Atrial Fibrillation, Stroke
Conditions
Keywords
AF, AFib, OAC, Atrial fibrillation, Oral anticoagulant, Education
Brief summary
The purpose of this study is to use a decentralized claims database to determine whether education on stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation (AF) among AF patients and their providers can result in increased use of oral anticoagulants (OAC) for stroke prevention among those AF patients with guideline-based indications for oral anticoagulation (CHA₂DS₂-VASc score of 2 or greater). Specifically, the investigators will conduct a prospective, randomized, open-label education intervention trial to evaluate the effect of the early patient and provider education interventions on the proportion of patients with evidence of at least one OAC prescription fill (defined as one OAC dispensing or 4 international normalized ratio \[INR tests\] over the course of the follow-up through the date on which at least 80% of eligible study participants have at least 12 months of follow-up time). A total of approximately 80,000 patients will be enrolled within multiple major health plans across the United States. The randomization will be performed by the central coordinating center, and the health plans will mail the educational intervention materials to their members and providers.
Detailed description
The study is a prospective, randomized, and open-label education intervention trial. Patients with AF and a CHA₂DS₂-VASc score of 2 or greater will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio to an intervention cohort and a control cohort within each participating health plan. The definition for OAC medication fill will be an OAC medication dispensing or at least 4 INR tests in the claims data. The claims records of the patients randomized to the intervention cohort will then be linked to fresh (i.e. about 1 month old) pharmacy claims data at the time of randomization. Patients without evidence of an OAC medication fill during the 12 months prior to randomization will be included in the patient-level and provider-level early educational intervention. In addition to usual care, these patients and their providers, where an individual provider may be identified, will receive a one-time mailing at trial start. Patients randomized to this early intervention with evidence of an OAC medication fill during the 12 months prior to randomization will be excluded from the trial. The control cohort will receive usual care over the initial study period. After the date on which at least 80% of eligible study participants have at least 12 months of follow-up time, fresh pharmacy claims data for the control intervention cohort that was generated and locked at the time of randomization will be used to assess trial eligibility, and those patients without evidence of an OAC medication fill during the 12 months prior to randomization will be included in the primary and secondary analyses as the control arm. Patients randomized to the control arm with evidence of an OAC medication fill during the 12 months prior to randomization will be excluded from the trial and will not be included in analyses. The baseline characteristics of the control patients will be examined at the same time point as the intervention patients, meaning at the time of randomization. The primary outcome is a comparison of the proportion of patients not on OAC during the 12 months prior to randomization, who were started on OAC over the course of the follow-up through the date on which at least 80% of eligible study participants have at least 12 months of follow-up time in the early versus the delayed intervention arm. A total of approximately 80,000 patients (randomized 1:1) across all participating data partners (Aetna, Harvard Pilgrim, Humana, and Optum) will be enrolled from participating data partners across the United States. The follow-up time for the primary outcome will be 12 months from the date at which at least 80% of eligible study participates are enrolled (date on which early intervention materials are mailed). The providers of patients in the control cohort who did not receive OAC medication during the course of the 12-month study period and meet the inclusion criteria will receive the delayed intervention: the provider-only education intervention, a one-time mailing administered 12 months after at least 80% of early intervention mailings have occurred (patients will not receive any educational materials). The investigators intend to assess the primary and secondary endpoints again 24 months after at least 80% of early intervention mailings have occurred to assess the durability and longer-term outcomes of the effect of the patient- and provider-level education intervention, as well as the use of OAC following the delayed provider-level education intervention. However, as this second assessment is exploratory, investigators may not conduct these analyses if the results of the primary outcome are consistently null. Because the Sentinel Distributed Database will be used for follow-up information, and this information is refreshed approximately quarterly and this is done on separate timetables for the different health plans, it is likely that when at least the required follow-up time is available for at least 80% of people, there will be more than 12 or 24 months of followup for over 80% of people. All participants' outcomes will be assessed using all possible person-time; patients will have different duration of follow-up.
Interventions
Letters to patients that (1) explain to the patient that he or she appears to have AF, characterize the risk of stroke, and emphasize that although there may be a medical reason, the patient does not seem to be on an anticoagulant and (2) encourage the patient to discuss this with his or her provider to ask if he or she might benefit from OAC therapy to prevent stroke. Early intervention letters to providers explain this project, the nature of the problem, and identify a list of the provider's patients who have been contacted, as the provider and patient letters will be sent at approximately the same time; describe evidence and guidelines regarding oral anticoagulation.
