Skip to content

Strategic Management to Improve CRT Using Multi-Site Pacing Post Approval Study (Reference # C1918)

Strategic Management to Improve CRT Using Multi-Site Pacing Post Approval Study (Reference # C1918)

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03257436
Acronym
SMARTMSP
Enrollment
586
Registered
2017-08-22
Start date
2018-01-05
Completion date
2020-11-19
Last updated
2022-01-03

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Left Ventricular Dysfunction

Keywords

Pacing

Brief summary

Prospective, multi-center, single arm, post approval study to be conducted in the United States.

Detailed description

Evaluate the effectiveness of Boston Scientific (BSC)'s LV MSP (Left Ventricular MultiSite Pacing) feature in the Resonate family of CRT-D devices and confirm safety in a post approval study when used in accordance with its approved labeling.

Interventions

DEVICECRT-D

Left Ventricular MultiSite Pacing

Sponsors

Boston Scientific Corporation
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
OTHER
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

1. Subjects who received de novo implantation of BSC's Resonate family of CRT-D devices with the LV MSP feature4 and BSC's ACUITYTM X4 LV Quadripolar leads. A Resonate family of CRT-D device upgrade from previous single or dual chamber pacemaker or ICD implantation is allowed. 2. Subjects must meet BSC labeled indication for CRT-D implantation. 3. Subjects must have a functional RA lead and RV lead implanted 4. Subjects who are willing and capable of providing informed consent 5. Subjects who are willing and capable of participating in all testing/visits associated with this clinical study at an approved clinical study center and at the intervals defined by this protocol 6. Subjects who are age 18 and above, or of legal age to give informed consent specific to state and national law

Exclusion criteria

1. Subjects who received LV pacing prior to receiving the Resonate family of CRT-D system implantation. 2. Subjects who received the LV MSP therapy post CRT-D implantation but prior to enrollment 3. Subjects with documented history of permanent AF 4. Subjects with documented permanent complete AV block 5. Subjects who are expected to receive a heart transplant during the 12 months course of the study 6. Subjects with documented life expectancy of less than 12 months 7. Subjects who enrolled in any other concurrent study or registry, with the exception of mandatory national or governmental registry, without prior written approval from BSC

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
LV MSP Feature Related Complication-Free RateBetween 6 month visit and the 12 month visit in non-responders with LV MSP on for any duration.Proportion of subjects free from LVMSP feature related complications at 12 months
Proportion of LV MSP Group Subjects With an Improved Clinical Composite Score at 12 Months12 Month Follow UpProportion of non-responders with LV MSP enabled at 6 months who were responders at 12 months. Responders were defined as having an Improved Clinical Composite Score at 12 Months.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Single Arm
General population who receive a Boston Scientific Resonate family of CRT-D device in accordance with its labeled indication for use. CRT-D: Left Ventricular MultiSite Pacing
583
Total583

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000
Overall StudyDeath19
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject76

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicSingle Arm
Age, Continuous66.7 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
2 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
2 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
95 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
10 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
14 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
460 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
583 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
211 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
372 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
19 / 584
other
Total, other adverse events
72 / 584
serious
Total, serious adverse events
131 / 584

Outcome results

Primary

LV MSP Feature Related Complication-Free Rate

Proportion of subjects free from LVMSP feature related complications at 12 months

Time frame: Between 6 month visit and the 12 month visit in non-responders with LV MSP on for any duration.

Population: Subjects who are non-responders at the 6 month follow up and who have LVMSP enabled for for any duration between the 6th and 12 month visit

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Single ArmLV MSP Feature Related Complication-Free Rate99 percentage of participants
Comparison: The LV MSP feature-related CFR between the 6 Month Visit and the 12 Month Visit was calculated using Kaplan-Meier methodology.~H0: LV MSP feature-related complication-free rate between 6 Month Visit and 12 Month Visit ≤ 90%.~The sample size of 61 subjects was required to evaluate the Primary Safety Endpoint using an exact test since a power calculation cannot be directly calculated for a one group Kaplan-Meier analysis.
Primary

Proportion of LV MSP Group Subjects With an Improved Clinical Composite Score at 12 Months

Proportion of non-responders with LV MSP enabled at 6 months who were responders at 12 months. Responders were defined as having an Improved Clinical Composite Score at 12 Months.

Time frame: 12 Month Follow Up

Population: Non-responders at 6 Months who had LV MSP enabled and had complete clinical composite score data, LV MSP on and achieved \>93% LVa and LVb pacing

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Single ArmProportion of LV MSP Group Subjects With an Improved Clinical Composite Score at 12 Months51.3 percentage of participants
Comparison: The effectiveness endpoint for SMART MSP PAS is the proportion of the LV MSP Group with an Improved CCS. For this endpoint, those subjects in the LV MSP Group that become responders will be defined as having an Improved CCS.~H0: Proportion of LV MSP Group subjects with Improved CCS from 6 Month Visit through 12 Month Visit ≤ 5%

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026