Skip to content

Antiretroviral Treatment Taken 4 Days Per Week Versus Continuous Therapy 7/7 Days Per Week in HIV-1 Infected Patients

Randomized, Open-label and Multicentric Trial Evaluating the Non-inferiority of Antiretroviral Treatment Taken 4 Consecutive Days Per Week Versus Continuous Therapy 7/7 Days Per Week in HIV-1 Infected Patients With Controlled Viral Load Under Antiretroviral Therapy

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03256422
Acronym
QUATUOR
Enrollment
640
Registered
2017-08-22
Start date
2017-09-07
Completion date
2020-03-02
Last updated
2026-04-13

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

HIV Infections

Keywords

Controlled, virological and therapeutic success, treatment discontinution, 4 days per week

Brief summary

The trial is an open-label, multicenter, prospective, randomized trial in 2 parallel groups, evaluating at W48, the non-inferiority of antiretroviral treatment taken 4 consecutive days a week versus continuous therapy, in HIV infected patients with controlled viral load for at least 12 months and stable antiretroviral treatment since 4 months.

Detailed description

Open-label, multicenter, prospective, randomized trial in 2 parallel groups, evaluating at W48, the non-inferiority of antiretroviral treatment taken 4 consecutive days a week versus continuous therapy, in HIV infected patients with controlled viral load for at least 12 months and stable antiretroviral treatment since 4 months. The non-inferiority margin (delta) is 5%. The randomization will be stratified according to the family of the third antiretroviral agent (II, PI, and NNRTI). A minimum of 200 patients will be included in the integrase inhibitor strata to provide a sufficient power to assess the efficacy of strategy in this population. At W48, all patients with virological success in the continuous therapy group will switch to the 4/7 days therapy.

Interventions

• Receiving tritherapy. Allowed treatment drugs are : 1. nucleoside analogs : tenofovir (TDF ou TAF), emtricitabine, abacavir, lamivudine 2. protease inhibitors : lopinavir/r, darunavir/r ou atazanavir/r 3. non nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors : efavirenz, rilpivirine ou etravirine 4. integrase inhibitors : dolutegravir, elvitegravir/cobicistat ou raltegravir

Sponsors

ANRS, Emerging Infectious Diseases
Lead SponsorOTHER_GOV
Institut de Médecine et d'Epidémiologie Appliquée - Fondation Internationale Léon M'Ba
CollaboratorOTHER
Institut National de la Santé Et de la Recherche Médicale, France
CollaboratorOTHER_GOV

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

Open-label, randomized trial in 2 parallel groups

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* HIV-1 infection, coinfection HIV-1/HIV-2 possible * Age≥18 years old * Current therapy unchanged for the last 4 months * Receiving tritherapy with 2 nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor+protease inhibitors or 2 nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor+non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors or 2 nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor+integrase inhibitors. Allowed treatment drugs are : 1\. nucleoside analogs : tenofovir (TDF ou TAF), emtricitabine, abacavir, lamivudine 2. protease inhibitors : lopinavir/r, darunavir/r ou atazanavir/r 3. Non nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors : efavirenz, rilpivirine ou etravirine 4. integrase inhibitors : dolutegravir, elvitegravir/cobicistat ou raltegravir * Viruses susceptible to all antiretroviral drugs present in the ongoing tritherapy (AC11-ANRS algorithm). 1. If a genotype is available in the patient medical history; viruses must be susceptible to all ongoing antiretroviral drugs 2. If no RNA genotype available, a genotype will be performed on DNA at screening and will not have to show any resistance to the ongoing antiretroviral drugs * Viral load (VL) \< 50 cp/mL in the past year, with at least 3 VL measurements including screening; only one episode of viral blip \< 200 copies/mL is authorized in the last year * CD4 T cells \> 250/mm3 at the screening visit * Estimated glomerular filtration rate \> 60 mL/min (Chronic Kidney Disease - Epidemiology Collaboration method) * Transaminases : aspartate aminotransférase et alanine aminotransférase \< 3N * Haemoglobin \> 10 g/dL * Platelets \> 100 000/mm3 * For women of childbearing age, negative pregnancy test at screening; agree to use mechanical contraception during the study * Social security system coverage * Informed consent form signed by patient and investigator

Exclusion criteria

* Infection by HIV-2 * Chronic and active Viral B Hepatitis with positive antigen HBs * Chronic and active Viral C Hepatitis with treatment expected in the next 98 weeks * Concomitant treatment using interferon, interleukins, any other immune-therapy or chemotherapy, antivitaminK for patients on ARVT using a booster * Concomitant prophylactic or curative treatment for an opportunistic infection * All conditions (use of alcohol, drugs, etc.) judged by the investigator to possibly interfere with study protocol compliance, observance and/or study treatment tolerance * Pregnant or breast feeding women * Subjects under "sauvegarde de justice" (judicial protection due to temporarily and slightly diminished mental or physical faculties), or under legal guardianship