Delayed intervention letters to patients' providers, where they may be identified, that explain this project, the nature of the problem, and identify a list of their patients who are flagged as at risk for stroke and have not been treated with an oral anticoagulant; describe evidence and guidelines regarding oral anticoagulation.
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
1. Two or more diagnoses of AF (ICD-9 and/or 10 codes) at least one day apart and with at least one diagnosis within the last 12 months prior to the last date in the current approved data used for cohort identification 2. CHA₂DS₂-VASc score of 2 or greater 3. Medical and pharmacy insurance coverage of at least the prior year as identified via administrative claims databases of one of the participating data partners as of the date of randomization 4. Age 30 years or greater as of the last date in the current approved data used for cohort identification
Exclusion criteria
1. Evidence of OAC medication fill during the 12 months prior to randomization (determined at randomization for the early intervention cohort and 12 months post-randomization for the delayed intervention cohort) 2. Conditions other than AF that require anticoagulation, including treatment of deep venous thrombosis, pulmonary embolism, or ever having had a mechanical prosthetic heart valve prior to the last date in the current approved data used for cohort identification 3. Pregnancy within 6 months of the last date in the current approved data used for cohort identification 4. Any known history of intracranial hemorrhage prior to the last date in the current approved data used for cohort identification 5. Hospitalization for bleeding within the last 6 months of the last date in the current approved data used for cohort identification 6. Patients with recent P2Y12 antagonist use (i.e. clopidogrel, prasugrel, ticlopidine, or ticagrelor within 90 days of the last date in the current approved data used for cohort identification
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Proportion of Patients With Evidence of at Least One OAC Dispensing (Prescription Fill) (Defined as One OAC Dispensing or 4 INR (International Normalized Ratio) Tests) | Outcome assessed at 42 days, 90 days, 183 days, and one year of follow-up time. | Evaluate the effect of the patient and provider education interventions (versus usual care with delayed provider education intervention) on the proportion of patients with evidence of at least one OAC prescription fill (defined as one OAC dispensing or 4 INR tests) over the course of the 12 months of follow-up. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Rates of Hospitalization for Hemorrhagic Stroke | Outcome assessed at one year of follow-up time. | Evaluate the impact of the patient and provider education interventions on rates of hospitalization for hemorrhagic stroke |
| Rates of Hospitalization for Ischemic or Hemorrhagic Stroke | Outcome assessed at one year of follow-up time. | Evaluate the impact of the patient and provider education interventions on rates of hospitalization for ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke |
| Rates of Hospitalization for Ischemic or Hemorrhagic Stroke or Systemic Embolism | Outcome assessed at one year of follow-up time. | Evaluate the impact of the patient and provider education interventions on rates of hospitalization for ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke or systemic embolism |
| Rates of Hospitalization for Ischemic or Hemorrhagic Stroke or Systemic Embolism or Bleeding | Outcome assessed at one year of follow-up time. | Evaluate the impact of the patient and provider education interventions on rates of hospitalization for ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke or systemic embolism or bleeding |
| Rates of Hospitalization for Bleeding | Outcome assessed at one year of follow-up time. | Evaluate the impact of the patient and provider education interventions on rates of hospitalization for any bleeding |
| Rates of Hospitalization for Ischemic or Unknown Stroke | Outcome assessed at one year of follow-up time. | Evaluate the impact of the patient and provider education interventions on rates of ischemic / unknown stroke hospitalization |
| Number of Days Covered by OAC Dispensing | Outcome assessed at one year of follow-up time. | Evaluate the impact of the patient and provider education interventions on proportion of days covered by OAC dispensings (prescription fills) |
| Proportion of Patients on Oral Anticoagulation | Outcome assessed at one year of follow-up time. | Evaluate the impact of the patient and provider education interventions on proportion of patients on oral anticoagulation at 12 months of follow-up |
| All-cause In-hospital Mortality Rates | Outcome assessed at one year of follow-up time. | Evaluate the impact of the patient and provider education interventions on all-cause in-hospital mortality rates |
| Health Care Utilization for AF Patients | Outcome assessed at one year of follow-up time. | Evaluate the impact of the patient and provider education interventions on health care utilization for AF patients, which would be reported as counts of number of health care utilization events (outpatient visits, days hospitalized, number of emergency department visits, etc.) |
| Health Care Utilization for AF Patients, Days | Outcome assessed at one year of follow-up time. | Evaluate the impact of the patient and provider education interventions on health care utilization for AF patients, which would be reported as counts of number of health care utilization events (outpatient visits, days hospitalized, number of emergency department visits, etc.) |
| Proportion of Patients Dispensed an OAC Within One Year | Outcome assessed at one year of follow-up time. | Evaluate the impact of the patient and provider education interventions on time to first OAC dispensing (prescription fill) |
Countries
United States
Participant flow
Recruitment details
Patients and their treating clinicians were identified through health insurance claims data from commercially-insured and Medicare Advantage populations.
