Skip to content

Does a Complex Care Discharge Planning Initiative Reduce Unplanned Hospital Readmissions? (G78717-Readmits)

Does a Complex Care Discharge Planning Initiative Reduce Unplanned Hospital Readmissions?

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03256734
Enrollment
300000
Registered
2017-08-22
Start date
2018-07-01
Completion date
2023-12-31
Last updated
2023-05-10

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Patient Readmission

Brief summary

Unplanned hospital readmissions are associated with increases in morbidity, mortality, cost and patient dissatisfaction,. Policymakers continue to seek effective policy solutions to avoid readmissions in order to improve quality of care and reduce unnecessary expenditures,. One attempt to reduce readmissions was implemented on June 1 2012, when the Specialist Services Committee of British Columbia (a partnership of Doctors of BC and the Ministry of Health) introduced the new G78717 fee code for physicians. The objective of the fee code was to create a financial incentive for physicians to provide a point-of-care supplemental discharge summary to patients and their primary care providers prior to discharge from hospital. Initially, only urgent hospital admissions were eligible for this incentive payment but on Nov 1 2015 the incentive was extended to include elective admissions as well. The other eligibility criteria remained unchanged. The effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of the fee code intervention is unknown. This study will address important questions relevant to this policy intervention using rigorous methods and empirical data. This study will employ two methods for measuring changes in readmission risk. First, we will use interrupted (multivariate) time series to measure whether there was a temporal change in provincial readmission risk associated with the implementation of the new fee code. We will complement the above analyses with a stronger design, comparing hospitalizations for which the fee code was charged (intervention group) with a cohort of clinically similar hospitalizations for which the fee code was not charged (control group). For this approach, multivariate logistic regression will be the primary statistical method. Using this analytic strategy, 30-day readmission risk between the intervention and control group will be measured over time, adjusted for patient-, provider-, and hospitalization-level covariates.

Interventions

OTHERPolicy intervention

Incentive payment for physicians

Sponsors

University of British Columbia
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
RETROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

The study population will be comprised of all hospital discharges in British Columbia between 1 Jan 2002 and 30 June 2017.

Exclusion criteria

We will exclude separations with the following International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems, 10th Revision, Canada (ICD-10-CA) codes as the Most Responsible Diagnosis: * Codes O00 - O99 \[Pregnancy, childbirth and the puerperium\] * Codes P00 - P96 \[Certain conditions originating in the perinatal period\]

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Unplanned hospital readmission within 30 days30 daysUnplanned hospital readmission within 30 days

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Primary care visits within 30 days and 1 year of index hospital discharge30 days and 1 yearPrimary care visits within 30 days and 1 year of index hospital discharge
Emergency department visit30 days and 1 yearEmergency department visit within 30 days and 1 year of index hospital discharge
Death30 days and 1 yearDeath within 30 days and 1 year of index hospital discharge
Unplanned (urgent) hospital readmission within 1 year of index hospital discharge1 yearUnplanned (urgent) hospital readmission within 1 year of index hospital discharge
Improvements in appropriate population-level post-discharge prescription prevalence of an indicated medication60 daysUsing health services records, we will identify a sub-cohort of patients with an index admission for acute coronary syndrome, heart failure, or chronic ischemic heart disease. Within this subcohort, we will determine the proportion of patients who filled at least one prescription for beta-blockers within 60 days of index hospital discharge date.
Improvements in appropriate population-level post-discharge prescription prevalence of a contraindicated medication60 daysUsing health services records, we will identify a sub-cohort of older adults (aged \>/=65 years at date of index hospital discharge date). Within this subcohort, we will determine the proportion of patients who filled at least one prescription for a potentially inappropriate medication within 60 days of index hospital discharge date. Our list of potentially inappropriate medications has been adapted from those listed in the American Geriatrics Society 2015 Updated Beers Criteria.
Use of transitional or stepdown care30 days and 1 yearUse of transitional or stepdown care (eg. rehabilitation, extended care, intermediate /personal care) after discharge from acute care but prior to return home

Countries

Canada

Contacts

Primary ContactJohn A Staples, MD
john.a.staples@gmail.com604-682-2344
Backup ContactJason M Sutherland, PhD
jsutherland@chspr.ubc.ca604-822-6812

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 23, 2026