Skip to content

Effect of VarIthena on Wound Healing in Venous Leg Ulcers (VLU)

Observational Study of the Effect of VarIthena® on Wound Healing in the Treatment of Venous Leg Ulcers Resulting From Chronic Venous Insufficiency

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03257254
Acronym
VIEW-VLU
Enrollment
76
Registered
2017-08-22
Start date
2017-09-29
Completion date
2020-09-28
Last updated
2021-12-14

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Venous Leg Ulcer

Keywords

GSV, AASV, Vein, Venous, Ulcer, Varicose Vein, VLU, venous insufficiency, venous disease, chronic VLU

Brief summary

A 12 month, multicenter, open-label registry to observe chronic venous insufficiency resulting in VLU treated with Varithena.

Detailed description

This 12 month, multicenter, open-label registry is designed to collect treatment and outcome data related to participants treated with Varithena for great saphenous vein (GSV) system and/or anterior accessory saphenous vein (AASV) incompetence resulting in VLU. Participant are treated per Investigator's Standard of Care (SoC) and in accordance with the Full Prescribing Information (FPI) and Instructions for Use (IFU). For participants with healed ulcers during the 12 month follow-up period, VLU recurrence information is collected.

Interventions

DRUGVarithena

Administration procedures and volume are per standard of care, full prescribing information, and instructions for use.

Sponsors

Boston Scientific Corporation
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum

Inclusion criteria

* Men and women; age ≥18 * Investigator has selected Varithena® to treat participants classified C6 with chronic (≥3 months) VLU resulting from GSV and/or AASV incompetence * Wound can be visualized in one plane to allow for image collection of the entire wound in one photograph, or if wound is circumferential, participant must be able to capture the entire wound using multiple photographs taken from directly above the wound (straight on) * Reflux \>500 milliseconds (ms) on duplex ultrasound * Willing and able to collect wound photographs and data using an application installed on a tablet * Willing and able to return for scheduled follow-up and wound care visits * Ability to comprehend and sign informed consent form (ICF) and complete questionnaires

Exclusion criteria

* Contraindications to Varithena® 1% in accordance with the FPI * Any serious concomitant disease, per physician's discretion, that confounds wound healing, including malignant changes of wound * Concomitant heat ablation, or heat ablation of index leg within 6 weeks prior to treatment with Varithena® * Significant arterial disease or ankle-brachial pressure index (ABPI) ≤0.8 * In the opinion of Investigator, wound would close within 12 weeks without additional treatment

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change From Baseline in Wound PerimeterBaseline to 12 weeks and to 12 monthsMean change in wound perimeter as measured by photograph inputted into wound measuring technology platform. Larger number indicates a lower wound perimeter compared to baseline. Epithelial migration measured by change in perimeter of wound.
Number of Wound Closure at 12 WeeksBaseline to 12 weeksTotal number of healed wounds at 12 weeks post treatment. Wound healing is measured measured by photograph inputted into wound measuring technology platform.
Time to Wound ClosureBaseline to wound closure or to 12 months, whichever occurs firstMedian number of days to wound closure measured weekly. Wound closure as measured by photograph inputted into wound measuring technology platform.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Wounds Remaining Closed at 3 Months Post-wound Closure DateBaseline to 12 monthsCount of wounds remaining closed at 3 months post-wound closure determined via photograph and assessed by wound measurement technology platform.
Change in PainBaseline to 12 weeks and to 12 monthsMean change in pain on numeric pain rating scale (NPRS) compared to baseline at 12 months post-treatment. Minimum value is 0 and maximum value is 10. Higher scores mean a worse outcome.
Number of Ulcer Free DaysBaseline to 12 monthsMean number of ulcer free days defined as days from baseline to date of recurrence
Number of Wound RecurrencesBaseline to 12 monthsCount of wound recurrences of healed wounds. For healed wounds, VLU recurrence was collected via phone calls and subjects at follow up timelines.
Change on EQ-5D-5L Quality of Life AssessmentBaseline to 12 weeks and to 12 monthsMean change on 5-level EQ-5D (EQ-5D-5L) quality of life assessment compared to baseline at 12 months post-treatment. Minimum value is 0 and maximum value is 1. Higher score mean better outcome.
Change in VCSSBaseline to 12 weeks and to 12 monthsMean change in Venous Clinical Severity Score (VCSS) from baseline to 12 month follow up. VCSS assesses nine common signs/symptoms of venous disease and each item is scored individually with a minimum score of 0 and maximum score of 3. The individual items are added together to assess change from baseline. Higher scores mean worst outcome.