Participants by arm
| Arm | Count |
|---|---|
| Intervention Educational mailing to (1) AF patients with guideline-based indications for oral anticoagulation (CHA₂DS₂-VASc score of 2 or greater) who appear to not have received OAC treatment at time of randomization and (2) their providers, where an individual provider may be identified.
Early Patient-Level and Provider-Level Educational Intervention: Letters to patients that (1) explain to the patient that he or she appears to have AF, characterize the risk of stroke, and emphasize that although there may be a medical reason, the patient does not seem to be on an anticoagulant and (2) encourage the patient to discuss this with his or her provider to ask if he or she might benefit from OAC therapy to prevent stroke.
Early intervention letters to providers explain this project, the nature of the problem, and identify a list of the provider's patients who have been contacted, as the provider and patient letters will be sent at approximately the same time; describe evidence and guidelines regarding oral anticoagulation. | 23 |
| Control Delayed Provider-Level Educational Intervention: The control arm patients received usual care for the time between randomization and a delayed educational mailing, which was sent after one year.
Delayed intervention included the following:
Educational mailing to providers of AF patients with guideline-based indications for oral anticoagulation (CHA₂DS₂-VASc score of 2 or greater) who appear to not have received OAC treatment in the time following randomization. These letters to patients' providers, where they may be identified, explain this project, the nature of the problem, and identify a list of their patients who are flagged as at risk for stroke and have not been treated with an oral anticoagulant; describe evidence and guidelines regarding oral anticoagulation. | 23 |
| Total | 46 |
Withdrawals & dropouts
| Period | Reason | FG000 | FG001 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study | Censored between old dataset and the follow-up start date (due to changing in data over time) | 3,446 | 3,599 |
| Overall Study | Censored prior to old dataset, other reason (unable to specify reason from available data) | 32 | 63 |
| Overall Study | Disenrolled earlier than originally captured in data (due to changing in data over time) | 320 | 344 |
| Overall Study | Evidence of OAC treatment prior to start date based on more complete data | 636 | 118 |
| Overall Study | On OAC treatment at follow up start (due to data lags) | 4,272 | 4,411 |
| Overall Study | Unable to be identified in dataset used for analysis | 43 | 49 |
Baseline characteristics
| Characteristic | Intervention | Control | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | 77.8 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.7 | 77.9 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.7 | 77.8 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.7 |
| Age, Customized Age 55-59 yr | 569 Participants | 562 Participants | 1131 Participants |
| Age, Customized Age < 55 yr | 471 Participants | 436 Participants | 907 Participants |
| Age, Customized Age 60-64 yr | 934 Participants | 979 Participants | 1913 Participants |
| Age, Customized Age 65-69 yr | 2,341 Participants | 2,360 Participants | 4701 Participants |
| Age, Customized Age 70-74 yr | 4,642 Participants | 4,762 Participants | 9404 Participants |
| Age, Customized Age 75-79 yr | 4,814 Participants | 4,946 Participants | 9760 Participants |
| Age, Customized Age 80-84 yr | 4,182 Participants | 3,966 Participants | 8148 Participants |
| Age, Customized Age 85-89 yr | 3,169 Participants | 3,205 Participants | 6374 Participants |
| Age, Customized Age 90 and older | 2,424 Participants | 2,571 Participants | 4995 Participants |
| ATRIA Score ≥ 5 | 11,165 Participants | 11,239 Participants | 22404 Participants |
| CHA2DS2-VASc score, mean | 4.53 units on a scale STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.7 | 4.50 units on a scale STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.7 | 4.51 units on a scale STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.7 |
| Dialysis | 664 Participants | 616 Participants | 1280 Participants |
| History of CABG | 3,409 Participants | 3,500 Participants | 6909 Participants |
