Skip to content

Low Back Pain: Unveiling the Contribution of Motor Control Adaption Using Biomechanical Modeling and Neuroimaging

Low Back Pain: Unveiling the Contribution of Motor Control Adaption Using Biomechanical Modeling and Neuroimaging

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03255616
Enrollment
80
Registered
2017-08-21
Start date
2019-04-01
Completion date
2023-01-17
Last updated
2023-01-18

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Low Back Pain

Brief summary

This project aims to reveal the potential sensorimotor reorganization of sensory input in low back pain patients and its association with different motor control strategies in LBP.

Detailed description

Background: Low back pain (LBP) is a major health issue. Treatment of chronic LBP is still a major challenge due to a lack of pathophysiological understanding. Thus, understanding LBP pathophysiology is a research priority. Adaptions of motor control likely play a significant role in chronic or recurrent LBP because motor control is crucial for spine posture, stability and movement. Different motor adaption strategies exist across individuals with LBP and two phenotypes representing the opposite ends of a spectrum have been suggested; i.e. tight control and loose control over trunk movement. The former would be associated with reduced trunk motor variability, the later with increased trunk motor variability. This conceptual framework is very useful to explain maintenance and aggravating of LBP because motor control adaptations are expected to have long-term consequences, such as increased spinal tissue loading, associated with degeneration of intervertebral discs and other tissues. Several knowledge gaps need to be addressed to test the validity of this framework: 1) Do loose/tight control phenotypes indeed exist and/or do other motor control adaption strategies exist? 2) Is reduced/altered paraspinal proprioceptive input associated with LBP related to neuroplastic cortical changes, thereby affecting the organizational structure in sensorimotor cortices and top-down trunk motor control? 3) Do psychological factors influence the organizational structure in sensorimotor cortices and motor control strategies? To address these knowledge gaps, the objectives of the current project are: I) To establish motor control phenotypes in LBP. Proprioceptive weighting and biomechanical assessment of dynamic movement tasks, including subject-specific spine kinematic variability and its relationship to pain duration, negative pain-related cognitions, segmental loadings and paraspinal muscle forces, will be performed. II) To test whether cortical proprioceptive maps differ between healthy subjects and patients with LBP. Brain activation in response to thoracolumbar vibrotactile stimulation will be interrogated using functional magnetic resonance imaging data and univariate and multivariate analysis based on machine learning. III) To test whether proprioceptive maps demonstrate a relationship to spine kinematic patterns, pain duration and negative pain-related cognitions in LBP patients.

Interventions

mechanical non-painful low- and high pressure stimuli to thoracolumbar segments of healthy subjects and low back pain patients

non-painful vibrotactile stimulation within a frequency range between 20-150Hz to thoracolumbar segments of healthy subjects and low back pain patients

Sponsors

Psychiatric University Hospital, Zurich
CollaboratorOTHER
Bern University of Applied Sciences
CollaboratorOTHER
Balgrist University Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
BASIC_SCIENCE
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 60 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

healthy subjects: * Aged between 18 and 60 * Written informed consent after being informed Inclusion criteria low back pain patients: * Aged between 18 and 60 * Low back pain for more than 1 week

Exclusion criteria

healthy subjects: * Consumption of alcohol, drugs, analgesics within the last 24 h * Pregnancy * acute and/or low recurrent back pain within the last 3 months * Prior spine surgery * Other chronic pain condition * history of psychiatric or neurological disorders * MR-contraindications * Body mass index (BMI) \> 30 kg/m2

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Blood oxygenation level dependent (BOLD) responsesMR assessment, 30 minutessupraspinal BOLD responses induced by mechanical and vibrotactile stimulations of the back recorded by means of functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI)
Spine kinematicsSpinal kinematics assessment, 120 minutesSagittal and frontal plane lumbar and thoracic spinal curvature angles
Spine biomechanics: muscle forcesSpinal kinematics assessment, 120 minutessegmental muscle forces (N/mm) during dynamic tasks
Spine biomechanics: segmental loadingSpinal kinematics assessment, 120 minutessegmental loading (N) during dynamic tasks
Proprioceptive repositioning errorsProprioceptive assessment, 10 minutesSagittal plane repositioning errors assessed through lumbar and thoracic spinal curvature angles
Center of pressure displacementsPostural stability assessment, 20 minutesCenter of pressure displacements during vibrotactile stimulation while standing on a force plate

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Segmental movementMR assessment, 20 minutesDisplacement (intervertebral angles) of the stimulated and adjacent spinal segments during mechanical pressure using dynamic T2 scans
Fear of movementMedical assessment, 5 minutesscore of the Tampa Scale of Kinesiphobia (TSK) questionnaire
Fear Avoidance BeliefsMedical assessment, 5 minutesscores of the Fear Aovidance Beliefs questionnaire (FABQ) in low back pain patients
Level of disabilityMedical assessment, 3 minutesscores of the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) in low back pain patients
Pain characteristicsMedical assessment, 1 minutesPain quality assessment using the PainDETECT questionnaire in low back pain patients
Perception of the backMedical assessment, 2 minutesAssessment of self-perception of the back using the Fremantle Back Awareness Questionnaire
State and Trait anxietyMedical assessment, 2 minutesscores of state and trait anxiety (STAI) questionnaire
Perceived harmfulness of back stressing movementsMedical assessment, 15 minutesAssessment of the perceived harmfulness of back stressing movements using the electronic version of the PHODA questionnaire

Countries

Switzerland

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026