Skip to content

Open Preperitoneal Mesh Versus Retromuscular Mesh Versus Suture Repair for Abdominal Wall Hernias

Randomized Clinical Trial Comparing Open Preperitoneal Mesh, Retromuscular Mesh and Suture Repair for Abdominal Wall Hernias Less Than 3 cm Diameter

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03255239
Enrollment
120
Registered
2017-08-21
Start date
2017-08-01
Completion date
2019-12-31
Last updated
2017-08-23

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Umbilical Hernia, Ventral Hernia, Ventral Incisional Hernia

Keywords

ventral hernia, Open mesh repair, Polyester mesh, Preperitoneal, Retromuscular

Brief summary

Randomized clinical trial comparing open preperitoneal mesh, retromuscular mesh and suture repair for ventral hernias less than 3 cm diameter

Detailed description

Many techniques of ventral hernias repair have been reported. It is shown that open mesh hernia repairs have low recurrence and low complication rates then suture repair. But for hernias less than 3 cm some surgeons defend the treatment by suture. The main variable of interest is the location of mesh placement compared to suture repair. The investigator will compare in a prospective randomized clinical trial three techniques of abdominal wall hernia repair: preperitoneal polyester mesh, retromuscular polyester mesh and suture for hernias less than 3 cm. All patients underwent general anesthesia. The investigators used Polyester-based mesh because it has shown minimal shrinkage and excellent tissue ingrowth in animal models. Operative notes were physician-abstracted and the presence, type, and location of mesh prosthesis was recorded. Independent variables of interest were patient-level demographics (age and sex), facility where hernia repair occurred, year of hernia repair, preoperative comorbid conditions, history of prior repair, and intraoperative variables. The results compared postoperative pain was evaluated using a visual analogue scale (range, 0-10) on the day of the first outpatient visit, operating time evaluated as skin-to-skin time, drain management and both of early and late complications including seroma and hematoma formation, wound infection, fistula formation and recurrence rates.

Interventions

PROCEDUREVentral hernia repair

Hernia repair is a surgical procedure to return an organ that protrudes through a weak area of muscle to its original position.

Sponsors

Hôpital Universitaire Taher Sfar
Lead SponsorOTHER_GOV

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 90 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Vebtral hernia or post incisional hernia diameter \< 3 cm * Male or female aged between 18 and 90 year-old * Elective surgery for ventral hernia

Exclusion criteria

* Any contraindication to the prosthetic treatment. * Any hernia or incisional hernia with a collar strictly greater than 3 cm. * Previous hernia mesh repaired * contraindication for general anaesthesia * Pregnancy

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Recurrence ratesOne yearLate complications of ventral hernia repair

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Operating time15 to 90 minutesoperating time evaluated as skin-to-skin time
Early complication30 daysEarly complicaion including seroma and hematoma formation, wound infection and fistula
Postoperative pain6, 12 and 24 hoursPostoperative pain evaluated using a visual analogue scale (range, 0-10) on the day of the first outpatient visit

Countries

Tunisia

Contacts

Primary ContactMoez Boudokhane, MD
Moez-chir@yahoo.fr98461511
Backup ContactMohamed Ali Chaouch, RD
Docmedalichaouch@gmail.com26205105

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026