| History of coronary stent | 1,205 Participants | 1,188 Participants | 2393 Participants |
| History of diabetes | 9,671 Participants | 9,625 Participants | 19296 Participants |
| History of heart failure | 9,451 Participants | 9,452 Participants | 18903 Participants |
| History of hospitalization for bleeding | 4,409 Participants | 4,481 Participants | 8890 Participants |
| History of hypertension | 22,338 Participants | 22,583 Participants | 44921 Participants |
| History of MI | 2,827 Participants | 2,744 Participants | 5571 Participants |
| History of peripheral vascular disease | 6,001 Participants | 5,981 Participants | 11982 Participants |
| History of prior cerebrovascular disease | 4,944 Participants | 4,863 Participants | 9807 Participants |
| Race and Ethnicity Not Collected | — | — | 0 Participants |
| Region of Enrollment United States Mid-Atlantic | 1,162 Participants | 1,298 Participants | 2460 Participants |
| Region of Enrollment United States Midwest | 4,723 Participants | 4,885 Participants | 9608 Participants |
| Region of Enrollment United States Mountain | 1,484 Participants | 1,470 Participants | 2954 Participants |
| Region of Enrollment United States New England | 645 Participants | 731 Participants | 1376 Participants |
| Region of Enrollment United States Pacific | 906 Participants | 859 Participants | 1765 Participants |
| Region of Enrollment United States South-Atlantic | 14,340 Participants | 14,286 Participants | 28626 Participants |
| Region of Enrollment United States Unknown/missing | 286 Participants | 258 Participants | 544 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Female | 11,262 Participants | 11,162 Participants | 22424 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Male | 12,284 Participants | 12,625 Participants | 24909 Participants |
Adverse events
| Event type | EG000 affected / at risk | EG001 affected / at risk |
|---|---|---|
| deaths Total, all-cause mortality | 493 / 23,546 | 483 / 23,787 |
| other Total, other adverse events | 0 / 23,546 | 0 / 23,787 |
| serious Total, serious adverse events | 737 / 23,546 | 760 / 23,787 |
Outcome results
Proportion of Patients With Evidence of at Least One OAC Dispensing (Prescription Fill) (Defined as One OAC Dispensing or 4 INR (International Normalized Ratio) Tests)
Evaluate the effect of the patient and provider education interventions (versus usual care with delayed provider education intervention) on the proportion of patients with evidence of at least one OAC prescription fill (defined as one OAC dispensing or 4 INR tests) over the course of the 12 months of follow-up.
Time frame: Outcome assessed at 42 days, 90 days, 183 days, and one year of follow-up time.
Population: Overall number of participants, as well as prespecified sex, age, and CHA2DS2-VASC score subgroups.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intervention | Proportion of Patients With Evidence of at Least One OAC Dispensing (Prescription Fill) (Defined as One OAC Dispensing or 4 INR (International Normalized Ratio) Tests) | OAC initiation at 90 days | 769 Participants |
| Intervention | Proportion of Patients With Evidence of at Least One OAC Dispensing (Prescription Fill) (Defined as One OAC Dispensing or 4 INR (International Normalized Ratio) Tests) | OAC initiation at one year, age 65-74 years | 704 Participants |
| Intervention | Proportion of Patients With Evidence of at Least One OAC Dispensing (Prescription Fill) (Defined as One OAC Dispensing or 4 INR (International Normalized Ratio) Tests) | OAC initiation at one year, female | 1,146 Participants |
| Intervention | Proportion of Patients With Evidence of at Least One OAC Dispensing (Prescription Fill) (Defined as One OAC Dispensing or 4 INR (International Normalized Ratio) Tests) | OAC initiation at one year, age 75-84 years | 987 Participants |
| Intervention | Proportion of Patients With Evidence of at Least One OAC Dispensing (Prescription Fill) (Defined as One OAC Dispensing or 4 INR (International Normalized Ratio) Tests) | OAC initiation at 183 days | 1403 Participants |
| Intervention | Proportion of Patients With Evidence of at Least One OAC Dispensing (Prescription Fill) (Defined as One OAC Dispensing or 4 INR (International Normalized Ratio) Tests) | OAC initiation at one year, age >=85 | 424 Participants |
