging (DE-MRI) image integration, lesion marking automaticity, automatic mapping, and workflow flexibility to aid in the success of complex ablation procedures. Utilization of this system in the treatment of complex ablation procedures and its impact on patient outcomes is not well characterized. This clinical study is designed to collect a broad range of usage scenarios, therefore this clinical study has limited patient selection criteria and data collection is focused on EnSite Precision™ Cardiac Mapping System usage and patient outcomes. The data collected from the procedure (performed per Instructions For Use (IFU) and per standard practice of the physician) as well as the 12 month follow up period enables the Sponsor to review the system's standard practice usage. This information will be added to the current knowledge and understanding of treatment options for patients with arrhythmias, which can assist the Sponsor to provide future recommendations for best practices to improve patient outcomes.

Interventions

PROCEDUREcardiac mapping and radiofrequency ablation procedure

It is a minimally invasive procedure which can be performed using either general or conscious sedation. During catheter ablation, catheters (narrow, flexible tubes) are inserted into a blood vessel, often through a site in the groin (upper thigh) or neck, and guided through the vein until they reach the heart. Small electrodes on the tip of the catheters stimulate and record the heart's activity. This test, called an electrophysiology study (EPS), allows the doctor to pinpoint the exact location of the short circuit. Another word for pinpointing the exact location of the short circuit is 'mapping', for which precision is a key requirement to maximize a successful outcome. Once the location is confirmed, the short circuit is either destroyed (to reopen the electrical pathway) or blocked (to prevent it from sending faulty signals to the rest of the heart).

Sponsors

Abbott Medical Devices
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Indicated for a cardiac electrophysiology mapping and radiofrequency ablation procedure using a 3-dimensional mapping system per Instructions for Use * Over 18 years of age * Able to provide informed consent for study participation and willing and able to comply with the protocol described evaluations and follow up schedule

Exclusion criteria

* Patients who are only presenting with: * Atrioventricular Nodal Reentrant Tachycardia (AVNRT) * Atrioventricular Reentrant Tachycardia (AVRT) * Planned cryoablation procedure * Implanted with a neurostimulator * Contraindication to anticoagulation * Known presence of cardiac thrombus * Recent (\<3 months) myocardial infarction or unstable angina or coronary artery by-pass * Currently enrolled in a clinical study/investigation evaluating another device or drug that would confound the results of this study * Pregnant or nursing * Individuals whose willingness to volunteer in a study, in the judgement of investigator or public authorities, could be unduly influenced by lack of or loss of the autonomy due to immaturity, or mental disability, or adverse personal circumstances, or hierarchical influence

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Rate of Acute Success Based on Pre-defined Procedural Endpointsduring procedureThe number and proportion of subjects with acute success will be summarized. Acute success was defined as the physician's goal or intention for the procedure.
Freedom From Arrhythmia RecurrenceFrom date of procedure until the date of first documented arrhythmia recurrence or date of study completion or withdrawal for any cause, whichever came first, assessed up to 12 monthsThis analysis will be performed using the Kaplan-Meier (KM) analyses. The start date is the date of the index procedure. For subjects who do not experience an event, their follow up duration will be defined from the start date to the date of death, withdrawal, or last follow-up, whichever occurred later.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
All Subjects
All subjects enrolled in the study.
925
Total925

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000
Overall StudyDeath19
Overall StudyEnrollment Criteria Not Met31
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up60
Overall StudyNo inducible Arrhythmia2
Overall StudyNo Radiofrequency Ablation14
Overall StudyProcedure Not Performed21
Overall StudyProcedure Not Performed by Trained Physician on Study2
Overall StudyProcedure Not Performed Per Protocol12
Overall StudyScreen Failure2
Overall StudySubject Noncompliance6
Overall StudyTreated Off Label69
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject48

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicAll Subjects
Age, Continuous64.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.6
Race and Ethnicity Not Collected— Participants
Region of Enrollment
Canada
174 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
751 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
279 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
646 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
20 / 1,065
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 0
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 0

Outcome results

Primary

Freedom From Arrhythmia Recurrence

This analysis will be performed using the Kaplan-Meier (KM) analyses. The start date is the date of the index procedure. For subjects who do not experience an event, their follow up duration will be defined from the start date to the date of death, withdrawal, or last follow-up, whichever occurred later.

Time frame: From date of procedure until the date of first documented arrhythmia recurrence or date of study completion or withdrawal for any cause, whichever came first, assessed up to 12 months

Population: Subjects who completed the 12-month visit post-procedure

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
All SubjectsFreedom From Arrhythmia Recurrence471 Participants
Primary

Rate of Acute Success Based on Pre-defined Procedural Endpoints

The number and proportion of subjects with acute success will be summarized. Acute success was defined as the physician's goal or intention for the procedure.

Time frame: during procedure

Population: Analysis Population, number of subjects ablated per study protocol

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
All SubjectsRate of Acute Success Based on Pre-defined Procedural Endpoints901 Participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026