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Proportion of patients with therapeutic success at Week 48.Week 48To evaluate after 48 weeks the therapeutic success of a weekly strategy of 4 consecutive days on treatment followed by 3 days off treatment, defined by : * absence of virological failure : a measure of the viral load will be done, this measure have to be \< 50 cp/mL. If it's \> 50 cp/mL, a second measure will be done at 2 to 4 weeks apart. If it's still \> 50 cp/mL, it's a virological failure * no discontinuation or modification of the study strategy for more than 30 consecutive days.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Proportion of patients with therapeutic success at Week 96Week 96To evaluate after 96 weeks the therapeutic success of a weekly strategy of 4 consecutive days on treatment followed by 3 days off treatment, defined by : * absence of virological failure : a measure of the viral load will be done, this measure have to be \< 50 cp/mL. If it's \> 50 cp/mL, a second measure will be done at 2 to 4 weeks apart. If it's still \> 50 cp/mL, it's a virological failure * no discontinuation or modification of the study strategy for more than 30 consecutive days.
Virological successWeek 48 and Week 96The HIV-1 viral load at week 48 must be inferior to 50 copies/mL
Number of virological " blips "between Week 0 and Week 48, and between Week 0 and Week 96viral load \> 50 copies/mL followed by a control value ≤ 50 cp/mL
Percentage of patients with a viral load signal detectedbetween Week 0 and Week 48 and Week 0 and Week 96(subgroup of patients tested with Roche-Taqman, threshold\<20 copies/mL)
Proportion of patients with acquisition of drugs resistance mutations in case of virological failure detected by Sanger and by next generation sequencingWeek 4, Week 12, Week 24, Week 36, Week 48, Week 60, Week 72, Week 84, Week 96 (if it's necessary)
Frequency of minority resistant variants archived in DNA at Week 0 and their impact on virological failure (2 consecutive VL> 50 copies / mL) and on the acquisition of drugs resistance mutationsWeek 0
Evolution of ultra sensitive viral load and total DNA in the peripheral blood mononuclear cells at Week 0, Week 24, Week 48 and Week 96; evolution of viral genotypic sequence between Week 0, Week 48 and Week 96 (subgroup of 120 patients)between Week 0, Week 48 and Week 96Immuno-viro-pharmacological sub-study of 120 patients
Description of the factors associated with virological rebound (viral load >50 cp/mL).Week 4, Week 12, Week 24, Week 36, Week 48, Week 60, Week 72, Week 84, Week 96 (if it's necessary)(viral load \>50 cp/mL).
Evolution of T cluster of differentiation 4 and cluster of differentiation 8 cells count, and T cluster of differentiation 4 /cluster of differentiation 8 ratiofrom Week-4 to Week 48 and Week 96Measurement of T cluster of differentiation 4 cell count, T cluster of differentiation 8 cell count, and T cluster of differentiation 4 /T cluster of differentiation 8 ratio
Evolution of fasting metabolic parametersuntil Week 48 and Week 96Measurement of total cholesterol total, LDL-C, HDL-C, Triglycerides and glycemia
Evolution of inflammation and immune activation parametersfrom Week 0 to Week 24 and Week 48Measurement of sCD14, sCD163, IP-10, C-reactive protein, interleukin-6 et D-dimerus, soluble TNF receptor 1, soluble TNF receptor 2 Immuno-viro-Pharmacological Sub-study in 120 patients
HIV RNA viral load in semenWeek 0, Week 24 and Week 48Sperm sub-study (120 patients)
Residual plasmatic concentrations of the third antiretroviral agentWeek 0, Week 4, Week 12, Week 24, Week 36, Week 48, Week 60, Week 72, Week 84 and Week 96Measurement of the third antiretroviral agent plasmatic concentration (protease inhibitors or non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors or integrase inhibitors)
Residual plasmatic concentrations of tenofovir (TDF or TAF)Week 0, Week 4, Week 12, Week 24, Week 36, Week 48, Week 60, Week 72, Week 84 and Week 96Measurement of tenofovir plasmatic concentration
Residual intracellular concentrations of the third antiretroviral agentsWeek 0, Week 24 and Week 48Immuno-viro-Pharmacological sub-study (120 patients) Measurement of the third antiretroviral agent intracellular concentration (protease inhibitors or non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors or integrase inhibitors)
Treatment adherenceWeek 0, Week 12, Week 24, Week 36, Week 48, Week 72,and Week 96Evaluation by a self-reported questionnaire
Patient Quality of lifeWeek-4, Week 0, Week 48 and Week 96Evaluation by a self-reported questionnaire
Patient satisfactionWeek 0, Week 12, Week 48 and Week 96Evaluation by a self-reported questionnaire
Pharmaco-economic aspects of the strategyBetween Week 0 and Week 98Assessment and comparison of cost essay between each arm.
Median time to virologic failureBetween week 0 and 98Measure the delay between week 0 and the date of different virologic failure
Frequency of grade 3 or more adverse events, adverse effects, drug-modifying adverse events, drug-related adverse events and serious adverse events (SAE)Between Week 0 and Week 98according to the sponsor's grading scale

Countries

France

Contacts

PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORPierre De Truchis, MD

Hôpital Raymond Poincaré

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Apr 14, 2026