| Intervention | Proportion of Patients With Evidence of at Least One OAC Dispensing (Prescription Fill) (Defined as One OAC Dispensing or 4 INR (International Normalized Ratio) Tests) | OAC initiation at one year, male | 1,182 Participants |
| Intervention | Proportion of Patients With Evidence of at Least One OAC Dispensing (Prescription Fill) (Defined as One OAC Dispensing or 4 INR (International Normalized Ratio) Tests) | OAC initiation at one year, CHA2DS2-VASC score of 2-3 | 657 Participants |
| Intervention | Proportion of Patients With Evidence of at Least One OAC Dispensing (Prescription Fill) (Defined as One OAC Dispensing or 4 INR (International Normalized Ratio) Tests) | OAC initiation at 42 days | 394 Participants |
| Intervention | Proportion of Patients With Evidence of at Least One OAC Dispensing (Prescription Fill) (Defined as One OAC Dispensing or 4 INR (International Normalized Ratio) Tests) | OAC initiation at one year, CHA2DS2-VASC score of 4-5 | 1,041 Participants |
| Intervention | Proportion of Patients With Evidence of at Least One OAC Dispensing (Prescription Fill) (Defined as One OAC Dispensing or 4 INR (International Normalized Ratio) Tests) | OAC initiation at one year, age <65 years | 141 Participants |
| Intervention | Proportion of Patients With Evidence of at Least One OAC Dispensing (Prescription Fill) (Defined as One OAC Dispensing or 4 INR (International Normalized Ratio) Tests) | OAC initiation at one year, CHA2DS2-VASC score >=6 | 629 Participants |
| Intervention | Proportion of Patients With Evidence of at Least One OAC Dispensing (Prescription Fill) (Defined as One OAC Dispensing or 4 INR (International Normalized Ratio) Tests) | OAC initiation at one year (primary) | 2,328 Participants |
| Control | Proportion of Patients With Evidence of at Least One OAC Dispensing (Prescription Fill) (Defined as One OAC Dispensing or 4 INR (International Normalized Ratio) Tests) | OAC initiation at one year, CHA2DS2-VASC score >=6 | 654 Participants |
| Control | Proportion of Patients With Evidence of at Least One OAC Dispensing (Prescription Fill) (Defined as One OAC Dispensing or 4 INR (International Normalized Ratio) Tests) | OAC initiation at one year (primary) | 2,330 Participants |
| Control | Proportion of Patients With Evidence of at Least One OAC Dispensing (Prescription Fill) (Defined as One OAC Dispensing or 4 INR (International Normalized Ratio) Tests) | OAC initiation at 183 days | 1362 Participants |
| Control | Proportion of Patients With Evidence of at Least One OAC Dispensing (Prescription Fill) (Defined as One OAC Dispensing or 4 INR (International Normalized Ratio) Tests) | OAC initiation at 90 days | 738 Participants |
| Control | Proportion of Patients With Evidence of at Least One OAC Dispensing (Prescription Fill) (Defined as One OAC Dispensing or 4 INR (International Normalized Ratio) Tests) | OAC initiation at 42 days | 361 Participants |
| Control | Proportion of Patients With Evidence of at Least One OAC Dispensing (Prescription Fill) (Defined as One OAC Dispensing or 4 INR (International Normalized Ratio) Tests) | OAC initiation at one year, female | 1,081 Participants |
| Control | Proportion of Patients With Evidence of at Least One OAC Dispensing (Prescription Fill) (Defined as One OAC Dispensing or 4 INR (International Normalized Ratio) Tests) | OAC initiation at one year, male | 1,249 Participants |
| Control | Proportion of Patients With Evidence of at Least One OAC Dispensing (Prescription Fill) (Defined as One OAC Dispensing or 4 INR (International Normalized Ratio) Tests) | OAC initiation at one year, age <65 years | 145 Participants |
| Control | Proportion of Patients With Evidence of at Least One OAC Dispensing (Prescription Fill) (Defined as One OAC Dispensing or 4 INR (International Normalized Ratio) Tests) | OAC initiation at one year, age 65-74 years | 707 Participants |
| Control | Proportion of Patients With Evidence of at Least One OAC Dispensing (Prescription Fill) (Defined as One OAC Dispensing or 4 INR (International Normalized Ratio) Tests) | OAC initiation at one year, age 75-84 years | 954 Participants |
| Control | Proportion of Patients With Evidence of at Least One OAC Dispensing (Prescription Fill) (Defined as One OAC Dispensing or 4 INR (International Normalized Ratio) Tests) | OAC initiation at one year, age >=85 | 440 Participants |