Countries

Canada, United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Prospective Registry Cohort
Participants classified C6 on Clinical-Etiology-Anatomy-Pathophysiology (CEAP) classification with active VLU resulting from venous insufficiency of the GSV system and/or AASV treated with Varithena.
76
Total76

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up9
Overall StudyStudy discontinued by sponsor5
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject7

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicProspective Registry Cohort
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
35 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
41 Participants
Age, Continuous63.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.7
Race and Ethnicity Not Collected— Participants
Region of Enrollment
Canada
9 participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
67 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
30 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
46 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 76
other
Total, other adverse events
1 / 76
serious
Total, serious adverse events
6 / 76

Outcome results

Primary

Change From Baseline in Wound Perimeter

Mean change in wound perimeter as measured by photograph inputted into wound measuring technology platform. Larger number indicates a lower wound perimeter compared to baseline. Epithelial migration measured by change in perimeter of wound.

Time frame: Baseline to 12 weeks and to 12 months

Population: Based on number of wounds continuing to heal at the timepoint.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Prospective Registry CohortChange From Baseline in Wound Perimeterat 12 weeks29.36 mmStandard Deviation 146.13
Prospective Registry CohortChange From Baseline in Wound Perimeterat 12 months43.64 mmStandard Deviation 2.6
Primary

Number of Wound Closure at 12 Weeks

Total number of healed wounds at 12 weeks post treatment. Wound healing is measured measured by photograph inputted into wound measuring technology platform.

Time frame: Baseline to 12 weeks

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Prospective Registry CohortNumber of Wound Closure at 12 Weeks43 wounds
Primary

Time to Wound Closure

Median number of days to wound closure measured weekly. Wound closure as measured by photograph inputted into wound measuring technology platform.

Time frame: Baseline to wound closure or to 12 months, whichever occurs first

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Prospective Registry CohortTime to Wound Closure89 days
Secondary

Change in Pain

Mean change in pain on numeric pain rating scale (NPRS) compared to baseline at 12 months post-treatment. Minimum value is 0 and maximum value is 10. Higher scores mean a worse outcome.

Time frame: Baseline to 12 weeks and to 12 months

Population: Analysis is based on the number of wounds and not number of patients. If a patient had more than one reported pain score during a timepoint, the worst (highest) NPRS score was used for analysis.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Prospective Registry CohortChange in Painat 12 weeks-1.4 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.1
Prospective Registry CohortChange in Painat 12 months-2.5 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.1
Secondary

Change in VCSS

Mean change in Venous Clinical Severity Score (VCSS) from baseline to 12 month follow up. VCSS assesses nine common signs/symptoms of venous disease and each item is scored individually with a minimum score of 0 and maximum score of 3. The individual items are added together to assess change from baseline. Higher scores mean worst outcome.

Time frame: Baseline to 12 weeks and to 12 months

Population: Analysis is based on number of wounds and not number of patients.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Prospective Registry CohortChange in VCSSat 12 weeks-5.8 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.6
Prospective Registry CohortChange in VCSSat 12 months-10.0 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.1
Secondary

Change on EQ-5D-5L Quality of Life Assessment

Mean change on 5-level EQ-5D (EQ-5D-5L) quality of life assessment compared to baseline at 12 months post-treatment. Minimum value is 0 and maximum value is 1. Higher score mean better outcome.

Time frame: Baseline to 12 weeks and to 12 months

Population: Statistics are based on the number of wounds and not number of patients.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Prospective Registry CohortChange on EQ-5D-5L Quality of Life Assessmentat 12 weeks0.066 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.233
Prospective Registry CohortChange on EQ-5D-5L Quality of Life Assessmentat 12 months0.072 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.223
Secondary

Number of Ulcer Free Days

Mean number of ulcer free days defined as days from baseline to date of recurrence

Time frame: Baseline to 12 months

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Prospective Registry CohortNumber of Ulcer Free Days240.5 daysStandard Deviation 118.9
Secondary

Number of Wound Recurrences

Count of wound recurrences of healed wounds. For healed wounds, VLU recurrence was collected via phone calls and subjects at follow up timelines.

Time frame: Baseline to 12 months

Population: 54 wounds were closed prior to the 12 month follow up.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Prospective Registry CohortNumber of Wound Recurrences7 wounds
Secondary

Number of Wounds Remaining Closed at 3 Months Post-wound Closure Date

Count of wounds remaining closed at 3 months post-wound closure determined via photograph and assessed by wound measurement technology platform.

Time frame: Baseline to 12 months

Population: 54 wounds were closed prior to the 12-month follow up visit.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_UNITS)
Prospective Registry CohortNumber of Wounds Remaining Closed at 3 Months Post-wound Closure Date47 wounds

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026