| Control | Proportion of Patients With Evidence of at Least One OAC Dispensing (Prescription Fill) (Defined as One OAC Dispensing or 4 INR (International Normalized Ratio) Tests) | OAC initiation at one year, CHA2DS2-VASC score of 2-3 | 683 Participants |
| Control | Proportion of Patients With Evidence of at Least One OAC Dispensing (Prescription Fill) (Defined as One OAC Dispensing or 4 INR (International Normalized Ratio) Tests) | OAC initiation at one year, CHA2DS2-VASC score of 4-5 | 992 Participants |
All-cause In-hospital Mortality Rates
Evaluate the impact of the patient and provider education interventions on all-cause in-hospital mortality rates
Time frame: Outcome assessed at one year of follow-up time.
| Arm | Measure | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|
| Intervention | All-cause In-hospital Mortality Rates | 492 Participants |
| Control | All-cause In-hospital Mortality Rates | 482 Participants |
Health Care Utilization for AF Patients
Evaluate the impact of the patient and provider education interventions on health care utilization for AF patients, which would be reported as counts of number of health care utilization events (outpatient visits, days hospitalized, number of emergency department visits, etc.)
Time frame: Outcome assessed at one year of follow-up time.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Intervention | Health Care Utilization for AF Patients | Number of outpatient/ambulatory encounters | 38.17 Health care utilization events | Standard Deviation 36.74 |
| Intervention | Health Care Utilization for AF Patients | Number of hospital admissions | 0.43 Health care utilization events | Standard Deviation 0.91 |
| Intervention | Health Care Utilization for AF Patients | Number of emergency department (ED) encounters | 0.66 Health care utilization events | Standard Deviation 1.5 |
| Intervention | Health Care Utilization for AF Patients | Number of institutional stays | 1.14 Health care utilization events | Standard Deviation 3.36 |
| Intervention | Health Care Utilization for AF Patients | Total number of encounters at patient level | 40.40 Health care utilization events | Standard Deviation 39.45 |
| Control | Health Care Utilization for AF Patients | Number of institutional stays | 1.10 Health care utilization events | Standard Deviation 3.23 |
| Control | Health Care Utilization for AF Patients | Total number of encounters at patient level | 40.51 Health care utilization events | Standard Deviation 39.51 |
| Control | Health Care Utilization for AF Patients | Number of outpatient/ambulatory encounters | 38.27 Health care utilization events | Standard Deviation 36.81 |
| Control | Health Care Utilization for AF Patients | Number of emergency department (ED) encounters | 0.69 Health care utilization events | Standard Deviation 1.75 |
| Control | Health Care Utilization for AF Patients | Number of hospital admissions | 0.44 Health care utilization events | Standard Deviation 0.96 |
Health Care Utilization for AF Patients, Days
Evaluate the impact of the patient and provider education interventions on health care utilization for AF patients, which would be reported as counts of number of health care utilization events (outpatient visits, days hospitalized, number of emergency department visits, etc.)
Time frame: Outcome assessed at one year of follow-up time.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Intervention | Health Care Utilization for AF Patients, Days | Days from modified intention-to-treat (mITT) start date to first outpatient/ambulatory encounter | 32.36 days | Standard Deviation 47.99 |
| Intervention | Health Care Utilization for AF Patients, Days | Number of days hospitalized | 3.01 days | Standard Deviation 9.74 |
| Control | Health Care Utilization for AF Patients, Days | Days from modified intention-to-treat (mITT) start date to first outpatient/ambulatory encounter | 32.76 days | Standard Deviation 49.42 |
| Control | Health Care Utilization for AF Patients, Days | Number of days hospitalized | 3.10 days | Standard Deviation 9.27 |
Number of Days Covered by OAC Dispensing
Evaluate the impact of the patient and provider education interventions on proportion of days covered by OAC dispensings (prescription fills)
Time frame: Outcome assessed at one year of follow-up time.
Population: Number of days on an OAC during all follow-up time among those initiated on OAC
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intervention | Number of Days Covered by OAC Dispensing | 166.48 days | Standard Deviation 129.75 |
| Control | Number of Days Covered by OAC Dispensing | 168.15 days | Standard Deviation 130.12 |
Proportion of Patients Dispensed an OAC Within One Year
Evaluate the impact of the patient and provider education interventions on time to first OAC dispensing (prescription fill)
Time frame: Outcome assessed at one year of follow-up time.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Intervention | Proportion of Patients Dispensed an OAC Within One Year | 9.84 Percent of participants |
| Control | Proportion of Patients Dispensed an OAC Within One Year | 9.74 Percent of participants |
Proportion of Patients on Oral Anticoagulation
Evaluate the impact of the patient and provider education interventions on proportion of patients on oral anticoagulation at 12 months of follow-up
Time frame: Outcome assessed at one year of follow-up time.
Population: Patients actively on an oral anticoagulant (OAC) at the end of follow-up among those treated for at least 1 day.
| Arm | Measure | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|
| Intervention | Proportion of Patients on Oral Anticoagulation | 1,135 Participants |
| Control | Proportion of Patients on Oral Anticoagulation | 1,183 Participants |
Rates of Hospitalization for Bleeding
Evaluate the impact of the patient and provider education interventions on rates of hospitalization for any bleeding
Time frame: Outcome assessed at one year of follow-up time.
| Arm | Measure | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|
| Intervention | Rates of Hospitalization for Bleeding | 382 Participants |
| Control | Rates of Hospitalization for Bleeding | 385 Participants |
Rates of Hospitalization for Hemorrhagic Stroke
Evaluate the impact of the patient and provider education interventions on rates of hospitalization for hemorrhagic stroke
Time frame: Outcome assessed at one year of follow-up time.
| Arm | Measure | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|
| Intervention | Rates of Hospitalization for Hemorrhagic Stroke | 81 Participants |
| Control | Rates of Hospitalization for Hemorrhagic Stroke | 64 Participants |
Rates of Hospitalization for Ischemic or Hemorrhagic Stroke
Evaluate the impact of the patient and provider education interventions on rates of hospitalization for ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke
Time frame: Outcome assessed at one year of follow-up time.
| Arm | Measure | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|
| Intervention | Rates of Hospitalization for Ischemic or Hemorrhagic Stroke | 419 Participants |
| Control | Rates of Hospitalization for Ischemic or Hemorrhagic Stroke | 436 Participants |
Rates of Hospitalization for Ischemic or Hemorrhagic Stroke or Systemic Embolism
Evaluate the impact of the patient and provider education interventions on rates of hospitalization for ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke or systemic embolism
Time frame: Outcome assessed at one year of follow-up time.
| Arm | Measure | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|
| Intervention | Rates of Hospitalization for Ischemic or Hemorrhagic Stroke or Systemic Embolism | 441 Participants |
| Control | Rates of Hospitalization for Ischemic or Hemorrhagic Stroke or Systemic Embolism | 453 Participants |
Rates of Hospitalization for Ischemic or Hemorrhagic Stroke or Systemic Embolism or Bleeding
Evaluate the impact of the patient and provider education interventions on rates of hospitalization for ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke or systemic embolism or bleeding
Time frame: Outcome assessed at one year of follow-up time.
| Arm | Measure | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|
| Intervention | Rates of Hospitalization for Ischemic or Hemorrhagic Stroke or Systemic Embolism or Bleeding | 733 Participants |
| Control | Rates of Hospitalization for Ischemic or Hemorrhagic Stroke or Systemic Embolism or Bleeding | 760 Participants |
Rates of Hospitalization for Ischemic or Unknown Stroke
Evaluate the impact of the patient and provider education interventions on rates of ischemic / unknown stroke hospitalization
Time frame: Outcome assessed at one year of follow-up time.
| Arm | Measure | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|
| Intervention | Rates of Hospitalization for Ischemic or Unknown Stroke | 341 Participants |
| Control | Rates of Hospitalization for Ischemic or Unknown Stroke | 375 Participants |